Promoting cardiac rehabilitation program quality in low-resource settings: Needs assessment and evaluation of the International Council of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation's registry quality improvement supports

BACKGROUND

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) registries have the potential to support quality improvement (QImp). This study investigated the QImp needs of International CR Registry-participating programs and their evaluation of its' supports.

METHODS

ICRR offers comparative outcome dashboards and QImp sessions, among other features. In this qualitative study, ICRR data stewards from the 17 active on-boarded CR programs were invited to a focus group held in November 2023 via Teams; stewards not sufficiently-proficient in English were invited to provide written input. Deductive-thematic analysis using NVIVO was undertaken by 2 researchers; member-checking ensued.

RESULTS

Nine participated, and four provided input, from eight countries. Three themes emerged; saturation was achieved. First, QImp facilitators included training, institutional requirements, dedicated staff, resources in academic centres and ICRR features. Second, QImp barriers included staffing issues, the global nature of the ICRR, and structural challenges in low-resource settings. Finally, ICRR supports for QImp included didactic webinars, hearing from other programs, 1-1 support offered and assessing minimum Certification standards.

CONCLUSION

ICRR-participating programs are satisfied with QImp supports but encounter challenges, including related to language, staffing and other resources. CR registries should be leveraged and optimized to support CR programs to assess and improve their care quality.

Translation and evaluation of a comprehensive educational program for cardiac rehabilitation patients in Latin America: A multi-national, longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

To translate, cross-culturally adapt and validate a comprehensive evidence- and theoretically-based CR education intervention in Latin America.

METHODS

First, best practices in translation and cross-cultural adaptation were applied through 6 steps. Then, the Spanish version was delivered to CR participants from programs in Colombia, Costa Rica and Peru for validation, such that the evaluation was pre-post, uncontrolled, pragmatic, observational, and prospective in design. Participants completed surveys assessing knowledge, health literacy, self-efficacy, and health behaviours. All outcomes were assessed pre-, and post-CR, as well as 6 months after CR completion.

RESULTS

After translation of the patient guide from English to Spanish, 5 of the 9 booklets were culturally adapted. Two-hundred and forty-nine patients consented to participate, of which 184 (74 %) completed post-CR, and 121 (48 %) completed final assessments. There was a significant improvement in disease-related knowledge pre- to post-CR, as well as in health literacy, self-efficacy, and health behaviours (all p < 0.05). These gains were sustained 6 months post-program. With adjustment, CR attendance (i.e., exposure to the education) was associated with greater post-CR knowledge (ß = 0.026; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A patient education intervention for CR patients in Latin America has been validated, and wider implementation is warranted.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Application of this first-ever validated CR education program for Spanish-speaking settings may result in secondary prevention.

Translation, adaptation, and psychometrically validation of an instrument to assess disease-related knowledge in Spanish-speaking cardiac rehabilitation participants: The Spanish CADE-Q SV

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Spanish Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire Short Version(CADE-QSV).

BACKGROUND

Knowledge assessment can tailor patient education strategies in CR.

METHODS

Ten CR experts culturally-adapted the translated tool and 249 CR patients in three countries participated in the psychometrically validation. The internal consistency was assessed using KR-20 and Cronbach's alpha. Distribution- and anchor-based methods were used to estimate the MCID for interpretability analysis. Factor structure, acceptability, floor and ceiling effects and discriminant validity were also assessed.

RESULTS

KR-20 was 0.75.Factor analysis revealed 5 factors, all internally consistent. Discriminant validity was supported by significant differences in educational level and family income at post-CR. Results showed that increases in knowledge can moderately increase mean steps per day, with MCID=3.00. Items were completed by 98% of participants. No evidence for ceiling/floor effects on total score. The area with the highest knowledge was nutrition and the lowest was medical condition.

CONCLUSION

The Spanish CADE-QSV demonstrated preliminary validity and reliability.