Dyssynchrony and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure Patients With Unfavorable Electrical Characteristics

BACKGROUND

Among heart failure (HF) patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), those with unfavorable electrical characteristics (UEC) are less frequently CRT responders.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to evaluate the relationship between preprocedural echocardiographic parameters of electromechanical dyssynchrony (EMD) and outcome following CRT.

METHODS

Among 551 patients receiving CRT, 121 with UEC, defined as atypical left bundle branch, presence of right bundle branch block, or unspecified intraventricular conduction disturbance, were enrolled. Indices of EMD were presence of septal flash, apical rocking, septal deformation patterns, and global wasted work (GWW), determined with the use of speckle-tracking strain echocardiography. Endpoints were response to CRT, defined as a relative decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at 9-month postoperative follow-up, and all-cause death or HF hospitalization during follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 121 patients, 68 (56%) were CRT responders. In multivariate analysis, GWW ≥200 mm Hg% (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 4.17 [95% CI: 1.33-14.56]; P = 0.0182) and longitudinal strain septal contraction patterns 1 and 2 (aOR: 10.05 [95% CI: 2.82-43.97]; P < 0.001) were associated with CRT response. During a 46-month follow-up (IQR: 42-55 months), survival free from death or HF hospitalization increased with the number of positive criteria (87% for 2, 59% for 1, and 27% for 0). After adjustment for established predictors of outcome in patients receiving CRT, absence of either of the 2 criteria remained associated with a considerable increased risk of death and/or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR: 4.83 [95% CI: 1.84-12.68]; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with UEC, echocardiographic assessment of EMD may help to select patients who will derive benefit from CRT.

Clinical and prognostic implications of phenomapping in patients with heart failure receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Despite having an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy according to current guidelines, patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy do not consistently derive benefit from it.

AIM

To determine whether unsupervised clustering analysis (phenomapping) can identify distinct phenogroups of patients with differential outcomes among cardiac resynchronization therapy recipients from routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We used unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis of phenotypic data after data reduction (55 clinical, biological and echocardiographic variables) to define new phenogroups among 328 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from routine clinical practice enrolled before cardiac resynchronization therapy. Clinical outcomes and cardiac resynchronization therapy response rate were studied according to phenogroups.

RESULTS

Although all patients met the recommended criteria for cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, phenomapping analysis classified study participants into four phenogroups that differed distinctively in clinical, biological, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics and outcomes. Patients from phenogroups 1 and 2 had the most improved outcome in terms of mortality, associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy response rates of 81% and 78%, respectively. In contrast, patients from phenogroups 3 and 4 had cardiac resynchronization therapy response rates of 39% and 59%, respectively, and the worst outcome, with a considerably increased risk of mortality compared with patients from phenogroup 1 (hazard ratio 3.23, 95% confidence interval 1.9-5.5 and hazard ratio 2.49, 95% confidence interval 1.38-4.50, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with an indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy from routine clinical practice, phenomapping identifies subgroups of patients with differential clinical, biological and echocardiographic features strongly linked to divergent outcomes and responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy. This approach may help to identify patients who will derive most benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy in "individualized" clinical practice.