Simulation CT Features and Radiation Cardiotoxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Radiation cardiotoxicity is a significant clinical dilemma in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy (RT). Baseline cardiovascular (CV) status may influence the risk of cardiotoxicity, and may be ascertainable from the appearance of the heart on simulation computed tomography (CT). We examined the association of CT features with incidental heart dose and risk of cardiac events in NSCLC.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients treated with curative-intent RT between 2015 and 2020 at a regional center were identified. Clinical notes were interrogated for baseline patient and CV health details, and follow-up CV events. Cardiac events were verified by a cardiologist. A deep learning-based auto-segmentation tool was applied, allowing extraction of a pre-specified list of volume parameters in a programming environment. CAC was graded as none, mild, moderate and severe in patients with a non-contrast scan. The craniocaudal relationship of the PTV and heart (Feng atlas) were annotated.

RESULTS

A total of 478 patients were included, with a median age of 70 and Charlson Index of 5. The median mean heart dose was 6.3 Gy (IQR 2.7-11.4). The median lung V20 was 20.0% (IQR 14.8-27.1). Cardiovascular risk factors were common, with most patients having 2 (39%) or 3 (31%). A history of previous cardiac events was common, including myocardial infarction (14%), arrhythmia (11%) or heart failure (9%). A total of 6.9% and 7.1% patients developed a new atrial arrhythmia (AA) or heart failure (HF) after completing RT. The volume metrics with the highest AUC for AA and HF events were the left atrium (LA) (AUC 0.67, p = 0.0002) and left ventricle:right ventricle (LV:RV) ratio (AUC 0.66, p = 0.0021). Kaplan-Meier analysis for cardiac events dichotomizing at the optimal cut-point for maximum sensitivity and specificity demonstrated significantly different rates for both AA (LA 109cc, HR 3.35, 95% CI 1.64-6.83, p = 0.0009) and HF (LV:RV ratio 1.61, HR 2.37, 95% CI 1.19-4.74, p = 0.0143). Only 2 patients with non-contrast scans developed a myocardial infarction, both had mild CAC. The incidence of pooled cardiac events was not significantly different between patients with no (n = 2/21, 9.5%), mild (n = 10/38, 26.3%), moderate (n = 8/53, 15.1%) and severe (n = 7/24, 29.2%) CAC (p = 0.3916). Where the inferior border of the PTV was above the superior border of the heart, mean heart dose was significantly lower than compared with overlap of levels (1.9 Gy v 9.7 Gy, p<0.0001), and this was true for 3DCRT (n = 139, p<0.001), IMRT (n = 94, p<0.001) and VMAT (n = 145, p<0.001) patients.

CONCLUSION

LA volume and LV:RV volume ratio are predictive for the development of AA and HF respectively. CAC grade did not differentiate patients by risk of cardiac events. Where the craniocaudal level of the PTV doesn't overlap with the level of the heart, the cardiac dose is likely to be very low. Several simulation CT features are associated with cardiac events following treatment for NSCLC and prospective evidence of cardiac risk could enable medical optimization prior to RT.

Patient-Level and Endpoint-Specific Clinico-Dosimetric Analysis of the Cardiac Base as a Mediator of Radiation Cardiotoxicity in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Cardiac disease is a dose-limiting toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiation therapy. Radiation dose to the cardiac base is associated with poor overall survival in several clinical studies, but has not been validated in a non-dose escalated cohort, or with individual patient delineations. In this study we examined the impact of cardiac base dose on overall survival (OS) and cardiac events (CEs), and interrogated the relationships of the substructures comprising the heart base with OS and CEs.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Patients with stage I-III NSCLC treated with curative-intent radiation therapy between 2015 and 2020 at a regional cancer center were identified. Clinical notes were examined for baseline patient, tumor and cardiac details, and both cancer and cardiac outcomes. Three cardiologists verified CEs. Cardiac delineations were completed using a validated deep learning-based autosegmentation tool. Cox and Fine and Gray regressions were undertaken for the risk of death and CEs respectively, accounting for pre-specified evidence-based dose metrics and clinically relevant cardiac covariates.

RESULTS

Most patients received 55 Gy/20# (n = 461/478, 96%) without chemotherapy (58%), planned with VMAT (51%) or IMRT (20%). Pre-existing cardiovascular morbidity was common, with 78% having ≥2 risk factors, and 46% having >1 established cardiac disease. The median follow-up was 21.1 months. Dichotomized at the median, higher heart base Dmax was associated with poorer survival on Kaplan-Meier analysis (21.6 months (95% CI 19.3-24.9) versus 29.4 months (95% CI 21.6-36.6), p = 0.021), and remained significant when statistically compared in published multivariate models. In a multivariate analysis for pooled acute CEs, heart base Dmax was associated with CEs (HR 1.75, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.04), but this was not the case for individual CEs. Using Fine and Gray models to account for the competing risk of death, left main coronary maximum dose was associated with atrial fibrillation (p = 0.024), proximal right coronary artery V15 (p = 0.023) and mean dose (p = 0.032), and the right atrium mean dose (p = 0.029) were associated with heart failure. No dose-volume metrics were significantly associated with acute coronary syndrome. None of the constituent base substructures dose were significantly associated with death.

CONCLUSION

Dose to the heart base was associated with increased mortality and an increased pooled cardiac event rate. Accounting for endpoint-specific clinical covariates, only select constituent substructures of the heart base were associated with CEs and no substructures were independently associated with survival. Together, these findings are suggestive of possible interplay between the constituent base substructures in their mediation of radiation cardiotoxicity.

A phase 2 study of BGJ398 in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) who failed or are intolerant to platinum-based chemotherapy

335

Background: CCA is a hepatobiliary malignancy with poor prognosis and few treatment options following cytotoxic therapy in the first-line metastatic setting. The fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) axis may promote CCA tumorigenesis. FGFR2 fusions (in up to 17% of intrahepatic CCAs) may predict FGFR inhibitor sensitivity. A prior phase 1 trial of the selective pan-FGFR inhibitor BGJ398 showed antitumor activity in a pt with CCA harboring an FGFR2 fusion. Methods: This ongoing phase 2, open-label study is evaluating oral BGJ398 125 mg once daily on a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule (28-day cycle) in pts with advanced or metastatic CCA with FGFR2 fusions (n ≈ 40) or other FGFR genetic alterations (n ≤ 15) who progressed after cisplatin/gemcitabine or are cisplatin intolerant (NCT02150967). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, best overall response (BOR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results: As of 10 July 2015, 26 pts with CCA harboring FGFR2 fusions (n = 22) or other FGFR alterations (n = 4), pretreated with 1 to ≥ 4 prior regimens, were enrolled. Common adverse events (AEs; ≥ 20% of pts), were hyperphosphatemia (50%), fatigue (42%), constipation (38%), cough (23%), and nausea (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs occurring in ≥ 2 pts were hyper/hypophosphatemia, lipase increase, and hyponatremia. AEs were manageable, reversible, and rarely led to treatment discontinuation. Among 22 pts evaluable for BOR, 3 achieved partial response and 15 had stable disease, including 10 with tumor reductions (-41%, n = 1; -2% to -29%, n = 9). Overall DCR was 82%. As of the cutoff date, 18 pts remained on therapy, of which 13 were on for > 120 days. Kaplan-Meier estimated lower limit (95% CI) of median time on study was 143 days. Conclusions: BGJ398 shows impressive anti-tumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with advanced FGFR-altered CCA, an indication of high unmet medical need. Updated data including additional responses post data cutoff will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT02150967.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of galeterone novel oral formulations

e16075

Background: Galeterone (gal) is an orally available steroid analog for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). A significant food effect, similar to abiraterone, was found when gal, as powder in capsule (PIC), was dosed in a phase I CRPC trial and confirmed in a PK study in human volunteers.The objective of this study was to assess single-dose PK of gal after reformulation and to evaluate effect of food. Methods: In this single-center open-label study, 24 male subjects were assigned to receive once daily doses of between 100 and 3400 mg in either a 3-treatment, 3-period or 4-treatment, 4-period dose scheme. Treatment periods were separated by 7-day washout intervals. Plasma concentrations were measured over 72 hours to assess PK. Two novel tablet formulations were administered in 100 mg doses under fasted and/or fed condition compared to 2600 mg-PIC administered under fed conditions. Escalating doses of PIC (975 to 2600 mg) and tablet (850 to 3400 mg) formulations were evaluated to assess linearity. Results: Gal was well tolerated. Food effect has been negated with the tablet. Exposure from 1700 mg galeterone tablet (fed or fasted) is comparable to a 2,600 mg dose of PIC (fed) (Table). For tablet, AUC(inf) increased in a dose-related and dose-proportional manner from 6,689 ± 2,602 hxng/mL (850 mg) to 20131 ± 9,930 hxng/mL (2,550 mg). Conclusions: The tablet formulation negates the food effect previously observed. Gal may be dosed either fed or fasted with no difference in absorption, which reduces intra-patient variability in exposure. Tablet has more consistent bioavailability and a linear increase in AUC between escalating doses. [Table: see text]