Proton pump inhibitors: use and misuse in the clinical setting

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has greatly improved our therapeutic approach to acid-related diseases for their efficacy and safety. Areas Covered: The following evidence-based indications for PPI use are acknowledged by many scientific societies: treatment of the various forms and complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease, eradication of H. pylori infection in combination with two or more antibiotics, short- and long-term therapy of H. pylori-negative peptic ulcers, healing, and prevention of NSAID/COXIB-associated gastric ulcers, co-therapy with endoscopic procedures to control upper digestive bleeding and medical treatment of Zollinger Ellison syndrome. Expert Commentary: Despite the above well-defined indications, however, the use of PPIs continues to grow every year in both western and eastern countries and the endless expansion of the PPI market has created important problems for many regulatory authorities for two relevant features: the progressive increase of the costs of therapy and the greater potential harms for the patients. The major reasons for the misuse of PPIs are the prevention of gastro-duodenal ulcers in patients without risk factors and the stress ulcer prophylaxis in non-intensive care units, steroid therapy alone, anti-platelet or anti-coagulant treatment in patients without risk of gastric injury and the overtreatment of functional dyspepsia.

Extrahepatic autoimmune diseases in primary biliary cholangitis: Prevalence and significance for clinical presentation and disease outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The prevalence and clinical significance of extrahepatic autoimmune diseases (EHAIDs) have not been evaluated in a large cohort of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

METHODS

The medical records of 1554 patients with PBC from 20 international centers were retrospectively reviewed. Development of decompensated cirrhosis (ascites, variceal bleeding, and/or hepatic encephalopathy) and hepatocellular carcinoma were considered clinical endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 35 different EHAIDs were diagnosed in 440 (28.3%) patients with PBC. Patients with EHAIDs were more often female (92.5% vs 86.1%, P < 0.001) and seropositive for anti-mitochondrial antibodies (88% vs 84%, P = 0.05) and antinuclear antibodies and/or smooth muscle antibodies (53.8% vs 43.6%, P = 0.005). At presentation, patients with EHAIDs had significantly lower levels of alkaline phosphatase (1.76 vs 1.98 × upper limit of normal [ULN], P = 0.006), aspartate aminotransferase (1.29 vs 1.50 × ULN, P < 0.001), and total bilirubin (0.53 vs 0.58 × ULN, P = 0.002). Patients with EHAIDs and without EHAIDs had similar rates of GLOBE high-risk status (12.3% vs 16.1%, P = 0.07) and Paris II response (71.4% vs 69.4%, P = 0.59). Overall, event-free survival was not different in patients with and without EHAIDs (90.8% vs 90.7%, P = 0.53, log rank). Coexistence of each autoimmune thyroid diseases (10.6%), Sjögren disease (8.3%), systemic sclerosis (2.9%), rheumatoid arthritis (2.7%), systemic lupus erythematosus (1.7%), celiac disease (1.7%), psoriasis (1.5%), and inflammatory bowel diseases (1.3%) did not influence the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that EHAIDs are frequently diagnosed in patients with PBC. The presence of EHAIDs may influence the clinical phenotype of PBC at presentation but has no impact on PBC outcome.

Epidemiology and natural history of gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is highly prevalent in Western countries, particularly when considering its most classic symptom that is heartburn. This symptom is very frequent in the community and ranges from 10% to more than 30%, according to the various population-based studies. This disease is much more represented in Europe and USA than in Asiatic countries. It has been shown that GERD prevalence increases in parallel with the remarkable growth of obesity, as this condition is able to favor all the pathogenetic mechanisms leading to it. Current information regarding the phenotypic presentation of GERD shows that there are two main phenotypic manifestations, that are erosive reflux disease (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and the latter includes the majority of patients (up to 70%). The major complication of GERD is the development of Barrett esophagus, a pre-malignant lesion potentially leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Data from medical literature on the natural history of this disease are scant and mainly retrospective, so the interpretation of them is very difficult. However, they seem to suggest that both NERD and mild esophagitis tend to remain as such overtime and the progression from NERD to ERD, from mild to severe ERD and from ERD to Barrett's esophagus may occur only in a small number of cases, ranging from 0% to 30%, 10-22% and 1-13%, respectively. Future studies should help us in elucidating better the real transition from one category to another and to do this, we have to exclude from the world of GERD all the functional conditions that nowadays can be easily recognized by means of impedance-pH monitoring.

Drugs for improving esophageal mucosa defense: where are we now and where are we going?

In the past, the attention of physiologists and doctors has been mainly focused on the key role of acid in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but increasing evidence that 20-40% of reflux patients respond not at all or only partially to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has underlined the concept that factors other than acid are implicated in its development and the elicitation of symptoms. Among these, impaired mucosal integrity, particularly in most patients with non-erosive reflux disease, has recently been reincluded and the reinforcement of defensive mechanisms and/or its protection has been reappointed as a renewed therapeutic target for the management of GERD patients. In this review we will summarize the existing knowledge of the old and novel compounds able to produce this therapeutic effect, including sucralfate, alginate-based drugs, and a new medical device consisting of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate dispersed in a bioadhesive carrier, together with the potential indications for their use. It is to be stressed, however, that, although these compounds may represent a real alternative to PPI therapy in GERD, the combination of mucosal protection with acid suppression may help manage many cases with a partial or unsatisfactory response to PPIs alone.

Narrow band imaging vs. high definition colonoscopy for detection of colorectal adenomas in patients with positive faecal occult blood test: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The impact of narrow band imaging in improving the adenoma detection rate in a screening scenario is still unclear.

AIM

To evaluate whether narrow band imaging compared with high definition white light colonoscopy can enhance the adenoma detection rate during screening colonoscopy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting for screening colonoscopy were included into this study and were randomly assigned to the narrow band imaging group (Group 1) or standard colonoscopy group (Group 2). Primary end point was the adenoma detection rate and secondary aim was the detection rate of advanced adenomas.

RESULTS

Overall, 117 patients were allocated to Group 1 and 120 to Group 2. Both the adenoma detection rate and the detection rate of advanced adenomas were not significantly different between the two groups (respectively, 52.1% vs. 55%, RR=0.95, 95% CI 0.75-1.20; 32.5% vs. 44.2%, RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.53-1.02). No significant difference between the proportions of polypoid and flat adenomas was found. Male gender, no prior history of screening, and endoscopist's adenoma detection rate were independent predictive factors of higher advanced adenoma detection rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In a screening scenario, narrow band imaging did not improve the adenoma nor advanced adenoma detection rates compared to high definition white light colonoscopy.

Multicenter cohort study of patients with buried bumper syndrome treated endoscopically with a novel, dedicated device

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is a rare adverse event of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement in which the internal bumper migrates through the stomal tract to become embedded within the gastric wall. Excessive tension between the internal and external bumpers, causing ischemic necrosis of the gastric wall, is believed to be the main etiologic factor. Several techniques for endoscopic management of BBS have been described using off-label devices. The Flamingo set is a novel, sphincterotome-like device specifically designed for BBS management. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Flamingo device in a large, homogeneous cohort of patients with BBS.

METHODS

A guidewire was inserted through the external access of the PEG tube into the gastric lumen. The Flamingo device was then introduced into the stomach over the guidewire. This dedicated tool can be flexed by 180 degrees, exposing a sphincterotome-like cutting wire, which is used to incise the overgrown tissue until the PEG bumper is exposed. A retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study was conducted on 54 patients between December 2016 and February 2019.

RESULTS

The buried bumper was successfully removed in 53 of 55 procedures (96.4%). The median time for the endoscopic removal of the buried bumper was 22 minutes (range, 5-60). Periprocedural endoscopic adverse events occurred in 7 procedures (12.7%) and were successfully managed endoscopically. A median follow-up of 150 days (range, 33-593) was performed in 29 patients (52.7%), during which no significant adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Through our experience, we found this dedicated novel device to be safe, quick, and effective for minimally invasive, endoscopic management of BBS.

High anti-TNF alfa drugs trough levels are not associated with the occurrence of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Objectives: Up to 40% of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with anti-TNF drugs lose response within 1 year of treatment, therefore requiring drug optimization. Although higher drug trough levels (TLs) are associated with sustained clinical outcomes, there are concerns that they may be associated with a higher risk of adverse events (AEs). The aim was to evaluate the presence of a possible association between drug TLs and the occurrence of AEs in IBD patients treated with anti-TNF drugs.Methods: We retrospectively studied a cohort of 113 IBD patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab, of whom 27 were in combination therapy with immunosuppressants. TLs were measured using a homogeneous mobility shift assay.Results: During a median follow-up of 16 months (range 1-144), we observed 103 AEs occurring in 58 patients. We found no statistically significant difference (p = .21) in median TLs between patients who did 6.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-36.2) or did not (7.7 mcg/mL; range 0.0-20.7) experience an AE. No difference was observed in the rate of AEs between patients in mono- or combination therapy (p = .38), as well as between elderly (i.e., >65 years) and younger patients (p = .32). Considering a TL cutoff of 7 mcg/mL for infliximab and 12 mcg/mL for adalimumab, or even double these TL values, we observed no statistically significant difference in the rate of AEs occurrence.Conclusion: Our study suggests that, when clinically required, anti-TNF drug dosage may be increased without particular concerns regarding the risk of AEs occurrence in IBD patients, even in patients on combination therapy and elderly ones.

Complexity and diversity of gastroesophageal reflux disease phenotypes

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as a condition which develops when the reflux of gastric contents causes troublesome symptoms, impairs quality of life, or leads to mucosal damage or complications. There are two main phenotypic presentations of GERD, the erosive (ERD) and non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), with the latter one representing up to 70% of GERD spectrum. Moreover, patients with GERD can be clinically subdivided into two distinct syndromes: patients with esophageal and extraesophageal symptoms. The diagnosis of NERD should be supported by the evidence that symptoms are due to reflux episodes on the basis of an excess of acid into the esophagus or a positive correlation between symptoms and acid and/or weakly acidic reflux episodes as evidenced by 24-hour impedance-pH monitoring. Patients with normal esophageal acid exposure and no correlation between heartburn and any kind of chemical reflux are considered affected by functional heartburn and do not pertain to the realm of NERD. They do not usually respond to PPI therapy as further empirical criterion and are included in the large group of functional digestive disorders with the expression of altered generation or perception of symptoms at the esophageal level and can often overlap with functional dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome.