Impact of Local Therapy on Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Transplantation

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who recur after liver transplantation have limited systemic therapy options in part due to ineligibility for immune checkpoint inhibition. Thus, assessing the benefit of local, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) is imperative. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MDT on outcomes in patients with post-transplant HCC recurrence.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients at a single center with recurrent HCC after liver transplant were identified. Recurrence/progression were assessed via RECIST criteria. At initial recurrence, patients with < = 3 metastases (mets) were considered oligorecurrent (oligoM1); those with >3 mets were polyrecurrent. Progression was defined as growth of existing mets or appearance of new mets. Poly-progression-free survival (polyPFS) was the time from oligorecurrence to polyprogression (>3 progressive mets) or death. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with outcomes; those with p<.05 were included in multivariable regression.

RESULTS

From 2005-2022, 43 patients with HCC who underwent liver transplantation experienced recurrence; 27 (63%) had oligoM1 disease at the time of recurrence. The most common sites of recurrence were liver (N = 14), abdominal nodes (N = 14), and lungs (N = 11). Low AFP (<400 ng/mL) and oligoM1 disease were associated with a favorable OS (P<.05) and these associations remained significant in multivariable analysis. Among patients with oligoM1 recurrence, 15/27 received MDT to all sites of disease (MDT-All). MDT consisted of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (N = 6), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (N = 2), TACE (N = 1), microwave ablation (N = 3), cryoablation (N = 2), and surgery (N = 2). Among oligoM1 patients, more patients with MDT-All had liver involvement than those who did not have MDT-All (33% vs 0%, P = .047), but there was no difference in performance status, AFP, or systemic therapy receipt. Among oligoM1 patients, MDT-All was associated with improved polyPFS (median 11.7 vs 4.8 mos; P = .025), and OS (38.4 vs 16.1 mos; P = .021) compared to those who did not receive MDT-All. Two patients who received MDT-All remained alive at >4 years of follow-up from recurrence, while 1 patient remained alive at >14 years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Local therapy in patients with post-transplantation oligorecurrence (<3 mets) of HCC may delay disease progression and improve survival.

Emerging inflammatory bowel disease demographics, phenotype, and treatment in South Asia, South-East Asia, and Middle East: Preliminary findings from the Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Emerging Nations' Consortium

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is emerging in the newly industrialized countries of South Asia, South-East Asia, and the Middle East, yet epidemiological data are scarce.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study of IBD demographics, disease phenotype, and treatment across 38 centers in 15 countries of South Asia, South-East Asia, and Middle East. Intergroup comparisons included gross national income (GNI) per capita.

RESULTS

Among 10 400 patients, ulcerative colitis (UC) was twice as common as Crohn's disease (CD), with a male predominance (UC 6678, CD 3495, IBD unclassified 227, and 58% male). Peak age of onset was in the third decade, with a low proportion of elderly-onset IBD (5% age > 60). Familial IBD was rare (5%). The extent of UC was predominantly distal (proctitis/left sided 67%), with most being treated with mesalamine (94%), steroids (54%), or immunomodulators (31%). Ileocolic CD (43%) was the commonest, with low rates of perianal disease (8%) and only 6% smokers. Diagnostic delay for CD was common (median 12 months; interquartile range 5-30). Treatment of CD included mesalamine, steroids, and immunomodulators (61%, 51%, and 56%, respectively), but a fifth received empirical antitubercular therapy. Treatment with biologics was uncommon (4% UC and 13% CD), which increased in countries with higher GNI per capita. Surgery rates were 0.1 (UC) and 2 (CD) per 100 patients per year.

CONCLUSIONS

The IBD-ENC cohort provides insight into IBD in South-East Asia and the Middle East, but is not yet population based. UC is twice as common as CD, familial disease is uncommon, and rates of surgery are low. Biologic use correlates with per capita GNI.

A rare clinic entity: Huge trichobezoar

INTRODUCTION

Trichobezoar is a rare clinical entity in which a ball of hair amasses within the alimentary tract. It can either be found as isolated mass in the stomach or may extend into the intestine. Trichobezoars mostly occur in young females with psychiatric disorders such as trichophagia and trichotillomania.

CASE REPORT

Authors present a giant trichobezoar in an 18year old female presented with complaints of upper abdominal mass, epigastric area pain, anorexia and weight loss. The patient underwent trans-abdominal ultrasonography (USG), Computed tomography (CT), upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and subsequently laparotomy. USG was inconclusive due to non-specific findings. It revealed a thick echogenic layer with posterior dirty shadowing extending from the left sub-diaphragmatic area to the right sub hepatic region obscuring the adjacent structures. Abdominal CT images revealed a huge, well defined, multi-layered, heterogeneous, solid appearing, non-enhancing mass lesion in the gastric lumen extending from the gastric fundus to the pyloric canal. An endoscopic attempt was performed for removal of this intraluminal mass, but due to its large size, and hard nature, the endoscopic removal was unsuccessful. Finally the large trichobezoar was removed with open laparotomy.

CONCLUSION

Trichobezoars should be suspected in young females with long standing upper abdominal masses; as the possibility of malignancy is not very common in this age group. While USG is inconclusive, trichobezoar can be accurately diagnosed with CT. In patient with huge trichobezoar, laparotomy can be performed firstly because of big size and location of mass, and psychiatric recommendation should be made to prevent relapse of this entity.

Natural history of acute upper GI bleeding due to tumours: short-term success and long-term recurrence with or without endoscopic therapy

BACKGROUND

Scant information is available regarding patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) from tumours.

AIM

To determine the presentation, endoscopic findings, treatment and outcomes in patients with UGIB from malignant tumours and identify risk factors associated with rebleeding.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who were hospitalised with haematemesis, melena or haematochezia and underwent upper endoscopy were identified retrospectively by reviewing an endoscopy database. Patients with UGIB due to biopsy-proven malignant tumours were studied.

RESULTS

Tumours were the source of bleeding in 106 (5%) of 2,166 patients with UGIB. Tumours were oesophageal in 17 (16%), gastric in 77 (73%) and duodenal in 12 (11%). At presentation, 84 (79%) did not have known cancer previously, and 79 (75%) had metastatic disease. Seventy-seven (73%) received transfusions at index hospitalisation. At endoscopy, 32 (30%) had active bleeding (31 oozing, 1 spurting). Among actively bleeding patients, haemostasis was achieved in 12 (86%) of 14 receiving endoscopic therapy and all 18 not receiving endoscopic treatment. Hospitalisation for rebleeding occurred in 50 (49%) of 103 at a median of 30 days (3-885). On multivariate analysis, age ≤60 years (OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.06-5.81) and haemodynamic instability (OR = 2.42, 95% CI 1.08-5.46) were associated with rebleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with tumour-associated UGIB have substantial blood loss, with three-quarters requiring transfusion at presentation. Initial haemostasis occurs in almost all patients, with or without endoscopic therapy, but rebleeding requiring repeat hospitalisation occurs in approximately half the patients and is more common in patients who are ≤60 years of age and have haemodynamic instability at presentation.