Implementing and measuring the impact of a clinical and translational research mentor recognition program.
J Clin Transl Sci 2018;
2:312-320. [PMID:
30828473 PMCID:
PMC6390404 DOI:
10.1017/cts.2018.329]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Research shows incentives can motivate faculty to increase their engagement in mentoring, despite a myriad of institutional barriers. One such incentive may be the implementation of a university-wide mentor award program to promote a culture of mentorship.
METHODS
A new mentorship award was created at a research-intensive university and faculty recipients were surveyed to assess their perceptions of the award's impact on their mentoring practices and career.
RESULTS
Sixty-two percent of awardees (n=21) completed the survey and felt the recognition incentivized them to engage in further mentoring and participate in formal mentorship training. Most awardees referenced the award in their CVs, performance evaluations, and grant proposals. Additionally, they felt the award effectively promoted mentoring among the broader faculty community.
CONCLUSION
Growth of clinical and translational research depends in part on the mentorship received by early career faculty. Therefore, other research universities may benefit from implementing such awards.
Collapse