Phase I study of pemetrexed in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) and to assess the need for steroid premedication

e17009

Background: Pemetrexed is a novel antimetabolite that inhibits both purine and pyrimidine biosynthesis. Because its mechanism of action is similar to that of both methotrexate and 5-FU, it may also have activity in recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, a disease with limited treatment options and very poor median survival. Pemetrexed is traditionally prescribed with steroids due to skin toxicities observed in early studies; however vitamin supplementation (B12 and folic acid) was not standard at the time of those studies. No study to date has evaluated the optimal use of steroids with pemetrexed in the era of vitamin supplementation. Methods: All patients had metastatic or recurrent HNSCC, were treated with at least one prior chemotherapy regimen, and had ECOG PS of 0–2. The first cohort of patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and the next receiving 600 mg/m2 based on a predefined standard dose escalation design. Within each dose level, patients were randomized to one of 3 premedication regimens: no dexamethasone, 20 mg IV on day 1, or standard 4 mg orally bid for 3 days. All patients received vitamin supplementation. The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of pemetrexed based on steroid premedication. Results: From October 2005 to March 2008, 36 patients were enrolled and 31 were available for evaluation. Median age was 57 years (range 42–82). 51.5% of patients had more than one prior chemotherapy regimens, 81.8% of patients had prior radiation therapy, and 48.5% of patients had prior surgery. Incidence of rash and combined skin toxicities were: 1/11 (9%) and 3/11 (27%) of patients without steroids, 1/11 (9%) and 3/11 (27%) with single IV dose, and 4/9 (44%) and 5/9 (55%) with oral steroids. No treatment-related grade 3 toxicities were observed. One patient initially received no steroid and required dose reduction and addition of steroid due to grade 2 rash. A partial response was observed in one patient (3.2%), and stable disease in 8 patients (25.8%) for a disease control rate of 29%. Conclusions: This is the first study to report the role of steroids as a premedication for pemetrexed. Our data suggests that no steroid premedication is needed with pemetrexed and vitamin supplementation.

[Table: see text]

Phase II study of dasatinib in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

6022

Background: Dasatinib is a potent inhibitor of src-family kinases, ephA2, PDGFR, Abl, and c-kit. A single-center, open-label, phase II trial was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of dasatinib in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. Methods: Pts with measurable disease by RECIST, who received 0 or 1 prior regimen for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with an ECOG performance status 0–1 and tumor tissue appropriate for IHC and FISH were eligible. Dasatinib 100 mg bid was given for 28-day cycles. Primary endpoints were 12-wk progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). Pts who took at least 1 dose of dasatinib and who died or left study before 12 wks were counted as progressive disease (PD). A 2 stage design, closure after accrual of 15 pts was required if PFS was 45% or less and ORR was 0. Otherwise, planned accrual was 35. Response was assessed at 4 and 12 wks. PK was studied in pts receiving dasatinib per PEG. Biomarkers relevant to Src pathway were planned in tissue and blood. Results: Fifteen pts were accrued. To date, 13 pts are evaluable for response, and 15 pts for toxicity. No grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities were noted. Grade 2–4 nonhematologic toxicities(n): pleural effusion(2), nausea/vomiting(2), dehydration(1), diarrhea(1), dyspnea(1). Toxicity led to hospitalization of 4 pts and drug discontinuation in 5 pts. ORR was 0. One pt was stable at 12 wks (PFS: 7.6%). This pt stopped drug at 15 wks due to toxicity, but also had PD. One pt died on study and cause was deemed unlikely related. Conclusions: Dosed at 100mg bid, dasatinib led to a characteristic toxicity profile in this pt population. Rates of hospitalization and discontinuation for toxicity were fairly high. Final efficacy parameters are pending evaluation of 2 pts. Evaluation of PK and tissue/blood biomarkers is ongoing.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of ZD 1869 for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

6038

Background: Advanced HN CSSC carries a 30–40% risk of death by 2 years with standard therapies. A number of patients (pts) with clinically aggressive CSCC tend to have a poor prognosis when treated with standard approaches using surgery and radiation (RT), thus novel therapies are needed. CSSC over expresses the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and these compounds have activity in head and neck cancers. We are studying the use of gefitinib as an induction therapy in a high-risk patient group prior to definitive therapy to determine the overall efficacy, toxicity and feasibility. Methods: Eligible pts must have HN CSSC >2cm, regional nodal metastases, peri-neural invasion, or deep invasion into cartilage, muscle or bone and must be candidates for definitive local-regional therapy with surgery and/or radiation. Two 30-day cycles of gefitinib 250mg administered orally are given daily prior to definitive therapy. Pts are assessed clinically after the first 30-day cycle. If a response is noted, gefitinib is continued. For patients with stable disease, the dose is escalated to 500mg daily. Pts with progressive disease go off study. Biomarker evaluations including EGFR and Akt expression prior to and after induction are planned. Results: To date, 14 pts have been enrolled. 10 are evaluable for response and 13 for toxicity. A complete clinical response (CR) was noted in 3 pts (30%, one pathological CR), partial response in 2 patients (20%), stable disease in 2 (20%) and progressive disease in 3 (30%). Therapy was well tolerated with 2 patients having grade 3 toxicity (rash, diarrhea, or elevated liver enzymes). Conclusions: Standard definitive surgery and RT are inadequate for patients with advanced HN CSSC. The emergence of targeted therapies has given new hope for many patients with high-risk cancers. The preliminary results from our study suggest that gefitinib is an active agent for HN CSCC, and is well tolerated. Correlative studies may help identify patients most likely to respond to anti- EGFR therapy.

[Table: see text]

Toxicities in a phase II study of accelerated high dose thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for limited small cell lung cancer (LSCLC) (RTOG 0239)

7717

Background: Accelerated fractionation proved beneficial in INT0096, but the total dose was low and local recurrence was high with higher acute grade (Gr.) 3+ esophagitis. RTOG 0239 was a phase II trial to improve local control and survival with LSCLC with acceptable acute Gr. 3+ esophagitis using accelerated high dose TRT and concurrent cisplatin/etoposide. This is the first report of acute Gr.3+ esophagitis and Gr.5 toxicities. Methods: Patients (pts) with LSCLC without pleural effusion, contralateral hilar or contralateral supraclavicular nodes and PS 0–1 were enrolled. TRT was given to large fields to 28.8 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction, 5 days per week for 16 fractions followed by BID with large field in AM, boost in PM, then off-cord boost BID for last 5 days, all at 1.8 Gy per fx for a total dose of 61.2 Gy in 34 fx in 5 weeks. Concurrent chemotherapy was started with TRT with cisplatin, 60 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; etoposide, 120 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; etoposide, 240 mg/m2 p.o. per day or 120 mg/m2 i.v. per day on days 2 or 3. Cycles were repeated q.3 wks during and for 2 cycles after TRT. Pts who have achieved complete response one month after completion of 4 cycles of chemotherapy were asked to participate in a prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) study. Common toxicity criteria (CTC) 2.0 was used for acute toxicity. Results: From 10/2003 to 5/2006, 72 pts were accrued. Median age was 63 yrs with 52% females. Survival data is still maturing. Acute toxicity information is available for 68 pts. Eleven pts (16%) experienced acute Gr. 3 and 1 pt (1%) had acute Gr. 4 esophagitis. 47 pts (69%) had grade 4 blood/bone marrow toxicities. There were 2 (3%) Gr. 5 toxicities reported [1 infection with neutropenia; 1 pulmonary (pneumonia)]. Conclusions: This accelerated high dose TRT with concurrent chemotherapy for LSCLC resulted in 17% acute Gr.3+ esophagitis compared to 27% with BID TRT with 45Gy in 3 weeks by INT0096. There were 3% grade 5 toxicities. This preliminary report suggests that RTOG-0239 has tolerable toxicity. The acute Gr3+ esophageal toxicity correlated with V20 and V40 will be presented. Pts continue to be followed for the primary endpoint of 2-year survival.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-term results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11: A phase III trial to preserve the larynx—Induction cisplatin/5-FU and radiation therapy versus concurrent cisplatin and radiation therapy versus radiation therapy

5517

Background: The 2-year results of Intergroup RTOG 91–11 were published in 2003 (NEJM 349:2091–8,2003). We now present the 5-year results (after median follow-up for surviving patients of 6.9 years) of 515 eligible pts with resectable stage III or IV (excluding T1 and high volume T4), cancer of the glottic or supraglottic larynx. Methods: Patients were randomized to induction cisplatin/5-FU (CF) with responders then receiving RT (I+RT) (n = 173); or concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m2 q 21 days × 3) and RT (CRT) (n = 171); or RT alone (R) (n = 171). Laryngectomy was performed for < partial response to induction CF, for persistent/recurrent disease or for laryngeal dysfunction. Results: At 5 years, laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (44.6%, p = 0.011) or CRT (46.6%, p = 0.011) compared to R (33.9%). There was no difference in LFS between I+RT and CRT (p = 0.98). Laryngeal preservation (LP) was significantly better with CRT (83.6%) compared to I+RT (70.5%, p = 0.0029) or R (65.7%, p = 0.00017). Local-regional control (LRC) was significantly better with CRT (68.8%) compared to I+RT (54.9%, p = 0.0018) or R (51%, p = 0.0005). I+RT compared to R for LP and LRC showed no significant difference (p = 0.37 and 0.62, respectively). The distant metastatic rate was low (I+RT 14.3%, CRT 13.2%, R 22.3%) with a trend (p ∼0.06) for benefit from chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly better with either I+RT (38.6%, p = 0.016) or CRT (39%, p = 0.0058) compared to R (27.3%). Overall survival rates were similar for the first 5 years (I+RT 59.2%, CRT 54.6%, R 53.5%); thereafter I+RT had a non-significant lower death rate. Compared to CRT, significantly more pts in the R group died of their cancer (34% vs 58.3%, p = 0.0007); the rate for I+RT was 43.8%. Conclusion: These 5-year results differ from the 2-year analysis by a significant improvement in LFS now seen for both I+RT and CRT treatments compared to R. For the endpoints of LP and LRC, CRT is still the superior treatment with no advantage seen to the addition of induction CF to R. There is no significant difference in overall survival.

[Table: see text]

Yttrium-90 microsphere treatment for liver dominant hepatic metastases from lung cancer

17122

Background: Hepatic metastases are a common manifestation of primary lung malignancies; the primary and other extrahepatic sites are often less responsive to systemic therapy. A new method of regional therapy for hepatic metastases, called SIR-Spheres, a 32μ resin sphere incorporating a pure Beta emitter, Yttrium - 90, has advantages to older forms of regional hepatic therapy, used to treat colorectal liver metastases. The effectiveness and relatively response durability suggests a favorable alternative to chemotherapy for patients with liver-dominant metastatic lung cancers. We report our experience using SIR-Spheres in this setting. Methods: 6 patients (2 well differentiated carcinoid, 2 well & 1 poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, 1 poorly differentiated small cell carcinoma) with unresectable hepatic metastases were treated with 8 infusions of SIR-Spheres after failing systemic chemotherapy, radiofrequency ablation or arterial embolization were included in the study. SIR-Spheres were administered as 2nd-6th line therapy. Median interval from diagnosis to SIR-Spheres treatment was 20.5 months (6–51 m). Results: Abdominal visceral arteriography demonstrated vasculature conducive for SIR-Spheres delivery in all patients. The median dose of 36.1 mCi (12.9–54 mCi) was delivered. SPECT - CT fusion Bremsstrahlung scans post therapy confirmed preferential deposition of SIR-Spheres within metastases. Responses to therapy included a decrease in the size of the hepatic metastases in one patient and stable disease in two patients. One patient had a mixed response and two patients had progression of disease. One Gr. III and one Gr. IV hepatic toxicity occurred. All patients experienced transient Gr. 1 or 2 fatigue. Time to progression of liver disease ranged from 3 to 9 months. Conclusion: SIR-Spheres is a feasible alternative to systemic therapy for patients with liver dominant metastases from lung cancers. Although serious hepatotoxicity was noted in patients with advanced liver metastases, the treatment was tolerated with only reversible fatigue in the majority of patients. When the treatment was effective, the duration of local disease control after one treatment equaled or exceeded what would be expected with chemotherapy.

[Table: see text]

Randomized phase III study of chemoradiation with or without amifostine for patients with favorable performance status inoperable stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: preliminary results

A prospective randomized study was conducted to determine whether amifostine (Ethyol) reduces the rate of severe esophagitis and hematologic and pulmonary toxicity associated with chemoradiation or improves control of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Sixty patients with inoperable stage II or III NSCLC were treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Both groups received thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) with 1.2 Gy/fraction, 2 fraction per day, 5 days per week for a total dose 69.6 Gy. All patients received oral etoposide (VP-16), 50 mg Bid, 30 minutes before TRT beginning day 1 for 10 days, repeated on day 29, and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1, 8, 29, and 36. Patients in the study group received amifostine, 500 mg intravenously, twice weekly before chemoradiation (arm 1); patients in the control group received chemoradiation without amifostine (arm 2). Patient and tumor characteristics were distributed equally in both groups. Of the 60 patients enrolled, 53 were evaluable (27 in arm 1, 26 in arm 2) with a median follow-up of 6 months. Median survival times were 26 months for arm 1 and 15 months for arm 2, not statistically significantly different. Morphine intake to reduce severe esophagitis was significantly lower in arm 1 (2 of 27, 7.4%) than arm 2 (8 of 26, 31%; P =.03). Acute pneumonitis was significantly lower in arm 1 (1 of 27, 3.7%) than in arm 2 (6 of 26, 23%; P =.037). Hypotension (20 mm Hg decrease from baseline blood pressure) was significantly more frequent in arm 1 (19 of 27, 70%) than arm 2 (1 of 26, 3.8%; P =.0001). Only 1 patient discontinued treatment because of hypotension. These preliminary results showed that amifostine significantly reduced acute severe esophagitis and pneumonitis. Further observation is required to assess long-term efficacy.

Multicenter phase I-II trial of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I-II, multi-institutional trial to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin in an induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) and to determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the regimen at MTD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 43 patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, curable SCCHN were entered. Overall, 29 patients (67%) had N2 or N3 nodal disease and nine (21%) had T4 primary tumors. All patients received docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1; cisplatin at 75 (level I) or 100 (level II) mg/m(2) on day 1; and a continuous fluorouracil infusion at 1,000 mg/m(2)/d on days 1 through 4. Patients were treated with prophylactic antibiotics on days 5 through 15. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for a total of three cycles. Patients then received definitive therapy based on institutional preferences.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were treated at level I, and 30 patients were treated at level II. All 43 patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no major differences in toxicity between level I and level II. Cisplatin-associated grade 3 or 4 hypomagnesemia or hypocalcemia occurred in 13 (30%) and hearing loss in two patients (5%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was observed in 41 patients (95%) and febrile neutropenia occurred in eight (19%). There was one serious infection (2%). There were 17 (40% [95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 56%]) clinical complete responders (CR), 23 (54% [95% CI, 39% to 69%]) partial responders (PR), one (2%) with no change, and two (5%) unassessable patients. Major responses (CR, PR) were observed in 40 (93% [95% CI, 81% to 99%]) patients. Primary site CR was documented in 24 (54%) of patients. Postchemotherapy primary site biopsies were performed in 25 patients (58%) and pathologically negative biopsy was obtained in 11 (92%) of 12 primary site clinical CRs and seven (54%) of 13 with PR or no change. Overall, negative biopsies were obtained in 18 patients (72%).

CONCLUSION

TPF induction chemotherapy can be delivered safely with a cisplatin dose of 100 mg/m(2) in previously untreated patients with SCCHN. The regimen is associated with a high rate of primary site clinical and pathologic CRs. Phase III comparison with cisplatinum and fluorouracil chemotherapy is warranted.

Cisplatin, ifosfamide, oral etoposide, and concurrent accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation for patients with limited small-cell lung carcinoma: results of radiation therapy oncology group trial 93-12

PURPOSE

The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide (PIEo) given concurrently with accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation was studied in patients with limited small-cell lung cancer in a phase II trial to assess response, survival, and toxicity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-seven patients were accrued between March 1994 and April 1996. Chemotherapy doses were cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and ifosfamide 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 3 and etoposide 40 mg/m(2) administered orally days 1 through 14. Radiation consisted of accelerated hyperfractionated thoracic radiation (AHTRT) 1.5 Gy bid x 30 fractions (total 45 Gy) days 1 through 19, concurrent with cycle 1 of chemotherapy. Three additional cycles of chemotherapy were given every 4 weeks after completion of chemoradiation. Prophylactic cranial radiation (25 Gy in 10 fractions) was offered to patients for whom complete response (CR) after completion of chemotherapy was achieved.

RESULTS

An overall objective response rate of 78% (41 CRs [67%] and seven partial responses [11%]) was seen in 61 patients whose disease response could be evaluated. Median progression-free and overall survival estimates were 12.7 and 23.7 months, respectively. Two- and 3-year survival rates were estimated at 50% and 39%, respectively. Major toxic effects included grade 4 granulocytopenia in 34 (55%), grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 16 (26%), grade 3 to 5 fever/infection in six (10%; with one death resulting from sepsis), and grade 3/4 esophagitis in 27 patients (43%). Other nonhematologic toxic greater than grade 2 occurred in 11 patients (18%).

CONCLUSION

Relative to conventional etoposide/cisplatin and concurrent AHTRT, chemoradiation with PIEo produced similar median and 2-year survival rates and a higher rate of acute esophageal toxicity. However, the locoregional control rate with a minimum follow-up of 2 years is excellent at 80%. It is conceivable that longer follow-up will prove this regimen more promising. Research efforts should focus on other methods to improve disease control in all potential sites of recurrence.

Phase I study of paclitaxel administered by ten-day continuous infusion

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical data have suggested that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances its cytotoxicity, but various clinical trials utilizing long-term infusions of paclitaxel have been limited by unacceptable hematologic toxicity, most notably significant neutropenia. A phase I study of paclitaxel administered over 10 days, was performed to evaluate the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities as well as to determine the maximum-tolerated dose for the 10-day infusion duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-nine solid tumor patients (predominantly non-small cell lung cancer and head and neck cancer) were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 5 mg/m2/day to 25 mg/m2/day administered as a 10-day continuous infusion via a pump every 21 days. Dose escalation was permitted within individual patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity, ANC < or = 500 or platelet count < or = 25,000 for > or = 7 days or febrile neutropenia. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose level at which less than two out of six patients developed DLT. All of the patients had received prior chemotherapy; approximately two-thirds had received prior radiation as well. All patients received standard pre-medications for paclitaxel, including anti-histamines and corticosteroids. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was not used.

RESULTS

A total of 110 courses of paclitaxel were administered to 29 patients. The incidence of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicity was quite low among the patients treated at dose levels below 17 mg/m2/day. At higher doses, non-hematologic toxicities including arthralgias, myalgias, fatigue, nausea, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were seen, although nearly all of the toxicities were less than grade 3 (NCI toxicity criteria). Hematologic toxicity mostly consisted of neutropenia and was more common at dose levels of 17 mg/m2/day or higher. Nevertheless, even at the highest dose levels (21 mg/m2/day and 25 mg/m2/day) grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in only 50% of patients. Dose-limiting hematologic toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at the 25 mg/m2/day dose level.

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel can be safely administered as a 10-day infusion. The MTD for this schedule is 210 mg/m2. Unlike the 96-hour paclitaxel infusions, dose-reduction for myelosuppression may not be necessary because the MTD of paclitaxel when administered over a 10-day infusion is similar to the MTD of paclitaxel when infused over 3 or 24 hours.

Phase I study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for patients with poor-prognosis cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

We have previously demonstrated high locoregional control rates in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer using fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and concomitant radiotherapy (RT) (FHX). In the trial reported here, we added paclitaxel to the FHX base and used hyperfractionated RT to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and response rate in a poor-prognosis group of patients.

METHODS

Fifty-five patients who had either failed to respond to prior RT (n = 25) or surgery, had a coexistent or prior second malignancy, or who had unresectable or metastatic disease and an expected 2-year survival rate less than 10%, were treated. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 2 Gy on days 2 to 6 (once-daily RT cohorts) or 1.5 Gy twice a day (hyperfractionated cohorts). Simultaneous HU (500 or 1,000 mg twice per day for 11 doses) and infusional 5-FU (600-800 mg/m2/d for 5 days) were given along with infusional paclitaxel at escalating doses of 5 to 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered on days 7 through 13 at 5 microg/kg/d. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until completion of RT. Plasma paclitaxel levels were determined on day 4 of cycle 1.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of myelosuppression, mucositis, dermatitis, and diarrhea. Plasma concentrations of paclitaxel greater than 10 nmol/L were achieved in 65% of patients at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) level of paclitaxel. Seventy percent of assessable patients achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy. Twenty patients were treated at the RPTD of HU 500 mg orally twice daily for 11 doses, 5-FU 600 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion for 5 days; and paclitaxel 20 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion for 5 days, with twice-daily RT.

CONCLUSION

The addition of infusional paclitaxel and hyperfractionated RT to FHX is feasible. Radiosensitizing levels of paclitaxel are achieved in most patients. The high locoregional control rate of this regimen justifies further investigation in previously untreated patients.

Integration of filgrastim into chemoradiation for limited small cell lung cancer: a Phase I study

PURPOSE

Recent studies document the value of early combined modality therapy of small cell lung cancer, but also indicate that early thoracic radiation adds to myelosuppression and can complicate further chemotherapy. Other studies indicate that simultaneous use of growth factors with thoracic radiation may be deleterious. However, temporal separation of growth factor use from cytotoxic therapy may allow dose intensity to be maintained/enhanced during combined modality treatment. We sought to integrate filgrastim into a novel chemoradiation regimen for patients with limited small cell lung cancer using an approach that separated growth factor administration from both chemotherapy and thoracic radiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer were enrolled in a Phase I trial of cisplatin, ifosfamide/mesna, oral etoposide, and thoracic radiation (1.5 Gy b.i.d. x 30 fractions days 1-19 cycle 1) +/- filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day). Filgrastim was given on days 20-25 of cycle 1 after completion of radiation and following completion of oral etoposide in subsequent cycles. The primary end point was determination of maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of chemotherapy. Serial cohorts were treated with and without filgrastim.

RESULTS

Because of dose-limiting thrombocytopenia, primarily, and nonhematologic toxicity, the MTDs with and without filgrastim were identical (cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and ifosfamide 1200 mg/m2 i.v., both given days 1-3, and etoposide 40 mg/m2 p.o. days 1-14). Filgrastim use shortened the duration of neutropenia at the MTD (median 4 vs. 7 days), but was not associated with a reduction in febrile neutropenia. Although growth factor administration did not allow dose escalation of this regimen, it did allow chemotherapy doses to be maintained at the MTD more frequently through four cycles of therapy. In the 24 evaluable patients, the overall response rate was 100% (71% partial and 29% complete).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite careful attention to the timing of growth factor with chemoradiation, the administration of filgrastim with this regimen did not allow dose escalation. As in many other recent studies of hematopoietic growth factors given prophylactically with chemotherapy, the duration of neutropenia at the MTD was shortened and the need for dose reduction throughout treatment was reduced in patients receiving filgrastim at the MTD.

Cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide in the treatment of patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and prolonged oral etoposide (PIE) was studied in patients with extensive small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) in a Phase I trial followed by a Phase II trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), characterize toxicity, and estimate response and median survival rates.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients were treated between October 1991 and December 1994. Doses for the initial cohort were cisplatin 20 mg/m2/day, ifosfamide 1500 mg/m2/day with mesna (all given intravenously on Days 1-3), and oral etoposide 50 mg/m2 on Days 4-17. This cycle was repeated every 4 weeks for up to 6 cycles. The MTD was reached for the first 9 patients. For these 9 patients and the next 24 patients, who were entered in the Phase II trial, response and survival were estimated.

RESULTS

Dose-limiting toxicity was manifested as Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 of 3 patients (associated with fever in 2 of 3), and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was encountered in 2 of 3 patients at the second dose level. Of 6 patients treated at the first dose level, 4 achieved targeted myelosuppression (absolute granulocyte count nadir <1000), but only 1 experienced Grade 4 neutropenia, defining this level as the MTD. Grade 4 neutropenia and/or thrombocytopenia was observed in 36 (24%) of a total of 152 courses administered at or below the MTD. Nonhematologic toxicity above Grade 2 was uncommon, excluding nausea and vomiting. Overall objective response rate was 93% of 30 evaluable patients: 5 (17%) complete responses and 23 partial responses (76%). Median failure free and overall survival durations were 36 and 54 weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cisplatin, ifosfamide, and oral etoposide produced encouraging failure free and overall median survival rates in patients with extensive SCLC. These results warrant further evaluation of this regimen in the initial therapy of patients with limited stage disease.

Maximum-tolerated dose defined for single-agent gemcitabine: a phase I dose-escalation study in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I trial of the novel nucleoside analog, gemcitabine, in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and efficacy in this population.

PATIENT AND METHODS

Eligibility requirements included stage III or IV NSCLC, performance status < or = 1, and no prior chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion weekly for 3 weeks every 4 weeks. We enrolled patients at doses that ranged from 1,000 to 2,800 mg/m2/wk (three patients per cohort). Responses were assessed after every two courses (8 weeks).

RESULTS

We treated 33 chemotherapy-naive patients with stage III (n = 5) or IV (n = 28) NSCLC. Most had performance status 1, and 67% had adenocarcinoma. Eight of 32 assessable patients (25%) achieved a partial response. The projected median survival duration (all patients) is 49 weeks. The maximum-tolerated dose was 2,200 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks; dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression and reversible transaminase elevation. Other side effects were consistently mild. The maximum dose-intensity achieved with the first two cycles was 2,362 mg/m2/wk for 3 weeks every 4 weeks, which is a feasible phase II starting dose.

CONCLUSION

This study estimates a phase II starting dose of gemcitabine in chemotherapy-naive patients to be 2,400 mg/m2/wk for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks; this is much higher than that previously reported in heavily pretreated patients. Twenty-five percent of patients with advanced NSCLC achieved a partial response to gemcitabine. This significant activity in conjunction with a very favorable toxicity profile supports the further evaluation of gemcitabine in combination with other active agents.

Phase II study of docetaxel for advanced or metastatic platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study to determine the response to and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer refractory to prior platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. The responses of 42 of 44 patients were assessable. Most patients had a Zubrod performance status of 1; the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma (61%), and 91% of patients had stage IV disease.

RESULTS

Nine of 42 assessable patients (21%) achieved a partial response to treatment. The median response duration (from response to progression) was 17 weeks, and the projected median survival duration of all patients is 42 weeks (51 weeks for adenocarcinoma and 22 weeks for nonadenocarcinoma). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 85% of patients and was associated with fever that required intravenous antibiotics in 16% of patients (3% of cycles). Other acute side effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions and dermatitis. Cumulative side effects included fluid retention and neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has notable activity against platinum-refractory non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 21% major response rate. Primary side effects were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase II study to determine the response and toxicity of docetaxel (Taxotere; Rhône-Poulenc Rorer Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Collegeville, PA) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We treated 41 chemotherapy-naive patients who had stage IIIb or IV non-small-cell lung cancer with 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Responses were assessed after every one to two treatment courses. Responses of 39 of 41 patients were assessable. The patient's median age was 63 years; 90% of patients had a Zubrod performance status of 0 or 1. The predominant histology was adenocarcinoma (54%), and 90% of patients had stage IV disease.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (33%) achieved a partial response to treatment, and the median response duration was 14 weeks. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 97% of patient; this was usually of brief duration and was associated with serious infection in 17% of patients. Other acute toxic effects included easily treated hypersensitivity reactions (36% of patients) and dermatitis (74%). We also observed fluid retention (with peripheral edema or pleural effusion or both) in 54% of patients. This was a cumulative side effect that generally occurred late in treatment.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel administered at 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks has significant activity against non-small-cell lung cancer, with a 33% major response rate. Primary toxicities were neutropenia, hypersensitivity, and fluid retention.

Characterization of acquired epipodophyllotoxin resistance in a Chinese hamster ovary cell line: loss of drug-stimulated DNA cleavage activity

Recent evidence indicates that type II DNA topoisomerases mediate epipodophyllotoxin-induced DNA damage and may be intrinsic to the drug's antitumor effects. Using an epipodophyllotoxin-resistant cell line, we have now further defined the relationship between DNA damage and cell death and delineated the significance of certain drug-enzyme interactions. When compared to wild-type cells, the mutant Chinese hamster ovary cell line, VpmR-5, exhibits marked resistance to both the cytotoxic and DNA cleavage activities of etoposide (VP-16). Steady-state concentrations of radiolabeled VP-16 are identical in both cell lines. Catalytic activity in crude nuclear extracts from wild-type and VpmR-5 cells is equal and is equally sensitive to inhibition by VP-16. However, using an assay that specifically measures generation of 5' protein-linked breaks in 32P-labeled 3' DNA, we have found that DNA cleavage activity in nuclear extract from the VpmR-5 line is profoundly resistant to stimulation by VP-16. Further, a somatic cell hybrid line of VpmR-5 cells and drug-sensitive EOT-3 cells exhibits recovery of VP-16 sensitivity in concert with reconstitution of DNA cleavage activity. These data indicate that stimulation of enzyme-mediated DNA cleavage, rather than loss of normal topoisomerase function, is responsible for epipodophyllotoxin-induced cytotoxicity.

Cross-resistance to intercalating agents in an epipodophyllotoxin-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line: evidence for a common intracellular target

Several intercalating agents, as well as the epipodophyllotoxins, appear to effect DNA damage through their interaction with type II DNA topoisomerases. However, the relationship of this phenomenon to anti-tumor activity remains unproven. Our studies with an epipodophyllotoxin-resistant cell line not only provide additional evidence that the enzyme is a multidrug target but also serve to implicate it as a mediator of cytotoxic effect. When compared to wild-type cells, the epipodophyllotoxin-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line, VpmR-5, exhibits cross-resistance to both the cytotoxic and DNA cleavage activities of 4',9-acridinylaminomethanesulfon-m-anisidide, mitoxantrone, and Adriamycin. Steady-state concentrations of radiolabeled-4',9-acridinylaminomethanesulfon-m-anisidide and daunomycin are identical in both cell lines. Sharp plateaus in the VpmR-5 dose-response curves for Adriamycin-induced DNA strand breaks and cytotoxicity appear to be related to interference with type II topoisomerase-mediated cleavage of DNA at high concentrations of the intercalator. These data support a direct role for DNA strand scission in cell death and also suggest that multidrug resistance may be acquired by a qualitative change in type II topoisomerase that alters interaction of drug with the enzyme or enzyme-DNA complex.

Role of topoisomerase II in mediating epipodophyllotoxin-induced DNA cleavage

Epipodophyllotoxins are an important new class of anticancer agents which include the compounds VM-26 (teniposide) and VP-16 (etoposide). The mechanism of action of these drugs appears to involve production of DNA single- and double-strand breaks by virtue of a temperature-sensitive interaction between drug and a heat-labile intranuclear component. We now report evidence indicating that type II topoisomerase is the likely intracellular target for the DNA strand-breaking effects of the epipodophyllotoxins. Both VM-26 and VP-16 stimulate site-specific DNA cleavage by a highly purified calf thymus type II topoisomerase. VM-26 is 5- to 10-fold more potent than VP-16 in this assay, a difference that is also seen when DNA strand breaks are assayed in isolated nuclei of mouse leukemia cells following drug exposure. Furthermore, a similar potency difference exists with respect to cytotoxicity. Equilibrium dialysis experiments using [3H]VP-16 indicate that the drug does not bind to DNA. Thus, we suggest that the epipodophyllotoxins exert their anti-cancer effects by "poisoning" type II topoisomerase without binding to DNA. In this regard, their actions may be analogous to those of nalidixic acid in bacteria.