1
|
Cheshire J, Jones L, Munthali L, Kamphinga C, Liyaya H, Phiri T, Parry-Smith W, Dunlop C, Makwenda C, Devall AJ, Tobias A, Nambiar B, Merriel A, Williams HM, Gallos I, Wilson A, Coomarasamy A, Lissauer D. The FAST-M complex intervention for the detection and management of maternal sepsis in low-resource settings: a multi-site evaluation. BJOG 2021; 128:1324-1333. [PMID: 33539610 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and improved the recognition and management of maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting. DESIGN A before-and-after design. SETTING Fifteen government healthcare facilities in Malawi. POPULATION Women suspected of having maternal sepsis. METHODS The FAST-M complex intervention consisted of the following components: the FAST-M maternal sepsis treatment bundle and the FAST-M implementation programme. Performance of selected process outcomes was compared between a 2-month baseline phase and 6-month intervention phase with compliance used as a proxy measure of feasibility. MAIN OUTCOME RESULT Compliance with vital sign recording and use of the FAST-M maternal sepsis bundle. RESULTS Following implementation of the FAST-M intervention, women were more likely to have a complete set of vital signs taken on admission to the wards (0/163 [0%] versus 169/252 [67.1%], P < 0.001). Recognition of suspected maternal sepsis improved with more cases identified following the intervention (12/106 [11.3%] versus 107/166 [64.5%], P < 0.001). Sepsis management improved, with women more likely to receive all components of the FAST-M treatment bundle within 1 hour of recognition (0/12 [0%] versus 21/107 [19.6%], P = 0.091). In particular, women were more likely to receive antibiotics (3/12 [25.0%] versus 72/107 [67.3%], P = 0.004) within 1 hour of recognition of suspected sepsis. CONCLUSION Implementation of the FAST-M complex intervention was feasible and led to the improved recognition and management of suspected maternal sepsis in a low-resource setting such as Malawi. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Implementation of a sepsis care bundle for low-resources improved recognition & management of maternal sepsis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Cheshire
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Jones
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - L Munthali
- Parent and Child Health Initiative (PACHI) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - C Kamphinga
- Parent and Child Health Initiative (PACHI) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - H Liyaya
- Parent and Child Health Initiative (PACHI) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - T Phiri
- Parent and Child Health Initiative (PACHI) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - W Parry-Smith
- World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shrewsbury and Telford NHS Trust, The Princess Royal Hospital, Telford, UK
| | - C Dunlop
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - C Makwenda
- Parent and Child Health Initiative (PACHI) Trust, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - A J Devall
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Tobias
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - B Nambiar
- Institute for Global Child Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - A Merriel
- School of Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - H M Williams
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - I Gallos
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Wilson
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - A Coomarasamy
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.,World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - D Lissauer
- Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.,College of Medicine, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|