Factors associated with the performance of primary dental health care in Brazil: A multilevel approach

This study evaluated the factors associated with the performance of Brazilian Oral Health Teams (OHTs).This is multilevel research that used data from 12,386 Brazilian OHTs in 2012. The OHTs performance was estimated in previous research by using Item Response Theory model, which employed 20 questions about dental procedures in Primary Care. The first level covariates were based on OHTs procedures such as: the record of pregnant woman dental appointment, provision of dentistry home care, dental appointments scheduled choices, and OHTs in charge for more than 5000 individuals. Moreover, the use of guidelines was accessed concerning delivering prostheses in primary care, referring to secondary care, referring to suspected oral cancer, and providing care towards patients with special needs. Variables included in level 2 were GINI and Human Development Index. Multilevel linear regression models were constructed, estimating linear regression coefficients, 95% confidence intervals, and P values.OHTs performance was different among the 3,613 municipalities analyzed (P < .001), with 36.7% of the variation in the performance of the OHTs being attributed to the variability between municipalities. The adjusted model showed that higher performance OHTs reported attention to pregnant women, dentistry home care and use of dental care guidelines (P < .001). There were lower performance scores for those OHTs with more restricted scheduling (P < .05), compared to those that reported scheduling appointments at any day and time. The best OHTs and population ratio led to a better performance score (P = .010). At the municipal level, better socioeconomic status was associated with better performance of the OHTs (P < .001).OHTs with higher performance are associated with oral health services organizations and municipalities' socioeconomic status.

Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação e qualidade na atenção básica em saúde no Brasil

Resumo: As Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação (TIC) - meios para tratar informação e agilizar comunicação - contribuem para o cuidado. Este artigo descreve a incorporação de TIC na atenção básica e sua associação com a qualidade, utilizando Programa Nacional de Melhoria do Acesso e da Qualidade da Atenção Básica (PMAQ). É um estudo transversal. O universo englobou 17.053 equipes. Criou-se o Índice de Incorporação de Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação (ITIC) englobando: infraestrutura, sistemas e utilização de informação. Para as associações, realizou-se análise de regressão. Somente 13,5% das equipes possuem grau alto de TIC. É na utilização da informação que se observou a maior força de associação. As TIC contribuem para a melhoria da qualidade da atenção básica.

Relationship between Primary and Secondary Dental Care in Public Health Services in Brazil

This cross-sectional study evaluated the relationship between primary and secondary oral health care in Brazil. For this purpose, data from the National Program for Improving Access and Quality of Primary Care were used. Dentists from 12,403 oral health teams (OHTs) answered a structured questionnaire in 2012. The data were analyzed descriptively and by cluster analysis. Of the 12,387 (99.9%) OHTs that answered all the questions, 62.2% reported the existence of Dental Specialties Centers (DSCs) to which they could refer patients. The specialties with the highest frequencies were endodontics (68.4%), minor oral surgery (65.8%), periodontics (63.0%), radiology (46.8%), oral medicine (40.2%), orthodontics (20.5%) and implantology (6.2%). In all percentiles, the shortest wait time for secondary care was for radiology, followed by oral medicine and the other specialties. In the 50th percentile, the wait for endodontics, periodontics, minor oral surgery and orthodontics was 30 days, while for implantology, the wait was 60 days. Finally, in the 75th percentile, the wait for endodontics, orthodontics and implantology was 90 days or more. Two clusters, with different frequencies of OHT access to specialties, were identified. Cluster 1 (n = 7,913) included the OHTs with lower frequencies in all specialties except orthodontics and implantology compared with Cluster 2 (n = 4,474). Of the Brazilian regions, the South and Southeast regions had the highest frequencies for Cluster 2, with better rates for the relationship between primary and secondary care. This study suggests certain difficulties in the relationship between primary and secondary care in specific specialties in oral health, with a great number of OHTs with limited access to DSCs, in addition to different performance in terms of OHT access to DSCs across Brazilian regions.

Institutional and matrix support and its relationship with primary healthcare

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether the level of institutional and matrix support is associated with better certification of primary healthcare teams.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated two kinds of primary healthcare support – 14,489 teams received institutional support and 14,306 teams received matrix support. Logistic regression models were applied. In the institutional support model, the independent variable was “level of support” (as calculated by the sum of supporting activities for both modalities). In the matrix support model, in turn, the independent variables were the supporting activities. The multivariate analysis has considered variables with p < 0.20. The model was adjusted by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

The teams had institutional and matrix supporting activities (84.0% and 85.0%), respectively, with 55.0% of them performing between six and eight activities. For the institutional support, we have observed 1.96 and 3.77 chances for teams who had medium and high levels of support to have very good or good certification, respectively. For the matrix support, the chances of their having very good or good certification were 1.79 and 3.29, respectively. Regarding to the association between institutional support activities and the certification, the very good or good certification was positively associated with self-assessment (OR = 1.95), permanent education (OR = 1.43), shared evaluation (OR = 1.40), and supervision and evaluation of indicators (OR = 1.37). In regards to the matrix support, the very good or good certification was positively associated with permanent education (OR = 1.50), interventions in the territory (OR = 1.30), and discussion in the work processes (OR = 1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

In Brazil, supporting activities are being incorporated in primary healthcare, and there is an association between the level of support, both matrix and institutional, and the certification result.