Antibody-mediated microcirculation injury is the major cause of late kidney transplant failure

We studied the phenotype of late kidney graft failure in a prospective study of unselected kidney transplant biopsies taken for clinical indications. We analyzed histopathology, HLA antibodies and death-censored graft survival in 234 consecutive biopsies from 173 patients, taken 6 days to 31 years posttransplant. Patients with late biopsies (>1 year) frequently displayed donor-specific HLA antibody (particularly class II) and microcirculation changes, including glomerulitis, glomerulopathy, capillaritis, capillary multilayering and C4d staining. Grafts biopsied early rarely failed (1/68), whereas grafts biopsied late often progressed to failure (27/105) within 3 years. T-cell-mediated rejection and its lesions were not associated with an increased risk of failure after biopsy. In multivariable analysis, graft failure correlated with microcirculation inflammation and scarring, but C4d staining was not significant. When microcirculation changes and HLA antibody were used to define antibody-mediated rejection, 17/27 (63%) of late kidney failures after biopsy were attributable to antibody-mediated rejection, but many were C4d negative and missed by current diagnostic criteria. Glomerulonephritis accounted for 6/27 late losses, whereas T-cell-mediated rejection, drug toxicity and unexplained scarring were uncommon. The major cause of late kidney transplant failure is antibody-mediated microcirculation injury, but detection of this phenotype requires new diagnostic criteria.

Effect of waiting time on renal transplant outcome

BACKGROUND

Numerous factors are known to impact on patient survival after renal transplantation. Recent studies have confirmed a survival advantage for renal transplant patients over those waiting on dialysis. We aimed to investigate the hypothesis that longer waiting times are more deleterious than shorter waiting times, that is, to detect a "dose effect" for waiting time.

METHODS

We analyzed 73,103 primary adult renal transplants registered at the United States Renal Data System Registry from 1988 to 1997 for the primary endpoints of death with functioning graft and death-censored graft failure by Cox proportional hazard models. All models were corrected for donor and recipient demographics and other factors known to affect outcome after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

A longer waiting time on dialysis is a significant risk factor for death-censored graft survival and patient death with functioning graft after renal transplantation (P < 0.001 each). Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, 24 to 36, 36 to 48, and over 48 months confer a 21, 28, 41, 53, and 72% increase in mortality risk after transplantation, respectively. Relative to preemptive transplants, waiting times of 0 to 6 months, 6 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and over 24 months confer a 17, 37, 55, and 68% increase in risk for death-censored graft loss after transplantation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer waiting times on dialysis negatively impact on post-transplant graft and patient survival. These data strongly support the hypothesis that patients who reach end-stage renal disease should receive a renal transplant as early as possible in order to enhance their chances of long-term survival.

Continuous measurement of cerebral cortical blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry in a rat stroke model

Laser-Doppler flowmetry (LDF), a new method allowing instantaneous, continuous, and noninvasive measurements of microcirculatory blood flow in a small tissue sample, was evaluated for its accuracy in monitoring regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in the cortical microcirculation after focal cerebral ischemia. Wistar and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR, n = 19) were subjected to permanent occlusion of the middle cerebral and common carotid arteries. Absolute rCBF in a tissue sample of the ischemic hemisphere was measured autoradiographically with [14C]iodoantipyrine as a tracer and compared to rCBF measured by LDF. Additionally, the percent change in rCBF between baseline and ischemic values was compared for both methods. Absolute rCBF values recorded with LDF correlated poorly (r = 0.54) with [14C]iodoantipyrine measurements. In contrast LDF readings expressed as a percentage of ischemic vs. preocclusion readings (relative LDF readings) correlated very well (r = 0.91) with the percent change in [14C]iodoantipyrine measurements. We conclude that LDF does not provide accurate measurements of absolute rCBF values but this method allows accurate measurements of changes in rCBF due to induction of focal cerebral ischemia.

Clinical decision support systems for the practice of evidence-based medicine

BACKGROUND

The use of clinical decision support systems to facilitate the practice of evidence-based medicine promises to substantially improve health care quality.

OBJECTIVE

To describe, on the basis of the proceedings of the Evidence and Decision Support track at the 2000 AMIA Spring Symposium, the research and policy challenges for capturing research and practice-based evidence in machine-interpretable repositories, and to present recommendations for accelerating the development and adoption of clinical decision support systems for evidence-based medicine.

RESULTS

The recommendations fall into five broad areas--capture literature-based and practice-based evidence in machine--interpretable knowledge bases; develop maintainable technical and methodological foundations for computer-based decision support; evaluate the clinical effects and costs of clinical decision support systems and the ways clinical decision support systems affect and are affected by professional and organizational practices; identify and disseminate best practices for work flow-sensitive implementations of clinical decision support systems; and establish public policies that provide incentives for implementing clinical decision support systems to improve health care quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the promise of clinical decision support system-facilitated evidence-based medicine is strong, substantial work remains to be done to realize the potential benefits.

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces late renal allograft loss independent of acute rejection

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) has been shown to significantly decrease the number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant recipients during the 1st year. A beneficial effect of MMF on long-term graft survival has been more difficult to demonstrate. This beneficial effect has not been detected, despite the impact of acute rejection on the development of chronic allograft nephropathy and experimental evidence that MMF may have a salutary effect on chronic allograft nephropathy independent of that of rejection.

METHODS

Data on 66,774 renal transplant recipients from the U.S. renal transplant scientific registry were analyzed. Patients who received a solitary renal transplant between October 1, 1988 and June 30, 1997 were studied. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate relevant risk factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed for censored graft survival.

RESULTS

MMF decreased the relative risk for development of chronic allograft failure (CAF) by 27% (risk ratio [RR] 0.73, P<0.001). This effect was independent of its outcome on acute rejection. Censored graft survival using MMF versus azathioprine was significantly improved by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 4 years (85.61% v. 81.9%). The effect of an acute rejection episode on the risk of developing CAF seems to be increasing over time (RR=1.9, 1988-91; RR=2.9, 1992-94; RR=3.7, 1995-97).

CONCLUSION

MMF therapy decreases the risk of developing CAF. This improvement is only partly caused by the decrease in the incidence of acute rejection observed with MMF; but, is also caused by an effect independent of acute rejection.

Temporal thresholds for neocortical infarction in rats subjected to reversible focal cerebral ischemia

We investigated the temporal threshold for focal cerebral infarction in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. The right middle cerebral artery and common carotid artery were occluded for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 24 hours, and all the animals were sacrificed 24 hours after the onset of ischemia. Cortical infarct volumes and edema volumes were quantified in serial frozen sections of hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue using image analysis. Upon occlusion, blood flow in the core of the ischemic zone, measured with laser-Doppler flowmetry, fell to a mean +/- standard deviation of 21 +/- 7% of the preocclusion baseline value (n = 26). During the first hour of ischemia, blood flow in the densely ischemic zone rose to 27 +/- 8% of baseline (n = 25). Release of the middle cerebral artery and common carotid artery occlusions rapidly restored cortical blood flow to 213 +/- 83% of baseline (n = 21). Focal ischemia of 1 hour's duration caused little or no infarction, while ischemic intervals of 2 and 3 hours produced successively larger volumes of infarcted cortex. Ischemic intervals of 3-4 hours' duration followed by approximately 20 hours of recirculation yielded infarct volumes that were not significantly different from those after 24 hours of permanent focal ischemia. The results indicate that 3-4 hours of focal cerebral ischemia in this rat model is sufficient to attain maximal infarction and suggest that recirculation or pharmacological interventions after this time will provide little benefit.

The impact of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation on long-term patient survival

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) ameliorates the progression of microvascular diabetic complications but the procedure is associated with excess initial morbidity and an uncertain effect on patient survival when compared with solitary cadaveric or living donor renal transplantation. We evaluated mortality risks associated with SPK, solitary renal transplantation, and dialysis treatment in a national cohort of type 1 diabetics with end-stage nephropathy.

METHODS

A total of 13,467 adult-type 1 diabetics enrolled on the renal and renal-pancreas transplant waiting list between 10/01/88 and 06/30/97 were followed until 06/30/98. Time-dependent mortality risks and life expectancy were calculated according to the treatment received subsequent to wait-list registration: SPK; cadaveric kidney only (CAD); living donor kidney only (LKD) transplantation; and dialysis [wait-listed, maintenance dialysis treatment (WLD)].

RESULTS

Adjusted 10-year patient survival was 67% for SPK vs. 65% for LKD recipients (P=0.19) and 46% for CAD recipients (P<0.001). The excess initial mortality normally associated with renal transplantation and the risk of early infectious death was 2-fold higher in SPK recipients. The time to achieve equal proportion of survivors as the WLD patients was 170, 95, and 72 days for SPK, CAD, and LKD recipients, respectively (P<0.001). However, the adjusted 5-year morality risk (RR) using WLD as the reference and the expected remaining life years were 0.40, 0.45, and 0.75 and 23.4, 20.9, and 12.6 years for SPK, LKD, and CAD, respectively. There was no survival benefit in SPK recipients > or =50 years old (RR=1.38, P=0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with type 1 DM with end-stage nephropathy, SPK transplantation before the age of 50 years was associated with long-term improvement in survival compared to solitary cadaveric renal transplantation or dialysis.

Evaluating informatics applications--some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism

A review of evaluation literature concerning CDSSs indicates that randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are the 'gold standard' for evaluation. While this approach is excellent for studying system or clinical performance, it is not well suited to answering questions concerning whether systems will be used or how they will be used. Because lack of use of CDSS has been of concern for some years, other evaluation research designs are needed to address those issues. This paper critiques RCT and experimental evaluation approaches and presents alternative approaches to evaluation that address questions outside the scope of the usual RCT and experimental designs. A wide range of literature is summarized to illustrate the value of evaluations that take into account social, organizational, professional, and other contextual considerations. Many of these studies go beyond the usual measures of systems performance or physicians' behavior by focusing on 'fit' of the system with other aspects of professional and organizational life. Because there is little explicit theory that informs many evaluations, the paper then reviews CDSS evaluations informed by social science theories. Lastly, it proposes a theoretical social science base of social interactionism. An example of such an approach is given. It involves a CDSS in psychiatry and is based on Kaplan's 4Cs, which focus on communication, control, care, and context. Although the example is a CDSS, the evaluation approach also is useful for clinical guideline implementation and other medical informatics applications. Similarly, although the discussion is about social interactionism, the more important point is the need to broaden evaluation through a variety of methods and approaches that investigate social, cultural, organizational, cognitive, and other contextual concerns. Methodological pluralism and a variety of research questions can increase understanding of many influences concerning informatics applications development and deployment.

Microarray analysis of rejection in human kidney transplants using pathogenesis-based transcript sets

Microarrays offer potential for objective diagnosis and insights into pathogenesis of allograft rejection. We used mouse transplants to annotate pathogenesis-based transcript sets (PBTs) that reflect major biologic events in allograft rejection-cytotoxic T-cell infiltration, interferon-gamma effects and parenchymal deterioration. We examined the relationship between PBT expression, histopathologic lesions and clinical diagnoses in 143 consecutive human kidney transplant biopsies for cause. PBTs correlated strongly with one another, indicating that transcriptome disturbances in renal transplants have a stereotyped internal structure. This disturbance was continuous, not dichotomous, across rejection and nonrejection. PBTs correlated with histopathologic lesions and were the highest in biopsies with clinically apparent rejection episodes. Surprisingly, antibody-mediated rejection had changes similar to T-cell mediated rejection. Biopsies lacking PBT disturbances did not have rejection. PBTs suggested that some current Banff histopathology criteria are unreliable, particularly at the cut-off between borderline and rejection. Results were validated in 51 additional biopsies. Thus many transcriptome changes previously described in rejection are features of a large-scale disturbance characteristic of rejection but occurring at lower levels in many forms of injury. PBTs represent a quantitative measure of the inflammatory disturbances in organ transplants, and a new window on the mechanisms of these changes.

Evaluating informatics applications--clinical decision support systems literature review

This paper reviews clinical decision support systems (CDSS) literature, with a focus on evaluation. The literature indicates a general consensus that clinical decision support systems are thought to have the potential to improve care. Evidence is more equivocal for guidelines and for systems to aid physicians with diagnosis. There also is general consensus that a variety of systems are little used despite demonstrated or potential benefits. In the evaluation literature, the main emphasis is on how clinical performance changes. Most studies use an experimental or randomized controlled clinical trials design (RCT) to assess system performance or to focus on changes in clinical performance that could affect patient care. Few studies involve field tests of a CDSS and almost none use a naturalistic design in routine clinical settings with real patients. In addition, there is little theoretical discussion, although papers are permeated by a rationalist perspective that excludes contextual issues related to how and why systems are used. The studies mostly concern physicians rather than other clinicians. Further, CDSS evaluation studies appear to be insulated from evaluations of other informatics applications. Consequently, there is a lack of information useful for understanding why CDSSs may or may not be effective, resulting in making less informed decisions about these technologies and, by extension, other medical informatics applications.

Increasing live donor kidney transplantation: a randomized controlled trial of a home-based educational intervention

With the shortage of deceased donor kidneys and the superior clinical outcomes possible with live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), more patients should seriously consider LDKT. However, little is known about how best to educate patients and their family members about LDKT. We evaluated the effectiveness of a home-based (HB) educational program in increasing LDKT. Patients were randomized to clinic-based (CB) education alone (CB, n = 69) or CB plus HB education (CB+HB, n = 63). Compared to CB, more patients in the CB+HB group had living donor inquiries (63.8% vs. 82.5%, p = 0.019) and evaluations (34.8% vs. 60.3%, p = 0.005) and LDKTs (30.4% vs. 52.4%, p = 0.013). Assignment to the CB+HB group, White race, more LDKT knowledge, higher willingness to discuss LDKT with others, and fewer LDKT concerns were predictors of having LDKT (p-values < 0.05). Both groups demonstrated an increase in LDKT knowledge after the CB education, but CB+HB led to an additional increase in LDKT knowledge (p < 0.0001) and in willingness to discuss LDKT with others (p < 0.0001), and a decrease in LDKT concerns (p < 0.0001). Results indicate that an HB outreach program is more effective in increasing LDKT rates than CB education alone.

Increased impact of acute rejection on chronic allograft failure in recent era

BACKGROUND

Acute rejection (AR) remains a major risk factor for the development of chronic renal allograft failure (CAF), which is a major cause of late graft loss. With the introduction of several newer immunosuppressive agents (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus and neoral) acute rejection rates have been steadily decreasing. However, the incidence of CAF has not decreased as dramatically as the incidence of acute rejection. One possible explanation is that the impact of AR on CAF is changing. The goal of this study was to analyze the relative impact of AR era on the development of CAF.

METHODS

We evaluated 63,045 primary renal transplant recipients reported to the USRDS from 1988 to 1997. CAF was defined as graft loss after 6 months posttransplantation, censored for death, acute rejection, thrombosis, infection, surgical complications, or recurrent disease. A Cox proportional hazard model correcting for 15 possible confounding factors evaluated the relative impact of AR on CAF. The era effect (years 1988-1989, 1990-1991, 1992-1993, 1994-1995 and 1996-1997) was evaluated by an era versus AR interaction term.

RESULTS

An AR episode within the first 6 months after transplantation was the most important risk factor for subsequent CAF (RR=2.4, CI 2.3-2.5). Compared with the reference group (1988-89 with no rejection), having an AR episode in 1988-89, 1990-1991, 1992-1993, 1994-1995, and 1996-1997, conferred a 1.67, 2.35, 3.4, 4.98 and 5.2-fold relative risk for the subsequent development of CAF (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Independently of known confounding variables, the impact of AR on CAF has significantly increased from 1988 to 1997. This effect may in part explain the relative lack of improvements in long term renal allograft survival, despite a decline in AR rates.

Exponentially increased risk of infectious death in older renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The benefit of renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been well documented. This benefit is seen throughout all age ranges of patients. However, it has been documented that older renal transplant recipients are at increased risk for death because of infectious causes when compared with younger recipients. The present study addresses whether this increased risk merely parallels an age-related increase in infectious mortality or is reflective of a particular vulnerability in older renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Patients wait-listed and transplanted between 1988 and 1997 were analyzed utilizing the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) database. The primary study end point was patient death secondary to infection. Secondary end points included death secondary to cardiovascular cause and malignancy. Cox-proportional hazard models were utilized with all pertinent variables.

RESULTS

Death related to infectious cause increased exponentially in transplanted patients with increasing age (slope = 2.90.34x), while it increased linearly (slope = 1.9x + 8.6) with increasing age for those patients on the waiting list. Overall mortality increases with age were equal between the wait-listed and transplanted groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall survival benefit of transplantation is maintained in the older age groups. However, renal transplantation is associated with an increased risk for infectious death beyond the expected age-related increased risk in patients on the renal transplant waiting list. This may have an impact on future immunosuppressive regimens in this population.

Diagnosing rejection in renal transplants: a comparison of molecular- and histopathology-based approaches

The transcriptome has considerable potential for improving biopsy diagnoses. However, to realize this potential the relationship between the molecular phenotype of disease and histopathology must be established. We assessed 186 consecutive clinically indicated kidney transplant biopsies using microarrays, and built a classifier to distinguish rejection from nonrejection using predictive analysis of microarrays (PAM). Most genes selected by PAM were interferon-gamma-inducible or cytotoxic T-cell associated, for example, CXCL9, CXCL11, GBP1 and INDO. We then compared the PAM diagnoses to those from histopathology, which are based on the Banff diagnostic criteria. Disagreement occurred in approximately 20% of diagnoses, principally because of idiosyncratic limitations in the histopathology scoring system. The problematic diagnosis of 'borderline rejection' was resolved by PAM into two distinct classes, rejection and nonrejection. The diagnostic discrepancies between Banff and PAM in these cases were largely due to the Banff system's requirement for a tubulitis threshold in defining rejection. By examining the discrepancies between gene expression and histopathology, we provide external validation of the main features of the histopathology diagnostic criteria (the Banff consensus system), recommend improvements and outline a pathway for introducing molecular measurements.

Fixed- or controlled-dose mycophenolate mofetil with standard- or reduced-dose calcineurin inhibitors: the Opticept trial

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was developed with cyclosporine as a fixed-dose immunosuppressant. More recent data indicate a relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure in individuals and clinical endpoints of rejection and toxicity. This 2-year, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of concentration-controlled MMF (MMF(CC)) dosing with a fixed-dose regimen in 720 kidney recipients. Patients received either (A) MMF(CC) and reduced-level calcineurin inhibitor (MMF(CC)/CNI(RL)); (B) MMF(CC) and standard-level CNI (MMF(CC)/CNI(SL)); or (C) fixed-dose MMF and CNI(SL) (MMF(FD)/CNI(SL)). Antibody induction and steroid use were according to center practice. The primary endpoint was noninferiority (alpha= 0.05) of group A versus group C for treatment failure (including biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss and death) at 1 year. Although mean CNI trough levels in group A did not reach the prespecified targets, they were statistically lower than those in groups B and C (p < or = 0.01 for each comparison). BPAR rates (8.5%) were low across groups. Group A had 19% fewer treatment failures (23% vs. 28%, p = 0.18). MMF doses were highest (p < 0.05), with withdrawals for adverse events the fewest (p = 0.02), in group A. Of the 80% of subjects taking tacrolimus (Tac), those with higher MPA exposure had significantly less rejection (p < 0.001) and diarrhea correlated with Tac, but not with MPA levels. Thus, MMF(CC) with low-dose CNI resulted in outcomes not inferior to those with standard CNI exposure and MMF(FD), indicating potential utility of MMF(CC) in CNI-sparing regimens.

Longitudinal assessment of everolimus in de novo renal transplant recipients over the first post-transplant year: pharmacokinetics, exposure-response relationships, and influence on cyclosporine

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to characterize the steady-state pharmacokinetics of everolimus and cyclosporine (INN, ciclosporin) when coadministered in de novo kidney allograft recipients during the first year after transplantation.

METHOD

This study was a multicenter randomized double-blind study of 101 patients who were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive everolimus tablets at doses of 0.5 mg, 1 mg, or 2 mg twice daily with cyclosporine and prednisone. Blood sampling for the pharmacokinetics of everolimus and cyclosporine was performed on day 1, on weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4, and on months 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Everolimus dose-proportionality and stability over time were assessed in the context of linear regression and ANOVA models. Everolimus exposure-response relationships between area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) and changes in platelets, leukocytes, and lipids were explored with the median-effect model. Potential differences in cyclosporine dosing and pharmacokinetics at different levels of everolimus exposure were assessed in the context of ANOVA.

RESULTS

Everolimus steady state was reached on or before day 7, with a median 3-fold accumulation of drug exposure compared with that after the first postoperative dose. Both steady-state maximum concentration and AUC were dose proportional over the full dose range when assessed on day 1, as well as for the full duration of the study at steady state. There was evidence for longitudinal stability in AUC of everolimus during the course of the study. The interindividual pharmacokinetic variability for AUC was 85.4% and intraindividual, interoccasion variability was 40.8%. Age (range, 17-69 years), weight (range, 49-106 kg), and sex (65 men and 36 women) were not significant contributors to variability. There was an increasing incidence of transient thrombocytopenia (< or =100 x 10(9)/L) with increasing everolimus AUC (P = .03). Cyclosporine doses, trough concentrations, and AUC exhibited similar temporal patterns during the course of the study regardless of the co-administered everolimus dose level (P = .13, .82, and .76, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus exhibited dose-proportional, stable exposure during the first post-transplant year. For a 4-fold range of everolimus doses there were no differential effects on cyclosporine dosing or pharmacokinetics.

Islet transplantation for brittle type 1 diabetes: the UIC protocol

This prospective phase 1/2 trial investigated the safety and reproducibility of allogeneic islet transplantation (Tx) in type I diabetic (T1DM) patients and tested a strategy to achieve insulin-independence with lower islet mass. Ten C-peptide negative T1DM subjects with hypoglycemic unawareness received 1-3 intraportal allogeneic islet Tx and were followed for 15 months. Four subjects (Group 1) received the Edmonton immunosuppression regimen (daclizumab, sirolimus, tacrolimus). Six subjects (Group 2) received the University of Illinois protocol (etanercept, exenatide and the Edmonton regimen). All subjects became insulin- independent. Group 1 received a mean total number of islets (EIN) of 1460 080 +/- 418 330 in 2 (n = 2) or 3 (n = 2) Tx, whereas Group 2 became insulin- independent after 1 Tx (537 495 +/- 190 968 EIN, p = 0.028). All Group 1 subjects remained insulin free through the follow-up. Two Group 2 subjects resumed insulin: one after immunosuppression reduction during an infectious complication, the other with exenatide intolerance. HbA1c reached normal range in both groups (6.5 +/- 0.6 at baseline to 5.6 +/- 0.5 after 2-3 Tx in Group 1 vs. 7.8 +/- 1.1 to 5.8 +/- 0.3 after 1 Tx in Group 2). HYPO scores markedly decreased in both groups. Combined treatment of etanercept and exenatide improves islet graft function and facilitates achievement of insulin-independence with less islets.

Tacrolimus predose concentrations do not predict the risk of acute rejection after renal transplantation: a pooled analysis from three randomized-controlled clinical trials(†)

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for tacrolimus (Tac) is universally applied. However, the concentration-effect relationship for Tac is poorly defined. This study investigated whether Tac concentrations are associated with acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Data from three large trials were pooled. We used univariate and multivariate analysis to investigate the relationship between biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) and Tac predose concentration at five time points (day 3, 10 and 14, and month 1 and 6 after transplantation). A total of 136/1304 patients experienced BPAR, giving an overall incidence of 10.4%. We did not find any significant correlations between Tac predose concentrations and the incidence of BPAR at the different time points. In the multivariate analysis, only delayed graft function (DGF) and the use of induction therapy were independently correlated with BPAR, with an odds ratio of 2.7 [95% CI: 1.8-4.0; p < 0.001] for DGF and 0.66 [95% CI: 0.44-0.99; p = 0.049] for induction therapy. The other variables, including the Tac predose concentrations, were not statistically significantly associated with BPAR. We did not find an association between the Tac predose concentrations measured at five time points after kidney transplantation and the incidence of acute rejection occurring thereafter. Based on this study it is not possible to define the optimal target concentrations for Tac.

The effect of renal insufficiency on mycophenolic acid protein binding

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is commonly used in solid organ transplant recipients. MMF is converted to mycophenolic acid (MPA) upon reaching the systemic circulation. Many acidic drugs have altered protein binding in renal failure, and it is possible that MPA protein binding may be decreased. The authors studied 23 renal transplant recipients: 8 transplant patients (7 kidney, 1 kidney/pancreas) with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and 15 renal transplant patients with preserved renal function. Plasma was obtained for kinetic profiles of total MPA, free MPA, and its glucuronide metabolite (MPAG). Plasma was obtained from 10 hemodialysis patients and 8 healthy control volunteers to assess in vitro differences in MPA protein binding. Average free fraction of MPA in patients with chronic renal insufficiency was more than double that of patients with normal renal function (5.8 +/- 2.7 vs. 2.5 +/- 0.4, p < 0.01). Free MPAAUC was almost doubled in the patients with chronic renal insufficiency versus controls (2.04 +/- .08 vs. 1.03 +/- 0.6, p < 0.01). MPA protein binding is decreased, and free MPA concentrations are increased in patients with chronic renal failure.

Panagiotopoulou E, Panagoulias I, Pandini CE, Panduro Vazquez JG, Pani P, Panitkin S, Pantea D, Paolozzi L, Papadopoulou TD, Papageorgiou K, Paramonov A, Paredes Hernandez D, Parker AJ, Parker MA, Parker KA, Parodi F, Parsons JA, Parzefall U, Pascuzzi VR, Pasqualucci E, Passaggio S, Pastore F, Pásztor G, Pataraia S, Pater JR, Pauly T, Pearce J, Pearson B, Pedersen LE, Pedersen M, Pedraza Lopez S, Pedro R, Peleganchuk SV, Penc O, Peng C, Peng H, Penwell J, Peralva BS, Perego MM, Perepelitsa DV, Perez Codina E, Perini L, Pernegger H, Perrella S, Peschke R, Peshekhonov VD, Peters K, Peters RFY, Petersen BA, Petersen TC, Petit E, Petridis A, Petridou C, Petroff P, Petrolo E, Petrov M, Petrucci F, Pettersson NE, Peyaud A, Pezoa R, Phillips PW, Piacquadio G, Pianori E, Picazio A, Piccaro E, Piccinini M, Pickering MA, Piegaia R, Pilcher JE, Pilkington AD, Pin AWJ, Pinamonti M, Pinfold JL, Pingel A, Pires S, Pirumov H, Pitt M, Plazak L, Pleier MA, Pleskot V, Plotnikova E, Pluth D, Poettgen R, Poggioli L, Pohl D, Polesello G, Poley A, Policicchio A, Polifka R, Polini A, Pollard CS, Polychronakos V, Pommès K, Pontecorvo L, Pope BG, Popeneciu GA, Poppleton A, Pospisil S, Potamianos K, Potrap IN, Potter CJ, Potter CT, Poulard G, Poveda J, Pozdnyakov V, Pozo Astigarraga ME, Pralavorio P, Pranko A, Prell S, Price D, Price LE, Primavera M, Prince S, Prokofiev K, Prokoshin F, Protopopescu S, Proudfoot J, Przybycien M, Puddu D, Purohit M, Puzo P, Qian J, Qin G, Qin Y, Quadt A, Quayle WB, Queitsch-Maitland M, Quilty D, Raddum S, Radeka V, Radescu V, Radhakrishnan SK, Radloff P, Rados P, Ragusa F, Rahal G, Raine JA, Rajagopalan S, Rammensee M, Rangel-Smith C, Ratti MG, Rauch DM, Rauscher F, Rave S, Ravenscroft T, Ravinovich I, Raymond M, Read AL, Readioff NP, Reale M, Rebuzzi DM, Redelbach A, Redlinger G, Reece R, Reed RG, Reeves K, Rehnisch L, Reichert J, Reiss A, Rembser C, Ren H, Rescigno M, Resconi S, Rezanova OL, Reznicek P, Rezvani R, Richter R, Richter S, Richter-Was E, Ricken O, Ridel M, Rieck P, Riegel CJ, Rieger J, Rifki O, Rijssenbeek M, Rimoldi A, Rimoldi M, Rinaldi L, Ristić B, Ritsch E, Riu I, Rizatdinova F, Rizvi E, Rizzi C, Robertson SH, Robichaud-Veronneau A, Robinson D, Robinson JEM, Robson A, Roda C, Rodina Y, Rodriguez Perez A, Rodriguez Rodriguez D, Roe S, Rogan CS, Røhne O, Roloff J, Romaniouk A, Romano M, Romano Saez SM, Romero Adam E, Rompotis N, Ronzani M, Roos L, Ros E, Rosati S, Rosbach K, Rose P, Rosien NA, Rossetti V, Rossi E, Rossi LP, Rosten JHN, Rosten R, Rotaru M, Roth I, Rothberg J, Rousseau D, Rozanov A, Rozen Y, Ruan X, Rubbo F, Rudolph MS, Rühr F, Ruiz-Martinez A, Rurikova Z, Rusakovich NA, Ruschke A, Russell HL, Rutherfoord JP, Ruthmann N, Ryabov YF, Rybar M, Rybkin G, Ryu S, Ryzhov A, Rzehorz GF, Saavedra AF, Sabato G, Sacerdoti S, Sadrozinski HFW, Sadykov R, Safai Tehrani F, Saha P, Sahinsoy M, Saimpert M, Saito T, Sakamoto H, Sakurai Y, Salamanna G, Salamon A, Salazar Loyola JE, Salek D, Sales De Bruin PH, Salihagic D, Salnikov A, Salt J, Salvatore D, Salvatore F, Salvucci A, Salzburger A, Sammel D, Sampsonidis D, Sánchez J, Sanchez Martinez V, Sanchez Pineda A, Sandaker H, Sandbach RL, Sandhoff M, Sandoval C, Sankey DPC, Sannino M, Sansoni A, Santoni C, Santonico R, Santos H, Santoyo Castillo I, Sapp K, Sapronov A, Saraiva JG, Sarrazin B, Sasaki O, Sato K, Sauvan E, Savage G, Savard P, Savic N, Sawyer C, Sawyer L, Saxon J, Sbarra C, Sbrizzi A, Scanlon T, Scannicchio DA, Scarcella M, Scarfone V, Schaarschmidt J, Schacht P, Schachtner BM, Schaefer D, Schaefer L, Schaefer R, Schaeffer J, Schaepe S, Schaetzel S, Schäfer U, Schaffer AC, Schaile D, Schamberger RD, Scharf V, Schegelsky VA, Scheirich D, Schernau M, Schiavi C, Schier S, Schillo C, Schioppa M, Schlenker S, Schmidt-Sommerfeld KR, Schmieden K, Schmitt C, Schmitt S, Schmitz S, Schneider B, Schnoor U, Schoeffel L, Schoening A, Schoenrock BD, Schopf E, Schott M, Schouwenberg JFP, Schovancova J, Schramm S, Schreyer M, Schuh N, Schulte A, Schultens MJ, Schultz-Coulon HC, Schulz H, Schumacher M, Schumm BA, Schune P, Schwartzman A, Schwarz TA, Schweiger H, Schwemling P, Schwienhorst R, Schwindling J, Schwindt T, Sciolla G, Scuri F, Scutti F, Searcy J, Seema P, Seidel SC, Seiden A, Seifert F, Seixas JM, Sekhniaidze G, Sekhon K, Sekula SJ, Seliverstov DM, Semprini-Cesari N, Serfon C, Serin L, Serkin L, Sessa M, Seuster R, Severini H, Sfiligoj T, Sforza F, Sfyrla A, Shabalina E, Shaikh NW, Shan LY, Shang R, Shank JT, Shapiro M, Shatalov PB, Shaw K, Shaw SM, Shcherbakova A, Shehu CY, Sherwood P, Shi L, Shimizu S, Shimmin CO, Shimojima M, Shirabe S, Shiyakova M, Shmeleva A, Shoaleh Saadi D, Shochet MJ, Shojaii S, Shope DR, Shrestha S, Shulga E, Shupe MA, Sicho P, Sickles AM, Sidebo PE, Sideras Haddad E, Sidiropoulou O, Sidorov D, Sidoti A, Siegert F, Sijacki D, Silva J, Silverstein SB, Simak V, Simic L, Simion S, Simioni E, Simmons B, Simon D, Simon M, Sinervo P, Sinev NB, Sioli M, Siragusa G, Sivoklokov SY, Sjölin J, Skinner MB, Skottowe HP, Skubic P, Slater M, Slavicek T, Slawinska M, Sliwa K, Slovak R, Smakhtin V, Smart BH, Smestad L, Smiesko J, Smirnov SY, Smirnov Y, Smirnova LN, Smirnova O, Smith JW, Smith MNK, Smith RW, Smizanska M, Smolek K, Snesarev AA, Snyder IM, Snyder S, Sobie R, Socher F, Soffer A, Soh DA, Sokhrannyi G, Solans Sanchez CA, Solar M, Soldatov EY, Soldevila U, Solodkov AA, Soloshenko A, Solovyanov OV, Solovyev V, Sommer P, Son H, Song HY, Sood A, Sopczak A, Sopko V, Sorin V, Sosa D, Sotiropoulou CL, Soualah R, Soukharev AM, South D, Sowden BC, Spagnolo S, Spalla M, Spangenberg M, Spanò F, Sperlich D, Spettel F, Spieker TM, Spighi R, Spigo G, Spiller LA, Spousta M, St. Denis RD, Stabile A, Stamen R, Stamm S, Stanecka E, Stanek RW, Stanescu C, Stanescu-Bellu M, Stanitzki MM, Stapnes S, Starchenko EA, Stark GH, Stark J, Staroba P, Starovoitov P, Stärz S, Staszewski R, Steinberg P, Stelzer B, Stelzer HJ, Stelzer-Chilton O, Stenzel H, Stewart GA, Stillings JA, Stockton MC, Stoebe M, Stoicea G, Stolte P, Stonjek S, Stradling AR, Straessner A, Stramaglia ME, Strandberg J, Strandberg S, Strandlie A, Strauss M, Strizenec P, Ströhmer R, Strom DM, Stroynowski R, Strubig A, Stucci SA, Stugu B, Styles NA, Su D, Su J, Suchek S, Sugaya Y, Suk M, Sulin VV, Sultansoy S, Sumida T, Sun S, Sun X, Sundermann JE, Suruliz K, Suster CJE, Sutton MR, Suzuki S, Svatos M, Swiatlowski M, Swift SP, Sykora I, Sykora T, Ta D, Taccini C, Tackmann K, Taenzer J, Taffard A, Tafirout R, Taiblum N, Takai H, Takashima R, Takeshita T, Takubo Y, Talby M, Talyshev AA, Tan KG, Tanaka J, Tanaka M, Tanaka R, Tanaka S, Tanioka R, Tannenwald BB, Tapia Araya S, Tapprogge S, Tarem S, Tartarelli GF, Tas P, Tasevsky M, Tashiro T, Tassi E, Tavares Delgado A, Tayalati Y, Taylor AC, Taylor GN, Taylor PTE, Taylor W, Teischinger FA, Teixeira-Dias P, Temming KK, Temple D, Ten Kate H, Teng PK, Teoh JJ, Tepel F, Terada S, Terashi K, Terron J, Terzo S, Testa M, Teuscher RJ, Theveneaux-Pelzer T, Thomas JP, Thomas-Wilsker J, Thompson PD, Thompson AS, Thomsen LA, Thomson E, Tibbetts MJ, Ticse Torres RE, Tikhomirov VO, Tikhonov YA, Timoshenko S, Tipton P, Tisserant S, Todome K, Todorov T, Todorova-Nova S, Tojo J, Tokár S, Tokushuku K, Tolley E, Tomlinson L, Tomoto M, Tompkins L, Toms K, Tong B, Tornambe P, Torrence E, Torres H, Torró Pastor E, Toth J, Touchard F, Tovey DR, Trefzger T, Tricoli A, Trigger IM, Trincaz-Duvoid S, Tripiana MF, Trischuk W, Trocmé B, Trofymov A, Troncon C, Trottier-McDonald M, Trovatelli M, Truong L, Trzebinski M, Trzupek A, Tseng JCL, Tsiareshka PV, Tsipolitis G, Tsirintanis N, Tsiskaridze S, Tsiskaridze V, Tskhadadze EG, Tsui KM, Tsukerman II, Tsulaia V, Tsuno S, Tsybychev D, Tu Y, Tudorache A, Tudorache V, Tulbure TT, Tuna AN, Tupputi SA, Turchikhin S, Turgeman D, Turk Cakir I, Turra R, Tuts PM, Ucchielli G, Ueda I, Ughetto M, Ukegawa F, Unal G, Undrus A, Unel G, Ungaro FC, Unno Y, Unverdorben C, Urban J, Urquijo P, Urrejola P, Usai G, Usui J, Vacavant L, Vacek V, Vachon B, Valderanis C, Valdes Santurio E, Valencic N, Valentinetti S, Valero A, Valery L, Valkar S, Valls Ferrer JA, Van Den Wollenberg W, Van Der Deijl PC, van der Graaf H, van Eldik N, van Gemmeren P, Van Nieuwkoop J, van Vulpen I, van Woerden MC, Vanadia M, Vandelli W, Vanguri R, Vaniachine A, Vankov P, Vardanyan G, Vari R, Varnes EW, Varol T, Varouchas D, Vartapetian A, Varvell KE, Vasquez JG, Vasquez GA, Vazeille F, Vazquez Schroeder T, Veatch J, Veeraraghavan V, Veloce LM, Veloso F, Veneziano S, Ventura A, Venturi M, Venturi N, Venturini A, Vercesi V, Verducci M, Verkerke W, Vermeulen JC, Vest A, Vetterli MC, Viazlo O, Vichou I, Vickey T, Vickey Boeriu OE, Viehhauser GHA, Viel S, Vigani L, Villa M, Villaplana Perez M, Vilucchi E, Vincter MG, Vinogradov VB, Vittori C, Vivarelli I, Vlachos S, Vlasak M, Vogel M, Vokac P, Volpi G, Volpi M, von der Schmitt H, von Toerne E, Vorobel V, Vorobev K, Vos M, Voss R, Vossebeld JH, Vranjes N, Vranjes Milosavljevic M, Vrba V, Vreeswijk M, Vuillermet R, Vukotic I, Wagner P, Wagner W, Wahlberg H, Wahrmund S, Wakabayashi J, Walder J, Walker R, Walkowiak W, Wallangen V, Wang C, Wang C, Wang F, Wang H, Wang H, Wang J, Wang J, Wang K, Wang R, Wang SM, Wang T, Wang W, Wanotayaroj C, Warburton A, Ward CP, Wardrope DR, Washbrook A, Watkins PM, Watson AT, Watson MF, Watts G, Watts S, Waugh BM, Webb S, Weber MS, Weber SW, Weber SA, Webster JS, Weidberg AR, Weinert B, Weingarten J, Weiser C, Weits H, Wells PS, Wenaus T, Wengler T, Wenig S, Wermes N, Werner MD, Werner P, Wessels M, Wetter J, Whalen K, Whallon NL, Wharton AM, White A, White MJ, White R, Whiteson D, Wickens FJ, Wiedenmann W, Wielers M, Wiglesworth C, Wiik-Fuchs LAM, Wildauer A, Wilk F, Wilkens HG, Williams HH, Williams S, Willis C, Willocq S, Wilson JA, Wingerter-Seez I, Winklmeier F, Winston OJ, Winter BT, Wittgen M, Wolf TMH, Wolff R, Wolter MW, Wolters H, Worm SD, Wosiek BK, Wotschack J, Woudstra MJ, Wozniak KW, Wu M, Wu M, Wu SL, Wu X, Wu Y, Wyatt TR, Wynne BM, Xella S, Xi Z, Xu D, Xu L, Yabsley B, Yacoob S, Yamaguchi D, Yamaguchi Y, Yamamoto A, Yamamoto S, Yamanaka T, Yamauchi K, Yamazaki Y, Yan Z, Yang H, Yang H, Yang Y, Yang Z, Yao WM, Yap YC, Yasu Y, Yatsenko E, Yau Wong KH, Ye J, Ye S, Yeletskikh I, Yildirim E, Yorita K, Yoshida R, Yoshihara K, Young C, Young CJS, Youssef S, Yu DR, Yu J, Yu JM, Yu J, Yuan L, Yuen SPY, Yusuff I, Zabinski B, Zacharis G, Zaidan R, Zaitsev AM, Zakharchuk N, Zalieckas J, Zaman A, Zambito S, Zanello L, Zanzi D, Zeitnitz C, Zeman M, Zemla A, Zeng JC, Zeng Q, Zenin O, Ženiš T, Zerwas D, Zhang D, Zhang F, Zhang G, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Zhang L, Zhang M, Zhang R, Zhang R, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhao X, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Zhemchugov A, Zhong J, Zhou B, Zhou C, Zhou L, Zhou L, Zhou M, Zhou N, Zhu CG, Zhu H, Zhu J, Zhu Y, Zhuang X, Zhukov K, Zibell A, Zieminska D, Zimine NI, Zimmermann C, Zimmermann S, Zinonos Z, Zinser M, Ziolkowski M, Živković L, Zobernig G, Zoccoli A, zur Nedden M, Zwalinski L. Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015

During 2015 the ATLAS experiment recorded [Formula: see text] of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of [Formula: see text]. The ATLAS trigger system is a crucial component of the experiment, responsible for selecting events of interest at a recording rate of approximately 1 kHz from up to 40 MHz of collisions. This paper presents a short overview of the changes to the trigger and data acquisition systems during the first long shutdown of the LHC and shows the performance of the trigger system and its components based on the 2015 proton-proton collision data.