Cost-effectiveness of intraoperative radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of early breast cancer: a disinvestment analysis

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant radiotherapy represents a key component in curative-intent treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients. In recent years, two accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) techniques are preferred for this population in our organization: electron-based Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) and Linac-based External Beam Radiotherapy, particularly Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Recently published long-term follow-up data evaluating these technologies have motivated a health technology reassessment of IORT compared to IMRT.

METHODS

We developed a Markov model to simulate health-state transitions from a cohort of women with early-stage breast cancer, after lumpectomy and adjuvant APBI using either IORT or IMRT techniques. The cost-effectiveness from a private health provider perspective was assessed from a disinvestment point of view, using life-years (LYs) and recurrence-free life-years (RFLYs) as measure of benefits, along with their respective quality adjustments. Expected costs and benefits, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were reported. Finally, a sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness using lower IORT local recurrence and metastasis rates in IORT patients, and if equipment maintenance costs are removed.

RESULTS

IORT technology was dominated by IMRT in all cases (i.e., fewer benefits with greater costs). Despite small differences were found regarding benefits, especially for LYs, costs were considerably higher for IORT. For sensitivity analyses with lower recurrence and metastasis rates for IORT, and scenario analyses without equipment maintenance costs, IORT was still dominated by IMRT.

CONCLUSIONS

For this cohort of patients, IMRT was, at least, non-inferior to IORT in terms of expected benefits, with considerably lower costs. As a result, IORT disinvestment should be considered, favoring the use of IMRT in these patients.

Prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA 2 and other mutations in Chilean population

e13553

Background: Arturo López Pérez Foundation (FALP) is a Chilean Institution aimed to treatment of cancer patients. Since 2016 it has an Unit for Oncological Genetic Counseling (AGO) for patients with warning flags of potential cases of cancer of genetic origin AGO Unit is aimed to capture patients with warning flags and deliver information through pre-test counseling, offer possibility of a genetic test and post-test counseling. The purpose of this review is to provide relevant results of four years of this Unit. Methods: A descriptive study was carried out from patient care in the Oncological Genetic Counseling Unit of FALP between 2016 and 2019. It was considered those cases in which the process of pretest/post-test counseling was performed. Six "warningflags" were established: cancer in patients under 50 years of age, triple negative breast cancer, breast cancer in men, ovarian cancer, history of 2 or more primary cancers and a family history of cancer The number of test performed was analyzed. The results were expressed in positive pathogenic variants, uncertain variants and negative results. Results: 365 genetic counseling processes were carried out during the period. The average consultation age was 43.2 years (20.8 and 75.5) and 90.1% (329 attentions ) were female. Of the patients, 79.7% (294) perform the genetic test. 18.5% tested positive for a pathogenic variant, 6.5% for a pathogenic variant plus an uncertain variable, and 2.8% for two pathogenic variants. The mutations found were BRCA2 32.6% BRCA1 29.1%, ATM 10.1% RAD51C 6.7% CDKN2 A 5.6%, MUTYH 3.4% TP53 3.4%, MSH2 3.4% RAD51D 2.4%), NF1 1.1%, NTHL1 1.1%, RET 1.1% A 64.9% (237 patients) had cancer diagnosed at the time of the consultation, versus 33.1% of healthy care. 2% had no information. The type of cancer present was 79.7% breast cancer (189), 8.0% ovarian cancer, 2.1% thyroid cancer, 1.7% breast and ovarian cancer, 0.9% colon and/or endometrial cancer and 7.6% other cancers. The warning flags present were 41.2% age below 50 years, 26.2% family history, 15.4% relatives of people with positive results, 8.5% patients with triple-negative breast cancer, 5.3% patients with ovarian cancer, 2.8% patients with 2 or more primary cancers, and 0.6% male breast cancer patients. Conclusions: The highest percentage of patient care was for women with breast cancer, under 50 years of age. The overall test positivity rate is a cumulative 29%. Mutations in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 were the most detected mutations, as reported in the literature. The slight predominance of BRCA 2 may be due to a familiar component. This is the largest report made in the Chilean population.