Committee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care Position Statement: Neurosurgical Capability for the Optimal Management of Traumatic Brain injury During Deployed Operations. Including Invited Commentaries.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2023;
Publish Ahead of Print:01586154-990000000-00391. [PMID:
37257063 PMCID:
PMC10389628 DOI:
10.1097/ta.0000000000004058]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Experiences over the last 3 decades of war have demonstrated a high incidence of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) resulting in a persistent need for a neurosurgical capability within the deployed theatre of operations. Despite this, no doctrinal requirement for a deployed neurosurgical capability exists. Through an iterative process, the Joint Trauma System Committee on Surgical Combat Casualty Care (CoSCCC) developed a Position Statement to inform medical and non-medical military leaders about the risks of the lack of a specialized neurosurgical capability.
METHODS
The need for deployed neurosurgical capability Position Statement was identified during the spring 2021 CoSCCC meeting. A tri-service working group of experienced forward-deployed caregivers developed a preliminary statement. An extensive iterative review process was then conducted to ensure that the intended messaging was clear to senior medical leaders and operational commanders. To provide additional context and a civilian perspective, statement commentaries were solicited from civilian clinical experts including a recently retired military trauma surgeon boarded in Neurocritical Care, a trauma surgeon instrumental in developing the Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG), a practicing neurosurgeon with world-renowned expertise in TBI, and the Chair of the Committee on Trauma (COT).
RESULTS
After multiple revisions, Position Statement was finalized it was approved by the CoSCCC membership in February 2023. Challenges identified include: 1) military neurosurgeon attrition; 2) the lack of a doctrinal neurosurgical capabilities requirement during deployed combat operations; 3) the need for neurosurgical telemedicine capability and in-theatre CT scans to triage TBI casualties requiring neurosurgical care.
CONCLUSION
Challenges identified regarding neurosurgical capabilities within the deployed trauma system include military neurosurgeon attrition and the lack of a doctrinal requirement for neurosurgical capability during deployed combat operations. To mitigate risk to the force in a future peer-peer conflict several evidence-based recommendations are made. The solicited civilian commentaries strengthen these recommendations by putting them into the context of civilian TBI management. These neurosurgical capabilities position statement is intended to be a forcing function and a communication tool to inform operational commanders and military medical leaders on the use of these teams on current and future battlefields.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Brief Report, 3.
Collapse