Telehealth in a Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IMPORTANCE

Telehealth offers advantages to patients with pelvic floor disorders because they face unique barriers to care; however, attendance of telehealth appointments is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine the attendance of telehealth appointments in urogynecology patients receiving pelvic floor physical therapy as compared with in-person visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively collected electronic medical record data from patients engaging in pelvic floor physical therapy from 2019, and pre- and post-COVID-19 in 2020. Information included appointment type, attendance, age, primary diagnoses, insurance status, and zip code. Cohort differences were examined using the χ2 test and analyses of variance.

RESULTS

Our sample included 359 individuals scheduled for in-person visits in 2019, 57 for telehealth visits in 2020, and 283 for in-person visits in 2020. Patients scheduled for telehealth appointments were younger (39 ± 13 years) than patients in 2019 (45 ± 14 years) or 2020 (42 ± 14 years) in-person cohorts (χ2 (2, 696) = 6.8, P < 0.001). Patients attended telehealth appointments at higher rates (73.7%) than in-person visits in 2019 (56.8%) and 2020 (45.6%; χ2 (2, 699) = 26.2, P < 0.001). Attendance did not differ across primary diagnoses. Proximity based on zip code was not associated with attendance.

CONCLUSIONS

Pelvic floor physical therapy attendance rates were highest for patients with telehealth visits as compared with in-person visits. Our findings encourage health care providers to continue or begin to offer telehealth visits for pelvic floor physical therapy for the urogynecology patient population.