1
|
Arrhythmia detection using insertable cardiac monitors after a negative electrophysiology study in Brugada syndrome: observations from a multicenter Spanish registry. Eur Heart J 2022. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac544.669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background/Introduction
Risk stratification in Brugada syndrome (BrS) remains controversial. In this respect, the role of electrophysiology study (EPS) has been subject of debate. It is common practice in some centers to implant an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) after a negative EPS, especially in the presence of unexplained symptoms. However, the diagnostic value of this approach has never been specifically addressed.
Purpose
We aimed to describe the baseline characteristics and the main findings of a diagnostic work-up strategy using an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) after a negative EPS in patients with BrS.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated data from a multicenter registry including 56 BrS patients from 7 referral hospitals who received an ICM to help risk stratification. Only patients with a negative EPS (ie, non-inducible VT/VF) prior to ICM implantation were considered for this analysis. EPS protocols differed across hospitals (see Figure 1)
Results
A total of 26 patients from 5 different hospitals were studied. Mean age was 33.0±12.8 and 77% were male. Spontaneous type 1 pattern was present in 12 patients (46%). Positive genotype was found in 10 (38%) and family history of sudden cardiac death was present in 11 (42%). Previous symptoms were syncope/presyncope in 15 patients (58%) and palpitations in 3 patients (12%). The rest of the patients (30%) were asymptomatic. After a median follow-up of 33.4 months (IQR 16.5 and 43.1 months), none of the patients presented ventricular arrhythmias. ICM allowed the detection of other arrhythmias in 5 patients (19%), which led to specific therapeutic actions in all but 2 of them (see Table 1). ICM-detected arrhythmias correlated with previously reported symptoms only in one of the patients.
Conclusion
The results of this exploratory analysis support the notion that EPS in BrS has a high negative predictive value for risk stratification. ICM implantation after a negative EPS may allow the detection of incidental arrhythmias during follow-up. Despite the apparent low correlation of these findings with previously reported symptoms, this strategy may lead to important treatment decisions in a significant proportion of patients.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sex differences in implantable cardiac defibrillator decision: myth or fact? Eur Heart J 2021. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.0644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction
Previous studies have found sex differences in implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implantation counseling, especially in primary prevention. Possible explanations to this phenomenon have been described: under-representation of women in clinical trials, patient's preferences, lower overall sudden cardiac death risk in women compared to men, higher prevalence of non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in women and better response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in this population. Nevertheless, this gap appears to narrow in most recent registries.
Purpose
Our aim is to asses if there is still sex discrimination in ICD counseling by comparing ICD implantation between men and women.
Methods
A single-centre retrospective registry of 160 patients with a reduced left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%) found in a routine transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) from January 2019 to June 2020. Inclusion and exclusion flow chart is described in Picture 1. Data collected included demographic, clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. Date of heart disease diagnosis, earliest date of LVEF ≤35% diagnosis (with TTE or cardiac magnetic resonance) and date of death when applicable were recorded. Cardiac resynchronization devices with ICD function were also considered for the analysis. In ICD carriers, implantation date and type of prevention for indication were collected. ICD implants and deaths up to December 31, 2020 were included for the analysis.
Results
Basal characteristics are described in Picture 2. The mean age was 67.5 years and 24.4% of the population were women. Ischemic etiology was the most frequent etiology in the overall population and in the male group. In women, DCM was the most common etiology.
Sixty-eight patients carried an ICD. No significant differences between both sexes, neither globally nor according to the implant indication (primary vs. secondary prevention) were observed.
In the subgroup analysis of patients with ICD, there were no significant differences in the number of devices between men and women, neither in ischemic or non-ischemic etiology. In primary prevention, there was a non-significant trend towards earlier implantation of the device in women (1.4 years vs 3.4 years, p=0.008) since the diagnosis of LVEF ≤35%.
In patients without ICD (n=92), the mean age was significantly higher (72.5 years vs. 60.8 years, p<0.0001) and similar in both sexes (women 74.6 years, men 71.8 years, p=0.414).
Conclusions
Despite under representation of women in pur population, we could not find differences in ICD implantation decision based on gender, even considering differences in underlying cardiomyopathy. There was no delay in implantation depending on sex, and even the trend was towards earlier implantation in women.
Funding Acknowledgement
Type of funding sources: None. Inclusion and exclusion flow chartBasal characteristics
Collapse
|