Access site bleeding complications comparing oral anticoagulation therapy with NOACs and VKAs in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac implantable device intervention

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Atrial fibrillation is frequent in patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) intervention. Such population require oral anticoagulation therapy, which increases risk of procedure related bleeding. There is a lack on data on procedure-related bleeding outcome with non-vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (NOACs) vs vitamin K antagonist anticoagulants (VKAs) in patients with AF undergoing CIED intervention.

Study purpose

Aim of the present stud was to evaluate whether NOACs have a safety benefit compared to VKAs in terms of fewer hemorrhagic complications at the site of CIED implant.

Methods

Consecutive AF patients receiving NOACs or VKAs at the time of CIED procedure were included in this observational, retrospective, monocentric investigation. Primary endpoint was the incidence of post-intervention clinically significant pocket hematoma. Multivariate analysis was performed to investigate the association between covariates and the primary endpoint.

Results

A total of 311 patients were enrolled, 146 on NOACs and 165 on VKAs. The incidence of pocket hematoma was 3.4% in the NOAC vs 13.3% in the VKA group (p=0.002) (Figure 1). Primary outcome-free survival at 30-days was 96.6 % in patients on NOACs and 86.0% in those on VKAs (p=0.019) (Figure 2). Multivariate analysis, adjusted by propensity-score calculation of inverse-probability-weighting, showed a significantly lower occurrence of pocket hematoma in patients receiving NOACs vs VKAs (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.96, p=0.042). Such NOACs benefit was confirmed vs patients on VKAs without peri-procedural bridging with low-molecular weight heparin (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.11-0.99, p=0.048). The incidence of pocket infection, surgical pocket evacuation, ischemic events and major bleeding complications at 30 days (secondary endpoints) was similar in the two groups.

Conclusion

Among patients with AF undergoing implantable cardiac defibrillator or pace-maker intervention, the use of NOACs vs VKAs is associated with significant reduction of post-procedural pocket hematoma, regardless of bridging with low molecular-weight heparin in the VKA group.

Long-term incidence of cardiac device complications with intrathoracic versus extrathoracic venous access: results from the PLACE (Planning Lead Access for Cardiac Electrostimulation) study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Introduction

Optimal venous access is crucial in successful cardiac device implantation. Most commonly used accesses are subclavian or axillary vein puncture and cephalic vein cutdown. The extrathoracic access has the advantage of reducing the risk of pneumothorax and lead disfunction; thus, this approach is recommended as the first choice approach.

Purpose

The aim of our retrospective registry was to evaluate the incidence of long-term device complications (pneumothorax, lead rupture or displacement, hematoma, infection or bleeding) with different venous approaches in four high-volume centers in Italy.

Methods

We collected data from implantation and device complications during follow up using available electronic records from each center.

Results

We included 4443 patients, mean age 73±11 years. Median follow up was 118 months (IC range 59-198 months). The incidence of any complication was 7.7 %, without difference between intrathoracic and extrathoracic access (7.8% vs 7.7% respectively, p=0.70). However, lead rupture was more frequent in the intrathoracic group (5.3% vs 1.4%, p=0.04).

Conclusion

In experienced, high-volume centers, the use of intrathoracic vein puncture in the case of unsuitable extrathoracic access may represent a safe alternative of venous access in patients undergoing cardiac device implantation, although associated with a higher occurrence of lead rupture.

Early improvement of cardiac performance after atrial fibrillation direct current cardioversion

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: None.

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and one of the most prevalent cardiac disease. Restoring sinus rhythm improves long-term systolic and diastolic function, quality of life and relieve symptoms in patients with symptomatic AF.

Purpose

The aim of the study was to evaluate the early effects of AF direct current cardioversion on myocardial deformation using speckle-tracking echocardiography.

Methods

51 patients with persistent AF who underwent successful direct current cardioversion were enrolled (age: 70 ± 9 years; men: 72.5%). Patients with ischemic, dilatative, hypertrophic cardiomyopaties, valvular heart disease, previous cardiac interventions were excluded from the study. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 55.2 ± 7.0%. A transthoracic echocardiography was performed one day before the successful cardioversion and 6 hours after, employing 2d standard echocardiography and speckle-tracking technique to evaluate left atrial, left ventricular and free-wall right ventricular longitudinal strain.

Results

Restoration of sinus rhythm led to a reduction of the heart rate (83 ± 14 vs 70 ± 13 bpm, p < 0.001). After about six hours from successful AF direct current cardioversion, we highlighted an increase in left ventricular filling pressure estimated with the ratio E/E’ (8.19 ± 0.29 vs 9.34 ± 0.41, p = 0.0016). A significant increase in left atrial longitudinal strain (10.47 ± 0.64% vs 19.76 ± 1.01%, p < 0.001, Figure A) and in left ventricular longitudinal strain (-13.10 ± 0.60% vs -15.86 ± 0.51%, p < 0.001, Figure C) were noticed; also the free wall right ventricular longitudinal strain increased (-12.06 ± 1.16% vs -15.86 ± 1.29%, p = 0.047, Figure B).

Conclusion

Restoring sinus rhythm improves cardiac performance as evidenced by the increase in either left atrial and bi-ventricular longitudinal strain, suggesting an amelioration even if after early time. Abstract Figure