1
|
Battaglin F, Ou FS, Qu X, Hochster HS, Niedzwiecki D, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Ashouri K, Zemla TJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Kabbarah O, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F. HER2 Gene Expression Levels Are Predictive and Prognostic in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2301507. [PMID: 38457761 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The phase III Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB)/SWOG 80405 trial found no difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in combination with either bevacizumab or cetuximab. We investigated the potential prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification and gene expression using next-generation sequencing (NGS) and NanoString data. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary tumor DNA from 559 patients was profiled for HER2 amplification by NGS (FoundationOne CDx). Tumor tissue from 925 patients was tested for NanoString gene expression using an 800-gene panel. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were the time-to-event end points. RESULTS High HER2 expression (dichotomized at median) was associated with longer PFS (11.6 v 10 months, P = .012) and OS (32 v 25.3 months, P = .033), independent of treatment. An OS benefit for cetuximab versus bevacizumab was observed in the high HER2 expression group (P = .02), whereas a worse PFS for cetuximab was seen in the low-expression group (P = .019). When modeled as a continuous variable, increased HER2 expression was associated with longer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75 to 0.93]; adjusted P = .0007) and PFS (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.74 to 0.91]; adjusted P = .0002), reaching a plateau effect after the median. In patients with HER2 expression lower than median, treatment with cetuximab was associated with worse PFS (HR, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.71]; adjusted P = .0027) and OS (HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.59]; adjusted P = .03) compared with that with bevacizumab. A significant interaction between HER2 expression and the treatment arm was observed for OS (Pintx = .017), PFS (Pintx = .048), and objective response rate (Pintx = .001). CONCLUSION HER2 gene expression was prognostic and predictive in CALGB/SWOG 80405. HER2 tumor expression may inform treatment selection for patients with low HER2 favoring bevacizumab- versus cetuximab-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Battaglin
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Karam Ashouri
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Tyler J Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel SP, Guadarrama E, Chae YK, Dennis MJ, Powers BC, Liao CY, Ferri WA, George TJ, Sharon E, Ryan CW, Othus M, Lopez G, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. SWOG 1609 cohort 48: anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 for advanced gallbladder cancer. Cancer 2024. [PMID: 38358334 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Most patients with advanced gallbladder cancer are treated with multiagent chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors offer the possibility of a durable response with less toxicity. This prospective, multicenter, open-label study was designed to evaluate the anticancer activity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. METHODS Nineteen patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to ≥1 previous therapy received nivolumab 240 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was confirmed radiographic overall response rate (ORR) (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] confirmed on subsequent scan); secondary end points included unconfirmed overall response, clinical benefit rate (confirmed and unconfirmed responses + stable disease >6 months), progression-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. RESULTS The confirmed ORR was 16% (CR, n = 1 [5%]; PR, n = 2 [11%]); all were microsatellite stable, and the confirmed CR had undetectable programmed death-ligand 1 by immunohistochemistry. The unconfirmed ORR and clinical benefit rates were both 32%. The median duration of response was 14.8 months (range, 4-35.1+ months). The 6-month progression-free survival was 26% (95% CI, 12-55). The median overall survival was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.9-19.1). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%), anemia (26%), and anorexia (26%). Aspartate aminotransferase elevation was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (11%). There was 1 possibly related death (sepsis with attendant hepatic failure). CONCLUSIONS Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed modest efficacy with durable responses in previously treated patients with advanced gallbladder cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02834013 (ClincialTrials.gov). PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY This prospective study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 19 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer refractory to previous therapy. The combination demonstrated modest efficacy with a 16% confirmed overall response rate, durable responses, and manageable toxicities, suggesting potential benefits for this challenging patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip P Patel
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | | | - Young Kwang Chae
- Division of Medical Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael J Dennis
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Benjamin C Powers
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - William A Ferri
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Elad Sharon
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christopher W Ryan
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Gabby Lopez
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Division of Medical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin Froedtert Cancer Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blanke CD. Safeguards for medical aid in dying. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2024; 85:1. [PMID: 38416530 DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2024.0011a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D Blanke
- OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herbst RS, Blanke CD, Sigal EV. Novel Approach to Accelerate Lung Cancer Research: Lung-MAP and the Potential of Public-Private Partnerships. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:29-32. [PMID: 37903180 PMCID: PMC10767300 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-2690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
The National Cancer Institute recently found that death rates for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reduced by over 6% overall in recent years. This reduction in mortality has been accompanied by an average increase in overall survival and largely credited to the therapeutic advancements for the effective treatment of NSCLC. Numerous molecular alterations have been identified in NSCLC that have enabled the development of new drugs capable of targeting these changes and efficiently kill cancerous cells. New treatments to modulate patients' immune systems have been shown to be effective in stimulating natural immune cells to have an improved anti-cancer effect. While these types of approaches to treat cancer are providing new options for patients, leadership from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recognized that the expansion of targeted therapy in NSCLC presented significant promise, but evaluation of the safety and efficacy of these new drugs would be slowed if new models for conducting clinical studies were not identified. Specifically, the FDA recommended that a comprehensive approach be implemented to identify the patients that are the best candidates for these, and other new treatments based upon the molecular characteristics of their tumors, and more efficiently conduct the clinical studies necessary to evaluate the safety and efficacy of new drugs. To address this growing challenge, leading lung cancer experts and stakeholders across academia, government, industry, and patient advocacy came together to design a clinical research approach that could serve as a sustainable infrastructure for new lung cancer treatments called the Lung Cancer Master Protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy S. Herbst
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University and Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Ellen V. Sigal
- Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, District of Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harris LN, Blanke CD, Erba HP, Ford JM, Gray RJ, LeBlanc ML, Hu-Lieskovan S, Litzow MR, Luger SM, Meric-Bernstam F, O'Dwyer PJ, Othus MK, Politi K, Shepherd LE, Allegra CJ, Chen HX, Ivy SP, Korde LA, Little RF, McShane LM, Moscow JA, Patton DR, Thurin M, Yee LM, Doroshow JH. The New NCI Precision Medicine Trials. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4728-4732. [PMID: 37531248 PMCID: PMC10690084 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-0917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs (master protocols) have emerged over the last decade to study precision medicine approaches in oncology. First-generation trials like NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) have proven the principle that studying targeted therapies on a large scale is feasible both from the laboratory and clinical perspectives. However, single-agent targeted therapies have shown limited ability to control metastatic disease, despite careful matching of drug to target. As such, newer approaches employing combinations of targeted therapy, or targeted therapy with standard therapies, need to be considered. The NCI has recently embarked on three second-generation precision medicine trials to address this need: ComboMATCH, iMATCH, and myeloMATCH. The design of these trials and necessary infrastructure are discussed in the following perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network, OHSU Knight Cancer Center, Portland, Oregon
| | - Harry P. Erba
- Department of Medicine, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - James M. Ford
- Division of Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Michael L. LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Siwen Hu-Lieskovan
- Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Mark R. Litzow
- Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Selina M. Luger
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Megan K.D. Othus
- Biostatistics, Public Health Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Katerina Politi
- Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Lois E. Shepherd
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Helen X. Chen
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - S. Percy Ivy
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Larissa A. Korde
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Lisa M. McShane
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - David R. Patton
- Clinical and Translational Research Branch, Center for Biomedical Informatics and Information Technology, NCI, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Magdalena Thurin
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Laura M. Yee
- Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, NCI, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brown JC, Ma C, Shi Q, Zemla T, Couture F, Kuebler P, Kumar P, Tan B, Krishnamurthi S, Chang V, Goldberg RM, Venook AP, Blanke CD, O’Reilly EM, Shields AF, Meyerhardt JA. Physical activity in recurrent colon cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B/SWOG 80702 (Alliance). Cancer 2023; 129:3724-3734. [PMID: 37651160 PMCID: PMC10843498 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One in three patients with stage III colon cancer will experience tumor recurrence. It is uncertain whether physical activity during and after postoperative chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer improves overall survival after tumor recurrence. METHODS A prospective cohort study nested within a randomized multicenter trial of patients initially diagnosed with stage III colon cancer who experienced tumor recurrence (N = 399) was conducted. Postoperative physical activity before tumor recurrence was measured. Physical activity energy expenditure was quantified via metabolic equivalent task hours per week (MET-h/week). The primary end point was overall survival after tumor recurrence. Multivariable flexible parametric survival models estimated relative and absolute effects with two-sided hypothesis tests. RESULTS Compared with patients expending <3.0 MET-h/week of physical activity (comparable to <1.0 h/week of brisk walking), patients with ≥18.0 MET-h/week of physical activity (comparable to 6 h/week of brisk walking) had a 33% relative improvement in overall survival time after tumor recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96). The overall survival rate at 3 years after tumor recurrence was 61.3% (95% CI, 51.8%-69.2%) with <3.0 MET-h/week of physical activity and 72.2% (95% CI, 63.1%-79.6%) with ≥18 MET-h/week of physical activity (risk difference, 10.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.2-20.8 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS Higher postoperative physical activity is associated with improved overall survival after tumor recurrence in patients initially diagnosed with stage III colon cancer. These data may be relevant to patients who, despite optimal postoperative medical therapy, have a high risk of tumor recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C. Brown
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, U.S.A
- LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
- Stanley S. Scott Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, U.S.A
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, U.S.A
| | - Qian Shi
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A
| | - Tyler Zemla
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, U.S.A
| | | | - Philip Kuebler
- Columbus NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Columbus, OH, U.S.A
| | - Pankaj Kumar
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Illinois CancerCare PC, Peoria, IL, U.S.A
| | - Benjamin Tan
- Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO, U.S.A
| | | | - Victor Chang
- Veterans Administration New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, U.S.A
| | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, U.S.A
| | | | - Eileen M. O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, U.S.A
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D Blanke
- Chair, SWOG Cancer Research Network, Professor, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Marquam II | 2611 SW 3rd Avenue MQ280 | Portland OR 97201
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Demetri GD, Blanke CD, von Mehren M, Joensuu H, McGreevey LS, Chen CJ, Van den Abbeele AD, Druker BJ, Kiese B, Eisenberg B, Roberts PJ, Singer S, Fletcher CDM, Silberman S, Dimitrijevic S, Fletcher JA. Kinase Mutations and Imatinib Response in Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:4829-4836. [PMID: 37890277 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) express constitutively activated mutant isoforms of KIT or kinase platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA) that are potential therapeutic targets for imatinib mesylate. The relationship between mutations in these kinases and clinical response to imatinib was examined in a group of patients with advanced GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS GISTs from 127 patients enrolled onto a phase II clinical study of imatinib were examined for mutations of KIT or PDGFRA. Mutation types were correlated with clinical outcome. RESULTS Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA were found in 112 (88.2%) and six (4.7%) GISTs, respectively. Most KIT mutations involved exon 9 (n = 23) or exon 11 (n = 85). All KIT mutant isoforms, but only a subset of PDGFRA mutant isoforms, were sensitive to imatinib, in vitro. In patients with GISTs harboring exon 11 KIT mutations, the partial response rate (PR) was 83.5%, whereas patients with tumors containing an exon 9 KIT mutation or no detectable mutation of KIT or PDGFRA had PR rates of 47.8% (P = .0006) and 0.0% (P < .0001), respectively. Patients whose tumors contained exon 11 KIT mutations had a longer event-free and overall survival than those whose tumors expressed either exon 9 KIT mutations or had no detectable kinase mutation. CONCLUSION Activating mutations of KIT or PDGFRA are found in the vast majority of GISTs, and the mutational status of these oncoproteins is predictive of clinical response to imatinib. PDGFRA mutations can explain response and sensitivity to imatinib in some GISTs lacking KIT mutations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Heinrich
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christopher L Corless
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - George D Demetri
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Charles D Blanke
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Margaret von Mehren
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Heikki Joensuu
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Laura S McGreevey
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chang-Jie Chen
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Annick D Van den Abbeele
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Brian J Druker
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Beate Kiese
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Burton Eisenberg
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Peter J Roberts
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Samuel Singer
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christopher D M Fletcher
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Silberman
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Sasa Dimitrijevic
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan A Fletcher
- From the Oregon Health and Science University Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, and Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA; Fox-Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; University of Turku, Turku; University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and Novartis Oncology, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vaidya R, Unger JM, Qian L, Minichiello K, Herbst RS, Gandara DR, Neal JW, Leal TA, Patel JD, Dragnev KH, Waqar SN, Edelman MJ, Sigal EV, Adam SJ, Malik S, Blanke CD, LeBlanc ML, Kelly K, Gray JE, Redman MW. Representativeness of Patients Enrolled in the Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP). JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300218. [PMID: 37677122 PMCID: PMC10581630 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Lung Cancer Master Protocol (Lung-MAP), a public-private partnership, established infrastructure for conducting a biomarker-driven master protocol in molecularly targeted therapies. We compared characteristics of patients enrolled in Lung-MAP with those of patients in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) trials to examine if master protocols improve trial access. METHODS We examined patients enrolled in Lung-MAP (2014-2020) according to sociodemographic characteristics. Proportions for characteristics were compared with those for a set of advanced NSCLC trials (2001-2020) and the US advanced NSCLC population using SEER registry data (2014-2018). Characteristics of patients enrolled in Lung-MAP treatment substudies were examined in subgroup analysis. Two-sided tests of proportions at an alpha of .01 were used for all comparisons. RESULTS A total of 3,556 patients enrolled in Lung-MAP were compared with 2,215 patients enrolled in other NSCLC studies. Patients enrolled in Lung-MAP were more likely to be 65 years and older (57.2% v 46.3%; P < .0001), from rural areas (17.3% v 14.4%; P = .004), and from socioeconomically deprived neighborhoods (42.2% v 36.7%, P < .0001), but less likely to be female (38.6% v 47.2%; P < .0001), Asian (2.8% v 5.1%; P < .0001), or Hispanic (2.4% v 3.8%; P = .003). Among patients younger than 65 years, Lung-MAP enrolled more patients using Medicaid/no insurance (27.6% v 17.8%; P < .0001). Compared with the US advanced NSCLC population, Lung-MAP under represented patients 65 years and older (57.2% v 69.8%; P < .0001), females (38.6% v 46.0%; P < .0001), and racial or ethnic minorities (14.8% v 21.5%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION Master protocols may improve access to trials using novel therapeutics for older patients and socioeconomically vulnerable patients compared with conventional trials, but specific patient exclusion criteria influenced demographic composition. Further research examining participation barriers for under represented racial or ethnic minorities in precision medicine clinical trials is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riha Vaidya
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Joseph M. Unger
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lu Qian
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Katherine Minichiello
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jyoti D. Patel
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | - Martin J. Edelman
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Stacey J. Adam
- Foundations for the National Institutes of Health, North Bethesda, MD
| | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Michael L. LeBlanc
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Karen Kelly
- UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - Mary W. Redman
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Unger JM, LeBlanc M, George S, Wolmark N, Curran WJ, O'Dwyer PJ, Schnall MD, Mannel RS, Mandrekar SJ, Gray RJ, Zhao F, Bah M, Vaidya R, Blanke CD. Population, Clinical, and Scientific Impact of National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network Treatment Studies. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2020-2028. [PMID: 36480773 PMCID: PMC10082246 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the United States, the National Cancer Institute National Cancer Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) groups have conducted publicly funded oncology research for 50 years. The combined impact of all adult network group trials has never been systematically examined. METHODS We identified randomized, phase III trials from the adult NCTN groups, reported from 1980 onward, with statistically significant findings for ≥ 1 clinical, time-dependent outcomes. In the subset of trials in which the experimental arm improved overall survival, gains in population life-years were estimated by deriving trial-specific hazard functions and hazard ratios to estimate the experimental treatment benefit and then mapping this trial-level benefit onto the US cancer population using registry and life-table data. Scientific impact was based on citation data from Google Scholar. Federal investment costs per life-year gained were estimated. The results were derived through December 31, 2020. RESULTS One hundred sixty-two trials comprised of 108,334 patients were analyzed, representing 29.8% (162/544) of trials conducted. The most common cancers included breast (34), gynecologic (28), and lung (14). The trials were cited 165,336 times (mean, 62.2 citations/trial/year); 87.7% of trials were cited in cancer care guidelines in favor of the recommended treatment. These studies were estimated to have generated 14.2 million (95% CI, 11.5 to 16.5 million) additional life-years to patients with cancer, with projected gains of 24.1 million (95% CI, 19.7 to 28.2 million) life-years by 2030. The federal investment cost per life-year gained through 2020 was $326 in US dollars. CONCLUSION NCTN randomized trials have been widely cited and are routinely included in clinical guidelines. Moreover, their conduct has predicted substantial improvements in overall survival in the United States for patients with oncologic disease, suggesting they have contributed meaningfully to this nation's health. These findings demonstrate the critical role of government-sponsored research in extending the lives of patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Suzanne George
- Office of the Alliance Group Chair, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Mitchell D. Schnall
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Robert S. Mannel
- Stephenson Cancer Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Sumithra J. Mandrekar
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Fengmin Zhao
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group–American College of Radiology Imaging Network Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Mariama Bah
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gholami S, Colby S, Horowitz DP, Guthrie KA, Ben-Josef E, El-Khoueiry AB, Blanke CD, Philip PA, Kachnic LA, Ahmad SA, Rocha FG. ASO Visual Abstract: Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancers - Secondary Analysis of a Single-Arm Clinical Trial (SWOG 0809). Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1364-1365. [PMID: 36542251 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12927-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Sacramento, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah Colby
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Katherine A Guthrie
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anthony B El-Khoueiry
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip A Philip
- Department of Oncology and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Karmanos Cancer Center, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gholami S, Colby S, Horowitz DP, Guthrie KA, Ben-Josef E, El-Khoueiry AB, Blanke CD, Philip PA, Kachnic LA, Ahmad SA, Rocha FG. Adjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Lymph Node-Positive Biliary Tract Cancers: Secondary Analysis of a Single-Arm Clinical Trial (SWOG 0809). Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:1354-1363. [PMID: 36622529 PMCID: PMC10695673 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12863-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND SWOG 0809 is the only prospective study of adjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation focusing on margin status in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and gallbladder cancer (GBCA); however, the effects of adjuvant therapy by nodal status have never been reported in this population. METHODS Patients with resected EHCC and GBCA, stage pT2-4, node-positive (N+) or margin-positive (R1) who completed four cycles of chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy were included. Cox regression was used to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis by nodal status. DFS rates were compared with historical data via a one-sample t-test. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients [EHCC, n = 46 (66%); GBCA, n = 23 (33%)] were evaluated, with a median age of 61.7 years and an R0 rate of 66.7% and R1 rate of 33.3%. EHCC versus GBCA was more likely to be N+ (73.9% vs. 47.8%, p = 0.03). Nodal status did not significantly impact OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-4.54, p = 0.11) or DFS (HR 1.63, 95% CI 0.77-3.44, p = 0.20). Two-year OS was 70.6% for node-negative (N0) disease and 60.9% for N+ disease, while 2-year DFS was 62.5% for N0 tumors and 49.8% for N+ tumors. N+ versus N0 tumors showed higher rates of distant failure (42.2% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.04). The 2-year DFS rate in N+ tumors was significantly higher than in historical controls (49.8% vs. 29.7%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant therapy is associated with favorable outcome independent of nodal status and may impact local control in N+ patients. These data could serve as a benchmark for future adjuvant trials, including molecular-targeted agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sepideh Gholami
- Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
| | - Sarah Colby
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David P Horowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Katherine A Guthrie
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Anthony B El-Khoueiry
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health Sciences University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Philip A Philip
- Department of Oncology and Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lisa A Kachnic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Syed A Ahmad
- Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health Sciences University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Van Blarigan EL, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Ng K, Niedzwiecki D, Giovannucci E, Lenz HJ, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O’Reilly EM, Ciombor KK, Meyerhardt JA. Dietary fat in relation to all-cause mortality and cancer progression and death among people with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from CALGB 80405 (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. Int J Cancer 2023; 152:123-136. [PMID: 35904874 PMCID: PMC9691576 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Data on diet and survival among people with metastatic colorectal cancer are limited. We examined dietary fat in relation to all-cause mortality and cancer progression or death among 1149 people in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 80405 trial who completed a food frequency questionnaire at initiation of treatment for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. We examined saturated, monounsaturated, total and specific types (n-3, long-chain n-3 and n-6) of polyunsaturated fat, animal and vegetable fats. We hypothesized higher vegetable fat intake would be associated with lower risk of all-cause mortality and cancer progression. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Over median follow-up of 6.1 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3, 7.2 y), we observed 974 deaths and 1077 events of progression or death. Participants had a median age of 59 y; 41% were female and 86% identified as White. Moderate or higher vegetable fat was associated with lower risk of mortality and cancer progression or death (HRs comparing second, third and fourth to first quartile for all-cause mortality: 0.74 [0.62, 0.90]; 0.75 [0.61, 0.91]; 0.79 [0.63, 1.00]; P trend: .12; for cancer progression or death: 0.74 [0.62, 0.89]; 0.78 [0.64, 0.95]; 0.71 [0.57, 0.88]; P trend: .01). No other fat type was associated with all-cause mortality and cancer progression or death. Moderate or higher vegetable fat intake may be associated with lower risk of cancer progression or death among people with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Tiffany M. Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Blase N. Polite
- University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | | | | | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
McCleary NJ, Zhang S, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Ng K, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Age and comorbidity association with survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: CALGB 80405 analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:469-479. [PMID: 35105521 PMCID: PMC9058225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the interaction of comorbidities and age on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer (mCRC), nor how comorbidities impact treatment tolerance. METHODS We utilized a cohort of 1345 mCRC patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405, a multicenter phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or both. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities assessed using NCI CTCAE v.3.0. Participants completed a questionnaire, including a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index. Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models tested associations of comorbidities and age on the endpoints. RESULTS In CALGB/SWOG 80405, 1095 (81%) subjects were < 70 years and >70 250 (19%). Presence of ≥1 comorbidity was not significantly associated with either OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.25) or PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16). Compared to subjects <70 with no comorbidities, OS was non-significantly inferior for ≥70 with no comorbidities (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.49) and significantly inferior for ≥70 with at least one comorbidity (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.86). There were no significant associations or interactions between age or comorbidity with PFS. Comorbidities were not associated with treatment-related toxicities. Age ≥ 70 was associated with greater risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.50-3.09, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among participants in a clinical trial of combination chemotherapy for mCRC, presence of older age with comorbidities was associated with worse OS but not PFS. The association of age with toxicity suggests additional factors of care should be measured in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Federico Innocenti
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, CCOP, Goldsboro, NC, United States of America
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smillow Cancer Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Unger JM, Vaidya R, Albain KS, LeBlanc M, Minasian LM, Gotay CC, Henry NL, Fisch MJ, Lee SM, Blanke CD, Hershman DL. Sex Differences in Risk of Severe Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immunotherapy, Targeted Therapy, or Chemotherapy in Cancer Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1474-1486. [PMID: 35119908 PMCID: PMC9061143 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women have more adverse events (AEs) from chemotherapy than men, but few studies have investigated sex differences in immune or targeted therapies. We examined AEs by sex across different treatment domains. METHODS We analyzed treatment-related AEs by sex in SWOG phase II and III clinical trials conducted between 1980 and 2019, excluding sex-specific cancers. AE codes and grade were categorized using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Symptomatic AEs were defined as those aligned with the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcome-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; laboratory-based or observable/measurable AEs were designated as objective (hematologic v nonhematologic). Multivariable logistic regression was used, adjusting for age, race, and disease prognosis. Thirteen symptomatic and 14 objective AE categories were examined. RESULTS In total, N = 23,296 patients (women, 8,838 [37.9%]; men, 14,458 [62.1%]) from 202 trials experiencing 274,688 AEs were analyzed; 17,417 received chemotherapy, 2,319 received immunotherapy, and 3,560 received targeted therapy. Overall, 64.6% (n = 15,051) experienced one or more severe (grade ≥ 3) AEs. Women had a 34% increased risk of severe AEs compared with men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.42; P < .001), including a 49% increased risk among those receiving immunotherapy (OR = 1.49; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.78; P < .001). Women experienced an increased risk of severe symptomatic AEs among all treatments, especially immunotherapy (OR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.37 to 2.01; P < .001). Women receiving chemotherapy or immunotherapy experienced increased severe hematologic AE. No statistically significant sex differences in risk of nonhematologic AEs were found. CONCLUSION The greater severity of both symptomatic AEs and hematologic AEs in women across multiple treatment modalities indicates that broad-based sex differences exist. This could be due to differences in AE reported, pharmacogenomics of drug metabolism/disposition, total dose received, and/or adherence to therapy. Particularly large sex differences were observed for patients receiving immunotherapy, suggesting that studying AEs from these agents is a priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Kathy S. Albain
- Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Lori M. Minasian
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, MD
| | - Carolyn C. Gotay
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lipsyc-Sharf M, Zhang S, Ou FS, Ma C, McCleary NJ, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Piawah S, Van Loon K, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg R, O’Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Survival in Young-Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings From Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:427-435. [PMID: 34636852 PMCID: PMC8902338 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer (yoCRC) is increasing. It is unknown if there are survival differences between young and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). METHODS We studied the association of age with survival in 2326 mCRC patients enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and SWOG 80405 trial, a multicenter, randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologics. The primary and secondary outcomes of this study were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), respectively, which were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared among younger vs older patients with the log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on Cox proportional hazards modeling, adjusting for known prognostic variables. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Of 2326 eligible subjects, 514 (22.1%) were younger than age 50 years at study entry (yoCRC cohort). The median age of yoCRC patients was 44.3 vs 62.5 years in patients aged 50 years and older. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between yoCRC vs older-onset patients (median = 27.07 vs 26.12 months; adjusted HR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.10; P = .78). The median PFS was also similar in yoCRC vs older patients (10.87 vs 10.55 months) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% CI = 0.92 to 1.13; P = .67). Patients younger than age 35 years had the shortest OS with median OS of 21.95 vs 26.12 months in older-onset patients with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI = 0.81 to 1.44; Ptrend = .93). CONCLUSION In this large study of mCRC patients, there were no statistically significant differences in survival between patients with yoCRC and CRC patients aged 50 years and older.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marla Lipsyc-Sharf
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chao Ma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Sorbarikor Piawah
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA
- Genentech, South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Eileen M O’Reilly
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jin Z, Dixon JG, Fiskum JM, Parekh HD, Sinicrope FA, Yothers G, Allegra CJ, Wolmark N, Haller D, Schmoll HJ, de Gramont A, Kerr R, Taieb J, Van Cutsem E, Tweleves C, O’Connell M, Saltz LB, Sadahiro S, Blanke CD, Tomita N, Seitz JF, Erlichman C, Yoshino T, Yamanaka T, Marsoni S, Andre T, Mahipal A, Goldberg RM, George TJ, Shi Q. Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Early-Onset Stage III Colon Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis of the ACCENT Database. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1693-1704. [PMID: 34405233 PMCID: PMC8634466 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon cancer (CC) incidence in young adults (age 20-49 years), termed early-onset CC (EO-CC), is increasing. METHODS Individual patient data on 35 713 subjects with stage III colon cancer from 25 randomized studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database were pooled. The distributions of demographics, clinicopathological features, biomarker status, and outcome data were summarized by age group. Overall survival, disease-free survival, time to recurrence, and survival after recurrence were assessed by Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models stratified by treatment arms within studies, adjusting for sex, race, body mass index, performance status, disease stage, grade, risk group, number of lymph nodes examined, disease sidedness, and molecular markers. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Using a 5% difference between age groups as the clinically meaningful cutoff, patients with stage III EO-CC had similar sex, race, performance status, risk group, tumor sidedness, and T stage compared with patients with late-onset CC (age 50 years and older). EO-CC patients were less likely to be overweight (30.2% vs 36.2%) and more commonly had 12 or more lymph nodes resected (69.5% vs 58.7%). EO-CC tumors were more frequently mismatch repair deficient (16.4% vs 11.5%) and less likely to have BRAFV600E (5.6% vs 14.0%), suggesting a higher rate of Lynch syndrome in EO-CC. Patients with EO-CC had statistically significantly better overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.74 to 0.89; P < .001), disease-free survival (HR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.84 to 0.98; P = .01), and survival after recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.80 to 0.97; P = .008) in the analysis without molecular markers; however, age at onset of CC lost its prognostic value when outcome was adjusted for molecular markers. CONCLUSION Tumor biology was found to be a more important prognostic factor than age of onset among stage III colon cancer patients in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer ENdpoint database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Jin
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jack M Fiskum
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hiral D Parekh
- Cancer Specialists of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Greg Yothers
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Carmen J Allegra
- Department of Medicine, Shands Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | - Daniel Haller
- Abramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Hans-Joachim Schmoll
- Department of Internal Medicine IV-Hematology-Oncology, University Clinic Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Aimery de Gramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France
| | | | - Julien Taieb
- Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Descartes University Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christopher Tweleves
- University of Leeds and St. James’s Institute of Oncology, Tom Connors Cancer Research Center, University of Bradford, Bradford, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Naohiro Tomita
- Cancer Treatment Center, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Takeharu Yamanaka
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | | | - Thierry Andre
- Medical Oncology Department in St. Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- University of Florida, Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Qian Shi
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Adams S, Othus M, Patel SP, Miller KD, Chugh R, Schuetze SM, Chamberlin MD, Haley BJ, Storniolo AMV, Reddy MP, Anderson SA, Zimmerman CT, O'Dea AP, Mirshahidi HR, Rodon Ahnert J, Brescia FJ, Hahn O, Raymond JM, Biggs DD, Connolly RM, Sharon E, Korde LA, Gray RJ, Mayerson E, Plets M, Blanke CD, Chae YK, Kurzrock R. A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Metaplastic Breast Cancer: Cohort 36 of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART, SWOG S1609). Clin Cancer Res 2021; 28:271-278. [PMID: 34716198 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-2182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC) is a rare aggressive subtype that responds poorly to cytotoxics. Median survival is approximately eight months for metastatic disease. We report results for advanced MpBC treated with ipilimumab+nivolumab, a cohort of S1609 for rare cancers (DART: NCT02834013). METHODS Prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II (two-stage) trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg IV q6weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg IV q2weeks) for advanced MpBC. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS Overall, 17 evaluable patients enrolled. Median age was 60 years (26-85); median number of prior therapy lines, 2 (0-5). ORR was 18%; 3/17 patients achieved objective responses (1 complete, 2 partial responses) (2 spindle cell, 1 chondromyxoid histology), which are ongoing at 28+, 33+ and 34+ months, respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2 and 12 months, respectively. Altogether, 11 patients (65%) experienced adverse events (AEs), including one grade 5 AE. Eight patients (47%) developed an immune-related AE (irAE); with adrenal insufficiency observed in all three responders. Responses occurred in tumors with low tumor mutational burden, low PD-L1 and absent TILs. CONCLUSION The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination showed no new safety signals and met its primary endpoint with 18% ORR in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory MpBC. All responses are ongoing at >2 to almost 3 years later. The effect of ipilimumab and nivolumab was associated with exceptional responses in a subset of patients versus no activity. This combination warrants further investigation in MpBC, with special attention to understanding mechanism of action, and carefully designed to weigh against the significant risks of irAEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
| | | | - Kathy D Miller
- Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Rashmi Chugh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
| | | | - Mary D Chamberlin
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center
| | | | | | - Mridula P Reddy
- Dayton Physicians LLC-Atrium Hematology Medical Oncology Division
| | | | | | - Anne P O'Dea
- Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | - David D Biggs
- Medical Oncology, Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants
| | | | - Elad Sharon
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute
| | - Larissa A Korde
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute
| | | | - Edward Mayerson
- SWOG Statistics & Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
| | - Melissa Plets
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
| | | | - Young Kwang Chae
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) for Personalized Cancer Therapy, Worldwide Innovative Network (WIN) for Personalized Cancer Therapy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE During the initial outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, cancer clinical trial participation decreased precipitously. Given the continued pandemic-especially the severe wave of new cases and deaths in winter 2020 to 2021-a vital question is whether trial enrollments have remained low or even worsened. OBJECTIVE To examine the experience of cancer clinical trial enrollment 1 year after the COVID-19 outbreak. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study examines initial enrollments to treatment trials and cancer control and prevention (CCP) trials conducted by the SWOG Cancer Research Network between January 1, 2016, and February 28, 2021. Participants include patients enrolled in the trials. EXPOSURES Landmark time points reflecting the onset and the apex, respectively, of the initial COVID-19 wave (March 1 to April 25, 2020) and the winter 2020 to 2021 wave (October 4, 2020, to January 23, 2021). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES This study used interrupted time-series analysis to examine enrollments over time related to the COVID-19-derived exposure variables using negative-binomial regression. Relative risk (RR) estimates representing weekly enrollment changes compared with expected rates (had the pandemic not occurred) were derived. The numbers of enrollments lost during the pandemic were estimated. RESULTS Overall, 29 398 patients (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [13.2] years) were enrolled (24 034 before the pandemic and 5364 during the pandemic), with 9198 patients (31.3%) aged 65 years or older, 17 199 female patients (58.6%), 3039 Black patients (10.8%), and 2260 Hispanic patients (7.9%). Most enrollments (19 451 [66.2%]) were to treatment trials. During the initial COVID-19 wave, there was a 9.0% model-estimated weekly reduction in enrollments (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.89-0.93; P < .001), with effects compounding each week. Enrollment recovered thereafter, but decreased again during the winter 2020 to 2021 wave, although by only 2.0% each week (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; P < .001). Overall, during the pandemic, actual enrollments were 77.3% of expected enrollments (5364 of 6913 enrollments; 95% CI, 70.5%-85.0%; P < .001). Actual enrollments were 54.0% of expected enrollments for CCP trials (1421 of 2641 enrollments; 95% CI, 43.0%-67.0%; P < .001) and 91.0% of expected enrollments for treatment trials (3922 of 4304 enrollments; 95% CI, 81.0%-102.0%; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study, clinical trial enrollments decreased during the full year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Enrollment reductions were primarily to CCP trials, whereas, remarkably, there was not strong evidence of enrollment reductions to treatment trials. This finding suggests that clinical research rapidly adapted to the circumstances of enrolling and treating patients on protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hong Xiao
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Department of Medicineand Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Group Chair’s Office, Portland, Oregon
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Patel SP, Mayerson E, Chae YK, Strosberg J, Wang J, Konda B, Hayward J, McLeod CM, Chen HX, Sharon E, Othus M, Ryan CW, Plets M, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. A phase II basket trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort. Cancer 2021; 127:3194-3201. [PMID: 33882143 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The authors previously reported the results of the nonpancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort of the SWOG S1609 DART (Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors) trial, which permitted all histologic grades and had a 44% overall response rate (ORR) among patients with high-grade disease. Here they sought to validate their findings in a dedicated prospective cohort of high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms within S1609. METHODS A prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab was conducted across multiple rare tumor cohorts. The dedicated, high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort was examined here. The primary end point was the ORR according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. RESULTS Nineteen patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (defined by local pathology review) were enrolled in this cohort of S1609. The most common primary sites were unknown primaries (21%), which were followed by the rectum, gastroesophageal junction, cervix, and pancreas (11%). The median number of lines of prior therapy was 1 (range, 0-3). All patients were microsatellite-stable. The median Ki-67 value was 80%. The ORR was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11%-45%), and the clinical benefit rate (stable disease for ≥6 months plus partial responses plus complete responses) was 32% (95% CI, 13%-57%). The 6-month PFS rate was 32% (95% CI, 16%-61%) with a median PFS of 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8 months to ∞) and a median OS of 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.1 months to ∞). The most common toxicities were fatigue (32%) and rash (26%), and the most common grade 3/4 immune-related adverse event was rash (15%); there were no events that required treatment discontinuation and no grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated a 26% ORR in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms, with durable responses seen in patients with refractory disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip Pravin Patel
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | - Edward Mayerson
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | | - Jue Wang
- University of Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Bhavana Konda
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Jourdain Hayward
- SWOG Data Operations Center/Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christine M McLeod
- SWOG Data Operations Center/Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, Washington
| | - Helen X Chen
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elad Sharon
- Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Melissa Plets
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington.,Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mackintosh C, Yuan C, Ou FS, Zhang S, Niedzwiecki D, Chang IW, O'Neil BH, Mullen BC, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Innocenti F, Nixon AB, Goldberg RM, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Association of Coffee Intake With Survival in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2020; 6:1713-1721. [PMID: 32940631 PMCID: PMC7499248 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Importance Several compounds found in coffee possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and insulin-sensitizing effects, which may contribute to anticancer activity. Epidemiological studies have identified associations between increased coffee consumption and decreased recurrence and mortality of colorectal cancer. The association between coffee consumption and survival in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer is unknown. Objective To evaluate the association of coffee consumption with disease progression and death in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective observational cohort study included 1171 patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405, a completed phase 3 clinical trial comparing the addition of cetuximab and/or bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy. Patients reported dietary intake using a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire at the time of enrollment. Data were collected from October 27, 2005, to January 18, 2018, and analyzed from May 1 to August 31, 2018. Exposures Consumption of total, decaffeinated, and caffeinated coffee measured in cups per day. Main Outcomes and Measures Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results Among the 1171 patients included in the analysis (694 men [59%]; median age, 59 [interquartile range, 51-67] years). The median follow-up time among living patients was 5.4 years (10th percentile, 1.3 years; IQR, 3.2-6.3 years). A total of 1092 patients (93%) had died or had disease progression. Increased consumption of coffee was associated with decreased risk of cancer progression (hazard ratio [HR] for 1-cup/d increment, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-1.00; P = .04 for trend) and death (HR for 1-cup/d increment, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98; P = .004 for trend). Participants who consumed 2 to 3 cups of coffee per day had a multivariable HR for OS of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.67-1.00) and for PFS of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68-0.99), compared with those who did not drink coffee. Participants who consumed at least 4 cups of coffee per day had a multivariable HR for OS of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46-0.87) and for PFS of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.59-1.05). Significant associations were noted for both caffeinated and decaffeinated coffee. Conclusions and Relevance Coffee consumption may be associated with reduced risk of disease progression and death in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Further research is warranted to elucidate underlying biological mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Brian C Mullen
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Andrew B Nixon
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Van Blarigan EL, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venlo A, Ng K, Atreya C, Van Loon K, Niedzwiecki D, Giovannucci E, Wolfe EG, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Association of Diet Quality With Survival Among People With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Cancer and Leukemia B and Southwest Oncology Group 80405 Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2023500. [PMID: 33125497 PMCID: PMC7599454 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Diet has been associated with survival in patients with stage I to III colorectal cancer, but data on patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are limited. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between diet quality and overall survival among individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a prospective cohort study of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who were enrolled in the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance) and Southwest Oncology Group 80405 trial between October 27, 2005, and February 29, 2012, and followed up through January 2018. EXPOSURES Participants completed a validated food frequency questionnaire within 4 weeks after initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Diets were categorized according to the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI), Alternate Mediterranean Diet (AMED) score, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) score, and Western and prudent dietary patterns derived using principal component analysis. Participants were categorized into sex-specific quintiles. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for overall survival. RESULTS In this cohort study of 1284 individuals with metastatic colorectal cancer, the median age was 59 (interquartile range [IQR]: 51-68) years, median body mass index was 27.2 (IQR, 24.1-31.4), 521 (41%) were female, and 1102 (86%) were White. There were 1100 deaths during a median follow-up of 73 months (IQR, 64-87 months). We observed an inverse association between the AMED score and risk of death (HR quintile 5 vs quintile 1, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04; P = .04 for trend), but the point estimates were not statistically significant. None of the other diet scores or patterns were associated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this prospective analysis of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, diet quality assessed at initiation of first-line treatment for metastatic disease was not associated with overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin L Van Blarigan
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Alan Venlo
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Chloe Atreya
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eric G Wolfe
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy; Department of Medicine-Hematology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | | | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
The article cited does not differentiate between Type I and Type II diabetes. More information is needed to properly assess risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D. Blanke
- Knight Cancer Institute and Department of MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandOregonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bertagnolli MM, Blanke CD, Curran WJ, Hawkins DS, Mannel RS, O'Dwyer PJ, Schnall MD, Wolmark N. What happened to the US cancer cooperative groups? A status update ten years after the Institute of Medicine report. Cancer 2020; 126:5022-5029. [PMID: 32970346 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The US cancer cooperative groups (cooperative groups) were founded in the 1950s to establish a standing infrastructure to conduct multi-institutional cancer clinical trials. Initially funded almost entirely by the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), over the years, the research conducted by the Cooperative Groups has evolved to meet the demands of cancer clinical research, with a scope now encompassing trials to advance cancer treatment, cancer control, biomarker development and validation, and health services research, with a corresponding broadening of their funding sources. The cooperative groups are also a critical mechanism for educating the next generation of cancer clinical trialists from many different disciplines. This review outlines the overall mission, structure, and funding of the cooperative groups, beginning in 1955 when they were first established by the NCI, and describes the considerable progress against cancer achieved over the past decade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Douglas S Hawkins
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert S Mannel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Oklahoma Stevenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Peter J O'Dwyer
- Department Hematology/Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Norman Wolmark
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Innocenti F, Sibley AB, Patil SA, Etheridge AS, Jiang C, Ou FS, Howell SD, Plummer SJ, Casey G, Bertagnolli MM, McLeod HL, Auman JT, Blanke CD, Furukawa Y, Venook AP, Kubo M, Lenz HJ, Parker JS, Ratain MJ, Owzar K. Genomic Analysis of Germline Variation Associated with Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy Plus Biologics in CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Clin Cancer Res 2020; 27:267-275. [PMID: 32958699 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU; FOLFIRI) or oxaliplatin/5-FU (FOLFOX), combined with bevacizumab or cetuximab, are approved, first-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed at identifying germline variants associated with survival in patients with mCRC treated with these regimens in Cancer and Leukemia Group B/SWOG 80405. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN Patients with mCRC receiving either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI were randomized to either cetuximab or bevacizumab. DNA from peripheral blood was genotyped for approximately 700,000 SNPs. The association between SNPs and overall survival (OS) was tested in 613 patients of genetically estimated European ancestry using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The four most significant SNPs associated with OS were three haplotypic SNPs between microsomal glutathione S-transferase 1 (MGST1) and LIM domain only 3 (LMO3, representative HR, 1.56; P = 1.30 × 10-6), and rs11644916 in AXIN1 (HR, 1.39, P = 4.26 × 10-6). AXIN1 is a well-established tumor suppressor gene in colorectal cancer, and rs11644916 (G>A) conferred shorter OS. Median OS for patients with the AA, AG, or GG genotypes was 18.4, 25.6, or 36.4 months, respectively. In 90 patients with stage IV colorectal cancer from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), rs11649255 in AXIN1 [in almost complete linkage disequilibrium (LD) with rs11644916], was associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.24, P = 0.0096). Using rs11648673 in AXIN1 (in very high LD with rs11644916 and with functional evidence), luciferase activity in three colorectal cancer cell lines was reduced. CONCLUSIONS This is the first large genome-wide association study ever conducted in patients with mCRC treated with first-line standard treatment in a randomized phase III trial. A common SNP in AXIN1 conferred worse OS and the effect was replicated in TCGA. Further studies in colorectal cancer experimental models are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Innocenti
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
| | | | - Sushant A Patil
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amy S Etheridge
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Chen Jiang
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Stefanie D Howell
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Sarah J Plummer
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Graham Casey
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Monica M Bertagnolli
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Howard L McLeod
- Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - James T Auman
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Charles D Blanke
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Yoichi Furukawa
- Division of Clinical Genome Research, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michiaki Kubo
- Laboratory for Genotyping Development, Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, RIKEN, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Joel S Parker
- UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Mark J Ratain
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Kouros Owzar
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.,Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Guercio BJ, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Pollak MN, Nixon AB, Mullen BC, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Benson AB, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Brown JC, O'Reilly EM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. IGF-Binding Proteins, Adiponectin, and Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 5:pkaa074. [PMID: 33426464 PMCID: PMC7785047 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Energy balance-related biomarkers are associated with risk and prognosis of various malignancies. Their relationship to survival in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) requires further study. Methods Baseline plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-3, IGFBP-7, C-peptide, and adiponectin were measured at time of trial registration in a prospective cohort of patients with mCRC participating in a National Cancer Institute–sponsored trial of first-line systemic therapy. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for confounders and examine associations of each biomarker with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). P values are 2-sided. Results Median follow-up for 1086 patients was 6.2 years. Compared with patients in the lowest IGFBP-3 quintile, patients in the highest IGFBP-3 quintile experienced an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for OS of 0.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.42 to 0.78; Pnonlinearity < .001) and for PFS of 0.61 (95% CI = 0.45 to 0.82; Ptrend = .003). Compared with patients in the lowest IGFBP-7 quintile, patients in the highest IGFBP-7 quintile experienced an adjusted hazard ratio for OS of 1.60 (95% CI = 1.30 to 1.97; Ptrend < .001) and for PFS of 1.38 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.69; Ptrend < .001). Plasma C-peptide and IGF-1 were not associated with patient outcomes. Adiponectin was not associated with OS; there was a nonlinear U-shaped association between adiponectin and PFS (Pnonlinearity = .03). Conclusions Among patients with mCRC, high plasma IGFBP-3 and low IGFBP-7 were associated with longer OS and PFS. Extreme levels of adiponectin were associated with shorter PFS. These findings suggest potential avenues for prognostic and therapeutic innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan J Guercio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Michael N Pollak
- Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada
| | - Andrew B Nixon
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brian C Mullen
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James E Shaw
- MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Al Bowen Benson
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Justin C Brown
- Department of Population and Public Health, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network and Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wagner AD, Grothey A, Andre T, Dixon JG, Wolmark N, Haller DG, Allegra CJ, de Gramont A, VanCutsem E, Alberts SR, George TJ, O'Connell MJ, Twelves C, Taieb J, Saltz LB, Blanke CD, Francini E, Kerr R, Yothers G, Seitz JF, Marsoni S, Goldberg RM, Shi Q. Sex and Adverse Events of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colon Cancer: An Analysis of 34 640 Patients in the ACCENT Database. J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 113:400-407. [PMID: 32835356 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djaa124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment option for patients with stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer. Sex is one of several factors responsible for the wide inter-patient variability in drug responses. Amalgamated data on the effect of sex on the toxicity of current standard adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer are missing. METHODS The objective of our study was to compare incidence and severity of major toxicities of fluoropyrimidine- (5FU or capecitabine) based adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without oxaliplatin, between male and female patients after curative surgery for colon cancer. Adult patients enrolled in 27 relevant randomized trials included in the ACCENT (Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points) database, a large, multi-group, international data repository containing individual patient data, were included. Comparisons were conducted using logistic regression models (stratified by study and treatment arm) within each type of adjuvant chemotherapy (5FU, FOLFOX, capecitabine, CAPOX, and FOLFIRI). The following major toxicities were compared (grade III or IV and grade I-IV, according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria [NCI-CTC] criteria, regardless of attribution): nausea, vomiting, nausea or vomiting, stomatitis, diarrhea, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neuropathy (in patients treated with oxaliplatin). RESULTS Data from 34 640 patients were analyzed. Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in the occurrence of grade III or IV nonhematological {especially nausea (5FU: odds ratio [OR] = 2.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.90 to 2.87, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.76 to 3.11, P < .001), vomiting (5FU: OR = 2.38, 95% CI = 1.86 to 3.04, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.50 to 2.66, P < .001; CAPOX: OR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.55 to 3.46, P < .001), and diarrhea (5FU: OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.51, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.35 to 1.90, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.25 to 1.97, P < .001)} as well as hematological toxicities (neutropenia [5FU: OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.37 to 1.76, P < .001; FOLFOX: OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.71 to 2.25, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.66 to 2.43, P < .001; capecitabine: OR = 4.07, 95% CI = 1.84 to 8.99, P < .001] and leukopenia [5FU: OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.40 to 2.17, P < .001; FOLFIRI: OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.28 to 2.40, P < .001]) were observed, with women being consistently at increased risk. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis confirms that women with colon cancer receiving adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy are at increased risk of toxicity. Given the known sex differences in fluoropyrimidine pharmacokinetics, sex-specific dosing of fluoropyrimidines warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna D Wagner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Axel Grothey
- West Cancer Center and Research Institute, Germantown, TN, USA
| | - Thierry Andre
- Sorbonne University and Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jesse G Dixon
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas J George
- Department of Medicine and University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Rachel Kerr
- Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer Group, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Greg Yothers
- NRG Oncology and the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jean F Seitz
- Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille-University, Marseille, France
| | - Silvia Marsoni
- Precision Oncology, The FIRC Institute Of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Chae YK, Othus M, Patel SP, Ohr JP, Worden FP, Suga JM, Naing A, Fenton SE, Kang H, Gurung S, McLeod CM, Giles FJ, Chen HX, Sharon E, Mayerson E, Plets M, Ryan C, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. Abstract 3418: A phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: The salivary gland tumor cohort. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-3418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Since their first approval in 2011 for metastatic melanoma, checkpoint inhibitors have been successfully applied to multiple tumor types. To date, the potential role for these treatments in rare solid tumors has not been well studied. We report the results of three salivary gland neoplasm cohorts of SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART) trial.
Methods: We performed a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg intravenously every 2 weeks) in multiple tumor types. Here, we report the results found in three salivary gland neoplasm cohorts that include patients with salivary gland tumor types arising in major salivary glands (cohort 2), other sites of origin (cohort 3) and adenoid cystic carcinomas of any site (cohort 34). Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1) (complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR)); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), stable disease >6 months, and toxicity.
Results: Twenty six patients with adenoid cystic salivary gland tumors and thirty five patients with other histologic subtypes of salivary gland neoplasm received therapy. The most common site of origin was the parotid (35%; N=9 in the adenoid cystic group and 54%; N=19 in the remaining histologies). The overall ORR in the adenoid cystic group was 4% (CR, 0%; PR, 4%, N= 1) and the median PFS was 4.4 months. 6 month OS was 84% and median OS was 12 months. In the remaining histologic subtypes the ORR was 9% (CR, 0%; PR, 9%, N=3) and the median PFS was 4.6 months. 6-month OS was 89%, median OS was not reached. The most common toxicities were fatigue (39%) and diarrhea (26%), with diarrhea (8%) as the most common grade 3-5 immune-related adverse event.
Conclusions: In salivary gland tumors, combination therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab resulted in a 4% ORR in adenoid cystic carcinoma and 9% in other histologies combined.
Citation Format: Young Kwang Chae, Megan Othus, Sandip Pravin Patel, James P. Ohr, Francis P. Worden, Jennifer M. Suga, Aung Naing, Sarah E. Fenton, Hyunseok Kang, Sewan Gurung, Christine M. McLeod, Francis J. Giles, Helen X. Chen, Elad Sharon, Edward Mayerson, Melissa Plets, Christopher Ryan, Charles D. Blanke, Razelle Kurzrock. A phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: The salivary gland tumor cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3418.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Othus
- 2SWOG Statistical and Data Management Center, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen X. Chen
- 11National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, MD
| | - Elad Sharon
- 11National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, MD
| | | | | | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- 13SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Chae YK, Othus M, Patel SP, Zalupski M, Kasi A, Khalil M, Kalyan A, Polite B, Fenton S, Gurung S, McLeod CM, Giles F, Chen HX, Sharon E, Mayerson E, Plets M, Ryan CW, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. Abstract 3417: A phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: The small bowel tumor cohort. Cancer Res 2020. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-3417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The potential therapeutic benefits of checkpoint inhibitors and their application to many different tumor types has been a key factor in the advancement of medical oncology since their first approval for metastatic melanoma in 2011. However, their efficacy in rare tumor types remains to be seen. This paper presents the results of combination therapy with both anti-CTLA and anti-PD-1 in the small bowel cohort of SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART).
Methods: This study is designed as a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg intravenously every 6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg intravenously every 2 weeks) in rare tumors. Here we report the outcomes from patients diagnosed with small bowel cancer (SBC). The primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1) (complete response (CR) and partial responses (PR)); progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), stable disease >6 months, and toxicity were the secondary endpoints.
Results: Twenty five patients were registered to the cohort and twenty three received therapy. The duodenum was the primary site of origin in 52% (N=11), 14% (N=3) arose in the ileum and 14% (N=3) arose in the jejunum. The primary site of origin was unknown in 19% (N=4). The overall response rate was 8% (CR, 4%, N= 1; PR, 4%, N= 1). The median PFS was 2 months; 6-month OS was 48% and median OS 6 months. The most common toxicities were diarrhea and fatigue (both 17%) followed by dyspnea (13%) with diarrhea, increased bilirubin, colitis and elevated lipase (all 4.3%) as the most common grade 3-5 immune-related adverse events.
Conclusions: Combination therapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab in small bowel tumors resulted in an overall response rate of 8% with one partial and one complete response in twenty three treated patients.
Citation Format: Young Kwang Chae, Megan Othus, Sandip Pravin Patel, Mark Zalupski, Anup Kasi, Maged Khalil, Aparna Kalyan, Blase Polite, Sarah Fenton, Sewan Gurung, Christine M. McLeod, Francis Giles, Helen X. Chen, Elad Sharon, Edward Mayerson, Melissa Plets, Christopher W. Ryan, Charles D. Blanke, Razelle Kurzrock. A phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) SWOG S1609: The small bowel tumor cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3417.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Anup Kasi
- 5University of Kansas Medical Center, KS
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Helen X. Chen
- 10National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, MD
| | - Elad Sharon
- 10National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, MD
| | | | | | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- 13SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, OR
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- 14University of California at San Diego Moores Cancer Center, CA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Tan AD, Willemsma K, MacNeill A, DeVries K, Srikanthan A, McGahan C, Hamilton T, Li H, Blanke CD, Simmons CE. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors significantly improved survival outcomes in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour: a multi-institutional cohort study. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 27:e276-e282. [PMID: 32669934 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The real-world impact of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (tkis) in clinical practice for gastrointestinal stromal tumour (gist) has not been extensively reported. We sought to assess how outcomes have changed over the eras and to evaluate the effect of access to imatinib and sunitinib on survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic gist in British Columbia. Methods Patients with metastatic or unresectable gist were allocated to one of three eras: pre-2002, 2002-2007, and post-2007 based on treatment availability (pre-imatinib, post-imatinib, and post-sunitinib). Overall survival (os) and progression-free survival (pfs) were compared between eras. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effects of tumour, patient, and treatment characteristics on survival outcomes. Results Of 657 patients diagnosed with gist throughout British Columbia during 1996-2016, 196 had metastatic disease: 23 in the pre-imatinib era, 67 in the post-imatinib era, and 106 in the post-sunitinib era. A significant increase in os, by 53.6 months (p = 0.0007), and pfs, by 29.1 months (p = 0.044), was observed after the introduction of imatinib. The introduction of sunitinib did not significantly affect os or pfs. Conclusions Implementation of tkis has drastically improved survival outcomes for patients with metastatic gist by up to 4.55 years in the real-world setting. Our study demonstrates that implementation of tkis in clinical practice has outperformed their benefit predicted in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - A MacNeill
- Surgical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - K DeVries
- Statistical Sciences, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | | | - C McGahan
- Statistical Sciences, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - T Hamilton
- Surgical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - H Li
- Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - C D Blanke
- Medical Oncology, ohsu Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, U.S.A
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
This cohort study investigates how the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is associated with national enrollment in cancer clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Group Chair’s Office, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Unger JM, Blanke CD, LeBlanc M, Barlow WE, Vaidya R, Ramsey SD, Hershman DL. Association of Patient Demographic Characteristics and Insurance Status With Survival in Cancer Randomized Clinical Trials With Positive Findings. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e203842. [PMID: 32352530 PMCID: PMC7193331 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Few new treatments tested in phase 3 cancer randomized clinical trials show an overall survival benefit. Although understanding whether the benefits are consistent among all patient groups is critical for informing guideline care, individual trials are designed to assess the benefits of experimental treatments among all patients and are too small to reliably determine whether treatment benefits apply to demographic or insurance subgroups. OBJECTIVE To systematically examine whether positive treatment effects in cancer randomized clinical trials apply to specific demographic or insurance subgroups. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Cohort study of pooled patient-level data from 10 804 patients in SWOG Cancer Research Network clinical treatment trials reported from 1985 onward with superior overall survival for those receiving experimental treatment. Patients were enrolled from 1984 to 2012. Maximum follow-up was 5 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Interaction tests were used to assess whether hazard ratios (HRs) for death comparing standard group vs experimental group treatments were associated with age (≥65 vs <65 years), race/ethnicity (minority vs nonminority populations), sex, or insurance status among patients younger than 65 years (Medicaid or no insurance vs private insurance) in multivariable Cox regression frailty models. Progression- or relapse-free survival was also examined. Data analyses were conducted from August 2019 to February 2020. RESULTS In total, 19 trials including 10 804 patients were identified that reported superior overall survival for patients randomized to experimental treatment. Patients were predominantly younger than 65 years (67.3%) and female (66.3%); 11.4% were black patients, and 5.7% were Hispanic patients. There was evidence of added survival benefits associated with receipt of experimental therapy for all groups except for patients with Medicaid or no insurance (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.97-1.56; P = .09) compared with those with private insurance (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.44-1.92; P < .001; P = .03 for interaction). Receipt of experimental treatment was associated with reduced added overall survival benefits in patients 65 years or older (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32; P < .001) compared with patients younger than 65 years (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.30-1.53; P < .001; P = .01 for interaction), although both older and younger patients appeared to strongly benefit from receipt of experimental treatment. The progression- or relapse-free survival HRs did not differ by age, sex, or race/ethnicity but differed between patients with Medicaid or no insurance (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.06-1.64; P = .01) vs private insurance (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.54-1.97; P < .001; P = .03 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Patients with Medicaid or no insurance may have smaller added benefits from experimental therapies compared with standard treatments in clinical trials. A better understanding of the quality of survivorship care that patients with suboptimal insurance receive, including supportive care and posttreatment care, could help establish how external factors may affect outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Group Chair’s Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - William E. Barlow
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Cancer Research Network Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Guercio BJ, Zhang S, Venook AP, Ou FS, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Mullen BC, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Brown JC, O'Reilly EM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Body Mass Index and Weight Loss in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2020; 4:pkaa024. [PMID: 33134818 PMCID: PMC7590517 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In nonmetastatic colorectal cancer, overweight and mild-to-moderately obese patients experience improved outcomes compared with other patients. Obesity’s influence on advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is relatively unexplored. Methods We conducted a prospective body mass index (BMI) companion study in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (now Alliance)/SWOG 80405, a phase III metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment trial. BMI was measured at trial registration. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival, respectively. To minimize confounding by poor and rapidly declining health, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for known prognostic factors, comorbidities, physical activity, and weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry. We also examined weight loss prior to enrollment as an independent predictor of patient outcome. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Among 2323 patients with mCRC, there were no statistically significant associations between BMI and overall or progression-free survival (adjusted Ptrend = .12 and .40, respectively). Weight loss during the 6 months prior to study entry was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival; compared with individuals with stable weight ±4.9%, individuals with weight loss greater than 15% experienced an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.52 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.26 to 1.84; Ptrend < .001) and of 1.23 for disease progression or death (95% CI = 1.02 to 1.47; Ptrend = .006). Conclusions In this prospective study of patients with mCRC, BMI at time of first-line chemotherapy initiation was not associated with patient outcome. Weight loss prior to study entry was associated with increased risk of patient mortality and disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan J Guercio
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | | - Brian C Mullen
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - James E Shaw
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL USA
| | | | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, NCORP, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | | | - Justin C Brown
- Department of Population and Public Health Science, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Cancer Research Network and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Patel SP, Othus M, Chae YK, Giles FJ, Hansel DE, Singh PP, Fontaine A, Shah MH, Kasi A, Baghdadi TA, Matrana M, Gatalica Z, Korn WM, Hayward J, McLeod C, Chen HX, Sharon E, Mayerson E, Ryan CW, Plets M, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. A Phase II Basket Trial of Dual Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1 Blockade in Rare Tumors (DART SWOG 1609) in Patients with Nonpancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2020; 26:2290-2296. [PMID: 31969335 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-3356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 188] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Immune checkpoint blockade has improved outcomes across tumor types; little is known about the efficacy of these agents in rare tumors. We report the results of the (nonpancreatic) neuroendocrine neoplasm cohort of SWOG S1609 dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II clinical trial of ipilimumab plus nivolumab across multiple rare tumor cohorts, with the (nonpancreatic) neuroendocrine cohort reported here. Response assessment by grade was not prespecified. The primary endpoint was overall response rate [ORR; RECIST v1.1; complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)]; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), stable disease >6 months, and toxicity. RESULTS Thirty-two eligible patients received therapy; 18 (56%) had high-grade disease. Most common primary sites were gastrointestinal (47%; N = 15) and lung (19%; N = 6). The overall ORR was 25% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-64%; CR, 3%, N = 1; PR, 22%, N = 7]. Patients with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma had an ORR of 44% (8/18 patients) versus 0% in low/intermediate grade tumors (0/14 patients; P = 0.004). The 6-month PFS was 31% (95% CI, 19%-52%); median OS was 11 months (95% CI, 6-∞). The most common toxicities were hypothyroidism (31%), fatigue (28%), and nausea (28%), with alanine aminotransferase elevation (9%) as the most common grade 3/4 immune-related adverse event, and no grade 5 events. CONCLUSIONS Ipilimumab plus nivolumab demonstrated a 44% ORR in patients with nonpancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, with 0% ORR in low/intermediate grade disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandip P Patel
- University of California at San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
| | - Megan Othus
- SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Francis J Giles
- Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Developmental Therapeutics Consortium, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Donna E Hansel
- University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California
| | | | - Annette Fontaine
- New Mexico MU-NCORP/New Mexico Cancer Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico
| | - Manisha H Shah
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology), Columbus, Ohio
| | - Anup Kasi
- University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, Kansas
| | - Tareq Al Baghdadi
- Michigan CRC NCORP/IHA Hematology Oncology Consultants, Ypsilanti, Michigan
| | - Marc Matrana
- Ochsner Clinic Foundation (ECOG-ACRIN), New Orleans, Louisiana
| | | | - W Michael Korn
- Caris Life Sciences, Tempe, Arizona.,University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | | | | | - Helen X Chen
- National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Elad Sharon
- National Cancer Institute, Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, Oregon
| | - Razelle Kurzrock
- University of California at San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, California.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brown JC, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Denlinger CS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Ng K, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Diabetes and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: CALGB 80405 (Alliance). JNCI Cancer Spectr 2019; 4:pkz078. [PMID: 32259016 PMCID: PMC7043296 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkz078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Diabetes is a prognostic factor for some malignancies, but its association with outcome in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) is less clear. Methods This cohort study was nested within a randomized trial of first-line chemotherapy and bevacizumab and/or cetuximab for advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients were enrolled at 508 community and academic centers throughout the National Clinical Trials Network. The primary exposure was physician-documented diabetes at the time of enrollment. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Tests of statistical significance were two-sided. Results Among 2326 patients, 378 (16.3%) had diabetes. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years. We observed 1973 OS events and 2173 PFS events. The median time to an OS event was 22.7 months among those with diabetes and 27.1 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.13 to 1.44; P < .001). The median time to a PFS event was 9.7 months among those with diabetes and 10.8 months among those without diabetes (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.30; P = .02). Patients with diabetes were more likely to experience no less than grade 3 hypertension (8.1% vs 4.4%; P = .054) but were not more likely to experience other adverse events, including neuropathy. Conclusions Diabetes is associated with an increased risk of mortality and tumor progression in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. Patients with diabetes tolerate first-line treatment with chemotherapy and monoclonal antibodies similarly to patients without diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin C Brown
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Sui Zhang
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Alan P Venook
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Bert H O'Neil
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - James E Shaw
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Blase N Polite
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - James N Atkins
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Kimmie Ng
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Robert J Mayer
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | - Charles D Blanke
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | | - Charles S Fuchs
- See the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Yuan C, Sato K, Hollis BW, Zhang S, Niedzwiecki D, Ou FS, Chang IW, O'Neil BH, Innocenti F, Lenz HJ, Blanke CD, Goldberg RM, Venook AP, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA, Ng K. Plasma 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Survival in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Findings from CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:7497-7505. [PMID: 31548349 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Previous studies have suggested that higher circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels are associated with decreased colorectal cancer risk and improved survival. However, the influence of vitamin D status on disease progression and patient survival remains largely unknown for patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We prospectively collected blood samples in 1,041 patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer participating in a randomized phase III clinical trial of first-line chemotherapy plus biologic therapy. We examined the association of baseline plasma 25(OH)D levels with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs), adjusted for prognostic factors and confounders. RESULTS At study entry, 63% of patients were vitamin D deficient (<20 ng/mL) and 31% were vitamin D insufficient (20-<30 ng/mL). Higher 25(OH)D levels were associated with an improvement in OS and PFS (P trend = 0.0009 and 0.03, respectively). Compared with patients in the bottom quintile of 25(OH)D (≤10.8 ng/mL), those in the top quintile (≥24.1 ng/mL) had a multivariable-adjusted HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.53-0.83) for OS and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.66-1.00) for PFS. The improved survival associated with higher 25(OH)D levels was consistent across patient subgroups of prognostic patient and tumor characteristics. CONCLUSIONS In this large cohort of patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, higher plasma 25(OH)D levels were associated with improved OS and PFS. Clinical trials assessing the benefit of vitamin D supplementation in patients with colorectal cancer are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Kaori Sato
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bruce W Hollis
- Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Sui Zhang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - I-Wen Chang
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Federico Innocenti
- Eshelman School of Pharmacy and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, San Francisco, California
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smilow Cancer Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Unger JM, Nghiem VT, Hershman DL, Vaidya R, LeBlanc M, Blanke CD. Association of National Cancer Institute-Sponsored Clinical Trial Network Group Studies With Guideline Care and New Drug Indications. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1910593. [PMID: 31483471 PMCID: PMC6727679 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Network (NCTN) groups serve a vital role in identifying effective new antineoplastic regimens. However, the downstream clinical effect of their trials has not been systematically examined. OBJECTIVE To examine the association of NCTN trials with guideline care and new drug indications. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This retrospective cohort study evaluated phase 3 SWOG Cancer Research Network clinical trials from January 1, 1980, through June 30, 2017. Only completed trials with published results were included. To be considered practice influential (PI), a trial must have been associated with guideline care through its inclusion in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) clinical guidelines or US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) new drug approvals in favor of a recommended treatment. Data were analyzed from June 15, 2018, through March 29, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Estimated overall rate of PI trials, as well as trends over time. The total federal investment supporting the set of trials was also determined. RESULTS In total, 182 trials consisting of 148 028 patients were studied. Eighty-two studies (45.1%; 95% CI, 37.7%-52.6%) were PI, of which 70 (38.5%) influenced NCCN guidelines, 6 (3.3%) influenced FDA new drug approvals, and 6 (3.3%) influenced both. The number of PI trials was 47 of 65 (72.3%) among those with positive findings and 35 of 117 (29.9%) among those with negative findings. Thus, 35 of 82 PI trials (42.7%) were based on studies with negative findings, with nearly half of these studies (17 of 35 [48.6%]) reaffirming standard of care compared with experimental therapy. The total federal investment spent in conducting the trials was $1.36 billion (2017 US dollars), a rate of $7.5 million per study or $16.6 million per PI trial. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Nearly half of all phase 3 trials by one of the NCTN's largest groups were associated with guideline care or new drug indications, including those with positive and negative findings. Compared with the costs of a new drug approval in pharmaceutical companies, typically estimated at more than $1 billion, the amount of federal funds invested to provide this valuable evidence was modest. These results suggest that the NCTN program contributes clinically meaningful, cost-efficient evidence to guide patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Van T. Nghiem
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Dawn L. Hershman
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Riha Vaidya
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Charles D. Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Guercio BJ, Zhang S, Ou FS, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Sato K, Ng K, Van Blarigan E, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Associations of Physical Activity With Survival and Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:2620-2631. [PMID: 31408415 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.01019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Regular physical activity is associated with reduced risk of recurrence and mortality in patients with nonmetastatic colorectal cancer. Its influence on patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been largely unexplored. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study nested in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00265850), a National Cancer Institute-sponsored phase III trial of systemic therapy for mCRC. Within 1 month after therapy initiation, patients were invited to complete a validated questionnaire that reported average physical activity over the previous 2 months. On the basis of responses, we calculated metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours per week to quantify physical activity. The primary end point of the clinical trial and this companion study was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and first grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events. To minimize confounding by poor and declining health, we excluded patients who experienced progression or died within 60 days of activity assessment and used Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to adjust for known prognostic factors, comorbidities, and weight loss. RESULTS The final cohort included 1,218 patients. Compared with patients engaged in less than 3 MET hours per week of physical activity, patients engaged in 18 or more MET hours per week experienced an adjusted hazard ratio for OS of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.02; PTrend = .06) and for PFS of 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.99; PTrend = .01). Compared with patients engaging in less than 9 MET hours per week, patients engaging in 9 or more MET hours per week experienced an adjusted hazard ratio for grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.86; PTrend < .001). CONCLUSION Among patients with mCRC in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (Alliance)/SWOG 80405, association of physical activity with OS was not statistically significant. Greater physical activity was associated with longer PFS and lower adjusted risk for first grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alan P Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Bert H O'Neil
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - James E Shaw
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | | | | | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Kaori Sato
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG, Portland, OR.,Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The combined 28 years of data of medical aid in dying (MAID) between Oregon (OR) and Washington (WA) are the most comprehensive in North America. No reports to date have compared MAID use in different US states. OBJECTIVE To evaluate and compare patterns of MAID use between the states with the longest-running US death with dignity programs. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective observational cohort study of OR and WA patients with terminal illness who received prescriptions as part of their states' legislation allowing MAID. All published annual reports, from 1998 to 2017 in OR and from 2009 to 2017 in WA, were reviewed. A total of 3368 prescriptions were included. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Number of deaths from self-administration of lethal medication vs number of prescriptions written. RESULTS A combined 3368 prescriptions were written in OR and WA, with 2558 patient deaths from lethal ingestion (76.0%). Of the 2558 patients, most were male (1311 [51.3%]), older than 65 years (1851 [72.4%]), and non-Hispanic white (2426 [94.8%]). The most common underlying illnesses were cancer (1955 [76.4%]), neurologic illness (261 [10.2%]), lung disease (144 [5.6%]), and heart disease (117 [4.6%]). Loss of autonomy (2235 [87.4%]), impaired quality of life (2203 [86.1%]), and loss of dignity (1755 [68.6%]) were the most common reasons for pursuing MAID. Time between drug intake to coma ranged from 1 to 660 minutes and time from drug intake to death ranged from 1 to 6240 minutes. In the 1557 patients for whom rates of complications were reported, 1494 (96.0%) did not experience a complication (592 of 626 [94.6%] in OR and 902 of 931 [96.8%] in WA). Eight patients (<0.5%) regained consciousness after drug ingestion in OR. Annual rates per year for percentage of patients who received a prescription ingesting the prescribed medication ranged from 48% to 87%, with no significant time trend in OR (adjusted odds ratio per year, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = .59) but with an increase over time in WA (adjusted odds ratio per year, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.08-1.19; P < .001). In both OR and WA there were increases in the number of patient deaths due to MAID per 1000 deaths over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this study, MAID results in Oregon and Washington were similar, although MAID use measured as a percentage of patients prescribed lethal medications and then self-administering them increased only in WA. Most patients who acquired lethal prescriptions had cancer or terminal illnesses that are difficult to palliate and lead to loss of autonomy, dignity, and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Taylor Bucy
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
| | | | | | - Frank L. Meyskens
- University of California, Irvine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Orange
| | | | - Charles D. Blanke
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
- SWOG Group Chair’s Office, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Lenz HJ, Ou FS, Venook AP, Hochster HS, Niedzwiecki D, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Bertagnolli MM, Blanke CD, Zemla T, Qu X, Wirapati P, Tejpar S, Innocenti F, Kabbarah O. Impact of Consensus Molecular Subtype on Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results From CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1876-1885. [PMID: 31042420 PMCID: PMC6675593 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the predictive and prognostic value of the consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) that represent a merging of gene expression-based features largely in primary tumors from six independent classification systems and provide a framework for capturing the intrinsic heterogeneity of CRC in patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405. PATIENTS AND METHODS CALGB/SWOG 80405 is a phase III trial that compared the addition of bevacizumab or cetuximab to infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan as first-line treatment of advanced CRC. We characterized the CMS classification using a novel NanoString gene expression panel on primary CRCs from 581 patients enrolled in this study to assess the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in these patients. RESULTS The CMSs are highly prognostic for overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). Furthermore, CMSs were predictive for both OS (P for interaction < .001) and PFS (P for interaction = .0032). In the CMS1 cohort, patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly longer OS than those treated with cetuximab (P < .001). In the CMS2 cohort, patients treated with cetuximab had a significantly longer OS than patients treated with bevacizumab (P = .0046). CONCLUSION These findings highlight the possible clinical utility of CMSs and suggests that refinement of the CMS classification may provide a path toward identifying patients with metastatic CRC who are most likely to benefit from specific targeted therapy as part of the initial treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heinz-Josef Lenz
- University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Alan P. Venook
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Deverka PA, Bangs R, Kreizenbeck K, Delaney DM, Hershman DL, Blanke CD, Ramsey SD. A New Framework for Patient Engagement in Cancer Clinical Trials Cooperative Group Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 110:553-559. [PMID: 29684151 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
For the past two decades, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has supported the involvement of patient advocates in both internal advisory activities and funded research projects to provide a patient perspective. Implementation of the inclusion of patient advocates has varied considerably, with inconsistent involvement of patient advocates in key phases of research such as concept development. Despite this, there is agreement that patient advocates have improved the patient focus of many cancer research studies. This commentary describes our experience designing and pilot testing a new framework for patient engagement at SWOG, one of the largest cancer clinical trial network groups in the United States and one of the four adult groups in the NCI's National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). Our goal is to provide a roadmap for other clinical trial groups that are interested in bringing the patient voice more directly into clinical trial conception and development. We developed a structured process to engage patient advocates more effectively in the development of cancer clinical trials and piloted the process in four SWOG research committees, including implementation of a new Patient Advocate Executive Review Form that systematically captures patient advocates' input at the concept stage. Based on the positive feedback to our approach, we are now developing training and evaluation metrics to support meaningful and consistent patient engagement across the SWOG clinical trial life cycle. Ultimately, the benefits of more patient-centered cancer trials will be measured in the usefulness, relevance, and speed of study results to patients, caregivers, and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rick Bangs
- SWOG Patient Advocate Committee, Portland, OR
| | - Karma Kreizenbeck
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Deborah M Delaney
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Scott D Ramsey
- Hutchinson Institute for Cancer Outcomes Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Guercio B, Zhang S, Venook AP, Ou FS, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, Sanoff H, Mahoney MR, O'Neil BH, Shaw JE, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Abstract 3285: Body mass index, weight loss, and progression and mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-3285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: In non-metastatic colorectal cancer, a body mass index (BMI) paradox is observed where overweight and early obese patients experience improved outcomes compared to patients with normal, low, or morbidly obese BMI. The influence of obesity on patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is relatively unexplored.
Methods: We conducted a prospective BMI companion study in CALGB (now Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology)/SWOG 80405, a phase III mCRC treatment trial. BMI was measured at trial registration. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall and progression-free survival, respectively. To minimize confounding by poor and rapidly declining health, we used Cox proportional hazards regression to adjust for known prognostic factors, comorbidities, physical activity, and weight loss, and excluded individuals with low BMI <21 from statistical tests for trend. We also examined self-reported weight loss over the six months prior to trial enrollment as an independent predictor of patient outcome.
Results: In this sub-study of a phase III mCRC trial, BMI was recorded for all 2,323 patients enrolled. Following adjustment for confounders, there were no significant associations between BMI and overall or progression-free survival (excluding BMI <21, Ptrend with increasing BMI = 0.12 and 0.42, respectively). Conversely, weight loss prior to treatment was associated with shorter overall and progression-free survival; compared to individuals with weight change <5%, individuals with weight loss >20% experienced an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.46 for all-cause mortality (95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.85, Ptrend <.0001) and of 1.27 for disease progression or death (95% confidence interval 1.04 to 1.56, Ptrend = .009).
Conclusion: In this prospective study of patients with mCRC, BMI at time of first-line chemotherapy initiation was not associated with patient outcome. Weight loss prior to study entry was associated with increased risk of patient mortality and disease progression.
Citation Format: Brendan Guercio, Sui Zhang, Alan P. Venook, Fang-Shu Ou, Donna Niedzwiecki, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Federico Innocenti, Hanna Sanoff, Michelle R. Mahoney, Bert H. O'Neil, James E. Shaw, Blase N. Polite, Howard S. Hochster, James N. Atkins, Richard M. Goldberg, Robert J. Mayer, Charles D. Blanke, Charles S. Fuchs, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt. Body mass index, weight loss, and progression and mortality in metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 3285.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sui Zhang
- 2Dana-Farber/Partners CancerCare, Boston, MA
| | - Alan P. Venook
- 3University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- 4Alliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- 5Duke Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Federico Innocenti
- 7Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Hanna Sanoff
- 7Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | | | - Bert H. O'Neil
- 8Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IL
| | | | - Blase N. Polite
- 10Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | | | - James N. Atkins
- 12Southeast Clinical Oncology Research (SCOR) Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Patel SP, Othus M, Chae YK, Giles F, Hansel D, Singh P, Fontaine A, Shah M, Kasi A, Baghdadi TA, Matrana M, Gatalica Z, Korn WM, Hayward J, MMcLeod C, Chen HX, Sharon E, Mayerson E, Ryan CW, Plets M, Blanke CD, Kurzrock R. Abstract CT039: A Phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) S1609: The neuroendocrine cohort. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-ct039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Immune checkpoint blockade, in particular anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1-directed approaches, have improved outcomes in various tumor types. However, little is known about the efficacy of these agents in metastatic rare solid tumors. We report here the results of the neuroendocrine cohort of SWOG S1609 Dual Anti-CTLA-4 & Anti-PD-1 blockade in Rare Tumors (DART).
Methods: We performed a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial of ipilimumab (1mg/kg q6 weeks) plus nivolumab (240mg intravenously every 2 weeks) across multiple cohorts of rare tumors, with the neuroendocrine cohort reported here. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are currently being accrued to a separate cohort of S1609. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1 (complete (CR) and partial responses (PR)); secondary endpoints included progression-free (PFS) and, overall survival (OS), stable disease (SD) >6 months, and toxicity.
Results: Thirty-three eligible patients received therapy; 58% (N= 19) had high-grade disease; most common sites were gastrointestinal (non-pancreatic) (45%; N = 15) and lung (18%; N = 6). Patients had received a median of 2 lines of prior therapy. The overall response rate was 24% (CR, 3%; PR, 21%). Patients with high-grade neuroendocrine cancer had a 42% (8 of 19 patients) response rate vs. 0% in low/intermediate grade tumors (0/14 patients; p = 0.01). The 6-month PFS was 30%; median OS was 11 months. The most common toxicities were fatigue (30% of patients) and nausea (27%). Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation (9%) was the most common grade 3-4 irAE, with no grade 5 toxicities.
Conclusions: Ipilimumab plus nivolumab was well tolerated with a 42% ORR in patients with high-grade neuroendocrine cancer, regardless of primary site. Further investigation of this combination is warranted.
Best Response Summary in 33 Patients with Neuroendocrine CancerResponse TypeAll Patients (n=33)High grade (n=19)Low/Intermediate grade (n=14)Complete Response (CR)1 (3%)1 (5%)0Partial Response (PR)7 (21%)7 (37%)0Stable Disease (SD)>6months2 (6%)02 (14%)SD11 (33%)3 (17%)8 (57%)Progressive Disease (PD)12 (36%)8 (42%)4 (29%)CR+PR8 (24%)8 (42%)0CR+PR+SD>6mo10 (30%)8 (42%)2 (14%)
Citation Format: Sandip Pravin Patel, Megan Othus, Young Kwang Chae, Francis Giles, Donna Hansel, Preet Singh, Annette Fontaine, Manisha Shah, Anup Kasi, Tareq Al Baghdadi, Marc Matrana, Zoran Gatalica, W. Michael Korn, Jourdain Hayward, Christine MMcLeod, Helen X. Chen, Elad Sharon, Edward Mayerson, Christopher W. Ryan, Melissa Plets, Charles D. Blanke, Razelle Kurzrock. A Phase II basket trial of dual anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 blockade in rare tumors (DART) S1609: The neuroendocrine cohort [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT039.
Collapse
|
44
|
Blanke CD, Crowley J, Baker LH, Fisher RI. In Memoriam: Charles A. Coltman, 1930 to 2018. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.00270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
45
|
Innocenti F, Ou FS, Qu X, Zemla TJ, Niedzwiecki D, Tam R, Mahajan S, Goldberg RM, Bertagnolli MM, Blanke CD, Sanoff H, Atkins J, Polite B, Venook AP, Lenz HJ, Kabbarah O. Mutational Analysis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer in CALGB/SWOG 80405 Identifies New Roles of Microsatellite Instability and Tumor Mutational Burden for Patient Outcome. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37:1217-1227. [PMID: 30865548 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.01798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 201] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that found no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with first-line metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab. Primary tumor DNA from 843 patients has been used to discover genetic markers of OS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Gene mutations were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Microsatellite status was determined by genotyping of microsatellites. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined by next-generation sequencing. Cox proportional hazard models were used, with adjusting factors. Interaction of molecular alterations with either the bevacizumab or the cetuximab arms was tested. RESULTS Patients with high TMB in their tumors had longer OS than did patients with low TMB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95]; P = .02). In patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, longer OS was observed in the bevacizumab arm than in the cetuximab arm (HR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.30]; interaction P < .001 for interaction between microsatellite status and the two arms). Patients with BRAF mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with wild-type (WT) tumors (HR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.71]; P < .001). Patients with extended RAS mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with WT tumors (HR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.84]; P < .001). Patients with triple-negative tumors (WT for NRAS/KRAS/BRAF) had a median OS of 35.9 months (95% CI, 33.0 to 38.8 months) versus 22.2 months (95% CI, 19.6 to 24.4 months ) in patients with at least one mutated gene in their tumors (P < .001). CONCLUSION In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in first line, low TMB, and BRAF and RAS mutations are negative prognostic factors. Patients with MSI-H tumors benefited more from bevacizumab than from cetuximab, and studies to confirm this effect of MSI-H are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hanna Sanoff
- 1 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - James Atkins
- 8 Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Blasé Polite
- 9 University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL
| | - Alan P Venook
- 10 University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Tenner L, Hlubocky FJ, Blanke CD, LeBlanc TW, Marron JM, McGinnis MM, Spence RA, Taylor LP. Let's Talk About Those Herbs You Are Taking: Ethical Considerations for Communication With Patients With Cancer About Complementary and Alternative Medicine. J Oncol Pract 2019; 15:44-49. [PMID: 30629899 DOI: 10.1200/jop.18.00432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Oncologists face ethical challenges when patients use potentially harmful complementary and alternative medicine in addition to or instead of conventional treatments for their cancer. For example, a patient may forego effective cancer treatment in favor of alternative therapies and suffer significant harm as a result. Similarly, false beliefs about the efficacy of complementary therapies may complicate the process of shared decision making about cancer treatment. In this vignette, we discuss clinicians' obligations and provide recommendations for ethically sound communication practices in this clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jonathan M Marron
- 5 Dana Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bertagnolli MM, Blaney SM, Blanke CD, Curran WJ, Dancey J, Mannel RS, O'Dwyer PJ, Schnall MD, Wolmark N. Current Activities of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups. J Natl Cancer Inst 2019; 111:11-18. [PMID: 30544145 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups is an organization representing the interests of patients and researchers who conduct research through the National Cancer Institute-supported National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN). The NCTN provides a crucial mechanism for executing practice-changing cancer clinical research to achieve both cancer control and development of new therapeutic agents or modality approaches. Public funding, largely through the National Cancer Institute, ensures that the work of the NCTN achieves important research that would not otherwise be accomplished in the private sector. In fall 2017, the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened a Scientific Leadership Council to review the current state of the network with regard to research capabilities and to develop a list of research questions to be prioritized by the network. This report presents the results of this meeting, detailing a roadmap for future work by the NCTN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica M Bertagnolli
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Susan M Blaney
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Baylor School of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Charles D Blanke
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University's Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
| | - Walter J Curran
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Woodruff Health Sciences Center, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Janet Dancey
- Department of Oncology, Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert S Mannel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Stephenson Cancer Institute, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK
| | | | - Mitchell D Schnall
- Department of Radiology Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Unger JM, Barlow WE, Tangen CM, Ramsey SD, Thompson IM, Klein EA, LeBlanc M, Blanke CD, Goodman PJ, Minasian LM, Nghiem VT, Hershman DL. The scientific impact and value of large, NCI-sponsored randomized phase III cancer chemoprevention trials. Cancer Epidemiol 2018; 55:117-122. [PMID: 29936140 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2018] [Revised: 06/09/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cancer research groups of the National Cancer Institute's National Clinical Trials Network have a history of successful conduct of large randomized phase III trials of chemoprevention for cancer. An important question for funding agencies is whether the conduct of large chemoprevention trials provides strong scientific return on investment. METHODS We evaluated the scientific impact of four large chemoprevention trials - two for breast cancer and two for prostate cancer - using citation analysis, a bibliometric technique. The results were compared to the scientific impact of a series of treatment trials conducted over the same 20-year time period (1991-2010, inclusive). Average annual citation counts were compared using t-tests. Scientific impact was also assessed relative to trial costs. RESULTS Twenty-seven treatment trials with 17,208 patients and four chemoprevention trials with 87,550 patients were examined. The mean annual citation rate for primary articles was higher for chemoprevention trials compared to treatment trials (188.1 vs. 40.4, p = .001). For both primary and secondary article publications, mean annual citations for articles associated with chemoprevention trials were also higher (483.9 vs. 69.0, p = .0003). Large chemoprevention trials were estimated to provide 50% more total citations from primary and secondary articles on a cost-adjusted basis. CONCLUSION Based on these criteria, the scientific impact of large phase III cancer chemoprevention trials was very high in absolute terms, and as good as or better than that of treatment trials after accounting for expenditure. For appropriate scientific questions, large chemoprevention trials provide a good scientific return on investment for federal funding agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M Unger
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
| | - William E Barlow
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Catherine M Tangen
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Scott D Ramsey
- Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Ian M Thompson
- CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Hospital - Medical Center, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | | | - Michael LeBlanc
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR United States
| | - Phyllis J Goodman
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Lori M Minasian
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Van T Nghiem
- SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Dawn L Hershman
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Herbst RS, Redman MW, Kim ES, Semrad TJ, Bazhenova L, Masters G, Oettel K, Guaglianone P, Reynolds C, Karnad A, Arnold SM, Varella-Garcia M, Moon J, Mack PC, Blanke CD, Hirsch FR, Kelly K, Gandara DR. Cetuximab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab versus carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in advanced NSCLC (SWOG S0819): a randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2017; 19:101-114. [PMID: 29169877 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30694-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2017] [Revised: 08/18/2017] [Accepted: 08/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND EGFR antibodies have shown promise in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly with squamous cell histology. We hypothesised that EGFR copy number by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) can identify patients most likely to benefit from these drugs combined with chemotherapy and we aimed to explore the activity of cetuximab with chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC who are EGFR FISH-positive. METHODS We did this open-label, phase 3 study (SWOG S0819) at 277 sites in the USA and Mexico. We randomly assigned (1:1) eligible patients with treatment-naive stage IV NSCLC to receive paclitaxel (200 mg/m2; every 21 days) plus carboplatin (area under the curve of 6 by modified Calvert formula; every 21 days) or carboplatin plus paclitaxel and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg; every 21 days), either with cetuximab (250 mg/m2 weekly after loading dose; cetuximab group) or without (control group), stratified by bevacizumab treatment, smoking status, and M-substage using a dynamic-balancing algorithm. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival in patients with EGFR FISH-positive cancer and overall survival in the entire study population. We analysed clinical outcomes with the intention-to-treat principle and analysis of safety outcomes included patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00946712). FINDINGS Between Aug 13, 2009, and May 30, 2014, we randomly assigned 1313 patients to the control group (n=657; 277 with bevacizumab and 380 without bevacizumab in the intention-to-treat population) or the cetuximab group (n=656; 283 with bevacizumab and 373 without bevacizumab in the intention-to-treat population). EGFR FISH was assessable in 976 patients and 400 patients (41%) were EGFR FISH-positive. The median follow-up for patients last known to be alive was 35·2 months (IQR 22·9-39·9). After 194 progression-free survival events in the cetuximab group and 198 in the control group in the EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation, progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·12; p=0·40; median 5·4 months [95% CI 4·5-5·7] vs 4·8 months [3·9-5·5]). After 570 deaths in the cetuximab group and 593 in the control group, overall survival did not differ between the treatment groups in the entire study population (HR 0·93, 95% CI 0·83-1·04; p=0·22; median 10·9 months [95% CI 9·5-12·0] vs 9·2 months [8·7-10·3]). In the prespecified analysis of EGFR FISH-positive subpopulation with squamous cell histology, overall survival was significantly longer in the cetuximab group than in the control group (HR 0·58, 95% CI 0·36-0·86; p=0·0071), although progression-free survival did not differ between treatment groups in this subgroup (0·68, 0·46-1·01; p=0·055). Overall survival and progression-free survival did not differ among patients who were EGFR FISH non-positive with squamous cell histology (HR 1·04, 95% CI 0·78-1·40; p=0·77; and 1·02, 0·77-1·36; p=0·88 respectively) or patients with non-squamous histology regardless of EGFR FISH status (for EGFR FISH-positive 0·88, 0·68-1·14; p=0·34; and 0·99, 0·78-1·27; p=0·96; respectively; and for EGFR FISH non-positive 1·00, 0·85-1·17; p=0·97; and 1·03, 0·88-1·20; p=0·69; respectively). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (210 [37%] in the cetuximab group vs 158 [25%] in the control group), decreased leucocyte count (103 [16%] vs 74 [20%]), fatigue (81 [13%] vs 74 [20%]), and acne or rash (52 [8%] vs one [<1%]). 59 (9%) patients in the cetuximab group and 31 (5%) patients in the control group had severe adverse events. Deaths related to treatment occurred in 32 (6%) patients in the cetuximab group and 13 (2%) patients in the control group. INTERPRETATION Although this study did not meet its primary endpoints, prespecified subgroup analyses of patients with EGFR FISH-positive squamous-cell carcinoma cancers are encouraging and support continued evaluation of anti-EGFR antibodies in this subpopulation. FUNDING National Cancer Institute and Eli Lilly and Company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy S Herbst
- Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Mary W Redman
- Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Statistical Center and Clinical Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Edward S Kim
- Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Thomas J Semrad
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Lyudmila Bazhenova
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Gregory Masters
- Christiana Care Health Systems, Helen F Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Kurt Oettel
- Wisconsin National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), Gundersen Health System, LaCrosse, WI, USA
| | - Perry Guaglianone
- Heartland Cancer Research NCORP, Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL, USA
| | - Christopher Reynolds
- Michigan Cancer Research Consortium NCORP, St Joseph Mercy Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anand Karnad
- University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Susanne M Arnold
- Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - James Moon
- Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) Statistical Center and Clinical Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Philip C Mack
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karen Kelly
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - David R Gandara
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Leichman CG, McDonough SL, Smalley SR, Billingsley KG, Lenz HJ, Beldner MA, Hezel AF, Velasco MR, Guthrie KA, Blanke CD, Hochster HS. Cetuximab Combined With Induction Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine, Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: SWOG 0713. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017; 17:e121-e125. [PMID: 29233486 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/14/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) is standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has associated with improved survival. In modern phase III trials of NCRT, pCR ranges from 10% to 20%. Cetuximab improves response in KRAS (KRAS proto-oncogene) wild type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer. S0713 was designed to assess improvement in pCR with additional use of cetuximab with induction chemotherapy and NCRT for locally advanced, KRAS-wt rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patient eligibility: stage II to III biopsy-proven, KRAS-wt rectal adenocarcinoma; no bowel obstruction; adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function; performance status of 0 to 2. Target enrollment: 80 patients. TREATMENT induction chemotherapy with wCAPOX (weekly capecitabine and oxaliplatin) and cetuximab followed by the same regimen concurrent with radiation (omitting day 15 oxaliplatin). If fewer than 7 pCRs were observed at planned interim analysis after 40 patients received all therapy, the study would close. Eighty eligible patients would provide 90% power given a true pCR rate > 35% at a significance of 0.04. The regimen would lack future interest if pCR probability was ≤ 20%. RESULTS Between February 2009 and April 2013, 83 patients registered. Four were ineligible and 4 not treated, leaving 75 evaluable for clinical outcomes and toxicity, of whom 65 had surgery. Of 75 patients, 20 had pCR (27%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17%-38%); 19 (25%) had microscopic cancer; 36 (48%) had minor/no response (including 10 without surgery). Three-year disease-free survival was 73% (95% CI, 63%-83%). CONCLUSION Our trial did not meet the pCR target of 35%. Toxicity was generally acceptable. This regimen cannot be recommended outside the clinical trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kevin G Billingsley
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- Division of Medical Oncology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Matthew A Beldner
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium-Upstate NCORP/Lowcountry Hematology Oncology, Mt Pleasant, SC
| | - Aram F Hezel
- Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Mario R Velasco
- Heartland NCORP/Cancer Care Specialists of Central Illinois, Decatur, IL
| | | | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG Group Chair's Office/Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR
| | | |
Collapse
|