Identification of dementia and MCI cases in health information systems: An Italian validation study

Introduction

The identification of dementia cases through routinely collected health data represents an easily accessible and inexpensive method to estimate the prevalence of dementia. In Italy, a project aimed at the validation of an algorithm was conducted.

Methods

The project included cases (patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) recruited in centers for cognitive disorders and dementias and controls recruited in outpatient units of geriatrics and neurology. The algorithm based on pharmaceutical prescriptions, hospital discharge records, residential long‐term care records, and information on exemption from health‐care co‐payment, was applied to the validation population.

Results

The main analysis was conducted on 1110 cases and 1114 controls. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values in discerning cases of dementia were 74.5%, 96.0%, 94.9%, and 79.1%, respectively, whereas in detecting cases of MCI these values were 29.7%, 97.5%, 92.2%, and 58.1%, respectively. The variables associated with misclassification of cases were also identified.

Discussion

This study provided a validated algorithm, based on administrative data, which can be used to identify cases with dementia and, with lower sensitivity, also early onset dementia but not cases with MCI.

Effects of low blood pressure in cognitively impaired elderly patients treated with antihypertensive drugs

IMPORTANCE

The prognostic role of high blood pressure and the aggressiveness of blood pressure lowering in dementia are not well characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether office blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, or the use of antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) predict the progression of cognitive decline in patients with overt dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Cohort study between June 1, 2009, and December 31, 2012, with a median 9-month follow-up of patients with dementia and MCI in 2 outpatient memory clinics.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Cognitive decline, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score change between baseline and follow-up.

RESULTS

We analyzed 172 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 79 (5) years and a mean (SD) MMSE score of 22.1 (4.4). Among them, 68.0% had dementia, 32.0% had MCI, and 69.8% were being treated with AHDs. Patients in the lowest tertile of daytime systolic blood pressure (SBP) (≤ 128 mm Hg) showed a greater MMSE score change (mean [SD], -2.8 [3.8]) compared with patients in the intermediate tertile (129-144 mm Hg) (mean [SD], -0.7 [2.5]; P = .002) and patients in the highest tertile (≥ 145 mm Hg) (mean [SD], -0.7 [3.7]; P = .003). The association was significant in the dementia and MCI subgroups only among patients treated with AHDs. In a multivariable model that included age, baseline MMSE score, and vascular comorbidity score, the interaction term between low daytime SBP tertile and AHD treatment was independently associated with a greater cognitive decline in both subgroups. The association between office SBP and MMSE score change was weaker. Other ambulatory blood pressure monitoring variables were not associated with MMSE score change.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Low daytime SBP was independently associated with a greater progression of cognitive decline in older patients with dementia and MCI among those treated with AHDs. Excessive SBP lowering may be harmful for older patients with cognitive impairment. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring can be useful to help avoid high blood pressure overtreatment in this population.

Tolerability of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in cognitively impaired elderly

OBJECTIVE

Recent guidelines have widened clinical indications for out-of-office blood pressure measurement, including home blood pressure monitoring and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), suggesting the latter as recommended method in cognitively impaired patients. There is, however, a widespread belief that ABPM could be poorly tolerated in dementia, often leading to withdraw from its use in these patients.

AIM

To assess the actual tolerability of ABPM in a group of cognitively impaired elderly, affected by dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

METHODS

We evaluated 176 patients aged 65 + years, recruited in two different memory clinics, with a Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) between 10 and 27. Behavioral and psychological symptoms were assessed with Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). A patient was considered tolerant if able to keep the device on continuously for 24 h. The minimum number of correct measurements required was 70% of the predicted total number.

RESULTS

16% of patients wore the device for less than 24 h. Dividing the study population in tertiles of MMSE performance, 29% failed to tolerate the device in the lowest, 12% in the middle and 7% in the highest tertile (p < 0.01). Dividing the study population in tertiles of NPI performance, 30% of patients failed in the highest, 19% in the middle and 8% in the lowest tertile (p = 0.02); 31% of patients who tolerated the device did not achieve the minimum number of measurements required, with a mean number of 63% of predicted measurements.

CONCLUSION

The ABPM proved a generally well-tolerated technique even in cognitively impaired elderly. Only a minority of subjects with poorer cognitive performances and greater behavioral symptoms did not tolerate the monitoring. Among most patients who failed to achieve the minimum number of measurements needed, the number of valid measurements was very close to the minimum required.

EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF CHOLINESTERASE INHIBITORS IN ELDERLY SUBJECTS WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE: A “REAL WORLD” STUDY

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEI) in improving cognitive status and disability in subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, little is known about the effectiveness of ChEI in clinical practice, and no large clinical trials comparing different ChEI are available at present. Aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of ChEI in a sample of elderly outpatients diagnosed with mild to moderate AD. We selected 407 subjects for ChEI treatment (donepezil,rivastigmine or galantamine). Their cognitive function was evaluated by means of the mini mental state examination (MMSE), and the global functional status was estimated by using the activities of daily living (ADL) and the instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales at baseline (To), then after 1 (T1), 3 (T2) and 9 months (T3), respectively. T3 follow-up was completed by 212 subjects. The patients were considered as responders (R), if the MMSEscore at T2 was unchanged or improved, if compared to that of T0. In 35 patients (8.6 %)treatment was withdrawn because of mostly gastrointestinal adverse events. Compared to the other drugs, donepezil was associated with a lower incidence of withdrawals due to adverse events. Subjects who completed T3 follow-up (age 78 +/- 6 years, MMSE scores 18.8 +/- 3.9) showed an increase at T2 of 0.7 +/- 2.7 (p = 0.001) and a decrease at T3 of -0.6 +/- 3.4 (p = 0.008) in the MMSE scores, as compared to To . The ADL and IADL scores did not show significant changes at T2; however, both decreased significantly at T3. The patients Rat-T2 showed a better cognitive and functional outcome at T3 , compared to the nonresponders(NR-at-T2), displaying values of MMSE R-at-T2 0.4 +/- 3.1 vs. NR-at-T2 -3.0 +/- 2.5, p = 0.001, and ADL values of -0.3 +/- 1.2 vs. -0.7 +/- 1.3, p = 0.03, respectively. No significant difference was found in the changes of MMSE scores between donepezil and rivastigmine (galantamine was not included in the comparison due to the small number of treated subjects). In conclusion, in this sample of elderly subjects with mild to moderate AD,treated with ChEI, a small but significant decline in cognitive and functional status was observed after 9 months. Subjects who showed a good response to treatment after 3 months, had a better cognitive and functional outcome at 9 months. No significant difference in cognitive outcome was found between drugs, while donepezil was better tolerated.