Burden, risk assessment, surveillance and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health workers: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Health workers (HWs) are at increased risk for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and a possible source of nosocomial transmission clusters. Despite the increased risk, the best surveillance strategy and management of exposed HWs are not yet well known. The aim of this review was to summarize and critically analyze the existing evidence related to this topic in order to support public health strategies aimed at protecting HWs in the hospital setting.

MAIN TEXT

A comprehensive computerized literature research from 1 January 2020 up to 22 May 2020 was made to identify studies analyzing the burden of infection, risk assessment, surveillance and management of HWs exposed to SARS-CoV-2. Among 1623 citation identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Google Scholar and manual search, we included 43 studies, 14 webpages and 5 ongoing trials. Health workers have a high risk of acquiring infection while caring for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. In particular, some types exposures and their duration, as well as the inadequate or non-use of personal protective equipment (PPE) are associated with increased infection risk. Strict infection prevention and control procedures (IPC), adequate training programs on the appropriate use of PPE and close monitoring of HWs with symptom surveillance and testing are essential to significantly reduce the risk. At the moment there is not enough evidence to provide precise indications regarding pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP).

CONCLUSIONS

During the spread of COVID-19 outbreak, numerous published papers investigated the epidemiology, risk assessment and prevention and control of SARS-CoV-2. However, more high-quality studies are needed to provide valid recommendations for better management and for the clinical and microbiological surveillance of healthcare personnel.

More Severe COVID-19 in Patients With Active Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity presentation between oncologic and non-oncologic patients and to evaluate the impact of cancer type and stage on COVID-19 course.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, retrospective study involving 13 COVID-19 Units in Campania region from February to May 2020. We defined as severe COVID-19 presentation the cases that required mechanical ventilation and/or admission to Intensive Care Units (ICU) and/or in case of death.

RESULTS

We enrolled 371 COVID-19 patients, of whom 34 (9.2%) had a history or a diagnosis of cancer (24 solid, 6 onco-hematological). Oncologic patients were older (p<0.001), had more comorbidities (p<0.001) and showed a higher rate of severe COVID-19 presentation (p=0.001) and of death (p<0.001). Compared to 12 patients with non-active cancer and to 337 without cancer, the 17 patients with active cancer had more comorbidities and showed a higher rate of severe COVID-19 and of mortality (all p values <0.001). Compared to the 281 non-severe patients, the 90 subjects with a severe presentation of COVID-19 were older (p<0.01), with more comorbidities (p<0.001) and with a higher rate of cancer (p=0.001). At multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11) and suffering from cancer in an active stage (OR 5.33, 95% CI: 1.77-16.53) were independently associated with severe COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the higher risk of severe evolution of COVID-19, cancer patients, especially those with an active malignancy, should be candidates for early evaluation of symptoms and early treatment for COVID-19.

Dementia as Risk Factor for Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Case-Control Study

Background

The aim of the present study was to investigate the outcome of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and dementia.

Patients and Methods

In a multicenter, observational, 1:2 matched case-control study all 23 patients with a history of dementia, hospitalized with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection from February 28th 2020 to January 31st 2021 were enrolled. For each Case, 2 patients without dementia observed in the same period study, pair matched for gender, age (±5 years), PaO₂/FiO₂ (P/F) ratio at admission (<200, or >200), number of comorbidities (±1; excluding dementia) were chosen (Control group).

Results

The majority of patients were males (60.9% of Cases and Controls) and very elderly [median age 82 years (IQR: 75.5–85) in the Cases and 80 (IQR: 75.5–83.75) in the Controls]. The prevalence of co-pathologies was very high: all the Cases and 43 (93.5%) Controls showed a Charlson comorbidity index of at least 2. During hospitalization the patients in the Case group less frequently had a moderate disease of COVID-19 (35 vs. 67.4%, p = 0.02), more frequently a severe disease (48 vs. 22%, p = 0.03) and more frequently died (48 vs. 22%, p = 0.03). Moreover, during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), 14 (60.8%) patients in the Case group and 1 (2.1%; p < 0.000) in the Control group showed signs and symptoms of delirium.

Conclusion

Patients with dementia are vulnerable and have an increased risk of a severe disease and death when infected with COVID-19.

SARS-CoV-2 infection: a hurricane that does not ignore chronic hepatitis

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly compromised screening, laboratory controls, clinical surveillance and treatment of chronic hepatitis patients and worsened their outcome, as evidenced by its significant correlation with advanced cirrhosis, liver decompensation and mortality.

RESULTS

This pandemic significantly impaired also the sector of liver transplantation, whose wards, operating rooms, outpatients' facilities, and healthcare personnel have been dedicated to patients with COVID-19. In addition, screening and treatment for HBV infection have been delayed or suspended in in most countries, with an increased risk of viral reactivation. Similar delay or suspension have also occurred for universal hepatitis B vaccination programs in many countries. Likewise, COVID-19 pandemic has made unreachable the goal of elimination of HCV infection as a worldwide public-health issue predicted for 2030 by the WHO.

CONCLUSION

This review article demonstrates how COVID-19 pandemic is causing serious damage to the sector of liver disease, which has quickly lost the beneficial effects of years of study, research, and clinical and technological application, as well as considerable financial investments.

Risk and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation during Immunosuppression for Non-Oncological Diseases

Reactivation of overt or occult HBV infection (HBVr) is a well-known, potentially life-threatening event which can occur during the course of immunosuppressive treatments. Although it has been described mainly in subjects receiving therapy for oncological or hematological diseases, the increasing use of immunosuppressant agents in non-oncological patients observed in recent years has raised concerns about the risk of reactivation in several other settings. However, few data can be found in the literature on the occurrence of HBVr in these populations, and few clear recommendations on its management have been defined. The present paper was written to provide an overview of the risk of HBV reactivation in non-neoplastic patients treated with immunosuppressive drugs, particularly for rheumatological, gastrointestinal, dermatological and neurological diseases, and for COVID-19 patients receiving immunomodulating agents; and to discuss the potential strategies for prevention and treatment of HBVr in these settings.

A Focus on the Nowadays Potential Antiviral Strategies in Early Phase of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19): A Narrative Review

Background: The outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the related disease (COVID-19) has rapidly spread to a pandemic proportion, increasing the demands on health systems for the containment and management of COVID-19. Nowadays, one of the critical issues still to be pointed out regards COVID-19 treatment regimens and timing: which drug, in which phase, for how long? Methods: Our narrative review, developed using MEDLINE and EMBASE, summarizes the main evidences in favor or against the current proposed treatment regimens for COVID-19, with a particular focus on antiviral agents. Results: Although many agents have been proposed as possible treatment, to date, any of the potential drugs against SARS-CoV-2 has shown to be safe and effective for treating COVID-19. Despite the lack of definitive evidence, remdesivir remains the only antiviral with encouraging effects in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Conclusions: In such a complex moment of global health emergency, it is hard to demand scientific evidence. Nevertheless, randomized clinical trials aiming to identify effective and safe drugs against SARS-CoV-2 infection are urgently needed in order to confirm or reject the currently available evidence.

Does COVID-19 Vaccination with BNT162b2 Influence HIV-Related Immunological and Virological Markers? Data from 235 Persons Living with HIV at Cotugno Hospital, Naples, Italy: Immune Response After Second and Third Doses, and Influence on Immunovirological Markers

Few data are available on the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on CD4 counts and HIV-RNA in persons living with HIV (PLWH). We present the data of 235 PLWH who were vaccinated with BNT162b2 in March 2021-February 2022 at the "Cotugno" hospital in Naples. PLWH treated at the "Cotugno" hospital, who were vaccinated at the hospital vaccination center, without prior COVID-19 and for whom immunological/virological data were available in the last 12 months and in the 6 months after vaccination were included. Antispike Ab were available for 187 and 64 PLWH after the second and third doses: PLWH with antispikes >33 binding antibodies units (BAU)/mL increased from 91% to 98%. Antinucleocapsid Ab performed in 147 and 56 patients identified 19 (13%) asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic COVID-19 infections after the second dose and an additional 15 (27%) after the third dose. Immunological/virological data were collected before vaccination (T0), after the second dose (T1), and after the third dose (T2). The absolute number of CD4 increased after the third dose (median 663, 657, and 707 at T0, T1, and T2; p < 0.000 T0 vs. T2). The proportion of patients with HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL increases significantly after the second dose (73%; 85.7%; 87.7%; p < 0.000 T0 vs. T2). The presence of COVID-19 asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic infections (demonstrated by the presence of antinucleocapsid Ab) significantly increases SARS-CoV-2 antispike Ab after second dose, but not after third dose. Asymptomatic/paucisymptomatic COVID-19 infections do not have influence on CD4 cell number and HIV-RNA level. Similarly, the presence of not-controlled HIV-RNA (HIV-RNA >50 copies/mL) does not influence antispike Ab response. According to our data, the response to SARS-CoV2 vaccination is effective in people living with HIV. Vaccination against COVID-19 appears to positively affect immunological and virological levels in people living with HIV.

What's new about clopidogrel

Clopidogrel is an oral tyenopiridin with a central role in the management of acute coronary syndromes and after stent implantation. Despite the use of this drug, many patients continue to experience thrombotic events which are usually referred as "therapy failure". Actually, to date, only stent thrombosis is considered therapy failure: mainly, it could be due to patient genetic predisposition or drug interaction, in particular with proton pump inhibitors. Genetic mutations in the CYP2C19 cytochrome (involved in the metabolism of clopidogrel and many other drugs) may lead to a lower concentration of active metabolites of the drug. In the same way, proton pump inhibitors interaction with the cytochrome may reduce clopidogrel activation. To overcome the problem some authors have suggested to increase the dosage of the drug, to use other drugs, to genotype patients, and not to use proton pomp inhibitors in patients on double antiplatelet therapy. Recent studies have shown that the interaction between clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors is far to be clinically relevant and that the variability between the different assay to determine patients response to the drug does not allow, to date, to rely on their use. Moreover, double clopidogrel dose is as effective as low one in preventing major cardiovascular events, with a significant reduction in stent thrombosis in spite of a modest increase in major bleeding. Aim of this review article was to update current knowledge on clopidogrel, particularly focusing on the problem of "resistance" and PPI interaction. Moreover, we will discuss current strategies to overcome the resistance.

Influences on myocardial perfusion in non-obstructive coronary disease: an observational quantitative perfusion mapping study

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by a Clinical Training Research Fellowship (K. Knott) from the British Heart Foundation and directly and indirectly from the Biomedical Research Centre at University College London Hospitals and Barts Heart Centre.

Background

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with automated inline perfusion mapping permits rapid fully automated non-invasive myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml/g/min). Understanding the microvascular component of MBF would help optimize epicardial coronary artery disease detection and potentially serve as an independent diagnostic / therapeutic target. 

Purpose

To explore MBF influences at stress and rest in patients with unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries.

Methods

242 participants (mean age 56.9 years) from 5 European centers with unobstructed epicardial coronary arteries and no myocardial scar underwent adenosine vasodilator perfusion mapping at stress and rest. The factors influencing MBF were determined using univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses.

Results

Mean rest perfusion was 0.91+/-0.24ml/g/min. Rest perfusion was higher in females (0.97+/-0.22ml/g/min vs 0.83 +/- 0.24ml/g/min) and lower in patients on beta blockers. Mean stress MBF was 2.53+/-0.82ml/g/min. Factors independently associated with reduced stress MBF were increasing age, diabetes, increasing left ventricular mass (LVMi) and the use of beta blockers.  The predicted stress MBF can be obtained from the equation MBF = 2.66–0.015(age-60)–0.013(LVMi-57)-0.405(diabetes)–0.365(beta blocker). This means stress MBF falls 10% over 19 years and that diabetes drops the MBF by the equivalent of being 27 years older. These changes are large: for example, a 70-year-old diabetic would have 30% lower stress MBF than a 35 year-old non-diabetic. 

Conclusions

In the absence of obstructive epicardial coronary disease, stress MBF falls with age, diabetes, increased LV mass and beta-blockers. These data may help develop normal reference ranges, input to other modelling (eg CT FFR), and they advance perfusion mapping as a measure of microvascular function.

Abstract Figure. Summary of the determinants of perfusion

Asymmetric septal thickening is observed in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutation carriers without left ventricular hypertrophy: insights from AI analysis

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Dr Hughes is supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant number FS/17/82/33222).

Background

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a common inherited cardiac disease characterised by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), often, with asymmetric septal thickening. Despite the prevalence of inherited mutations present in &gt;50% of cases, there is variable phenotypic expression in those with abnormal sarcomere protein genes. In individuals with abnormal genes but without LVH, we hypothesised that there is subtle asymmetric septal hypertrophy, detectable by the increased precision offered by an artificial intelligence (AI) tool for measuring wall thickness.

Purpose

We explored the septal-lateral ratio measured by AI in individuals with an identified genotype but no left ventricular hypertrophy as a component of sub-clinical HCM.

Methods

43 individuals with identified genotype, but no left ventricular hypertrophy (G+LVH-) and 97 age-, sex- and disease-matched controls underwent CMR. Patients were excluded if they had a maximum wall thickness (MWT) of ≥13mm. A clinically validated AI tool was used to measure the MWT, for each segment in the 16-segment AHA model. The septal-lateral ratio was calculated using the septal segment with the largest MWT and the lateral segment with the largest MWT.

Results

The mean septal-lateral ratio of the G+LVH- patients was 1.22 (SD 0.22) and the mean septal-lateral ratio of the matched controls was 1.14 (SD 0.15) with a statistically significant mean difference of 0.08 (p=0.01). There was no significant difference between the MWT of the G+LVH- patients at 10.3mm (SD 2.2) and healthy volunteers at 10.1mm (SD 1.8) (p = 0.61).

Conclusion

G+LVH- patients have a 7% increase in their septal-lateral ratio compared with age-matched controls despite the lack of difference in the MWT. Using increased precision offered by AI, early features of HCM can be observed in patients without overt LVH.

Improving the diagnostic accuracy of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using machine learning

Funding Acknowledgements

Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Dr Hughes is supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant number FS/17/82/33222).

Introduction

The imaging criteria for diagnosis of apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (ApHCM) is a maximum wall thickness (MWT) ≥15mm. CMR enables detection of subtle phenotypic features (e.g. loss of apical tapering, cavity obliteration) and coupled with characteristic electrocardiogram changes, ApHCM can be diagnosed without overt hypertrophy. However, these patients are not captured by current diagnostic criteria.

Purpose

We sought to use a machine learning tool to quantify wall thickness and identify patients with ‘relative’ ApHCM that do not reach current diagnostic thresholds.

Methods

CMR images from 4118 healthy participants from the UK Biobank were segmented automatically with a clinically validated machine learning algorithm and wall thickness measured at all point in the myocardium by solving a solution to Laplace’s equation. MWT were pooled into 16 AHA segments and indexed to body surface area (BSA). The non-indexed and indexed segmental upper limit of normal was calculated as the mean + 3 standard deviations (the equivalent of 95% confidence interval after correcting for multiple [16] comparisons using the Bonferroni method).

Results

73 overt ApHCM subjects (MWT&gt;15mm) and 31 relative ApHCM subjects underwent CMR scanning. In healthy controls, the non-indexed (and indexed) upper limits were calculated for the apical-anterior 10.2mm (5.2 mm/m2), apical-septal 11.1mm (5.6 mm/m2), apical-inferior 10.5mm (5.3 mm/m2) and apical-lateral 10.1mm (5.2 mm/m2) segments. With a non-indexed cut-off, all (73 of 73) overt ApHCM and 84% (26 of 31) relative ApHCM were classified as having an abnormally thick apex. 3% (127 of 4118) of the healthy UK Biobank cohort were classified as abnormal, as expected. Using an indexed cut-off, all overt ApHCM and 87% (27/31) relative ApHCM were classified as abnormal, and 3% (123 of 4118) of the healthy UK Biobank cohort were misclassified.

Conclusion

We can successfully classify 87% of relative ApHCM patients from a normative reference range derived from a large cohort of healthy patients – a significant improvement on existing methods. We show that the specificity and sensitivity is increased when MWT is indexed to BSA. For practical clinical application, we recommend a cut-off of 10mm or an indexed cut-off of 5mm/m2 in any apical segment to diagnose apical LVH. Overt and relative apical HCM examplesHealthy controls AHA maps (non-indexed)