Assessment of the three-test genetic toxicology battery for groundwater metabolites

The two-test in vitro battery for genotoxicity testing (Ames and micronucleus) has in the majority of cases replaced the three-test battery (as two-test plus mammalian cell gene mutation assay) for the routine testing of chemicals, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and agrochemical metabolites originating from food and feed as well as from water treatment. The guidance for testing agrochemical groundwater metabolites, however, still relies on the three-test battery. Data collated in this study from 18 plant protection and related materials highlights the disparity between the often negative Ames and in vitro chromosome aberration data and frequently positive in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assays. Sixteen of the 18 collated materials with complete datasets were Ames negative, and overall had negative outcomes in in vitro chromosome damage tests (weight of evidence from multiple tests). Mammalian cell gene mutation assays (HPRT and/or mouse lymphoma assay (MLA)) were positive in at least one test for every material with this data. Where both MLA and HPRT tests were performed on the same material, the HPRT seemed to give fewer positive responses. In vivo follow-up tests included combinations of comet assays, unscheduled DNA synthesis, and transgenic rodent gene mutation assays, all gave negative outcomes. The inclusion of mammalian cell gene mutation assays in a three-test battery for groundwater metabolites is therefore not justified and leads to unnecessary in vivo follow-up testing.

In Vivo Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: Report from the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)

The in vivo working group (WG) considered three topics: acceptable maximum doses for negative erythrocyte micronucleus (MN) tests; validation status of MN assays in non-haematopoietic tissues; nuisance factors in the comet assay. The WG reached agreement on many issues, including: Negative erythrocyte MN studies should be acceptable if dosing is conducted to OECD test guideline (TG) 474 recommendations and if sufficient bone marrow exposure is demonstrated; consensus on the evidence required to demonstrate "sufficient" exposure was not reached. The liver MN test using six-week-old rats is sufficiently validated to develop an OECD TG, but the impact of animal age warrants additional study. Ki-67 is a reliable marker for cellular proliferation in hepatocytes. The gastrointestinal tract MN test is useful for detecting poorly absorbed or rapidly degraded aneugens, and for genotoxic metabolites formed in the colon. Although current validation data are insufficient to support development of an OECD TG, the methodologies are sufficient to consider as an appendix to OECD TG474. Comparison of comet assay results to laboratory historical control data (HCD) should not be used in data evaluation, unless the HCD distribution is demonstrated to be stable and the predominant source of HCD variation is due to animal, not study, factors. No universally acceptable negative control limit for any tissue was identified. Methodological differences in comet studies can result in variable data interpretations; more data are required before best practice recommendations can be made. Hedgehogs alone are unreliable indicators of cytotoxicity and additional investigations into cytotoxicity markers are required. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Assessing the quality and making appropriate use of historical negative control data: A report of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT)

Historical negative control data (HCD) have played an increasingly important role in interpreting the results of genotoxicity tests. In particular, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) genetic toxicology test guidelines recommend comparing responses produced by exposure to test substances with the distribution of HCD as one of three criteria for evaluating and interpreting study results (referred to herein as "Criterion C"). Because of the potential for inconsistency in how HCD are acquired, maintained, described, and used to interpret genotoxicity testing results, a workgroup of the International Workshops for Genotoxicity Testing was convened to provide recommendations on this crucial topic. The workgroup used example data sets from four in vivo tests, the Pig-a gene mutation assay, the erythrocyte-based micronucleus test, the transgenic rodent gene mutation assay, and the in vivo alkaline comet assay to illustrate how the quality of HCD can be evaluated. In addition, recommendations are offered on appropriate methods for evaluating HCD distributions. Recommendations of the workgroup are: When concurrent negative control data fulfill study acceptability criteria, they represent the most important comparator for judging whether a particular test substance induced a genotoxic effect. HCD can provide useful context for interpreting study results, but this requires supporting evidence that (i) HCD were generated appropriately, and (ii) their quality has been assessed and deemed sufficiently high for this purpose. HCD should be visualized before any study comparisons take place; graph(s) that show the degree to which HCD are stable over time are particularly useful. Qualitative and semi-quantitative assessments of HCD should also be supplemented with quantitative evaluations. Key factors in the assessment of HCD include: (i) the stability of HCD over time, and (ii) the degree to which inter-study variation explains the total variability observed. When animal-to-animal variation is the predominant source of variability, the relationship between responses in the study and an HCD-derived interval or upper bounds value (i.e., OECD Criterion C) can be used with a strong degree of confidence in contextualizing a particular study's results. When inter-study variation is the major source of variability, comparisons between study data and the HCD bounds are less useful, and consequentially, less emphasis should be placed on using HCD to contextualize a particular study's results. The workgroup findings add additional support for the use of HCD for data interpretation; but relative to most current OECD test guidelines, we recommend a more flexible application that takes into consideration HCD quality. The workgroup considered only commonly used in vivo tests, but it anticipates that the same principles will apply to other genotoxicity tests, including many in vitro tests.

Impact of sampling time on the detection of mutations in rapidly proliferating tissues using transgenic rodent gene mutation models: A review

The OECD Test Guideline 488 (TG 488) for the Transgenic Rodent Gene Mutation Assay has undergone several revisions to update the recommended design for studying mutations in somatic tissues and male germ cells. The recently revised TG recommends a single sampling time of 28 days following 28 days of exposure (i.e., 28 + 28 days) for all tissues, irrespective of proliferation rates. An alternative design (i.e., 28 + 3 days) is appropriate when germ cell data is not required, nor considered. While the 28 + 28 days design is clearly preferable for slowly proliferating somatic tissues and germ cells, there is still uncertainty about the impact of extending the sampling time to 28 days for rapidly somatic tissues. Here, we searched the available literature for evidence supporting the applicability and utility of the 28 + 28 days design for rapidly proliferating tissues. A total of 79 tests were identified. When directly comparing results from both designs in the same study, there was no evidence that the 28 + 28 days regimen resulted in a qualitatively different outcome from the 28 + 3 days design. Studies with a diverse range of agents that employed only a 28 + 28 days protocol provide further evidence that this design is appropriate for rapidly proliferating tissues. Benchmark dose analyses demonstrate high quantitative concordance between the 28 + 3 and 28 + 28 days designs for rapidly proliferating tissues. Accordingly, our review confirms that the 28 + 28 days design is appropriate to assess mutagenicity in both slowly and rapidly proliferating somatic tissues, and germ cells, and provides further support for the recommended design in the recently adopted TG 488.

An evaluation of carcinogenicity predictors from short-term and sub chronic repeat-dose studies of agrochemicals in rats: Opportunities to refine and reduce animal use

The aim of this study was to examine whether short term, repeat dose, rat studies provide sufficient information about potential carcinogenicity to enable predictions about the carcinogenic potential of agrochemicals to be made earlier in compound development. This study aimed to identify any correlations between toxicity findings obtained for short term rat studies (28 day and 90 day) and neoplastic findings obtained from 24 month rat carcinogenicity studies for agrochemical compounds (18 compounds) tested in Han Wistar and Sprague Dawley rats. The macroscopic pathology, microscopic pathology, hematology, biochemistry, organ weights, estrogen receptor activation and genotoxicity results were examined. Seven out of 18 non genotoxic compounds developed tumors in treated rats in the carcinogenicity study and of these, two compounds showed no preneoplastic findings in the affected tissues (false positives). Of the remaining five true positives, correlations were noted between corneal opacity and keratitis (90 day study) as early indicators of squamous cell carcinoma and papilloma of the cornea of the eye (compound 1, a hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor) and inflammation of the stomach and kidney (90 day study) and gastric squamous cell papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma and renal tubular adenoma and carcinoma, respectively (compound 12, a fungicide with multisite activity). Minor decreases in uterine weight and increases in estradiol hydroxylation activity at 28 days were associated with endometrial adenocarcinoma (compound 18, a mitochondrial complex II electron transport inhibitor). Early liver weight increases and hepatocellular centrilobular hypertrophy (28 day study) were associated with thyroid follicular adenomas (compound 11, a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) in female animals only. Hepatic centrilobular hypertrophy (28 day studies) correlated with thyroid adenomas in males in carcinogenicity studies (compound 2, a hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor). In contrast, treatment related, nasopharynx tumors (compound 3, an elongase inhibitor) and uterine adenocarcinoma (compound 9, a succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor) could not be correlated with findings from the short term studies examined. Eleven compounds displayed preneoplastic findings with no tumors (false negatives) and there were no compounds with no preneoplastic findings and no tumors (true negatives). This work indicates the value of examining historical, short term studies for specific, nonneoplastic findings which correlate with tumors in carcinogenicity studies, which may obviate the need for further animal carcinogenicity studies.

Hvdroquinone: Assessment of genotoxic potential in the in vivo alkaline comet assay

Hydroquinone (HQ) exposure is common as it is a natural component of plant-based foods and is used in some fingernail polishes, hair dyes, and skin lighteners. Industrially it is used as an antioxidant, polymerization inhibitor, and reducing agent. The current study was undertaken to determine whether HQ may cause DNA damage in an in vivo comet assay in F344 rats. DNA strand breaks were assessed in the duodenum as a direct tissue contact site, the testes, and the liver and kidneys, which were tumor sites in bioassays. Rats were exposed to HQ by gavage at 0, 105, 210, or 420 mg/kg/day. At all dose levels, mean % tail intensity and tail moment values for all tissues in animals given HQ were similar to the control. There were no statistically significant increases in tail intensity in any tissue following HQ treatment of male and female rat and data for all animals fell within the available historical control ranges for each tissue. There was no evidence of induction of DNA damage in cells isolated from duodenum, kidney or liver of male and female rats or in the testes of male rats following exposure to HQ at a dose levels up to 420 mg/kg/day, which caused acute renal necrosis.

Caffeic Acid Genotoxicity: Correlation of the Pig-a Assay with Regulatory Genetic Toxicology In Vivo Endpoints

Caffeic acid is found in variety of fruits and vegetables. It is considered as possible human carcinogen (Group 2B). It is negative in Ames and mouse micronucleus (MN), but positive in mouse lymphoma and chromosomal aberration assays. The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of caffeic acid using three different endpoints: in vivo MN, Pig-a, and comet assay. Two sets of six rats per group were administered vehicle (0.5% hydroxypropyl methylcellulose), 500, 1,000, or 2,000 mg/kg/day of caffeic acid for three consecutive days via oral gavage. One set of animals was used for the Pig-a and MN assay and the other set was used for the comet assay. N-Ethyl N-Nitrosourea was used as positive control for the Pig-a and MN assay, and ethyl methanesulfonate for the comet assay. From one set of animals, peripheral blood was collected on Days -1, 14, and 30 for the Pig-a assay and on Day 4 for the MN assay. The other set of animals was euthanized 3 hr after the last dose; liver and blood were collected for the comet assay. A statistically significant increase in the MN frequency was observed at 2,000 mg/kg/day. No increase in the red blood cells (RBC^CD59- ) or reticulocytes (RET^CD59- ) Pig-a mutant frequencies was observed on Days 14 or 30. No increase in DNA strand breaks was observed in the peripheral blood or liver in the comet assay. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

In vivo genotoxicity testing strategies: Report from the 7th International workshop on genotoxicity testing (IWGT)

The working group reached complete or majority agreement on many issues. Results from TGR and in vivo comet assays for 91 chemicals showed they have similar ability to detect in vivo genotoxicity per se with bacterial mutagens and Ames-positive carcinogens. TGR and comet assay results were not significantly different when compared with IARC Group 1, 2 A, and unclassified carcinogens. There were significantly more comet assay positive responses for Group 2B chemicals, and for IARC classified and unclassified carcinogens combined, which may be expected since mutation is a sub-set of genotoxicity. A liver comet assay combined with the bone marrow/blood micronucleus (MNviv) test would detect in vivo genotoxins that do not exhibit tissue-specific or site-of-contact effects, and is appropriate for routine in vivo genotoxicity testing. Generally for orally administered substances, a comet assay at only one site-of-contact GI tract tissue (stomach or duodenum/jejunum) is required. In MNviv tests, evidence of target tissue exposure can be obtained in a number of different ways, as recommended by ICH S2(R1) and EFSA (Hardy et al., 2017). Except for special cases the i.p. route is inappropriate for in vivo testing; for risk evaluations more weight should be given to data from a physiologically relevant administration route. The liver MN test is sufficiently validated for the development of an OECD guideline. However, the impact of dosing animals >6 weeks of age needs to be evaluated. The GI tract MN test shows promise but needs more validation for an OECD guideline. The Pig-a assay detects systemically available mutagens and is a valuable follow-up to in vitro positive results. A new freeze-thaw protocol provides more flexibility. Mutant reticulocyte and erythrocyte frequencies should both be determined. Preliminary data are available for the Pig-a assay in male rat germ cells which require validation including germ cell DNA mutation origin.

A comparison of transgenic rodent mutation and in vivo comet assay responses for 91 chemicals

A database of 91 chemicals with published data from both transgenic rodent mutation (TGR) and rodent comet assays has been compiled. The objective was to compare the sensitivity of the two assays for detecting genotoxicity. Critical aspects of study design and results were tabulated for each dataset. There were fewer datasets from rats than mice, particularly for the TGR assay, and therefore, results from both species were combined for further analysis. TGR and comet responses were compared in liver and bone marrow (the most commonly studied tissues), and in stomach and colon evaluated either separately or in combination with other GI tract segments. Overall positive, negative, or equivocal test results were assessed for each chemical across the tissues examined in the TGR and comet assays using two approaches: 1) overall calls based on weight of evidence (WoE) and expert judgement, and 2) curation of the data based on a priori acceptability criteria prior to deriving final tissue specific calls. Since the database contains a high prevalence of positive results, overall agreement between the assays was determined using statistics adjusted for prevalence (using AC1 and PABAK). These coefficients showed fair or moderate to good agreement for liver and the GI tract (predominantly stomach and colon data) using WoE, reduced agreement for stomach and colon evaluated separately using data curation, and poor or no agreement for bone marrow using both the WoE and data curation approaches. Confidence in these results is higher for liver than for the other tissues, for which there were less data. Our analysis finds that comet and TGR generally identify the same compounds (mainly potent mutagens) as genotoxic in liver, stomach and colon, but not in bone marrow. However, the current database content precluded drawing assay concordance conclusions for weak mutagens and non-DNA reactive chemicals.

Assessment of the mutagenic potential of para-chloroaniline and aniline in the liver, spleen, and bone marrow of Big Blue® rats with micronuclei analysis in peripheral blood

Splenic tumors have been reported in rat cancer bioassays with para-chloroaniline (PCA) and aniline. Development of these tumors is hypothesized to be due to hematotoxicity via the formation of methemoglobin (MetHb) and not direct DNA reactivity. To evaluate the mode of action (MOA) for tumor formation a transgenic rodent (TGR) in vivo gene mutation assay in Big Blue® TgF344 rats was performed with parallel micronuclei analysis in peripheral blood. Male rats were gavaged daily for 28 d to 0.5, 15, and 60 mg/kg PCA and 100 mg/kg aniline, the base molecular structure of PCA. On test day 10, the 60 mg/kg PCA dose was reduced to 30 mg/kg due to toxicity. On test day 4 and 29 peripheral blood micronucleus analysis was performed and on test day 29 clinical chemistry, hematology, and MetHb measurements were taken. At study termination, on test day 31, spleen, bone marrow, and liver (control tissue) were analyzed for cII transgene mutant frequency (MF). Repeat gavage exposure to PCA and aniline for 28 d did not produce an increase in cII transgene MF in analyzed tissues. An increase in micronuclei was seen at both time points at ≥15 mg/kg PCA and 100 mg/kg aniline. At the same dose levels, significant reductions in red blood cells, increases in absolute reticulocytes (ABRET), and increased levels of MetHb were observed. Together these results support that generation of micronuclei and tumorigenicity following exposure to PCA and aniline is due to compensatory mechanisms (e.g. increased cellular turnover) and not direct DNA reactivity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:785-797, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Genotoxicity assessment of the flavouring agent, perillaldehyde

Perillaldehyde, a natural monocyclic terpenoid found most abundantly in the herb perilla, has a long history of use as a flavouring ingredient to add spiciness and citrus taste to foods. Previously, it was judged to be safe by several international expert panels. To confirm the safety of flavourings placed on the European Union list of flavourings, perillaldehyde was selected by the European Food Safety Authority as a representative of a subgroup of alicyclic aldehyde flavouring substances to be evaluated for genotoxic potential. Perillaldehyde was tested in a bacterial reverse mutation assay, an in vitro micronucleus assay in human lymphocytes, an HPRT assay in mouse lymphoma cells, and a micronucleus/comet assay in Han Wistar rats. In contrast to previously published results, perillaldehyde induced mutation in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA98 in the absence of metabolic activation. The comet assay was negative for duodenum and weakly positive for liver but only at a hepatotoxic dose of perillaldehyde. All other genotoxicity assays were negative. These data do not provide an indication of any genotoxic potential for perillaldehyde, and they provide the primary basis for recent scientific opinions regarding perillaldehyde genotoxicity announced by several international organizations responsible for safety assessment of food additives and flavourings.

Nonclinical Safety Profile of Etelcalcetide, a Novel Peptide Calcimimetic for the Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism

Etelcalcetide is a novel d-amino acid peptide that functions as an allosteric activator of the calcium-sensing receptor and is being developed as an intravenous calcimimetic for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. To support clinical development and marketing authorization, a comprehensive nonclinical safety package was generated. Primary adverse effects included hypocalcemia, tremoring, and convulsions. Other adverse effects were considered sequelae of stress associated with hypocalcemia. Cardiovascular safety evaluations in the dog revealed an anticipated prolongation of the corrected QT interval that was related to reductions in serum calcium. Etelcalcetide did not affect the human ether-a-go-go gene ion channel current. Etelcalcetide was mutagenic in some strains of Salmonella, however, based on the negative results in 2 in vitro and 2 in vivo mammalian genotoxicity assays, including a 28-day Muta mouse study, etelcalcetide is considered nongenotoxic. Further support for a lack of genotoxicity was provided due to the fact that etelcalcetide was not carcinogenic in a 6-month transgenic rasH2 mouse model or a 2-year study in rats. There were no effects on fertility, embryo–fetal development, and prenatal and postnatal development. All of the adverse effects observed in both rat and dog were considered directly or secondarily related to the pharmacologic activity of etelcalcetide and the expected sequelae associated with dose-related reductions in serum calcium due to suppression of parathyroid hormone secretion. These nonclinical data indicate no safety signal of concern for human risk beyond that associated with hypocalcemia and associated QT prolongation.

Evaluation of 4-methylimidazole, in the Ames/Salmonella test using induced rodent liver and lung S9

4-methylimidazole (4-MeI) is formed by the interaction of ammonia with reducing sugars and low levels have been identified as a by-product in coffee, soy sauce, wine, dark beers, soft drinks, and caramel colors. The 4-MeI has been reported to induce alveolar/bronchiolar tumors in mice but not rats. Its mechanism of action is unlikely to be due to genotoxicity as 4-MeI does not induce mutation in Salmonella typhimurium and does not induce micronuclei in rodent peripheral erythrocytes or bone marrow cells. However, the question of whether genetically reactive intermediates could be formed via lung-specific metabolism has not previously been addressed. The 4-MeI was tested for its ability to induce mutation in five standard Ames strains of S. typhimurium using induced rat (F344/N) and mouse (B6C3F1) liver and lung S9 as a source of exogenous metabolism. The chemicals were tested in an OECD 471-compliant bacterial reverse mutation assay, using both plate-incorporation and pre-incubation methodologies, together with 10% S-9 metabolic activation. No induction of mutation (as measured by an increase in revertant colonies) was observed and it was concluded that 4-MeI was not mutagenic in S. typhimurium using either rodent liver or lung S9 for exogenous metabolism.

JaCVAM-organized international validation study of the in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay for detection of genotoxic carcinogens: II. Summary of definitive validation study results

The in vivo rodent alkaline comet assay (comet assay) is used internationally to investigate the in vivo genotoxic potential of test chemicals. This assay, however, has not previously been formally validated. The Japanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods (JaCVAM), with the cooperation of the U.S. NTP Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM)/the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM), and the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society/Mammalian Mutagenesis Study Group (JEMS/MMS), organized an international validation study to evaluate the reliability and relevance of the assay for identifying genotoxic carcinogens, using liver and stomach as target organs. The ultimate goal of this exercise was to establish an Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) test guideline. The study protocol was optimized in the pre-validation studies, and then the definitive (4th phase) validation study was conducted in two steps. In the 1st step, assay reproducibility was confirmed among laboratories using four coded reference chemicals and the positive control ethyl methanesulfonate. In the 2nd step, the predictive capability was investigated using 40 coded chemicals with known genotoxic and carcinogenic activity (i.e., genotoxic carcinogens, genotoxic non-carcinogens, non-genotoxic carcinogens, and non-genotoxic non-carcinogens). Based on the results obtained, the in vivo comet assay is concluded to be highly capable of identifying genotoxic chemicals and therefore can serve as a reliable predictor of rodent carcinogenicity.

Micronucleus test in rodent tissues other than liver or erythrocytes: Report of the IWGT working group

At the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing, the liver micronucleus test (MNT) working group briefly discussed the MNT using tissues other than liver/erythrocytes. Many tissues other than liver/erythrocytes have been studied, primarily for research purposes. They have included the colon and intestinal epithelium, skin, spleen, lung, stomach, bladder, buccal mucosa, vagina, and fetal/neonatal tissues. These tissues were chosen because they were target sites of carcinogens, and/or relevant to a specific route of exposure. Recently, there has been particular focus on the gastrointestinal (GI) tract as it is a contact site associated with high exposure following oral gavage. Furthermore GI tumors are observed with high frequency in human populations. A collaborative study of the rat glandular stomach and colon MNT was conducted in conjunction with a collaborative study of the repeated-dose liver MNT. Based on limited data currently available, the rodent MNT using the glandular stomach and/or colon seems to detect genotoxic carcinogens with GI tract target-organ specificity. The working group concluded that the GI tract MNT would be a promising method to examine clastogenicity or aneugenicity of test chemicals in the stomach and/or colon. Further data will be needed to fully establish the methods, and to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the GI tract MNT.

Recommended protocols for the liver micronucleus test: Report of the IWGT working group

At the 6th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT), the liver micronucleus test working group discussed practical aspects of the in vivo rodent liver micronucleus test (LMNT). The group members focused on the three methodologies currently used, i.e., a partial hepatectomy (PH) method, a juvenile/young rat (JR) method, and a repeated-dose (RD) method in adult rodents. Since the liver is the main organ that metabolizes chemicals, the LMNT is expected to detect clastogens, especially those that need metabolic activation in the liver, and aneugens. Based on current data the three methods seem to have a high sensitivity and specificity, but more data, especially on non-genotoxic but toxic substances, would be needed to fully evaluate the test performance. The three methods can be combined with the micronucleus test (MNT) using bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB). The ability of the PH method to detect both clastogens and aneugens has already been established, but the methodology is technically challenging. The JR method is relatively straightforward, but animal metabolism might not be fully comparable to adult animals, and data on aneugens are limited. These two methods also have the advantage of a short testing period. The RD method is also straightforward and can be integrated into repeated-dose (e.g. 2 or 4 weeks) toxicity studies, but again data on aneugens are limited. The working group concluded that the LMNT could be used as a second in vivo test when a relevant positive result in in vitro mammalian cell genotoxicity tests is noted (especially under the condition of metabolic activation), and a negative result is observed in the in vivo BM/PB-MNT. The group members discussed LMNT protocols and reached consensus about many aspects of test procedures. However, data gaps as mentioned above remain, and further data are needed to fully establish the LMNT protocol.

Evaluation of a multi-endpoint assay in rats, combining the bone-marrow micronucleus test, the Comet assay and the flow-cytometric peripheral blood micronucleus test

With the publication of revised draft ICH guidelines (Draft ICH S2), there is scope and potential to establish a combined multi-end point in vivo assay to alleviate the need for multiple in vivo assays, thereby reducing time, cost and use of animals. Presented here are the results of an evaluation trial in which the bone-marrow and peripheral blood (via MicroFlow(®) flow cytometry) micronucleus tests (looking at potential chromosome breakage and whole chromosome loss) in developing erythrocytes or young reticulocytes were combined with the Comet assay (measuring DNA strand-breakage), in stomach, liver and blood lymphocytes. This allowed a variety of potential target tissues (site of contact, site of metabolism and peripheral distribution) to be assessed for DNA damage. This combination approach was performed with minimal changes to the standard and regulatory recommended sampling times for the stand-alone assays. A series of eight in vivo genotoxins (2-acetylaminofluorene, benzo[a]pyrene, carbendazim, cyclophosphamide, dimethylnitrosamine, ethyl methanesulfonate, ethyl nitrosourea and mitomycin C), which are known to act via different modes of action (direct- and indirect-acting clastogens, alkylating agents, gene mutagens, cross-linking and aneugenic compounds) were tested. Male rats were dosed at 0, 24 and 45 h, and bone marrow and peripheral blood (micronucleus endpoint), liver, whole blood and stomach (Comet endpoint) were sampled at three hours after the last dose. Comet and micronucleus responses were as expected based on available data for conventional (acute) stand-alone assays. All compounds were detected as genotoxic in at least one of the endpoints. The importance of evaluating both endpoints was highlighted by the uniquely positive responses for certain chemicals (benzo[a]pyrene and 2-acetylaminofluorene) with the Comet endpoint and certain other chemicals (carbendazim and mitomycin C) with the micronucleus endpoint. The data generated from these investigations demonstrate the suitability of the multi-endpoint design.

Induction of LacZ mutations in Muta™Mouse can distinguish carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic analogues of diaminotoluenes and nitronaphthalenes

2,4-Diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT) is a liver carcinogen in rats and mice whereas 2,6-DAT is not. Both are genotoxic in vitro. Tests for mutations in transgenic mice, unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS), DNA damage and enhancement of initiated foci in vivo have shown some discrimination between these two analogues, but only after oral administration. 1- and 2-nitronaphthalene (1- and 2-NNT) are also both genotoxic in vitro, although, unlike 2,4- and 2,6-DAT, they do not require metabolic activation. There is some evidence that 2-NNT may be able to induce liver and bladder tumours, and there is some evidence that 1-NNT is not carcinogenic to rats or mice, but none of the data are convincing. When tested for induction of LacZ mutations in Muta Mouse after topical exposure (human occupational exposure route) at their maximum tolerated doses, 2,4-DAT induced a positive response in liver and a marginal response in kidney, whereas 2,6-DAT was negative. 2-NNT also induced a positive mutagenic response in liver, and a marginal response in bladder, whereas 1-NNT was negative. Neither 2,4- nor 2,6-DAT induced mutations at the site of application (skin) as might be expected for chemicals requiring activation by liver enzymes. 2-NNT, which is a direct-acting mutagen in vitro, gave a marginal response for induced mutation at the site of application, but 1-NNT was negative. This study shows that investigation of induction of LacZ mutations after topical application in vivo can provide useful data to help discriminate potentially carcinogenic from non-carcinogenic chemicals that are mutagenic in vitro. Robust carcinogenicity data are needed to determine whether 2-NNT can induce tumours in the liver and bladder.

Evaluation of the potential genotoxicity of the phosphate binder lanthanum carbonate

Lanthanum was evaluated for potential genotoxicity using a range of in vitro assays (as the carbonate) in the presence and absence of post-mitochondrial fraction (S9) and in vivo in three independent tests for mutagenicity and clastogenicity (as the carbonate and chloride). The drug was devoid of mutagenic activity in bacterial assays (maximum concentration 5000 microg/plate) using a range of test strains (Salmonella typhimurium TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98, TA100 and TA102 and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA and WP2 uvrA pkm101). No effects were seen in the hgprt gene mutation assay in Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of S9. In the absence of S9, sporadic increases in revertant numbers were not dose-related or reproducible in subsequent experiments and hence were concluded to be chance events. In an in vitro chromosome aberration assay using Chinese hamster ovary cells, chromosome damage in the presence and absence of S9 (concentration 200-5000 microg/ml) was attributed to overt cell toxicity. To confirm this, a comprehensive in vivo evaluation of the drug was performed. Negative results were obtained in two independent rodent micronucleus tests. In the first mice were given oral doses (of carbonate) up to 2000 mg/kg, in the second rats were given a single i.v. bolus injection (of chloride) up to 0.1 mg/kg. Negative results were also obtained in a rat liver unscheduled DNA synthesis assay after treatment for 28 days with i.v. bolus injections (of chloride) up to 0.1 mg/kg/day. In these in vivo studies lanthanum plasma concentrations were >3000 times higher than the steady-state peak plasma concentration observed in dialysis patients given therapeutic doses of lanthanum carbonate. It can be concluded that lanthanum is not genotoxic and that lanthanum carbonate is unlikely to present a latent hazard in therapeutic use.

Recommendations for conducting the in vivo alkaline Comet assay. 4th International Comet Assay Workshop

The in vivo alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay, hereafter the Comet assay, can be used to investigate the genotoxicity of industrial chemicals, biocides, agrochemicals and pharmaceuticals. The major advantages of this assay include the relative ease of application to any tissue of interest, the detection of multiple classes of DNA damage and the generation of data at the level of the single cell. These features give the Comet assay potential advantages over other in vivo test methods, which are limited largely to proliferating cells and/or a single tissue. The Comet assay has demonstrated its reliability in many testing circumstances and is, in general, considered to be acceptable for regulatory purposes. However, despite the considerable data published on the in vivo Comet assay and the general agreement within the international scientific community over many protocol-related issues, it was felt that a document giving detailed practical guidance on the protocol required for regulatory acceptance of the assay was required. In a recent meeting held in conjunction with the 4th International Comet Assay Workshop (Ulm, Germany, 22-25 July 2001) an expert panel reviewed existing data and recent developments of the Comet assay with a view to developing such a document. This paper is intended to act as an update to the more general guidelines which were published as a result of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures. The recommendations are also seen as a major step towards gaining more formal regulatory acceptance of the Comet assay.