Wash-off potential of pyrethroids after use of total release fogger products

Pyrethroids are frequently detected in urban wastewater. Even though treatment facilities remove most pyrethroids (> 90 %) in wastewater, residual concentrations can exceed thresholds that are acutely toxic to sensitive aquatic species. Total release foggers (also known as "bug bombs") are widely used by the general public for insect control. It was hypothesized that these products serve as a source of pyrethroids entering the urban wastewater through the deposition of the active ingredients on various surfaces and subsequent transfer from the contaminated surfaces to the waste stream through cleaning activities. Based on experiments conducted in an enclosure, we found that substantial amounts of a pyrethroid (i.e., cypermethrin) were deposited on various surfaces after a total release fogger use. A series of experiments simulating scenarios that would be representative of common residential cleaning activities indicated that the pyrethroid could be transferred from the contaminated surfaces to other adsorptive materials via physical contact (with or without water as a solvent). The pyrethroid was readily extracted from the adsorptive materials (cotton fabric and filter paper) when water was used as a solvent. Adding a small amount of detergent to the water significantly increased the extraction efficiency compared to water alone. These results indicate that insecticides used in total release foggers can contribute to insecticide loading into the wastewater treatment system via several possible routes, such as contact with or cleaning of exposed surfaces and washing contaminated clothing after their use within a structure.

Effect of Pelacarsen on Lipoprotein(a) Cholesterol and Corrected Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

BACKGROUND

Laboratory methods that report low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) include both LDL-C and lipoprotein(a) cholesterol [Lp(a)-C] content.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of pelacarsen on directly measured Lp(a)-C and LDL-C corrected for its Lp(a)-C content.

METHODS

The authors evaluated subjects with a history of cardiovascular disease and elevated Lp(a) randomized to 5 groups of cumulative monthly doses of 20-80 mg pelacarsen vs placebo. Direct Lp(a)-C was measured on isolated Lp(a) using LPA4-magnetic beads directed to apolipoprotein(a). LDL-C was reported as: 1) LDL-C as reported by the clinical laboratory; 2) LDL-C_corr = laboratory-reported LDL-C - direct Lp(a)-C; and 3) LDL-C_corrDahlén = laboratory LDL-C - [Lp(a) mass × 0.30] estimated by the Dahlén formula.

RESULTS

The baseline median Lp(a)-C values in the groups ranged from 11.9 to 15.6 mg/dL. Compared with placebo, pelacarsen resulted in dose-dependent decreases in Lp(a)-C (2% vs -29% to -67%; P = 0.001-<0.0001). Baseline laboratory-reported mean LDL-C ranged from 68.5 to 89.5 mg/dL, whereas LDL-C_corr ranged from 55 to 74 mg/dL. Pelacarsen resulted in mean percent/absolute changes of -2% to -19%/-0.7 to -8.0 mg/dL (P = 0.95-0.05) in LDL-C_corr, -7% to -26%/-5.4 to -9.4 mg/dL (P = 0.44-<0.0001) in laboratory-reported LDL-C, and 3.1% to 28.3%/0.1 to 9.5 mg/dL (P = 0.006-0.50) increases in LDL-C_corrDahlén. Total apoB declined by 3%-16% (P = 0.40-<0.0001), but non-Lp(a) apoB was not significantly changed.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelacarsen significantly lowers direct Lp(a)-C and has neutral to mild lowering of LDL-C_corr. In patients with elevated Lp(a), LDL-C_corr provides a more accurate reflection of changes in LDL-C than either laboratory-reported LDL-C or the Dahlén formula.

Ongoing controversies and recent insights of the ARMS2-HTRA1 locus in age-related macular degeneration

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of central vision loss among elderly populations in industrialized countries. Genome-wide association studies have consistently associated two genomic loci with progression to late-stage AMD: the complement factor H (CFH) locus on chromosome 1q31 and the age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2-HtrA serine peptidase 1 (ARMS2-HTRA1) locus on chromosome 10q26. While the CFH risk variant has been shown to alter complement activity, the ARMS2-HTRA1 risk haplotype remains enigmatic due to high linkage disequilibrium and inconsistent functional findings spanning two genes that are plausibly causative for AMD risk. In this review, we detail the genetic and functional evidence used to support either ARMS2 or HTRA1 as the causal gene for AMD risk, emphasizing both the historical development and the current understanding of the ARMS2-HTRA1 locus in AMD pathogenesis. We conclude by summarizing the evidence in favor of HTRA1 and present our hypothesis whereby HTRA1-derived ECM fragments mediate AMD pathogenesis.

The interplay of oxidative stress and ARMS2-HTRA1 genetic risk in neovascular AMD

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the leading cause of vision loss in adults over 60 years old globally. There are two forms of advanced AMD: “dry” and “wet”. Dry AMD is characterized by geographic atrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium and overlying photoreceptors in the macular region; whereas wet AMD is characterized by vascular penetrance from the choroid into the retina, known as choroidal neovascularization (CNV). Both phenotypes eventually lead to loss of central vision. The pathogenesis of AMD involves the interplay of genetic polymorphisms and environmental risk factors, many of which elevate retinal oxidative stress. Excess reactive oxygen species react with cellular macromolecules, forming oxidation-modified byproducts that elicit chronic inflammation and promote CNV. Additionally, genome-wide association studies have identified several genetic variants in the age-related maculopathy susceptibility 2/high-temperature requirement A serine peptidase 1 (ARMS2-HTRA1) locus associated with the progression of late-stage AMD, especially the wet subtype. In this review, we will focus on the interplay of oxidative stress and HTRA1 in drusen deposition, chronic inflammation, and chronic angiogenesis. We aim to present a multifactorial model of wet AMD progression, supporting HTRA1 as a novel therapeutic target upstream of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), the conventional target in AMD therapeutics. By inhibiting HTRA1’s proteolytic activity, we can reduce pro-angiogenic signaling and prevent proteolytic breakdown of the blood-retina barrier. The anti-HTRA1 approach offers a promising alternative treatment option to wet AMD, complementary to anti-VEGF therapy.

Increased incidence of indinavir nephrolithiasis in patients with hepatitis B or C virus infection

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A HIV-1 patient database was scanned in March 1998, and 750 patients were identified who had received HAART including indinavir. Of these, 28 cases had nephrolithiasis; and 85 asymptomatic indinavir-treated patients were randomly selected as controls. The characteristics of cases and controls were compared by analysis of variance for quantitative parameters and by Fisher's exact test for classes.

RESULTS

We observed a significant increase in the incidence of nephrolithiasis in patients co-infected with HIV-1 and either hepatitis C virus (HCV) (HCV RNA-positive) or hepatitis B virus (HBV) (HBs antigen-positive) (odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals: 2.8 and 1.1-7.7), whereas no significant differences were demonstrated between cases and controls with regard to age (42.4 +/- 8.0 versus 39.8 +/- 9.8 years), sex (male patients 70.4 versus 74.1%), duration of HIV-1 infection (8.6 +/- 3.1 versus 7.7 +/- 4.0 years), duration of indinavir treatment (16.1 +/- 5.8 versus 14.1 +/- 5.4 months), AST increase > or = 1.25 of normal (29.6 versus 25.9%), or ALT increase > or = 1.25 of normal (33.3 versus 22.4%). In co-infected patients, ALT increase (> or = 1.25 of normal), but not AST increase, at the time of indinavir initiation was statistically related to the occurrence of nephrolithiasis.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant increase of nephrolithiasis incidence in patients co-infected with HIV-1 and HCV or HBV, which suggests that underlying multifactorial hepatic damage may limit liver catabolism of indinavir, and consequently increase its renal excretion and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Caution is therefore advised when initiating indinavir treatment in HIV patients with evidence of HBV or HCV infection.