The Effect of Third Dose of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines on IgG Antibody Titers

With the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorized the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine with the rationale for prolonged elevation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers and protection against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. To better understand how administration of the third dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine affects the incidence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections, we administered the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) to 189 participants. Blood samples were collected from participants during each of their scheduled visits (baseline, week two, week 12, and week 24) and tested for semi-quantitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers. Our results showed that administration of the third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) vaccine elicited elevated anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies for the 24-week duration of the study. IgG antibody titers were greatest in week two, and progressively decreased by week 12 and week 24, with statistically significant differences between the IgG antibody titers for each collection date.

Mammalian hemicentin 1 is assembled into tracks in the extracellular matrix of multiple tissues

BACKGROUND

Hemicentins (HMCNs) are a family of extracellular matrix proteins first identified in Caenorhabditis elegans, with two orthologs (HMCN1 and 2) in vertebrates. In worms, HMCN is deposited at specific sites where it forms long, fine tracks that link two tissues by connecting adjacent basement membranes (BMs). By generating CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Hmcn1 and Hmcn2 knockout mice, we tested the hypothesis that HMCNs perform similar functions in mammals.

RESULTS

Hmcn1 ^-/- mice were viable and fertile. Using new, knockout mouse-validated HMCN1 antibodies, HMCN1 was detected in wild-type mice as fine tracks along the BM of hair and whisker follicles, in the sclera of the eyes, and in the lumen of some lymphoid conduits. It was also observed in the mesangial matrix of the kidney glomerulus. However, HMCN1 deficiency did not affect the functions of these tissues, including adherence of coat hairs and whiskers, the sieving function of lymphoid conduits, or the immune response to injected antigens. HMCN2 deficiency did not lead to any discernible phenotypes on its own or when combined with HMCN1 deficiency.

CONCLUSION

That Hmcn1 ^-/- , Hmcn2 ^-/- , and Hmcn1/2 double knockout mice did not display any overt phenotypes implicates compensation by other members of the fibulin family.

Space and time in the nucleus: developmental control of replication timing and chromosome architecture

All eukaryotic cells replicate segments of their genomes in a defined temporal sequence. In multicellular organisms, at least half of the genome is subject to changes in this temporal sequence during development. We now know that this temporal sequence and its developmentally regulated changes are conserved across distantly related species, suggesting that it either represents or reflects something biologically important. However, both the mechanism and the significance of this program remain unknown. We recently demonstrated a remarkably strong genome-wide correlation between replication timing and chromatin interaction maps, stronger than any other chromosomal property analyzed to date, indicating that sequences localized close to one another replicate at similar times. This provides molecular confirmation of long-standing cytogenetic evidence for spatial compartmentalization of early- and late-replicating DNA and supports our earlier model that replication timing is reestablished in each G(1) phase, coincident with the anchorage of chromosomal segments at specific locations within the nucleus (timing decision point [TDP]). Here, we review the evidence linking the replication program to the three-dimensional architecture of chromatin in the nucleus and discuss what such a link might mean for the mechanism and significance of a developmentally regulated replication program.