Disparities in prostate cancer diagnoses in persons experiencing homelessness

24

Background: We previously reported that persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) are significantly less likely to undergo prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing compared to persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH). The purpose of this study was to determine if reduced PSA testing in PEH results in more advanced prostate cancer diagnoses. Methods: We identified PSA screening eligible PEH (men ages 50-69) from an institutional registry of all patients that presented to our healthcare system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. A matched cohort of non-PEH was generated for comparison. Institutional CPT and HCPCS billing codes for PSA testing were available beginning 01/01/2017 and cross-referenced to identify PEH and non-PEH who underwent PSA testing at least once between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2021. In patients with ≥ 1 PSA test, we recorded screening, oncologic and treatment related variables. Patients with a history of prostate cancer diagnosed outside the study timeframe were excluded. Results: A total of 9,249 PEH were identified, with 1,597 meeting PSA screening criteria during the study timeframe; 3,370 screening eligible non-PEH were available for comparison. The median age was 59.0 for PEH and 60.0 for non-PEH. PEH were significantly less likely to have a primary care provider (58% vs 81%, p<0.001) or to have a PSA test (12% vs 33%, p<0.001). Among patients with a PSA test, PEH were significantly less likely to have multiple PSA tests compared to non-PEH (28% vs 61%, p<0.001) and significantly more likely to have a PSA ≥ 4.0 (18% vs 12%, p=0.028). In patients with a PSA ≥ 4.0, PEH were less likely to receive a prostate biopsy (37% vs 61%, p =0.009) and there was a trend towards decreased prostate MRI (11% vs 25%, p=0.085). A total of 6 PEH (0.4%) and 46 non-PEH (1.4%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer. The median PSA at diagnosis was 12.6 in PEH vs 7.0 in non-PEH (p=0.052). PEH were significantly more likely to present with high/very high risk disease (4/6 [66%] vs 9/46 [20%], p=0.019); no PEH had very low/low risk disease compared with 20 (43.5%) non-PEH. PEH were more likely to present with lymph node positive or metastatic disease (3/6 [50%] vs 3/46 [7%], p=0.016). The median time from biopsy to treatment was 119 days in PEH and 76 days in non-PEH (p=0.391). Conclusions: PEH are less likely to receive prostate cancer testing following an elevated PSA and more likely to present with high risk advanced prostate cancer. Interventions to increase prostate cancer awareness in PEH are needed to reduce disparities.

Cancer Diagnoses and Use of Radiation Therapy Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness

PURPOSE

Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have low rates of cancer screening and worse cancer mortality compared with persons not experiencing homelessness. Data regarding cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are limited. We investigated cancer prevalence and use of radiation therapy (RT) in PEH.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients presenting between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2021, at a large metropolitan hospital system were assessed for homelessness via intake screening or chart search. PEH data were cross-referenced with the institution's cancer database to identify PEH with cancer diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were abstracted.

RESULTS

Of a total of 9654 (9250 evaluable) PEH with a median age of 42 years, 81 patients (0.88%) had at least 1 cancer diagnosis and 5 had multiple diagnoses, for a total of 87 PEH with at least 1 cancer diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. In total, 43% were female and 51% were Black, and 43% presented with advanced or metastatic disease. Lung (17%), prostate (15%), leukemia/lymphoma (13%), and head/neck (9%) were the most common diagnoses. In total, 17% of patients underwent surgery alone, 13% received chemotherapy alone, 14% received RT alone, and 6% received hormone therapy alone. A total of 8% of patients underwent no treatment, and 43% underwent multimodality therapy. In total, 58% of treated patients never achieved disease-free status. Of the 31 patients who received RT, 87% received external beam RT. Most patients (70%) received hypofractionated regimens. For patients who had multifraction treatment, the treatment completion rate was 85%, significantly lower than the departmental completion rate of 98% (P < .00001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of PEH in a metropolitan setting, cancer diagnoses were uncommon and were frequently in advanced stages. Most patients underwent single-modality treatment or no treatment at all. Despite the use of hypofractionation, the RT completion rate was low, likely reflecting complex barriers to care. Further interventions to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are urgently needed.

Prostate Cancer Screening Disparities in Persons Experiencing Homelessness

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing rates in persons experiencing homelessness (PEH), identify factors associated with screening, and compare PSA screening rates in PEH with a matched cohort of persons not experiencing homelessness (non-PEH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 9,249 potentially eligible PEH cared for at a large metropolitan hospital system from an institutional registry of all patients who presented to the health care system as homeless from 2014 to 2021. Homelessness was defined by the presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59), the listed address matching to the address of a homeless shelter or other transitional housing or a positive screen for homelessness. A matched cohort of 10,000 non-PEH was generated for comparison. Univariate chi-square analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to evaluate variables associated with PSA testing.

RESULTS

A total of 1,605 PEH and 3,413 non-PEH were eligible for PSA screening within the study timeframe. Half of PEH were Black (50%). Medicaid was the most common insurance (51%), followed by Medicare (18%). PEH were less likely to have a PCP (58% v 81%, P < .001) and had a significantly lower PSA testing rate (13% v 34%, P < .001) compared with non-PEH. Univariate analysis revealed that PSA testing was more common in PEH who were employed (P < .001), had private insurance or Medicare (P < .001), or had an established primary care provider (PCP; P < .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that having a PCP (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.62 to 4.00; P < .001) significantly increased the likelihood of PSA testing in PEH.

CONCLUSION

PEH experience low rates of prostate cancer screening. Interventions to increase screening in this population, including increased PCP access, are needed.

Breast cancer screening in persons experiencing homelessness

6515

Background: Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) suffer from poor health outcomes, including worse cancer mortality, compared to persons not experiencing homelessness. A portion of the disparity in cancer outcomes is attributable to reduced access to cancer screening, leading to more advanced-stage disease and a higher risk of death compared to the general population. Data regarding cancer screening rates in PEH are scarce. We therefore sought to evaluate baseline rates of breast cancer screening in PEH. Methods: All patients presenting for care from January 1, 2014 onward at a hospital system spanning five counties in a populous Midwestern state were screened for homelessness. Homelessness was identified by two criteria: presence of the Z-code for homelessness (Z59) in the patient’s electronic medical record, and/or patient’s address on record listed as an address matching that of a regional homeless shelter, transitional housing, or “homeless.” Identified PEH were maintained in a prospective registry. For each female PEH in the screening age range, billing data for completed breast cancer screening mammography performed in the previous five years (1/1/17-12/31/21) were extracted (CPT codes 77063, 77067). Data were also extracted for a cohort of non-PEH patients eligible for screening. Demographic and clinical data were extracted for all patients. This study was approved by the hospital system’s IRB. Results: A total of 3,474 female (biological sex) PEH were identified, with 1,320 eligible for screening mammography (alive and between the ages of 40 and 79) in the study timeframe. The median age was 53.5 years old; 44% were Black, 48% White, 8.5% unknown/other race, and 3% Hispanic ethnicity. 28% of PEH were uninsured, and 67% had government insurance; 66% had an assigned primary care physician (PCP). Of PEH eligible for screening mammography, 237 (18%) had at least one screening mammogram during this five-year interval (2017, 2.2%; 2018, 4.3%; 2019, 3.6%; 2020, 3.7%; 2021, 4.3%). In a cohort of 6,240 non-PEH eligible for screening over the same timeframe, the screening mammography rate was 32%, which was significantly higher than the screening rate for PEH (p < 0.00001). Compared to PEH who did not undergo screening mammography, PEH who underwent screening mammography were more likely to have an assigned PCP (90% vs 38%, p < 0.00001), to be a non-current tobacco user (56% vs 35%, p < 0.00001), and to be a non-current illicit drug user (84 % vs 68%, p = 0.0015). PEH who underwent screening mammography were significantly less likely to be uninsured (12% vs 31%, p < 0.00001). Conclusions: In the largest study of its kind to date, we identified low rates of breast cancer screening in female PEH. Interventions to increase breast cancer screening in this vulnerable population are urgently needed and may include increased access to PCPs, tobacco and drug cessation programs, and provision of health insurance.