Identifying patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease in a managed care organization

The ability of various strategies to identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the relative economic impact on disease management programs for GERD were studied. A telephone interview was conducted of a random sample of patients enrolled in any of three health plans in a 100,000-member managed care organization who had either a pharmacy claim or an encounter claim during 1997. The telephone interview identified patients with GERD and served as the standard by which the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of the following patient-identification strategies were compared: (1) telephone interview, (2) chart review, (3) use of encounter claims, (4) use of pharmacy claims, (5) use of both encounter claims, and pharmacy claims, and (6) use of encounter claims or pharmacy claims. Conservative estimates of costs and projected savings were then used to model the potential return on investment of the strategies. A total of 1186 patients completed the telephone interview, of whom 390 (33%) met the case definition of GERD. The most sensitive method for identifying patients with GERD was using either pharmacy or encounter claims (26%). The most specific strategy with the highest positive predictive value (PPV) (87%) was using both pharmacy and encounter claims, but this approach had a case-detection rate of only 3%. Encounter claims were significantly more sensitive than pharmacy claims and yielded a higher estimate of prevalence. The telephone interview identified the most subjects who could have benefited from a disease management program and cost 84% less than chart review. While use of administrative data (pharmacy and encounter claims) was the least costly strategy, it identified 74% fewer patients expected to benefit from disease management. The efficiency of disease management programs for GERD may depend on the method of patient identification, which in turn may depend on whether PPV or negative predictive value (NPV) should be maximized. If there is a need to identify all cases (i.e., sensitivity and NPV are most important), then telephone interview may provide the greatest opportunity for disease management with the greatest return on investment, but at the expense of enrolling many patients who may not benefit.

Symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease: development of a questionnaire for use in clinical trials

Many persons who suffer from GERD report additional symptoms, e.g., chest pain, dyspepsia, dysphagia, that are often not measured in clinical trials even though they may be distressing to the GERD sufferer. The primary goal of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric characteristics of a new GERD symptom scale measuring frequency, severity, and distress. The GERD Symptom Assessment Scale (GSAS) was administered to a sample of 169 GERD sufferers at baseline and two weeks. Internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability were assessed. Responsiveness was evaluated using clinical trial data assessing drug efficacy.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was >0.80 for the symptom severity and distress scales. All three scales showed stability over two weeks (ICC >0.70). Both validity hypotheses were supported. Comparison of effect sizes showed the GSAS is sensitive to changes in severity of symptoms. In conclusion, the GSAS is a reliable, valid, and responsive measure of GERD symptoms.

The impact of nocturnal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

Two types of reflux episodes have been identified: upright or daytime and supine or nocturnal. The population-based prevalence of symptoms of nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the impact of those symptoms on health-related quality of life (HRQL) have not been established.

METHODS

A national random-sample telephone survey was conducted to estimate the prevalence of frequent GERD and nocturnal GERD-like symptoms and to assess the relationship between HRQL, GERD, and nocturnal GERD symptoms. Respondents were classified as controls, subjects with symptomatic nonnocturnal GERD, and subjects with symptomatic nocturnal GERD. The HRQL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The prevalence of frequent GERD was 14%, with an overall prevalence of nocturnal GERD of 10%. Seventy-four percent of those with frequent GERD symptoms reported nocturnal GERD symptoms. Subjects with nonnocturnal GERD had significant decrements on the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores compared with the US general population. Subjects reporting nocturnal GERD symptoms were significantly more impaired than subjects reporting nonnocturnal GERD symptoms on both the physical component summary (38.94 vs 41. 52; P<.001) and mental component summary (46.78 vs 49.51; P<.001) and all 8 subscales of the SF-36 (P<.001). Subjects with nocturnal GERD demonstrated considerable impairment compared with the US general population and chronic disease populations. Subjects with nocturnal GERD had significantly more pain than those with hypertension and diabetes (P<.001) and similar pain compared with those with angina and congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Nocturnal symptoms are commonly experienced by individuals who report frequent GERD symptoms. In addition, HRQL is significantly impaired in those persons who report frequent GERD symptoms, and HRQL impairment is exacerbated in those who report nocturnal GERD symptoms.

Patient-based assessment in dyspepsia: development and validation of Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI)

This paper describes the development and testing of a new self-report measure, the Dyspepsia Symptom Severity Index (DSSI), for assessing the severity of symptoms commonly associated with dyspepsia. The instrument was based on the literature, focus groups, and feedback from gastroenterologists; 48 patients and 24 controls participated in testing. Patients completed the DSSI and a symptom diary to test concurrent validity; one-week reproducibility was evaluated in 21 stable patients. Three subscales comprise the 20-item DSSI, representing reflux-, ulcer-, and dysmotility-like symptoms. Subscale internal consistency levels (alpha) were high (0.84-0.89), total score alpha levels were very good (0.76, 0.80), and scores were reproducible (ICC = 0.90-0.92). Correlations between the DSSI and diary were moderate to strong (r = 0.33-0.77; P < 0.05). Patients reported significantly more severe symptoms than controls (P < 0.001). Results indicate the DSSI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating symptom severity in patients with functional dyspepsia.

A national inpatient cost estimate of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)-associated aspiration pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To present national estimates of the prevalence and costs of inpatient admissions for aspiration pneumonia (AP) associated with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs) inserted before or during an admission.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis using medical claims.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

National estimates of the prevalence of inpatient admissions associated with AP and mortality rates were developed, using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP-3) Database. The MEDSTAT Group's MarketScan Private Pay Fee-for-Service (FFS) and Medicare FFS databases were used to calculate the percentage of admissions for AP that were preceded by a PEG or that entailed a PEG placement. Associated statistics, such as average length of stay and mean payments for these admissions, also were estimated.

RESULTS

Approximately 300,000 inpatient admissions for AP took place in the United States in 1995, of which roughly 70,000 (23.9%) resulted in death. Approximately 10% of all AP admissions occurred after or entailed a PEG placement. After adjusting for differences in patients' age, gender, and health status, the total mean payments were estimated to be $26,618 per patient. This per-patient estimate translates into a national estimate of the cost of PEG-associated AP of approximately $808.2 million.

CONCLUSION

The cost of PEG-associated AP is relatively high, as estimated in this study. The high inpatient mortality rates of AP imply that future efforts should be directed toward preventing AP.

Upper gastrointestinal symptoms in North America: prevalence and relationship to healthcare utilization and quality of life

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal symptoms (UGIS) in a general population and quantify the relationship of those symptoms to healthcare utilization and quality of life. In-person interviews were conducted with 2056 United States and Canadian residents selected at random. Subjects reported frequency and severity for 11 symptoms, prescription and over-the-counter medication use, primary care and specialty physician visits in prior three months, and completed the Psychological General Well-Being Scale. For analyses, subjects were classified into four mutually exclusive symptom groups: gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) -like, GERD plus motility-like (GERD+), ulcerlike, and motility-like. Of the total sample, 51.4% reported the occurrence of at least one UGIS in the prior three months. Subjects in the GERD+ and ulcer groups used more prescription medications and were more likely to see a physician about the symptoms (P<0.001). Subjects with symptoms demonstrated poorer quality of life compared to subjects with no symptoms. The prevalence of UGIS in the general population is high and symptoms are associated with significant health-care utilization and poorer quality of life.

The Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST): design, subjects and methods

BACKGROUND

The Domestic/International Gastroenterology Surveillance Study (DIGEST) was designed to examine the 3-month prevalence of upper gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms internationally and the impact of these symptoms on healthcare usage and quality of life.

METHODS

The study sample was derived from the urban, adult (> or = 18 years) population of Canada, Italy, Japan, The Netherlands, Switzerland, the USA and the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden). Subjects were randomly recruited on a house-to-house basis in all countries except the USA and Italy, where telephone recruitment was carried out. Participants were interviewed in their own homes (house-to-house recruitment) or at a central location (telephone recruitment). The DIGEST questionnaire consisted of two sections. The first was a newly developed questionnaire consisting of 27 questions examining the prevalence, frequency and severity of upper GI symptoms, and their impact on healthcare use and daily activities. It also examined a number of demographic and socioeconomic variables. This part of the questionnaire was evaluated and pilot-tested before commencement of the survey. The second part of the questionnaire consisted of the local language version of the Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI), a validated generic quality-of-life scale. Following completion of the survey, subjects with upper GI symptoms were classified on the basis of their most bothersome symptom into three symptom groups: gastro-oesophageal reflux-like, ulcer-like or dysmotility-like.

CONCLUSIONS

Rigorous design, standardization of interview techniques and prior evaluation of the DIGEST questionnaire, provided a firm foundation for reliable data collection, analysis and interpretation.

Psychometric validation of a constipation symptom assessment questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Clinical management of constipation is complicated by the lack of a gold standard for evaluation of symptoms. A constipation symptom assessment instrument, the PAC-SYM, was developed to address the patient perspective on the disorder. Instrument content was based on literature review and results of focus groups.

METHODS

Two hundred and sixteen patients at nine sites participated in a 6-week psychometric evaluation of the PAC-SYM. The final instrument contained 12 items assigned to 3 subscales: stool symptoms, rectal symptoms, and abdominal symptoms. The psychometric properties of this final instrument were assessed.

RESULTS

Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the final instrument was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89; intraclass correlation = 0.75). Concurrent validity was supported by the correlation with both subject and investigator constipation severity ratings (r= 0.68 and 0.72, respectively; P < 0.0001). Scores were moderately correlated with instruments measuring quality of life. Comparison of treatment responders with nonresponders showed the ability of the instrument to differentiate between groups on the basis of clinical severity (t = -6.12, P < 0.0001 ). Scores changed significantly over time among responders, indicating instrument responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The PAC-SYM is internally consistent, reproducible under stable conditions, valid, and responsive to change and provides a comprehensive means to assess the effectiveness of treatment for constipation.

Domperidone in the management of symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis: efficacy, tolerability, and quality-of-life outcomes in a multicenter controlled trial. DOM-USA-5 Study Group

The purpose of this clinical study was to determine the efficacy, tolerability, and impact on quality of life of domperidone--a specific peripherally acting dopamine antagonist--in the management of symptoms of gastroparesis, a common and potentially debilitating condition in patients with diabetes mellitus. In the first phase of this multicenter, two-phase withdrawal study, 287 diabetic patients with symptoms of gastroparesis of at least 6 months' duration received domperidone 20 mg QID in a single-masked fashion for 4 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated using a four-point rating scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) for each of the following symptoms: nausea, abdominal distention/bloating, early satiety, vomiting, and abdominal pain. At the end of the first phase, patients with sufficient improvement in their total symptom score (a score < or = 6 and a decrease in score of > or = 5 units from the baseline [selection] visit) were eligible for the 4-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-masked withdrawal phase of the study. The impact of domperidone on quality of life was determined using the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36). Of 269 patients with data from the single-masked phase, 208 (77%) qualified for entry into the double-masked phase based on a statistically significant improvement in total symptom score, from a mean score of 10.32 at baseline (initial visit) to 3.79 after 4 weeks of single-masked domperidone therapy. During the double-masked phase, patients in the placebo group had significantly greater deterioration in total symptom scores compared with patients in the domperidone group (mean changes of 1.84 and 0.85, respectively). Similar significant differences in favor of domperidone were seen in the secondary efficacy variables (i.e., patients' diary scores and global assessments of symptoms). The tolerability profile of domperidone was similar to that of placebo. Patients who responded to domperidone experienced significant improvements in quality of life, as indicated by the SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores. During the double-masked phase, patients who were randomized to placebo experienced a significant deterioration in the physical component summary score compared with patients in the domperidone group. The results of this study suggest that domperidone 20 mg QID provides significant improvement in the upper gastrointestinal symptoms of diabetic gastroparesis and is well tolerated in patients with this condition.

Gastrointestinal illness in managed care: healthcare utilization and costs

Identification of inefficiencies is a first step to improving the quality of gastrointestinal (GI) care at the most reasonable cost. This analysis used administrative data to examine the healthcare utilization and associated costs of the management of GI illnesses in a 2.5 million-member private managed care plan containing many benefit designs. An overall incidence of 10% was found for GI conditions, with a preponderance in adults (patients older than 40 years) and women. The most frequently occurring conditions were abdominal pain, nonulcer peptic diseases, lower GI tract diseases, and other GI tract problems. These conditions, along with gallbladder/biliary tract disease, were also the most costly. Claims submitted for care during GI episodes averaged $17 per member per month. Increasing severity of condition was associated with substantial increases in utilization and costs (except for medication use). For most GI conditions, approximately 40% of charges were for professional services (procedures, tests, and visits) and 40% of charges were for facility admissions. The prescription utilization analysis indicated areas where utilization patterns may not match accepted guidelines, such as the low use of anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy, the possible concomitant use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with upper GI diseases, and the use of narcotics in treating patients with lower GI disease and abdominal pain. Also, there was no clear relationship between medication utilization and disease severity. Thus, this analysis indicated that GI disease is a significant economic burden to managed care, and identified usage patterns that potentially could be modified to improve quality of care.