Clinical risk assessment of organ manifestations in systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research group database

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem autoimmune disease, which is classified into a diffuse cutaneous (dcSSc) and a limited cutaneous (lcSSc) subset according to the skin involvement. In order to better understand the vascular, immunological and fibrotic processes of SSc and to guide its treatment, the EULAR Scleroderma Trials And Research (EUSTAR) group was formed in June 2004.

AIMS AND METHODS

EUSTAR collects prospectively the Minimal Essential Data Set (MEDS) on all sequential patients fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria in participating centres. We aimed to characterise demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics of disease presentation in SSc and analysed EUSTAR baseline visits.

RESULTS

In April 2006, a total of 3656 patients (1349 with dcSSc and 2101 with lcSSc) were enrolled in 102 centres and 30 countries. 1330 individuals had autoantibodies against Scl70 and 1106 against anticentromere antibodies. 87% of patients were women. On multivariate analysis, scleroderma subsets (dcSSc vs lcSSc), antibody status and age at onset of Raynaud's phenomenon, but not gender, were found to be independently associated with the prevalence of organ manifestations. Autoantibody status in this analysis was more closely associated with clinical manifestations than were SSc subsets.

CONCLUSION

dcSSc and lcSSc subsets are associated with particular organ manifestations, but in this analysis the clinical distinction seemed to be superseded by an antibody-based classification in predicting some scleroderma complications. The EUSTAR MEDS database facilitates the analysis of clinical patterns in SSc, and contributes to the standardised assessment and monitoring of SSc internationally.

EULAR recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: a report from the EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR)

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment of systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a challenge because the pathogenesis of SSc is unclear and it is an uncommon and clinically heterogeneous disease affecting multiple organ systems. The aim of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trials and Research group (EUSTAR) was to develop evidence-based, consensus-derived recommendations for the treatment of SSc.

METHODS

To obtain and maintain a high level of intrinsic quality and comparability of this approach, EULAR standard operating procedures were followed. The task force comprised 18 SSc experts from Europe, the USA and Japan, two SSc patients and three fellows for literature research. The preliminary set of research questions concerning SSc treatment was provided by 74 EUSTAR centres.

RESULTS

Based on discussion of the clinical research evidence from published literature, and combining this with current expert opinion and clinical experience, 14 recommendations for the treatment of SSc were formulated. The final set includes the following recommendations: three on SSc-related digital vasculopathy (Raynaud's phenomenon and ulcers); four on SSc-related pulmonary arterial hypertension; three on SSc-related gastrointestinal involvement; two on scleroderma renal crisis; one on SSc-related interstitial lung disease and one on skin involvement. Experts also formulated several questions for a future research agenda.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based, consensus-derived recommendations are useful for rheumatologists to help guide treatment for patients with SSc. These recommendations may also help to define directions for future clinical research in SSc.

Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

In 1997, the first consensus guidelines for haematopoietic SCT (HSCT) in autoimmune diseases (ADs) were published, while an international coordinated clinical programme was launched. These guidelines provided broad principles for the field over the following decade and were accompanied by comprehensive data collection in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) AD Registry. Subsequently, retrospective analyses and prospective phase I/II studies generated evidence to support the feasibility, safety and efficacy of HSCT in several types of severe, treatment-resistant ADs, which became the basis for larger-scale phase II and III studies. In parallel, there has also been an era of immense progress in biological therapy in ADs. The aim of this document is to provide revised and updated guidelines for both the current application and future development of HSCT in ADs in relation to the benefits, risks and health economic considerations of other modern treatments. Patient safety considerations are central to guidance on patient selection and HSCT procedural aspects within appropriately experienced and Joint Accreditation Committee of International Society for Cellular Therapy and EBMT accredited centres. A need for prospective interventional and non-interventional studies, where feasible, along with systematic data reporting, in accordance with EBMT policies and procedures, is emphasized.

Autologous stem cell transplantation in the treatment of systemic sclerosis: report from the EBMT/EULAR Registry

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the durability of the responses after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe systemic sclerosis (SSc) and determine whether the high transplant related mortality (TRM) improved with experience. This EBMT/EULAR report describes the longer outcome of patients originally described in addition to newly recruited cases.

METHODS

Only patients with SSc, treated by HSCT in European phase I-II studies from 1996 up to 2002, with more than 6 months of follow up were included. Transplant regimens were according to the international consensus statements. Repeated evaluations analysed complete, partial, or non-response and the probability of disease progression and survival after HSCT (Kaplan-Meier).

RESULTS

Given as median (range). Among 57 patients aged 40 (9.1-68.7) years the skin scores improved at 6 (n = 37 patients), 12 (n = 30), 24 (n = 19), and 36 (n = 10) months after HSCT (p<0.005). After 22.9 (4.5-81.1) months, partial (n = 32) or complete response (n = 14) was seen in 92% and non-response in 8% (n = 4) of 50 observed cases. 35% of the patients with initial partial (n = 13/32) or complete response (n = 3/14) relapsed within 10 (2.2-48.7) months after HSCT. The TRM was 8.7% (n = 5/57). Deaths related to progression accounted for 14% (n = 8/57) of the 23% (n = 13/57) total mortality rate. At 5 years, progression probability was 48% (95% CI 28 to 68) and the projected survival was 72% (95% CI 59 to 75).

CONCLUSION

This EBMT/EULAR report showed that response in two thirds of the patients after HSCT was durable with an acceptable TRM. Based on these results prospective, randomised trials are proceeding.

The challenge of early systemic sclerosis for the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) community. It is time to cut the Gordian knot and develop a prevention or rescue strategy

Early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc) may allow the start of treatment that could slow disease progression. For this reason early diagnosis of the disease is of pivotal importance. However, the lack of diagnostic criteria and valid predictors significantly limit patient evaluation and the use of potentially effective drugs in the earliest phase of SSc. Early SSc may be suspected on the basis of Raynaud's phenomenon, puffy fingers, autoantibodies and SSc capillaroscopic pattern. In practice, the aim is to have criteria for the diagnosis of very early SSc. The criteria that are proposed are obviously provisional and need to be validated: (a) initially through a Delphi technique; (b) thereafter perhaps using already available datasets; but (c) of critical importance, through prospective studies. Only after prospective studies can these potential criteria be considered validated. The consensus on criteria for the classification of very early SSc might be part of the evolving EULAR/ACR project of reclassification of SSc.

N-terminal connective tissue growth factor is a marker of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma

BACKGROUND

Over-expression of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) is a hallmark of fibrotic disease, including scleroderma. CTGF acts with the pro-fibrotic cytokine TGFbeta to promote sustained fibrotic responses in vivo. Elevated production of CTGF might be responsible for maintenance of the fibrotic phenotype in scleroderma. Assays of CTGF or of its fragments are potential non-invasive measures of the fibrotic response in scleroderma.

AIM

To determine the utility of whole, N-terminal, and C-terminal CTGF as surrogate markers for fibrosis in scleroderma.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional controlled study.

METHODS

Plasma was collected prospectively from 47 scleroderma patients (26 diffuse scleroderma, 21 limited scleroderma) and 18 healthy controls. At the same time, dermal interstitial fluid was derived by a suction blister technique from the lesional skin of scleroderma patients, and from the forearm skin of healthy controls. Whole, N-terminal, and C-terminal CTGF were assayed by ELISA, using monoclonal antibodies specific for N- and C-terminal epitopes.

RESULTS

N-terminal cleavage products of CTGF were present at elevated levels in the plasma and dermal interstitial fluid of scleroderma patients, compared to healthy controls. N-terminal CTGF levels in plasma and dermal interstitial fluid correlated with severity of skin disease and (negatively) with disease duration. Whole and C-terminal CTGF levels were low in blister fluid and plasma levels were not elevated in disease.

DISCUSSION

These results support a role for CTGF in scleroderma-associated fibrosis and the utility of N-terminal CTGF as a marker of fibrosis.

Cardiopulmonary assessment of patients with systemic sclerosis for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: recommendations from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Autoimmune Diseases Working Party and collaborating partners

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare disabling autoimmune disease with a similar mortality to many cancers. Two randomized controlled trials of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for SSc have shown significant improvement in organ function, quality of life and long-term survival compared to standard therapy. However, transplant-related mortality (TRM) ranged from 3–10% in patients undergoing HSCT. In SSc, the main cause of non-transplant and TRM is cardiac related. We therefore updated the previously published guidelines for cardiac evaluation, which should be performed in dedicated centers with expertize in HSCT for SSc. The current recommendations are based on pre-transplant cardiopulmonary evaluations combining pulmonary function tests, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and invasive hemodynamic testing, initiated at Northwestern University (Chicago) and subsequently discussed and endorsed within the EBMT ADWP in 2016.

Consensus statement concerning cardiotoxicity occurring during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of autoimmune diseases, with special reference to systemic sclerosis and multiple sclerosis

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is now a feasible and effective treatment for selected patients with severe autoimmune diseases. Worldwide, over 650 patients have been transplanted in the context of phase I and II clinical trials. The results are encouraging enough to begin randomised phase III trials. However, as predicted, significant transplant-related morbidity and mortality have been observed. This is primarily due to complications related to either the stage of the disease at transplant or due to infections. The number of deaths related to cardiac toxicity is low. However, caution is required when cyclophosphamide or anthracyclines such as mitoxantrone are used in patients with a possible underlying heart damage, for example, systemic sclerosis patients. In November 2002, a meeting was held in Florence, bringing together a number of experts in various fields, including rheumatology, cardiology, neurology, pharmacology and transplantation medicine. The object of the meeting was to analyse existing data, both published or available, in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation autoimmune disease database, and to propose a safe approach to such patients. A full cardiological assessment before and during the transplant emerged as the major recommendation.

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis: methods of elaboration and results of systematic literature research

OBJECTIVE

To describe methods and procedures used for the development of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research group (EUSTAR) recommendations for the treatment of systemic sclerosis. In particular, the results of a web-based Delphi exercise aimed at selection of research questions and evidence from systematic literature research, as parts of the development of these recommendations, are presented in detail.

METHODS

In agreement with the EULAR standard operating procedures a Task Force was created that consisted of the EUSTAR board members, 10 systemic sclerosis (SSc) experts invited from outside the EUSTAR board and representing Europe, the USA and Japan, a clinical epidemiologist, 2 patients with SSc and 3 fellows for literature research. All EUSTAR centres were invited to contribute to the development of recommendations through submission and preliminary selection of the research questions. The systematic literature research was performed using the Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Retrieved trials were evaluated according to the Jadad classification, and the level of evidence was graded from 1 to 4. Outcome data for efficacy and adverse events were abstracted and effect size, number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) were calculated when appropriate.

RESULTS

In all, 65 EUSTAR Centres provided 304 research questions concerning SSc treatment. These questions were aggregated, subdivided into 19 treatment categories and then subjected to preliminary selection by a web-based Delphi technique. The final set of 26 research questions was created by the Expert Committee based on the results of the Delphi exercise and the expert's experience.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is a comprehensive summary of the methods we used to build recommendations for the drug treatment of systemic sclerosis, combining an evidence based approach and expert opinion.

OP0249 LONG-TERM EXTENSION RESULTS OF RISE-SSC, A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF RIOCIGUAT IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

RISE-SSc (NCT02283762) was a multicenter Phase IIb trial of riociguat in pts with early (duration ≤18 months) dcSSc and modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) 10−22 units. Pts were randomized double-blind to placebo or riociguat 0.5–2.5 mg t.i.d. for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint, mRSS change from baseline to Week (Wk) 52, did not reach statistical significance (p=0.08, riociguat vs placebo), but there were favorable trends in some other outcomes.

Objectives:

To present open-label long-term extension (LTE) results of RISE-SSc.

Methods:

Pts who completed Wk 52 of double-blind therapy could enter LTE on riociguat. Endpoints included mRSS, adverse events (AEs), and serious AEs (SAEs).

Results:

Of 60 pts randomized to riociguat and 61 to placebo, 42 (riociguat−riociguat group) and 45 (former placebo group), respectively, entered LTE. At LTE start, mean±SD mRSS was 16.4±3.2 and 16.3±4.2 units, and mean disease duration was 8.9±7.8 and 8.9±5.8 months, in the riociguat−riociguat and former placebo groups, respectively. Other demographics/disease characteristics were also comparable. Median duration of riociguat treatment was 1092 d in riociguat−riociguat pts and 649 d in former placebo pts. Throughout the study, mRSS decreased in both groups (Figure 1). From Wk 52 to last visit, mRSS fell by −3.02±5.51 in riociguat−riociguat patients and −3.96±5.43 in former placebo pts. Rates of mRSS regression (decrease by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) and of % declines in mRSS were similar in the two groups (Figure 2). mRSS progression (increase by >5 units and ≥25% from Wk 52 to last visit) occurred in 1 pt (2%) in each group. During the entire study, rescue therapy agents were used in 15 (36%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 17 (38%) former placebo pts. AEs were reported from Wk 52 to last visit in 82 pts (94%): 40 (95%) riociguat−riociguat and 42 (93%) former placebo. Most common AEs overall: nasopharyngitis (24%), gastroesophageal reflux disease (17%), diarrhea (15%), and hypotension (14%). AEs of special interest (dizziness, postural dizziness, or hypotension) occurred in 5 riociguat−riociguat pts (12%) and 4 former placebo pts (9%). SAEs were reported in 21 (24%) pts: 10 (24%) riociguat−riociguat pts and 11 (24%) former placebo pts, with no SAE reported in >1 patient, no SAEs of special interest, and no deaths.

Conclusion:

During LTE riociguat treatment, mRSS decreased in both groups from Wk 52 onwards and mRSS progression was uncommon. Riociguat had acceptable safety, similar to the main study, with no new safety signal.

Acknowledgments:

RISE-SSc was jointly funded by Bayer AG and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Disclosure of Interests:

Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos, Grant/research support from: NIH NIAID, NIH NIAMS, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Corbus, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB Pharma, Janet Pope Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly & Company, Merck, Roche, Seattle Genetics, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eicos Sciences, Eli Lilly & Company, Emerald, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: UCB, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: BMS, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Consultant of: Actelion, Bayer AG, BMS, BI, Melanie Wosnitza Employee of: Bayer AG, Marie-Elise Truchetet: None declared, Gabriella Szücs: None declared, Wendy Stevens: None declared, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Chiara Stagnaro: None declared, Vanessa Smith Grant/research support from: The affiliated company received grants from Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), Belgian Fund for Scientific Research in Rheumatic diseases (FWRO), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and Janssen-Cilag NV, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co, Speakers bureau: Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Boehringer-Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co and UCB Biopharma Sprl, Richard Silver: None declared, Elena Schiopu: None declared, Valeria Riccieri: None declared, Frank Kramer Employee of: Bayer AG, Sindhu Johnson Grant/research support from: Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Merck, Bayer, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Ikaria, Osamu Ishikawa: None declared, Tomonori Ishii: None declared, Eric Hachlla: None declared, Ellen De Langhe Consultant of: member of advisory board for Boehringer, László Czirják Consultant of: Actelion, BI, Roche-Genentech, Lilly, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer AG, Radim Bečvář Consultant of: Actelion, Roche, Tatsuya Atsumi Grant/research support from: Eli Lily Japan K.K., Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Astellas Pharma Inc., Consultant of: Gilead Sciences, Inc., Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., AbbVie Inc., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Speakers bureau: Eli Lilly Japan K.K., UCB Japan Co. Ltd., Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., AbbVie Inc., Eisai Co. Ltd., Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Co., Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma Inc., Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche

OP0250 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ROMILKIMAB IN DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC): RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, 24-WEEK, PROOF OF CONCEPT STUDY

Background:

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a progressive, multi-organ disease with limited treatment options. Interleukin-4 (IL-4) and IL-13 have been implicated in the fibrotic pathway and pathogenesis of SSc and are promising targets. Romilkimab (RKB) is an engineered humanized bispecific Ig-G4 antibody that binds and neutralizes both IL-4/IL-13. We report a Phase IIa randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (NCT02921971, Sanofi funded) employing RKB in SSc.

Objectives:

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of RKB in dcSSc.

Methods:

Patients with dcSSc duration ≤36 months, mRSS 10-35, with or without immunosuppressive background therapy were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous RKB 200mg or placebo (PBO) for 24 weeks and stratified on history of SSc-ILD. Primary endpoint was mean change in mRSS at Week 24 and FVC/DLco and HAQ-DI were secondary endpoints. All analyses used a 1-sided p-value <0.05 as reaching statistical significance.

Results:

Ninety-seven patients with similar baseline characteristics between arms, including use of background therapy (RKB 59.2% vs. PBO 52.1%) were randomized. Six (12.2%) and 4 (8.3%) patients discontinued study treatment early in the PBO and RKB arms, respectively. Primary endpoint showed an absolute change in mRSS of -2.45 (0.85) and -4.76 (0.86) for PBO and RKB groups, respectively with a difference of -2.31 (1.21) favoring RKB (p=0.029). Subgroup analysis based on background therapy showed a similar treatment effect with a PBO subtracted difference in mRSS of -2.69 (1.83) and -2.38 (1.59), suggesting an additive effect between background therapy and RKB. Secondary endpoints did not show a statistically significant difference between RKB vs. PBO arms, although there was numerically less decline in FVC with RKB with a PBO subtracted difference of 70ml (p=0.06). Exploratory endpoints suggested possible effect of RKB on overall pain, Raynaud’s, digital ulcers, and EQ-5D-5L. Post-hoc analysis was undertaken to determine time to progression (first event defined as death, ≥10% relative decline in % predicted FVC, ≥15% relative decline in % predicted DLCO, ≥20% increase or +5 in mRSS, or other events: cardiac, SRC, PAH development) and showed a benefit for RKB (HR: 0.47 p=0.04). Adverse events were balanced between the two groups (RKB 83.3% vs. PBO 83.7%). There were 5 and 4 SAEs in the PBO and RKB arms, respectively. One death occurred in each arm (SRC – RKB, cardiomyopathy – PBO).

Conclusion:

Patients with dcSSc who were treated with RKB showed a statistically significant reduction in mRSS compared to those receiving PBO. Secondary outcomes were not met, although RKB was associated with a smaller decline in FVC than PBO. Post-hoc analysis showed a possible reduction on time to progression with RKB. RKB was well tolerated with no major safety concerns.

References:

None.

Disclosure of Interests:

Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: Yannick Allanore has received grants from Inventiva, Roche and Sanofi, Consultant of: Yannick Allanore has received fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Curzion, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Peter Wung Shareholder of: I own Sanofi stock, Employee of: I work for Sanofi, Christina Soubrane Employee of: I work for Sanofi., Corinne Esperet Employee of: I work for Sanofi., MARRACHE Frederic Employee of: I work for Sanofi, Raphael Bejuit Employee of: I work for Sanofi., Amel Lahmar Employee of: I work for Sanofi., Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer

OP0171 PHASE 3 TRIAL OF LENABASUM, A CB2 AGONIST, FOR THE TREATMENT OF DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS (DCSSC)

Background:

Lenabasum is an oral CB2 agonist that attenuates inflammation and fibrosis in SSc animal models and showed clinical benefit with acceptable safety in a Phase 2 trial in dcSSc.

Objectives:

Test efficacy and safety of lenabasum in a Phase 3 trial in dcSSc.

Methods:

Subjects ≥18 years old with disease duration ≤ 6 years were randomized 1:1:1 to lenabasum 5 mg, 20 mg, or placebo (PBO), all BID, with stable background immunosuppressant therapy (IST) allowed. The primary efficacy endpoint was ACR CRISS score, and secondary endpoints were ΔmRSS, ΔHAQ-DI, and ΔFVC, all at Week 52 for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO.

Results:

363 adults were dosed; 37 (10%) stopped study drug early, with only 1 subject (PBO cohort) stopping due to adverse event (AE). Baseline demographics were similar among groups. Disease duration was ≤ 3 years in 60% and 66%, mean mRSS score was 22.0 and 23.3, and background IST was used by 89% and 84% of lenabasum 20 mg and PBO groups, respectively.

Safety results showed serious AEs and severe AEs occurred in 9.2% and 5.8% vs 14.6% and 13.0%, respectively, of lenabasum 20 mg and PBO groups.

Efficacy results (Table) demonstrated:

Table 1.

Primary and secondary efficacy endpoints and post-hoc analyses, Week 52

Group, by IST treatmentCohortNΔmRSS, mean (SD)ΔFVC% mean (SD)ΔFVC, mL mean (SD)ΔHAQ-DI mean (SD)ACR CRISS medianmITT population, MMRM primary analysis methodAllPlacebo123-8.1 (7.72)-1.0 (8.68)-51 (317)-0.13 (0.468)0.887Lenabasum 20 mg120-6.7 (6.59)-1.6 (6.91)-78 (265)-0.13 (0.436)0.888Placebo subjects, per protocol completers, LOCFNo ISTPlacebo16-2.3 (9.4)-2.8 (7.4)-97 (244)0.12 (0.34)0.417All ISTPlacebo97-8.9 (7.07)-1.0 (9.2)-43 (330)-0.17 (0.474)0.936MMF, no other ISTPlacebo29-10.7 (8.1)-0.58 (7.1)-37 (235)-0.12 (0.456)0.935MMF ≤ 2 years, no other ISTPlacebo23-11.7 (8.1)-0.3 (6.0)-41 (197)-0.13 (0.495)0.935Non-MMF ≤ 2 yearsPlacebo24-6.7 (6.2)-1.4 (7.87)-52 (281)-0.15 (0.357)0.931Post-hoc comparisons, per protocol completers, LOCFNo ISTPlacebo16-2.3 (9.4)-2.8 (7.4)-97 (244)0.12 (0.34)0.417Lenabasum 20 mg10-6.3 (6.02)-2.3 (5.58)-99 (209)-0.06 (0.498)0.811Established IST1Placebo26-6.1 (5.35)-4.6 (10.11)-170 (350)-0.17 (0.445)0.619Lenabasum 20 mg38-7.4 (5.08)-0.4 (5.70)2-21 (233)3-0.07 (0.357)0.941Established IST, subjects with ILDPlacebo22-5.9 (5.28)-3.7 (5.43)-133 (206)-0.10 (0.372)0.553Lenabasum 20 mg33-7.2 (5.70)-1.0 (10.5)-47 (365)-0.06 (0.391)0.819

2 P = 0.0386 two-sample t-test; 3 P = 0.0481 two-sample t-test; other comparisons were not significant

• No significant differences were seen in primary and secondary efficacy endpoints. Primary MMRM analyses with treatment-by-time-by-subgroup interactions showed that background mycophenolate (MMF) significantly influenced the outcome

•oSubjects on no IST with disease duration ≤3 years were only 7% of PBO subjects and showed little improvement on PBO, in line with other dcSSc trials in which IST was restricted. Post-hoc subgroup analyses of these subjects on no IST suggested improvement in ΔmRSS and ΔHAQ-DI, for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO

•uUnexpectedly high improvement occurred in PBO subjects receiving IST, notably those on MMF started within 2 years of baseline

•nPost-hoc analyses of subjects on established IST (MMF or, if no MMF, ≥ 1 non-MMF IST started > 2 years before baseline) suggested improvement in ΔFVC% (nominal P = 0.0386) and ΔFVC mL (nominal P = 0.0481) for lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO. Improvement in FVC was also seen in subjects on established IST who had ILD at baseline, lenabasum 20 mg vs PBO

•mACR CRISS score demonstrated a ceiling effect and correlated most highly with ΔmRSS (r = -0.739) and moderately with MDGA (-0.432), HAQ-DI (-0.362), FVC% (0.366), and PtGA (-0.288)

Conclusion:

Lenabasum was safely used in this study. Unexpectedly high improvement on background IST, especially MMF, has not been previously reported at this level. The primary endpoint was not met. Post-hoc analyses showed greater improvement in lenabasum- vs PBO-treated subjects who were not on background IST and those on established IST, including subjects with ILD.

Disclosure of Interests:

Robert Spiera Consultant of: Abbvie, Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Formation Biologics, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Formation Biologics, Sanofi, Inflarx, Astra Zeneca, Kadmon, Masataka Kuwana Speakers bureau: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Janssen, Consultant of: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, Corbus, Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Chugai, MBL, Ono Pharmaceuticals, Tanabe-Mitsubishi, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc (less than 5%). Leadership/Equity position – Chief Medical Officer, CiviBioPharma/Eicos Sciences, Inc, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Abbvie, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Corbus, Gilead, Galapagos, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Horizon, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and United Therapeutics, Grant/research support from: NIH, Immune Tolerance Network, Bayer, BMS, Horizon, Pfizer, Laura Hummers Consultant of: CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals. Corbus, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medpace, Kadmon, Cumberland, CSL Behring, Tracy Frech Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Wendy Stevens Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Jessica Gordon Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals. Research funding for EICOS Pharmaceuticals and Cumberland Pharmaceuticals., Suzanne Kafaja Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Consultant of: Actelion, Janssen, Inventiva, Bayer, Biogen, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Corbus, Galapagos, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Regeneron, Acceleron, MSD, Chemomab, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Oliver Distler Consultant of: Consultancy relationship and/or has received research funding in the area of potential treatments for systemic sclerosis and its complications from (last three years): Abbvie, Acceleron Pharma, Amgen, AnaMar, Arxx Therapeutics, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, ChemomAb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Galapagos NV, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, GSK, Horizon (Curzion) Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, iQvia, Italfarmaco, iQone, Kymera Therapeutics, Lilly, Medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Serodapharm, Topadur, Target Bioscience and UCB., Eun Bong Lee Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Yair Levy Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Jae-Bum Jun Consultant of: Consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim Korea, Jeil Pharma, Dae Woong Pharma, Kwangdong Pharma, and Sama Pharma., Grant/research support from: Investigator for study sponsored by Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Scott Constantine Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Nancy Dgetluck Employee of: Employee of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Barbara White Employee of: Employee and stockholder of Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Daniel Furst Consultant of: Corbus, Galapagos, Pfizer, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Actelion, Amgen, Novartis, Roche/Genentech, Gilead, Talaris, and Boehringer Ingelheim., Grant/research support from: grants from Corbus, Galapagos, GSK, Pfizer, Talaris, CSL Behring, Mitsubishi Tanabi, Christopher Denton Consultant of: Consultancy fees and/or honoraria from Corbus, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Bayer, Sanofi, Galapagos, Inventiva, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, CSL Behring, Acceleron, Horizon, Arxx Therapeutics

Characteristics of joint involvement and relationships with systemic inflammation in systemic sclerosis: results from the EULAR Scleroderma Trial and Research Group (EUSTAR) database

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of and independent factors associated with joint involvement in a large population of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

This study was cross-sectional, based on data collected on patients included in the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Scleroderma Trials and Research (EUSTAR) registry. We queried this database to extract data regarding global evaluation of patients with SSc and the presence of any clinical articular involvement: synovitis (tender and swollen joints), tendon friction rubs (rubbing sensation detected as the tendon was moved), and joint contracture (stiffness of the joints that decreased their range of motion). Overall joint involvement was defined by the occurrence of synovitis and/or joint contracture and/or tendon friction rubs.

RESULTS

We recruited 7286 patients with SSc; their mean age was 56 +/- 14 years, disease duration 10 +/- 9 years, and 4210 (58%) had a limited cutaneous disease subset. Frequencies of synovitis, tendon friction rubs, and joint contractures were 16%, 11%, and 31%, respectively. Synovitis, tendon friction rubs, and joint contracture were more prevalent in patients with the diffuse cutaneous subset and were associated together and with severe vascular, muscular, renal, and interstitial lung involvement. Moreover, synovitis had the highest strength of association with elevated acute-phase reactants taken as the dependent variable.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight the striking level of articular involvement in SSc, as evaluated by systematic examination in a large cohort of patients with SSc. Our data also show that synovitis, joint contracture, and tendon friction rubs are associated with a more severe disease and with systemic inflammation.

Use of imipramine for attention deficit disorder in a borderline patient

A subcategory of patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) who also meet criteria for attention deficit disorder (ADD) has recently been described. The present case involves a young man with BPD and ADD who failed to respond to methylphenidate but experienced a marked reversal of anxiety, explosiveness, restlessness, and affective lability when treated with imipramine. Tricyclics may prove to be helpful in borderlines who also meet criteria for ADD.

THU0330 EFFECTS OF NINTEDANIB IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS-ASSOCIATED ILD (SSC-ILD) AND DIFFERING EXTENTS OF SKIN FIBROSIS: FURTHER ANALYSES OF THE SENSCIS TRIAL

Background:

In the SENSCIS trial, nintedanib reduced the progression of SSc-ILD compared with placebo, as shown by a significantly lower rate of decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) over 52 weeks. There was no significant difference between treatment groups in change in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at week 52. An mRSS of 18–25 has been proposed as an upper cut-off to enrich a cohort for skin-progressive patients. Progression of skin fibrosis has been associated with later progression of ILD.

Objectives:

To assess the effects of nintedanib on the rate of FVC decline and change in mRSS in the SENSCIS trial in subgroups by mRSS <18 and ≥18 at baseline.

Methods:

Patients with SSc-ILD with onset of first non-Raynaud symptom <7 years before screening and ≥10% fibrosis of the lungs on a high-resolution computed tomography scan were randomised to receive nintedanib or placebo. We analysed the rate of decline in FVC (ml/year) over 52 weeks and the change from baseline in mRSS at week 52 in subgroups by mRSS (<18; ≥18) at baseline.

Results:

In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, 219/288 (76.0%) and 226/288 (78.5%) patients had mRSS <18 at baseline. Compared with those with mRSS <18, patients with mRSS ≥18 had a lower mean FVC % predicted (68.3% vs 73.7%) and greater proportions were taking mycophenolate at baseline (58.1% vs 45.6%), were anti-topoisomerase I antibody positive (67.4% vs 58.7%) and had diffuse cutaneous SSc (100% vs 37.8%). The mean (SE) annual rate of decline in FVC in the placebo group was numerically greater in patients who had mRSS ≥18 than mRSS <18 at baseline (-131.7 [29.2] mL/year vs -81.4 [15.4] mL/year). The effect of nintedanib vs placebo on reducing the annual rate of decline in FVC was numerically more pronounced in patients with mRSS ≥18 (difference: 88.7 mL/year [95% CI 7.7, 169.8]) than mRSS <18 (difference: 26.4 mL/year (95% CI -16.8, 69.6) at baseline, but statistical testing did not indicate heterogeneity in the treatment effect of nintedanib between subgroups (p=0.18 for treatment-by-time-by-subgroup interaction) (Figure). In the nintedanib and placebo groups, respectively, changes in mRSS at week 52 were -2.2 (0.3) and -2.1 (0.3) (difference -0.1 [95% CI -1.0, 0.7]) in patients with mRSS <18 at baseline and -2.1 (0.7) and -1.6 (0.7) (difference -0.6 [95% CI -2.1, 1.0]) in patients with mRSS ≥18 at baseline (p=0.62 for treatment-by-visit-by-subgroup interaction).

Conclusion:

In the placebo group of the SENSCIS trial, the rate of decline in FVC over 52 weeks was numerically greater in patients with mRSS ≥18 than <18 at baseline, while reductions in mRSS were similar. A lower rate of FVC decline was observed in patients treated with nintedanib than placebo both in patients with mRSS ≥18 and <18 at baseline.

Acknowledgments:

The SENSCIS trial was funded by Boehringer Ingelheim

Disclosure of Interests:

Yannick Allanore Grant/research support from: Yannick Allanore has received grants from Inventiva, Roche and Sanofi, Consultant of: Yannick Allanore has received fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Curzion, Inventiva, Roche, Sanofi, Viginia Steen Grant/research support from: The associated affiliation has received grants/research from Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Eicos, Galapagos, Immune Tolerance Network, Reata, Consultant of: Virginia Steen has acted as a consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus, CSL Behring, Eicos, Forbius, Masataka Kuwana Grant/research support from: Acetelion, Consultant of: Acetelion, Bayer, Chugai, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring and Reata Pharmaceuticals. He was a member of the SENSCIS trial Steering Committee (Boehringer Ingelheim), Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Marco Matucci-Cerinic Grant/research support from: Actelion, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Speakers bureau: Acetelion, Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elizabeth Volkmann Grant/research support from: Forbius, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Forbius, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Dinesh Khanna Shareholder of: Eicos Sciences, Inc./Civi Biopharma, Inc., Grant/research support from: Dr Khanna was supported by NIH/NIAMS K24AR063120, Consultant of: Acceleron, Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Horizon Therapeutic, Galapagos, Roche/Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Sanofi-Aventis/Genzyme, UCB, Daniel Wachtlin Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Martina Gahlemann Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Manuel Quaresma Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Margarida Alves Employee of: Employee of Boehringer Ingelheim, Oliver Distler Grant/research support from: Grants/Research support from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Competitive Drug Development International Ltd. and Mitsubishi Tanabe; he also holds the issued Patent on mir-29 for the treatment of systemic sclerosis (US8247389, EP2331143)., Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Actelion, Acceleron Pharma, AnaMar, Bayer, Baecon Discovery, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer, CSL Behring, Catenion, ChemomAb, Curzion Pharmaceuticals, Ergonex, Galapagos NV, GSK, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inventiva, Italfarmaco, iQvia, medac, Medscape, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, MSD, Roche, Sanofi and UCB, Speakers bureau: Speaker fees from Actelion, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medscape, Pfizer and Roche

SAT0281 BIOSAMPLES FROM AT RISK SSC PATIENTS SHOW CLASSIC PATHOLOGICAL SIGNS OF SCLERODERMA: OPPORTUNITY FOR DIAGNOSIS OF PRE-CLINICAL SSC

Background:

The VEDOSS study has recently indicated that more than 80% of patients affected by Raynaud’s phenomenon (RP) with specific SSc auto-antibodies and capillaroscopy changes satisfied ACR/EULAR 2013 criteria within 5 years. These data suggest that there is a window of opportunity for early detection of SSc in these patients.

Objectives:

Here we aimed to determine whether sera, skin biopsies and skin fibroblasts cultured from these patients showed any biomarker sign of SSc.

Methods:

Fifty-nine at risk patients identified by having RP and SSc auto-antibodies or capillaroscopy pattern (or both) were enrolled in the Kennedy national inception cohort. Sera were tested for IFN inducible chemokines (CXCL-9,10 and 11 and CCL2, 8 and 19) and biomarker of extracellular matrix turnover (ELF test), all previously shown to be increased in SSc. Further, two 3mm skin biopsies were taken from the forearms from 3 ACA+ve (anti-centromere antibodies), 3 SCL70+ve patients. One biopsy was subjected to histology analysis, including haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistological staining for Collagen Type 1, alpha-SMA, Caveolin 1 and CD31 as endothelial marker. The other biopsy was used to explant fibroblasts cultures. mRNA and protein were isolated from primary fibroblasts and processed for RT-qPCR and western blotting analyses.

Results:

Sera from at risk patients showed overall higher IFN inducible chemokines and ELF test (P<0.05) with bimodal distribution among patients. Skin biopsies from both ACA or SCL70+ve patients showed decreased number of CD31+ cells, increased number of myofibroblasts and increased collagen bundles within the dermis, as usually seen in SSc, compared to healthy controls. In vitro, fibroblasts from both ACA or SCL70+ve patients showed average 10-fold higher collagen mRNA levels and 31-fold increased collagen protein levels

compared to healthy control fibroblasts. Furthermore, fibroblasts from ACA or SCL70+ve patients showed limited TGF-beta induced increase in collagen and SMA expression, similar to SSc fibroblasts.

Conclusion:

Although pilot in nature, this study suggests that patients “at risk” already show biomarker signs of SSc both in their sera, at skin biopsy and fibroblast level. Longitudinal studies on patients at this stage of pre-clinical disease may inform on the stratification strategies for imminent progression to clinical manifestations, and offer both insights on pathogenesis of clinical signs and a window of opportunity for delaying the onset clinical intervention trials.

Disclosure of Interests:

rebecca ross: None declared, Ioanna Georgiou: None declared, Antonio Carriero: None declared, Giuseppina Abignano: None declared, Chris Wasson: None declared, Gemma Migneco: None declared, Ariane Herrick: None declared, Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Francesco Del Galdo: None declared

AB0568 BASELINE EUROPEAN PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS AND DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHASE 3 STUDY OF SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF LENABASUM, A CB2 AGONIST, IN DIFFUSE CUTANEOUS SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Background:

We previously presented on the baseline characteristics of a large cohort of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc) patients enrolled in a Phase 3 trial of lenabasum, a selective cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2) agonist. Lenabasum, was safe and well-tolerated in a prior Phase 2 study in dcSSc patients and associated with improvements in ACR Combined Response Index Systemic Sclerosis (CRISS) score and multiple secondary efficacy outcomes.

Objectives:

We now report on the background standard of care and baseline disease characteristics of European (EU) patients in order to assess variability by geographic regions.

Methods:

The RESOLVE-1 Phase 3 study was designed with input from study investigators and regulatory authorities. An important intent of the design was to have eligibility criteria that allow testing of efficacy and safety of lenabasum in an inclusive group of dcSSc subjects to maximize relevance to patients in current practice. The study is ongoing and remains blinded.

Results:

Primary efficacy outcome is the ACR CRISS score at 12 months, comparing lenabasum 20 mg BID to placebo. Key inclusion criteria are males and females ≥ 18 years of age with dcSSc and disease duration ≤ 6 years who are on stable standard of care medicines, with background stable immunosuppressive mediations allowed. Baseline mRSS needed to be ≥ 15 if disease duration was > 3 to ≤ 6 years at enrollment. The study enrolled 110 EU subjects over 15 months who received ≥ 1 dose of study drug at 20 sites in 7 countries. Baseline characteristics as shown in Table 1. The majority were middle-aged, female, and white, and 80% were on immunosuppressive drugs in EU region; methotrexate (MTX) used in 30% of subjects, mycophenolate/mycophenolic acid (MMF) used in 46% of subjects, and 43% of subjects took ≥ 2 concurrent immunosuppressive drugs. There were regional differences in background immunosuppressive with use of MTX, MMF and corticosteroids highest in EU, NA and Asia, respectively.

Table 1.

Patient Baseline Demographics and Disease Characteristics by Regions (Blinded)

Characteristic at First DoseMean (SD) or %RegionEuropeUS, CA, AU, ILAsiaN =110 (30.1%)N = 189 (51.8%)N = 66 (18.1%)Years of age51 ± 11.751 ± 13.549 ± 13.2Female75%78%71%ILD55%40%58%Caucasian101 (91.8%)148 (78.3%)0 (0.0%)Asian2 (1.8%)10 (5.3%)66 (100.0%)Black2 (1.8%)16 (8.5%)0 (0.0%)Other5 (4.6%)15 (7.9%)0 (0.0%)Any immunosuppressive drug80%89%79%≥ 2 immunosuppressive drugs43%48%38%Mycophenolate46%70%26%Corticosteroids31%31%53%Methotrexate30%22%23%Other31%41%26%Modified Rodnan Skin Score21.9 ± 7.7523.8 ± 8.4120.0 ± 7.72Physician Global Assessment5.9 ± 1.575.3 ± 1.565.0 ± 1.50Patient Global Assessment4.9 ± 2.025.0 ± 2.254.8 ± 1.89HAQ-DI with aids/devices1.0 ± 0.691.3 ± 0.760.7 ± 0.77Forced vital capacity % predicted83.2 ± 18.9277.5 ± 16.4182.5 ± 14.73

Conclusion:

This is the first Phase 3 study to use ACR CRISS as the primary efficacy outcome, a composite outcome of multiple clinically relevant measures of SSc, and the largest interventional study to date in diffuse cutaneous SSc. While the use of background immunosuppressive therapies is significant irrespective of geographic regions, MTX use is highest in the EU. Benefits of having inclusive eligibility criteria are that they facilitated timely full enrollment and will make the study more relevant to real-world practice. This study provides a model for future Phase 3 trials in dcSSc and will afford valuable information regarding scleroderma care in practice as well as evaluating the efficacy and safety of lenabasum.

Disclosure of Interests:

Christopher Denton Grant/research support from: GlaxoSmithKline, CSL Behring, and Inventiva, Consultant of: Medscape, Roche-Genentech, Actelion, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Aventis, Inventiva, CSL Behring, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Acceleron, Curzion and Bayer, Bradley Bloom Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Nancy Dgetluck Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Barbara White Shareholder of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Employee of: Corbus Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Robert Spiera Grant/research support from: Roche-Genetech, GSK, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chemocentryx, Corbus, Forbius, Sanofi, Inflarx, Consultant of: Roche-Genetech, GSK, CSL Behring, Sanofi, Janssen, Chemocentryx, Forbius, Mistubishi Tanabe