Development of a reliable surgical quality assurance tool for gastrectomy in oncological trials

BACKGROUND

Despite its recognized importance, there is currently no reliable tool for surgical quality assurance (SQA) of gastrectomy in surgical oncology. The aim of this study was to develop an SQA tool for gastrectomy and to apply this tool within the ADDICT Trial in order to assess the extent and completeness of lymphadenectomy.

METHODS

The operative steps for D1+ and D2 gastrectomy have been previously described in the literature and ADDICT trial manual. Two researchers also performed fieldwork in the UK and Japan to document key operative steps through photographs and semi-structured interviews with expert surgeons. This provided the steps that were used as the framework for the SQA tool. Sixty-two photographic cases from the ADDICT Trial were rated by three independent surgeons. Generalizability (G) theory determined inter-rater reliability. D-studies examined the effect of varying the number of assessors and photographic series they rated. Chi-square assessed intra-rater reliability, comparing how the individual assessor's responses corresponded to their global rating for extent of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

The tool comprised 20 items, including 19 anatomical landmarks and a global rating score. Overall reliability had G-coefficient of 0.557. Internal consistency was measured with a Cronbach's alpha score of 0.869 and Chi-square confirmed intra-rater reliability for each assessor as < 0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

A photographic surgical quality assurance tool is presented for gastrectomy. Using this tool, the assessor can reliably determine not only the quality but also the extent of the lymphadenectomy performed based on remaining anatomy rather than the excised specimen.

Tumour length as an independent prognostic factor in resectable oesophageal carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal longitudinal tumour length has been investigated as a prognostic indicator for disease recurrence and overall survival in resectable oesophageal carcinoma. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding its use in clinical practice. This study aims to assess the prognostic significance of histological tumour length in potentially curative oesophageal resections for cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma (squamous or adenocarcinoma) were identified in a single centre between July 2000 and December 2016. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and survival outcomes were assimilated. Unifactorial and multifactorial analysis was performed to assess tumour length correlation with oncological outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were included; 226 (80.4%) male and 55 (19.6%) female, with a median age of 66 years; 39 patients (13.9%) developed local recurrence and 104 (37%) distant metastases. Disease progression rate was 44.8% with a median progression-free survival of 21 months and median overall survival of 30 months. Median tumour length was 3cm (interquartile range 2-4.5cm). Multivariate analysis demonstrated longer tumours to be significantly associated with a higher rate of local recurrence (p=0.028), metastases (p=0.016), disease progression (p=0.001) and shorter progression-free survival (p=0.001).

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrates histological tumour length as an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence, metastases, disease progression and progression-free survival. Further larger multicentre studies are required to define the role of longitudinal tumour length as a marker to identify patients who are at higher risk of poor oncological outcomes following surgery.

Preoperative oral antibiotic bowel preparation in elective resectional colorectal surgery reduces rates of surgical site infections: a single-centre experience with a cost-effectiveness analysis

INTRODUCTION

Surgical site infections cause considerable postoperative morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the effect on surgical site infection rates following introduction of a departmental oral antibiotic bowel preparation protocol.

METHODS

A prospective single-centre study was performed for elective colorectal resections between May 2016-April 2018; with a control group with mechanical bowel preparation and treatment group with oral antibiotic bowel preparation (neomycin and metronidazole) and mechanical bowel preparation. The primary outcome of surgical site infection and secondary outcomes of anastomotic leak, length of stay and mortality rate were analysed using Fisher's exact test and independent samples t-tests. A cost-effectiveness analysis was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 311 patients were included; 156 in the mechanical bowel preparation group and 155 in the mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation group. The study included 180 (57.9%) men and 131 (42.1%) women with a mean age of 68 years. There was a significant reduction in surgical site infection rates (mechanical bowel preparation 16.0% vs mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation 4.5%; P = 0.001) and mean length of stay (mechanical bowel preparation 10.2 days vs mechanical bowel preparation plus oral antibiotic bowel preparation 8.2 days; P = 0.012). There was also a reduction in anastomotic leak and mortality rates. Subgroup analyses demonstrated significantly reduced surgical site infection rates in laparoscopic resections (P = 0.008). There was an estimated cost saving of £239.13 per patient and £37,065 for our institution over a one-year period.

CONCLUSION

Oral antibiotic bowel preparation is a feasible and cost-effective intervention shown to significantly reduce the rates of surgical site infection and length of stay in elective colorectal surgery.