1
|
Duca F, Rettl R, Kronberger C, Binder C, Mann C, Dusik F, Schrutka L, Dalos D, Öztürk B, Dachs TM, Cherouny B, Camuz Ligios L, Agis H, Kain R, Koschutnik M, Donà C, Badr-Eslam R, Kastner J, Beitzke D, Loewe C, Nitsche C, Hengstenberg C, Kammerlander AA, Bonderman D. Myocardial structural and functional changes in cardiac amyloidosis: insights from a prospective observational patient registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023; 25:95-104. [PMID: 37549339 PMCID: PMC10735280 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The pathophysiological hallmark of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is the deposition of amyloid within the myocardium. Consequently, extracellular volume (ECV) of affected patients increases. However, studies on ECV progression over time are lacking. We aimed to investigate the progression of ECV and its prognostic impact in CA patients. METHODS AND RESULTS Serial cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations, including ECV quantification, were performed in consecutive CA patients. Between 2012 and 2021, 103 CA patients underwent baseline and follow-up CMR, including ECV quantification. Median ECVs at baseline of the total (n = 103), transthyretin [(ATTR) n = 80], and [light chain (AL) n = 23] CA cohorts were 48.0%, 49.0%, and 42.6%, respectively. During a median period of 12 months, ECV increased significantly in all cohorts [change (Δ) +3.5% interquartile range (IQR): -1.9 to +6.9, P < 0.001; Δ +3.5%, IQR: -2.0 to +6.7, P < 0.001; and Δ +3.5%, IQR: -1.6 to +9.1, P = 0.026]. Separate analyses for treatment-naïve (n = 21) and treated (n = 59) ATTR patients revealed that the median change of ECV from baseline to follow-up was significantly higher among untreated patients (+5.7% vs. +2.3%, P = 0.004). Survival analyses demonstrated that median change of ECV was a predictor of outcome [total: hazard ratio (HR): 1.095, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047-1.0145, P < 0.001; ATTR: HR: 1.073, 95% CI: 1.015-1.134, P = 0.013; and AL: HR: 1.131, 95% CI: 1.041-1.228, P = 0.003]. CONCLUSION The present study supports the use of serial ECV quantification in CA patients, as change of ECV was a predictor of outcome and could provide information in the evaluation of amyloid-specific treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz Duca
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - René Rettl
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Kronberger
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Binder
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christopher Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Fabian Dusik
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Lore Schrutka
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Dalos
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Begüm Öztürk
- Division of Cardiology, Favoriten Clinic, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| | - Theresa Marie Dachs
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Cherouny
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Luciana Camuz Ligios
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Hermine Agis
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Hematology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Renate Kain
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Matthias Koschutnik
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Carolina Donà
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Roza Badr-Eslam
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Kastner
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietrich Beitzke
- Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Loewe
- Department of Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Nitsche
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Hengstenberg
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Anselm Kammerlander
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Bonderman
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- Division of Cardiology, Favoriten Clinic, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rettl R, Wollenweber T, Duca F, Binder C, Cherouny B, Dachs TM, Luciana CL, Schrutka L, Dalos D, Beitzke D, Loewe C, Eslam RB, Kastner J, Hacker M, Bonderman D. Monitoring tafamidis treatment with quantitative SPECT/CT in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023:7070981. [PMID: 36881774 PMCID: PMC10364619 DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jead030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Tafamidis treatment positively affects left ventricular (LV) structure and function and improves outcomes in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM). We aimed to investigate the relationship between treatment response and cardiac amyloid burden identified by serial quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT. We furthermore aimed to identify nuclear imaging biomarkers that could be used to quantify and monitor response to tafamidis therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS Forty wild-type ATTR-CM patients who underwent 99mTc-DPD scintigraphy and SPECT/CT imaging at baseline and after treatment with tafamidis 61 mg once daily [median, 9.0 months (interquartile range 7.0-10.0)] were divided into two cohorts based on the median (-32.3%) of the longitudinal percent change in standardized uptake value (SUV) retention index. ATTR-CM patients with a reduction greater than or equal to the median (n = 20) had a significant decrease in SUV retention index (P < 0.001) at follow-up, which translated into significant benefits in serum N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide levels (P = 0.006), left atrial volume index (P = 0.038), as well as LV [LV global longitudinal strain: P = 0.028, LV ejection fraction (EF): P = 0.027, LV cardiac index (CI): P = 0.034] and right ventricular (RV) [RVEF: P = 0.025, RVCI: P = 0.048] functions compared with patients with a decrease less than the median (n = 20). CONCLUSION Treatment with tafamidis in ATTR-CM patients results in a significant reduction in SUV retention index, associated with significant benefits for LV and RV function and cardiac biomarkers. Serial quantitative 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging with SUV may be a valid tool to quantify and monitor response to tafamidis treatment in affected patients. TRANSLATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging with determination of SUV retention index as part of a routine annual examination can provide evidence of treatment response in ATTR-CM patients receiving disease-modifying therapy. Further long-term studies with 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging may help to evaluate the relationship between tafamidis-induced reduction in SUV retention index and outcome in patients with ATTR-CM and will demonstrate whether highly disease-specific 99mTc-DPD SPECT/CT imaging is more sensitive than routine diagnostic monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Rettl
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Tim Wollenweber
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Franz Duca
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Christina Binder
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Bernhard Cherouny
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Theresa-Marie Dachs
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Camuz Ligios Luciana
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Lore Schrutka
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Daniel Dalos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Dietrich Beitzke
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Christian Loewe
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Roza Badr Eslam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Johannes Kastner
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria
| | - Marcus Hacker
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Bonderman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna 1090, Austria.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Favoriten Clinic, Kundratstraße 3, 1100 Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rettl R, Duca F, Binder C, Dachs TM, Cherouny B, Camuz Ligios L, Mann C, Schrutka L, Dalos D, Charwat-Resl S, Badr Eslam R, Kastner J, Bonderman D. Impact of tafamidis on myocardial strain in transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy. Amyloid 2023; 30:127-137. [PMID: 36251806 DOI: 10.1080/13506129.2022.2131385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The impact of tafamidis on myocardial strain in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) have been barely investigated. We aimed to determine tafamidis-induced changes using serial speckle tracking echocardiography and to identify imaging parameters for specific therapy monitoring. METHODS AND RESULTS ATTR-CM patients underwent serial TTE with two-dimensional (2 D) speckle tracking imaging. Patients receiving tafamidis free acid 61 mg (n = 62) or tafamidis meglumine 20 mg (n = 21) once daily (QD) showed stable measurements at follow-up (61 mg: 8.5 months, 20 mg: 7.0 months) in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (61 mg: -11.75% vs. -11.58%, p = 0.534; 20 mg: -10.61% vs. -10.12%, p = 0.309), right ventricular (RV) GLS (61 mg: -14.18% vs. -13.72%, p = 0.377; 20 mg: -14.53% vs. -13.99%, p = 0.452) and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (LASr; 61 mg: 8.80% vs. 9.42%, p = 0.283; 20 mg: 8.23% vs. 8.67%, p = 0.589), whereas treatment-naïve ATTR-CM patients (n = 54) had clear signs of disease progression at the end of the observation period (10.5 months; LV-GLS: -11.71% vs. -10.59%, p = 0.001; RV-GLS: -14.36% vs. -12.99%, p = 0.038; LASr: 10.67% vs. 8.41%, p = 0.005). Between-group comparison at follow-up revealed beneficial effects of tafamidis free acid 61 mg on LASr (p = 0.003) and the LV (LV-GLS: p = 0.030, interventricular septum (IVS): p = 0.006), resulting in clinical benefits (six-minute walk distance (6-MWD): p = 0.006, NT-proBNP: p= <0.001), while patients treated with tafamidis meglumine 20 mg QD showed positive effects on LASr (p = 0.039), but no differences with respect to the LV (LV-GLS: p = 0.274, IVS: p = 0.068) and clinical status (6-MWD: p = 0.124, NT-proBNP: p = 0.053) compared to the natural course. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with tafamidis free acid 61 mg in ATTR-CM patients delays the deterioration of LA and LV longitudinal function, resulting in significant clinical benefits compared with natural history. Serial TTE with 2 D speckle tracking imaging may be appropriate for disease-specific therapy monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René Rettl
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Franz Duca
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christina Binder
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Theresa-Marie Dachs
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bernhard Cherouny
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Luciana Camuz Ligios
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christopher Mann
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lore Schrutka
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Daniel Dalos
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Silvia Charwat-Resl
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Favoriten Clinic, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roza Badr Eslam
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johannes Kastner
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Diana Bonderman
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Favoriten Clinic, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rettl R, Duca F, Binder C, Dachs T, Cherouny B, Camuz Ligios L, Mann C, Schrutka L, Dalos D, Charwat-Resl S, Badr Eslam R, Kastner J, Bonderman D. Two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in tafamidis-treated patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy: a glimmer of hope for viable therapy monitoring? Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.1756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Treatment with Tafamidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) has been shown to have beneficial effects on the left ventricle (LV), as assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Although CMR represents the gold standard among imaging modalities, its limited availability in clinical practice makes it unfeasible for routine therapy monitoring.
Purpose
We aimed to determine Tafamidis-induced changes using two-dimensional (2D) speckle-tracking echocardiography and to identify echocardiographic imaging parameters that could be used for specific therapy monitoring.
Methods
We subjected a series of ATTR-CM patients to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at baseline and follow-up and compared patients treated with Tafamidis 61mg once daily (QD) to a historical control cohort treated with Tafamidis 20mg QD, as well as to a historical treatment-naïve control cohort reflecting the natural course of the disease.
Results
Patients receiving Tafamidis 61mg (n=62) or 20mg (n=21) QD showed stable measurements at follow-up [61mg: 8.5 months, 20mg: 7.0 months] in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (61mg: −11.75% vs. −11.58%, p=0.534; 20mg: −10.61% vs. −10.12%, p=0.309), right ventricular (RV) GLS (61mg: −14.18% vs. −13.72%, p=0.377; 20mg: −14.53% vs. −13.99%, p=0.452) and left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (LASr; 61mg: 8.80% vs. 9.42%, p=0.283; 20mg: 8.23% vs. 8.67%, p=0.589), whereas treatment-naïve ATTR-CM patients (n=54) had clear signs of disease progression at the end of the observation period [10.5 months; LV-GLS: −11.71% vs. −10.59%, p=0.001; RV-GLS: −14.36% vs. −12.99%, p=0.038; LASr: 10.67% vs. 8.41%, p=0.005]. Between-group comparison at follow-up revealed beneficial effects of Tafamidis 61mg on LASr (p=0.003), LV-GLS (p=0.030) and interventricular septum (IVS) thickness (p=0.006), resulting in clinical benefits (six-minute walk distance (6-MWD): p=0.006, NT-proBNP: p≤0.001), while patients treated with Tafamidis 20mg QD showed positive effects on LASr (p=0.039) but no differences in LV-GLS (p=0.274), IVS thickness (p=0.068) and clinical status (6-MWD: p=0.124, NT-proBNP: p=0.053) compared to the natural course.
Conclusion
Treatment with Tafamidis 61mg in ATTR-CM patients delays the increase in IVS thickness and the deterioration of LA and LV longitudinal function, resulting in significant clinical benefits compared with natural history. Serial TTE with 2D speckle-tracking imaging may be appropriate for disease-specific therapy monitoring.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by the Pfizer Inc. However, Pfizer Inc. did not have influence on study design, data processing, or statistical analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Rettl
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - F Duca
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - C Binder
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - T Dachs
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - B Cherouny
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | | | - C Mann
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - L Schrutka
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | - D Dalos
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | | | | | - J Kastner
- Medical University of Vienna , Vienna , Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|