Patient and rescuer safety: recommendations for dispatch and prioritization of rescue resources based on a retrospective study of Norwegian avalanche incidents 1996-2017

BACKGROUND

Avalanche emergency response should address current accident scenarios to optimize survival chances of victims and to keep rescuers safe. The purpose of this article is to present a basis for evaluation and necessary adjustments in dispatch, prioritization, and management of Norwegian avalanche rescue operations.

METHODS

This is the first peer-reviewed retrospective study of all Norwegian avalanche incidents registered by the two Joint Rescue Co-ordination Centers (JRCCs) in the period 1996-2017 that describes the characteristics and trends of rescue missions and victims.

RESULTS

The Norwegian JRCCs have registered 720 snow avalanche events, with a total of 568 avalanche victims, of which 120 (21%) died. Including those fatally injured, a total of 313 avalanche victims in 209 accidents were treated as patients (55%), and we saw > 1 patient in 24% of these operations. Norwegian avalanche victims were partially or completely recovered prior to the arrival of rescuers in 75% (n = 117) of all rescue operations. In the remaining 25% of cases, the rescue service located 62% (n = 55) of the avalanche victims visually or electronically. In 50% of the 720 incidents, rescuers spent time searching in avalanches with no victims.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey indicates that we have experienced a shift in Norwegian avalanche rescue: from search for missing persons in the avalanche debris to immediate medical care of already-located patients. The findings suggest that a stronger focus on both patient and rescuer safety is necessary. The patients must be ensured the right treatment at the right place at the right time and the allocation of rescue resources must reflect a need to reduce exposure in avalanche terrain, especially in cases with no affirmed victims. We present a flowchart with a recommended rescue response to avalanche accidents in Norway.

Clinical variables are associated with treatment satisfaction in patients with breast, lung, and colorectal cancer

6608

Background: The association between clinical variables (e.g. disease stage/type, side effects, ECOG performance status (PS)) and patient-reported treatment satisfaction has received little attention, despite the potential implications for treatment adherence and decision-making. We examined the relation between clinical variables and treatment satisfaction in a U.S. sample of patients with breast (BC), lung (LC), or colorectal (CRC) cancer using the Cancer Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), a recently validated 16-item measure designed to assess expectations of therapy (ET), feelings about side effects (FSE), and satisfaction with therapy (SWT). Methods: Cancer stage, line of therapy, physician-reported ECOG PS, presence vs. absence of medication side effects, and perceived change in cancer over the last two weeks were obtained on patients. These clinical variables were examined in relation to the ET, FSE, and SWT scales of the CTSQ. Higher scale scores indicated better outcomes (e.g., better satisfaction). Group means were compared using one-way ANOVAs; trends of scale scores across clinical variables were also examined. Results: Participants were 349 patients with early and late stage BC (n=137), CRC (n=121), or LC (n=91) who had ≥ 1 cycles of chemo-, bio-, or hormonal therapy in the last 6 months. In all cancer types, FSE differed by presence of side effects (BC<.03; CRC<.01; LC<.02). In BC patients, FSE differed by stage, and ET differed significantly depending on ECOG PS (p<.006) and perceived change (p<.05). For CRC patients, ET significantly differed by stage (p<.05) and perceived change (p<.02); and SWT by presence of side effects (p<.01). SWT also differed by perceived change (p<.01) for LC patients. Most trends were in the expected direction. Conclusions: These results indicate that patient-reported satisfaction with therapy is correlated with clinical variables. On average, patients who perceive less improvement in their cancer, have side effects, and poorer ECOG PS are less satisfied with their current cancer therapy. Unknown is the impact of this relation on adherence and decision-making. Recent changes in healthcare suggests that treatment satisfaction may become an increasingly important measure of clinical outcome.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Administrative issues in the follow-up treatment of insanity acquittees

This paper discusses issues in the community-based management of forensic patients. Community acceptance and safety demand a careful system of follow-up treatment for insanity acquittees. Many studies have examined the recidivism of this population, but few have dealt with administrative strategies to manage their care as outpatients. In this paper, we discuss our experiences in developing systems for follow-up care of insanity acquittees in the state of Maryland. Central to this work is the balancing of clinical, judicial and community concerns. The decision for outpatient care or movement of the patient to a non-forensic (regional) hospital is a significant turning point in the forensic patient's care. One of the major challenges faced by forensic mental health services is to develop consistency of practice throughout a state. A centralized system is easier to manage, but costly. A system embedded in community mental health centers is less duplicative, but requires major and ongoing educational support. A private practice model is flexible, but administratively challenging. The authors believe Maryland possesses well-developed approaches for the evaluation, treatment and conditional release of insanity acquittees. The state continues to study and redesign its systems toward increased effectiveness and efficiency.

Group dynamics in forensic pretrial decision-making

This study examines how forensic evaluators' opinions that pertain to diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility (Maryland's version of the not guilty by reason of insanity plea) are rendered at a state forensic hospital for defendants pleading not criminally responsible. Pretrial evaluations completed independently by a psychiatrist, a psychologist, and a social worker were presented at a forensic staff conference where psychiatrist and psychologists openly "voted" on diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility. These results were then sent to the court. The purpose of this study was to assess the clinicians' level of agreement and the role that conformity played in the decision-making process. A sample of twenty court-ordered pretrial evaluations of defendants examined at the hospital between March and June 1991, with evaluators' opinions generated by a secret ballot, were compared with a matched control group from an earlier time, when opinions were generated by open ballot. The study was designed to compare the opinions of forensic evaluators in the issues of diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility between the two samples. The defendants in the experimental group and the control group were matched on the basis of age, race, sex, and offense. It was hypothesized that with secret ballot voting there would be a greater disparity of agreement regarding diagnosis, competency to stand trial, and criminal responsibility opinions compared with the open method of voting. However, the results of this study did not support that hypothesis. There was little disparity on forensic opinions rated either by secret or open voting.