1
|
Drysdale K, Cama E, Botfield J, Bear B, Cerio R, Newman CE. Targeting cancer prevention and screening interventions to LGBTQ communities: A scoping review. Health Soc Care Community 2021; 29:1233-1248. [PMID: 33316150 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Revised: 10/13/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Although some people within LGBTQ communities are at risk of developing some cancers at higher rates than non-LGBTQ people, there is limited evidence of the outcomes of targeted cancer prevention and screening interventions for these communities. This scoping review examined key findings regarding the feasibility, acceptability and efficacy of evaluated intervention studies conducted in high income settings and published in peer reviewed literature (2014-2020) by combining evidence of both cancer risk-reducing behavioural interventions and screening and preventative practice interventions. While there is limited evidence of stronger outcomes from targeted interventions with cohorts of gender and sexuality diverse communities, compared with the use of mainstream or untailored interventions, there is stronger evidence that targeted interventions are more acceptable to these communities and may be more feasible in some contexts. Thus, there is benefit in understanding what targeting entails in these interventions, and to understand what influences acceptability, to inform the design and delivery of such interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerryn Drysdale
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Elena Cama
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jessica Botfield
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Christy E Newman
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
MacGibbon J, Lea T, Ellard J, Murphy D, Kolstee J, Power C, Crawford D, Bear B, De Wit J, Holt M. Access to Subsidized Health Care Affects HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Uptake Among Gay and Bisexual Men in Australia: Results of National Surveys 2013-2019. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2021; 86:430-435. [PMID: 33230031 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0000000000002572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed willingness to use HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and current PrEP use among gay and bisexual men (GBM) in Australia. METHODS National, online cross-sectional surveys of GBM were conducted in 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019. Willingness to use PrEP was measured on a previously validated scale. Trends and associations with key measures were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS During 2013-2019, 4908 surveys were completed. Among HIV-negative and untested men not currently using PrEP, willingness to use PrEP increased from 23.0% in 2013 to 36.5% in 2017 (P < 0.001) but then plateaued at 32% in 2019 (P = 0.13). The proportion of current PrEP users increased significantly from 2.5% in 2015 to 38.5% in 2019 (P < 0.001). In 2019, factors independently associated with being a current PrEP user (compared with non-PrEP users who were willing to use PrEP) included having subsidized health care (Medicare), knowing HIV-positive people, being recently diagnosed with an STI other than HIV, having higher numbers of recent male sexual partners, recent condomless sex with casual and regular partners, and frequent PrEP sorting. CONCLUSION Willingness to use PrEP has plateaued as its use has rapidly increased among GBM in Australia. PrEP use is concentrated among more sexually active men with access to subsidized health care. Free or low cost access schemes may facilitate broader access among GBM who want or need PrEP but lack access to subsidized health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James MacGibbon
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Toby Lea
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeanne Ellard
- Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dean Murphy
- Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Cherie Power
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - John De Wit
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Holt M, MacGibbon J, Bear B, Lea T, Kolstee J, Crawford D, Murphy D, Power C, Ellard J, de Wit J. Trends in Belief That HIV Treatment Prevents Transmission Among Gay and Bisexual Men in Australia: Results of National Online Surveys 2013-2019. AIDS Educ Prev 2021; 33:62-72. [PMID: 33617321 DOI: 10.1521/aeap.2021.33.1.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
We have tracked belief in the effectiveness of HIV treatment as prevention (TasP) among Australian gay and bisexual men (GBM) since 2013. National, online cross-sectional surveys of GBM were conducted every 2 years during 2013-2019. Trends and associations were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Data from 4,903 survey responses were included. Belief that HIV treatment prevents transmission increased from 2.6% in 2013 to 34.6% in 2019. Belief in the effectiveness of TasP was consistently higher among HIV-positive participants than other participants. In 2019, higher levels of belief in TasP were independently associated with university education, being HIV-positive, using pre-exposure prophylaxis, knowing more HIV-positive people, being recently diagnosed with a sexually transmitted infection (STI) and use of post-exposure prophylaxis. Belief that HIV treatment prevents transmission has increased substantially among Australian GBM, but remains concentrated among HIV-positive GBM, those who know HIV-positive people, and GBM who use antiretroviral-based prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - James MacGibbon
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Toby Lea
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | | | - Dean Murphy
- The Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Cherie Power
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeanne Ellard
- Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, Australia
| | - John de Wit
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holt M, Lea T, Bear B, Halliday D, Ellard J, Murphy D, Kolstee J, de Wit J. Trends in Attitudes to and the Use of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis by Australian Gay and Bisexual Men, 2011-2017: Implications for Further Implementation from a Diffusion of Innovations Perspective. AIDS Behav 2019; 23:1939-1950. [PMID: 30539496 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-018-2368-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Using repeated, national, online, cross-sectional surveys of Australian gay and bisexual men (GBM), we analysed trends related to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Specifically, we analysed trends in PrEP use, willingness to use PrEP, and concern about using PrEP during 2011-2017. We assessed support for GBM using PrEP and willingness to have sex with men taking PrEP between 2015 and 2017. For time-based analyses, we used multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sampling variations over time. We constructed new scales assessing reduced concern about HIV among PrEP users and non-users in 2017, and used multivariate logistic regression to identify independent correlates of PrEP use (vs. non-use). The analyses included 4567 HIV-negative and untested participants (2011-2017). PrEP use increased from 0.5% in 2011 to 25.5% in 2017 (p < 0.001). Willingness to use PrEP increased from 27.9% in 2011 to 36.5% in 2017 (p < 0.001) while concern about using PrEP fell (52.1-36.1%, p < 0.001). Support for GBM using PrEP remained stable (52.5% in 2015, 51.9% in 2017, p = 0.62), and willingness to have sex with men taking PrEP increased from 34.9% in 2015 to 49.0% in 2017 (p < 0.001). In 2017, 22.8% of non-PrEP-users had reduced HIV concern because of PrEP, while 73.6% of PrEP users had reduced HIV concern and greater sexual pleasure because of PrEP. The analysis of PrEP users vs. non-users in 2017 indicated that PrEP users were more sexually active and reported higher risk sexual practices, were more likely to live in New South Wales and Victoria, and to be in full-time employment. They were also more likely to know HIV-positive people and other PrEP users. Diffusion of Innovations theory suggests that future PrEP users in Australia may be less adventurous and require greater reassurance about PrEP's efficacy and legitimacy, to sustain rollout and address current disparities in uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 2, John Goodsell Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Toby Lea
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- German Institute for Addiction and Prevention Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Dale Halliday
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeanne Ellard
- Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dean Murphy
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - John de Wit
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Holt M, Lea T, Bear B, Halliday D, Ellard J, Murphy D, Kolstee J, de Wit J. Trends in Attitudes to and the Use of HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis by Australian Gay and Bisexual Men, 2011-2017: Implications for Further Implementation from a Diffusion of Innovations Perspective. AIDS Behav 2019; 23:1939-1950. [PMID: 30539496 DOI: 10.1007/210461-018-2368-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Using repeated, national, online, cross-sectional surveys of Australian gay and bisexual men (GBM), we analysed trends related to HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Specifically, we analysed trends in PrEP use, willingness to use PrEP, and concern about using PrEP during 2011-2017. We assessed support for GBM using PrEP and willingness to have sex with men taking PrEP between 2015 and 2017. For time-based analyses, we used multivariate logistic regression, controlling for sampling variations over time. We constructed new scales assessing reduced concern about HIV among PrEP users and non-users in 2017, and used multivariate logistic regression to identify independent correlates of PrEP use (vs. non-use). The analyses included 4567 HIV-negative and untested participants (2011-2017). PrEP use increased from 0.5% in 2011 to 25.5% in 2017 (p < 0.001). Willingness to use PrEP increased from 27.9% in 2011 to 36.5% in 2017 (p < 0.001) while concern about using PrEP fell (52.1-36.1%, p < 0.001). Support for GBM using PrEP remained stable (52.5% in 2015, 51.9% in 2017, p = 0.62), and willingness to have sex with men taking PrEP increased from 34.9% in 2015 to 49.0% in 2017 (p < 0.001). In 2017, 22.8% of non-PrEP-users had reduced HIV concern because of PrEP, while 73.6% of PrEP users had reduced HIV concern and greater sexual pleasure because of PrEP. The analysis of PrEP users vs. non-users in 2017 indicated that PrEP users were more sexually active and reported higher risk sexual practices, were more likely to live in New South Wales and Victoria, and to be in full-time employment. They were also more likely to know HIV-positive people and other PrEP users. Diffusion of Innovations theory suggests that future PrEP users in Australia may be less adventurous and require greater reassurance about PrEP's efficacy and legitimacy, to sustain rollout and address current disparities in uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Holt
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Level 2, John Goodsell Building, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| | - Toby Lea
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- German Institute for Addiction and Prevention Research, Catholic University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Dale Halliday
- New South Wales Ministry of Health, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jeanne Ellard
- Australian Federation of AIDS Organisations, Sydney, Australia
| | - Dean Murphy
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Gender and Cultural Studies, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - John de Wit
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Forty-four pathologically proved mammary carcinomas were studied by clinical examination, xeroradiography, and ultrasonography with a dedicated whole-breast scanner. Abnormalities reflecting carcinoma were shown by echography in 90% of cases and xeromammography in 97%. Ultrasonic manifestations of malignancy were separated into four categories: (a) a solid, hypoechoic mass; (b) a hyperechoic focus; (c) an irregular, echogenic zone of parenchymal disruption; and (d) an atypical cystic mass. Dedicated ultrasound instruments enhance interpretation and improve differential diagnostic capability. Sonography demonstrates abnormalities better and permits superior definition of abnormal characteristics in a dysplastic breast than in a fatty, atrophic breast, while xeromammography may be more reliable in postmenopausal women with fatty breasts than in women with mammographically dense breasts. One limitation of current ultrasound equipment is the inability to consistently demonstrate microcalcification.
Collapse
|