Abstract P1-14-02: A phase 2 study of low dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

Background: Eribulin mesylate is a non-taxane microtubule dynamics inhibitor approved by FDA in treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on improvements in overall survival in the pivotal EMBRACE trial. Eribulin is approved at 1.4mg/m2 administered D1,8 of q21d cycle. However, this dose and schedule may have significant myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy requiring dose reductions and treatment delays for some patients. We hypothesized that a low dose metronomic schedule will allow responding patients to remain on treatment, resulting in longer TTP (time to progression) and decreased incidence of toxicities and treatment-related discontinuations.

Methods: A multi-site prospective open-label phase II trial of metronomic dosing of eribulin in patients with MBC has completed accrual of 60 patients, outcomes will be updated at presentation. Patients whose disease had progressed following 1-6 prior regimens with prior exposure to a taxane, ECOG performance status of 0 – 2, measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, with normal marrow and organ function were eligible. Eribulin was administered at 0.9mg/m2 weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks. For patients with HER2 positive disease, concurrent trastuzumab administration was allowed. Concurrent denosumab or bisphosphonates were allowed for patients with bone disease.

Results: 60 patients were enrolled, average age 58 (range 34-83). Majority were postmenopausal Caucasian females, but the study included African American, Hispanic, native American, male patients. The majority of tumors were ER+, infiltrating ductal, but the study included 13 HER2+, and 12 TN tumors, with 5 ILC, and 5 mixed ILC/IDC. Nearly half of the enrolled patients had clinical benefit from the regimen, remaining on therapy for 6 months or longer, with stable disease or response; 50% had progression PD at 3 months 32% had stable disease and 18% had a partial or complete response (1, long term). Overall Survival, OS, for the entire group of heavily pre-treated patients was 1.2 years, with TN and HER2 positive patients faring better than ER+ in this small study. One HER2+ patient remains in long-term remission, off chemotherapy.

The regimen was extremely well tolerated. The majority of the patients experienced grade 0 or 1 toxicity for alopecia (48/60) and peripheral neuropathy (7 with grade 2 neuropathy, 5 pre-existing, 2 with grade 3 neuropathy). There were few dose reductions (n=15), thrombocytopenia (11 grade 1 only), or use of G-CSF (14).

Conclusions: Metronomic weekly low dose eribulin appears to be an active and tolerable regimen with less myelosuppression, alopecia and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with approved dose, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen. Outcomes will be updated at presentation.

Citation Format: Chalasani P, Liu AJ, Khanjian JA, Peha M, Buening BJ, Gadi VK, Specht JM, Salazar L, Linden HM. A phase 2 study of low dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-02.

Abstract P4-22-11: Combined targeted therapies for advanced triple negative breast cancer: A phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib

Background: Chemotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy for patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that the addition of biologic agents targeting key pathways (bevacizumab targeting angiogenesis and erlotinib directed against EGFR) may prolong progression free survival (PFS) and offer a novel treatment strategy free from chemotherapy for patients with metastatic TNBC.

Methods: Patients with TNBC receiving initial therapy for metastatic disease were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial (NCT00733408) conducted at an academic center and affiliated, community practice sites. Induction therapy included nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 IV Qweek (wk) and Bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2wks x 24 weeks. Patients free of progression at 24 wks began maintenance therapy with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2wks and erlotinib 150 mg po daily until progression with radiographic assessment every 8 wks. Primary objective was PFS with secondary objectives of response rate, overall survival (OS) and safety. All eligible patients were included in the analysis of PFS and OS. Response was evaluated among patients with measurable disease by RECIST 1.1 with central review. Patients with inadequate disease assessments were coded as non-responders. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS and OS with patients censored at date of last tumor assessment (PFS) or date of last follow up (OS).

Results: From April 2009 – December 2015, 58 patients (median age 54, range 33-83) were enrolled; 56 (97%) had measurable disease, and all had metastatic TNBC by local assessment. 33 (57%) patients completed induction; 22 (38%) came off study during induction; 3 (5%) continue on maintenance therapy. 4 patients discontinued therapy prior to first assessment. As of June 8, 2016, 53 patients (91%) have progressed. Median follow up for surviving patients is 14.5 months (range 4.1-65.4). Median PFS is 7.7 months (95% CI 5.7, 9.5). Of 56 patients with measurable disease, 38 (66%) had partial response (PR); 10 (17%) with stable disease for clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 86%. Median OS is 18.2 months (95% CI 16.3, 24.5). Most common grade 3-4 toxicities during induction were neutropenia [17 (29%), 1 grade 4], fatigue [13 (22%), all grade 3], leukopenia [7 (12%), all grade 3], and neuropathy [7 (12%), all grade 3]. Rash was most common ≥ grade 3 toxicity during maintenance [4 (7%), grade 3]. One patient experienced clinical CHF during maintenance month 16 requiring bevacizumab discontinuation. Conclusions: Nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib was well tolerated. While the observed PFS did not meet pre-specified criteria of interest, the majority of patients experienced clinical benefit (86%) with 30 (57%) receiving maintenance targeted therapy. Correlative studies are ongoing. Supported by Genentech (OSI4266s), Celegene (AX-CL-BRST-PI-003828) and Janssen.

Citation Format: Specht JM, Gadi VK, Gralow JR, Korde LA, Linden HM, Salazar LG, Rodler ET, Cundy A, Buening BJ, Baker KK, Redman MW, Kurland BF, Garrison MA, Smith JC, vanHaelst C, Anderson JE. Combined targeted therapies for advanced triple negative breast cancer: A phase II trial of nab-paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by maintenance targeted therapy with bevacizumab and erlotinib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-22-11.

Physiologic and Perceptual Responses to Cold-Shower Cooling After Exercise-Induced Hyperthermia

CONTEXT

Exercise conducted in hot, humid environments increases the risk for exertional heat stroke (EHS). The current recommended treatment of EHS is cold-water immersion; however, limitations may require the use of alternative resources such as a cold shower (CS) or dousing with a hose to cool EHS patients.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cooling effectiveness of a CS after exercise-induced hyperthermia.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover controlled study.

SETTING

Environmental chamber (temperature = 33.4°C ± 2.1°C; relative humidity = 27.1% ± 1.4%).

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Seventeen participants (10 male, 7 female; height = 1.75 ± 0.07 m, body mass = 70.4 ± 8.7 kg, body surface area = 1.85 ± 0.13 m(2), age range = 19-35 years) volunteered.

INTERVENTION(S)

On 2 occasions, participants completed matched-intensity volitional exercise on an ergometer or treadmill to elevate rectal temperature to ≥39°C or until participant fatigue prevented continuation (reaching at least 38.5°C). They were then either treated with a CS (20.8°C ± 0.80°C) or seated in the chamber (control [CON] condition) for 15 minutes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Rectal temperature, calculated cooling rate, heart rate, and perceptual measures (thermal sensation and perceived muscle pain).

RESULTS

The rectal temperature (P = .98), heart rate (P = .85), thermal sensation (P = .69), and muscle pain (P = .31) were not different during exercise for the CS and CON trials (P > .05). Overall, the cooling rate was faster during CS (0.07°C/min ± 0.03°C/min) than during CON (0.04°C/min ± 0.03°C/min; t16 = 2.77, P = .01). Heart-rate changes were greater during CS (45 ± 20 beats per minute) compared with CON (27 ± 10 beats per minute; t16 = 3.32, P = .004). Thermal sensation was reduced to a greater extent with CS than with CON (F3,45 = 41.12, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the CS facilitated cooling rates faster than no treatment, clinicians should continue to advocate for accepted cooling modalities and use CS only if no other validated means of cooling are available.