Three-station three-dimensional bolus-chase MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic tracking

PURPOSE

To determine the feasibility of using real-time fluoroscopic tracking for bolus-chase magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of peripheral vasculature to image three stations from the aortoiliac bifurcation to the pedal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Eight healthy volunteers (three men; mean age, 48 years; age range, 30-81 years) and 13 patients suspected of having peripheral arterial disease (five men; mean age, 67 years; age range, 47-81 years) were enrolled and provided informed consent. All subjects were imaged with the fluoroscopic tracking MR angiographic protocol. Ten patients also underwent a clinical computed tomographic (CT) angiographic runoff examination. Two readers scored the MR angiographic studies for vessel signal intensity and sharpness and presence of confounding artifacts and venous contamination at 35 arterial segments. Mean aggregate scores were assessed. The paired MR angiographic and CT angiographic studies also were scored for visualization of disease, reader confidence, and overall diagnostic quality and were compared by using a Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Real-time fluoroscopic tracking performed well technically in all studies. Vessel segments were scored good to excellent in all but the following categories: For vessel signal intensity and sharpness, the abdominal aorta, iliac arteries, distal plantar arteries, and plantar arch were scored as fair to good; and for presence of confounding artifacts, the abdominal aorta and iliac arteries were scored as fair. The MR angiograms and CT angiograms did not differ significantly in any scoring category (reader 1: P = .50, .39, and .39; reader 2: P = .41, .61, and .33, respectively). CT scores were substantially better in 20% (four of 20) and 25% (five of 20) of the pooled evaluations for the visualization of disease and overall image quality categories, respectively, versus 5% (one of 20) for MR scores in both categories.

CONCLUSION

Three-station bolus-chase MR angiography with real-time fluoroscopic tracking provided high-spatial-resolution arteriograms of the peripheral vasculature, enabled precise triggering of table motion, and compared well with CT angiograms.

Blood flow imaging through detection of temporal variations in magnetization

Two hypotheses were tested: (a) that view-to-view variations in bulk phase and modulus of magnetization in vascular volume elements can indicate the presence of disordered blood flow, and (b) that a substantial loss of signal intensity on magnetic resonance (MR) angiograms of poststenotic regions is due to view-to-view changes in magnetization. To test these hypotheses, a technique was developed in which view-to-view variations in transverse magnetization were used to create angiographic projection images, which showed only disordered flow (disordered flow maps) in vitro and in vivo. In phantom studies, this technique recovered signal intensity downstream from stenoses. A combination of disordered flow maps with morphologic images improved visualization of stenotic regions and provided information on characteristics of local flow. These results show that view-to-view variations in transverse magnetization occur in regions of disordered flow and are an important cause of loss of signal intensity. This technique can provide information about dynamic blood flow and improve depiction of anatomic structures on MR angiograms.