Impact of cancer chemotherapy before ovarian cortex cryopreservation on ovarian tissue transplantation

STUDY QUESTION

How efficacious is transplantation of ovarian cortex previously exposed to chemotherapy?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Prior exposure to chemotherapy did not disrupt the function of cryopreserved ovarian tissue after transplantation.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) followed by ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) is an efficacious technique for restoration of female fertility. At least 130 children have been born following this procedure. To date, little is known about the efficacy of OTT in patients exposed to cancer chemotherapy prior to OTC.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study evaluates the recovery of ovarian function and fertility in 31 consecutive patients who had received OTT, between 2005 and 2015.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Thirty one patients, wanting children, were transplanted with autologous ovarian cortex, among which 22 patients (71%) had been exposed to chemotherapy before OTC. Recovery of ovarian function was considered total once menstruation occurred. Ovarian function recovery (OFR), ovarian graft survival, and incidence of pregnancy were related to previous chemotherapy exposure, type of chemotherapy and graft characteristics (number of grafted fragments and follicular density).

MAIN RESULTS AND ROLE OF CHANCE

The amount of ovarian tissue collected was the only parameter to show any significant change between patients with versus without previous chemotherapy. At 1 year after OTT, the cumulative incidence of OFR was 83% (93% in patients exposed to chemotherapy and 67% in others (P = 0.14)). A low follicular density (<0.3 foll/mm2) in the transplant and a low number of grafted fragments (<16) were significantly associated with a delayed OFR. Graft survival at 2 years after OTT was 77%. It was significantly lower in patients exposed to bifunctional alkylating agents before ovarian cryopreservation and in patients with a low follicular density. The proportion of women who succeeded in having at least one live birth was 23% in the total population, 0% (0/9) in the group 'no previous chemotherapy', and 32% (7/22) in the group 'previous chemotherapy'. The cumulative incidence of pregnancy (Kaplan-Meier) at 3 years after OTT was 36% overall and 49% in case of previous chemotherapy, with no difference related to previous chemotherapy exposure. In total there were 13 pregnancies and 8 births in 7 patients.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The pathology in the two groups of patients was not comparable. In the group of patients who had chemotherapy before OTC, there were 95% of hematological malignancies. In the group of patients who did not have chemotherapy before OTC only 1 out of 9 patients had a malignant hematological disease while 44% had some pathology affecting the ovaries. Few women are available for study and only large changes are likely to have statistical significance.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These results suggest that prior cancer chemotherapy should no longer be considered a limitation to cryopreservation of ovarian tissue and current recommendations in this regard should be revised.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the Agence de la Biomédecine (France's biomedical office). There are no competing interests to report.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02184806.

Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular characteristics of 14 T-ALL patients carrying the TCRβ-HOXA rearrangement: a study of the Groupe Francophone de Cytogénétique Hématologique

Recently, we and others described a new chromosomal rearrangement, that is, inv(7)(p15q34) and t(7;7)(p15;q34) involving the T-cell receptor beta (TCRbeta) (7q34) and the HOXA gene locus (7p15) in 5% of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients leading to transcriptional activation of especially HOXA10. To further address the clinical, immunophenotypical and molecular genetic findings of this chromosomal aberration, we studied 330 additional T-ALLs. This revealed TCRbeta-HOXA rearrangements in five additional patients, which brings the total to 14 cases in 424 patients (3.3%). Real-time quantitative PCR analysis for HOXA10 gene expression was performed in 170 T-ALL patients and detected HOXA10 overexpression in 25.2% of cases including all the cases with a TCRbeta-HOXA rearrangement (8.2%). In contrast, expression of the short HOXA10 transcript, HOXA10b, was almost exclusively found in the TCRbeta-HOXA rearranged cases, suggesting a specific role for the HOXA10b short transcript in TCRbeta-HOXA-mediated oncogenesis. Other molecular and/or cytogenetic aberrations frequently found in subtypes of T-ALL (SIL-TAL1, CALM-AF10, HOX11, HOX11L2) were not detected in the TCRbeta-HOXA rearranged cases except for deletion 9p21 and NOTCH1 activating mutations, which were present in 64 and 67%, respectively. In conclusion, this study defines TCRbeta-HOXA rearranged T-ALLs as a distinct cytogenetic subgroup by clinical, immunophenotypical and molecular genetic characteristics.

The epigenetic imprinting defect of patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome born after assisted reproductive technology is not restricted to the 11p15 region

BACKGROUND

Genomic imprinting refers to an epigenetic marking resulting in monoallelic gene expression and has a critical role in fetal development. Various imprinting diseases have recently been reported in humans and animals born after the use of assisted reproductive technology (ART). All the epimutations implicated involve a loss of methylation of the maternal allele (demethylation of KvDMR1/KCNQ1OT1 in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), demethylation of SNRPN in Angelman syndrome and demethylation of DMR2/IGF2R in large offspring syndrome), suggesting that ART impairs the acquisition or maintenance of methylation marks on maternal imprinted genes. However, it is unknown whether this epigenetic imprinting error is random or restricted to a specific imprinted domain.

AIM

To analyse the methylation status of various imprinted genes (IGF2R gene at 6q26, PEG1/MEST at 7q32, KCNQ1OT1 and H19 at 11p15.5, and SNRPN at 15q11-13) in 40 patients with BWS showing a loss of methylation at KCNQ1OT1 (11 patients with BWS born after the use of ART and 29 patients with BWS conceived naturally).

RESULTS

3 of the 11 (27%) patients conceived using ART and 7 of the 29 (24%) patients conceived normally displayed an abnormal methylation at a locus other than KCNQ1OT1.

CONCLUSIONS

Some patients with BWS show abnormal methylation at loci other than the 11p15 region, and the involvement of other loci is not restricted to patients with BWS born after ART was used. Moreover, the mosaic distribution of epimutations suggests that imprinting is lost after fertilisation owing to a failure to maintain methylation marks during pre-implantation development.

DHPLC-based method for DNA methylation analysis of differential methylated regions from imprinted genes

The bisulfite genomic sequencing method is one of the most widely used techniques for methylation analysis in heterogeneous unbiased PCR, amplifying for both methylated and unmethylated alleles simultaneously. However, it requires labor-intensive and time-consuming cloning and sequencing steps. In the current study, we used a denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) procedure in a complementary way with the bisulfite genomic sequencing to analyze the methylation of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of imprinted genes. We showed reliable and reproducible results in distinguishing overall methylation profiles of DMRs regions of human SNRPN, H19, MEST/PEG1, LIT1, IGF2, TSSC5, WT1 antisense, and mouse H19, Mest/Peg1, Igf2R imprinted genes. These DHPLC profiles were in accordance with bisulfite genomic sequencing data and may serve as a type of "fingerprint," revealing the overall methylation status of DMRs associated with sample heterogeneity. We conclude that DHPLC analysis could be used to increase the throughput efficiency of methylation pattern analysis of imprinted genes after the bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA and unbiased PCR amplification.