Longitudinal comparison of dyssynchrony correction and strain improvement by conduction system pacing: LEVEL-AT trial secondary findings

Longitudinal dyssynchrony correction and strain improvement by comparable cardiac resynchronization therapy techniques is unreported.

AIMS

Our purpose was to compare echocardiographic dyssynchrony correction and strain improvement by conduction system pacing (CSP) vs. biventricular pacing (BiVP) as a marker of contractility improvement during one-year follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A treatment-received analysis was performed in patients included in the LEVEL-AT trial (NCT04054895), randomized to CSP or BiVP, and evaluated at baseline (ON and OFF programming) and at 6 and 12 months (n = 69, 32% women). Analysis included intraventricular (septal flash), interventricular (difference between left and right ventricular outflow times), and atrioventricular (diastolic filling time) dyssynchrony and strain parameters (septal bounce, global longitudinal strain [GLS], left bundle branch block pattern and mechanical dispersion).Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 27.5 ± 7% and left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) was 138 ± 77 ml, without differences between groups. Longitudinal analysis showed LVEF and LVESV improvement (p < 0.001), without between-group differences. At 12-month follow-up, adjusted mean LVEF was 46% with CSP (95%CI 42.2%, 49.3%) vs. 43% with BiVP (95%CI 39.6%, 45.8%) (p = 0.31) and LVESV was 80 ml (95%CI 55.3 ml, 104.5 ml) vs. 100 ml (95%CI 78.7 ml, 121.6 ml), respectively (p = 0.66).Longitudinal analysis showed a significative improvement of all dyssynchrony parameters and GLS over time (p < 0.001), without differences between groups. Baseline GLS significantly correlated with LVEF and LVESV at 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

CSP and BiVP provided similar dyssynchrony and strain correction over time. Baseline global longitudinal strain correction predicted ventricular remodeling at 12-month follow-up.

Stepwise application of ECG and electrogram-based criteria to ensure electrical resynchronization with left bundle branch pacing

AIMS

To define a stepwise application of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) criteria that will simplify implantation and guarantee electrical resynchronization. Left bundle branch pacing has emerged as an alternative to biventricular pacing. However, a systematic stepwise criterion to ensure electrical resynchronization is lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A cohort of 24 patients from the LEVEL-AT trial (NCT04054895) who received LBBP and had electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) at 45 days post-implant were included. The usefulness of ECG- and electrogram-based criteria to predict accurate electrical resynchronization with LBBP were analyzed. A two-step approach was developed. The gold standard used to confirm resynchronization was the change in ventricular activation pattern and shortening in left ventricular activation time, assessed by ECGI. Twenty-two (91.6%) patients showed electrical resynchronization on ECGI. All patients fulfilled pre-screwing requisites: lead in septal position in left-oblique projection and W paced morphology in V1. In the first step, presence of either right bundle branch conduction delay pattern (qR or rSR in V1) or left bundle branch capture Plus (QRS ≤120 ms) resulted in 95% sensitivity and 100% specificity to predict LBBP resynchronization, with an accuracy of 95.8%. In the second step, the presence of selective capture (100% specificity, only 41% sensitivity) or a spike-R <80 ms in non-selective capture (100% specificity, sensitivity 46%) ensured 100% accuracy to predict resynchronization with LBBP.

CONCLUSION

Stepwise application of ECG and electrogram criteria may provide an accurate assessment of electrical resynchronization with LBBP (Graphical abstract).

Cardiac injury before and after COVID-19. A longitudinal MRI study

Background

Recent MRI-based studies have raised great concern about frequent cardiac involvement even in mild or asymptomatic COVID-19. However, while signs of myocardial injury were found in large proportions of patients after COVID-19, all studies published to date lack baseline imaging and are therefore unable to discriminate between pre-existing and COVID-19-induced injury.

Purpose

In this longitudinal study, we aimed to assess the true cardiac impact of COVID-19 based on pre- and post-COVID-19 late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-MRI.

Methods

A prospective registry of patients with serial LGE-MRIs was screened for patients with documented SARS-COV-2 infection after cardiac LGE-MRI. Eligible patients then received a post-COVID-19 LGE-MRI using the same scanner and sequence as in the pre-COVID-19 MRI. Inversion recovery prepared T1-weighted gradient echo sequences were acquired in sinus rhythm using ECG gating and a free-breathing 3D navigator, 15–20 minutes after administering an intravenous bolus of 0.2 mmol/kg of gadobutrol. A TI scout sequence was used in order to determine the optimal TI that nullified the left ventricular myocardial signal. The presence of LGE was independently assessed qualitatively by two experienced investigators blinded to patient information. For quantitative analyses a 3D-reconstruction of the left ventricle was performed using ADAS-3D software. LGE was then automatically quantified based on a prespecified signal intensity threshold of ≥3 SD above the mean of a remote non-enhanced myocardial region.

Results

Pre- and post-COVID LGE-MRI from 31 patients with cardiovascular risk factors that had recovered from mild to moderate COVID-19 (23% hospitalised) were analysed. At a median of 5 months post-COVID-19, LGE-lesions indicative of myocardial injury were encountered in 15 out of 31 patients (48%), which is in line with previous reports. However, intraindividual comparison with the pre-COVID-19 MRI reveiled all of these lesions as pre-existing and thus not COVID-19-related. Quantitative analysis detected no increase in the size of individual LGE-lesions, nor in the global left ventricular LGE-extent. There was no difference in any functional or structural parameter between pre- and post-COVID-19 MRI.

Conclusion

This longitudinal study in a cohort of patients considered at high risk of cardiac involvement, did not find any evidence for COVID-19-induced myocardial injury. The complete absence of de novo LGE lesions in this cohort is reassuring and indicates that cardiac sequelae of COVID-19 are rare and certainly not as common as previously suggested.

Funding Acknowledgement

Type of funding sources: None.

Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement

Background: The upper physiological threshold for tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) of 2.8 m/s proposed by the Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) guidelines had been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative PH in patients with aortic stenosis, long-term after valve replacement, using two different TRV thresholds (2.55 and 2.8 m/s). Methods: Four hundred and forty four patients were included (mean age 73 ± 9 years; 55% male), with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (98% completed). Patients were divided into three PH probability groups according to guidelines (low, intermediate and high) for both thresholds (TRV ≤ 2.8 m/s and TRV ≤ 2.55 m/s), using right atrial area>18 cm² and right ventricle/left ventricle ratio>1 as additional echocardiographic variables. Results: In patients with measurable TRV (n = 304), the low group mortality rate was 25% and 30%, respectively for 2.55 and 2.8 m/s TRV thresholds. The intermediate group with TRV > 2.55 m/s was an independent mortality risk factor (HR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.91 to 3.48, p = 0.01), in contrast to the intermediate group with TRV>2.8 m/s (HR 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.32, p = 0.14). Both high probability groups were associated with an increased mortality risk, as compared to their respective low groups. When including all patients (with measurable and non-measurable TRV), both intermediate groups remained independently associated with an increased mortality risk: HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.35 p = 0.01) for the new cut-off point; and HR 1.43 (95% CI: 0.96 to 2.13, p = 0.07) for guidelines threshold. Conclusion: A TRV threshold of 2.55 m/s, together with right cavities measures, allowed a better risk assessment of patients with PH secondary to severe aortic stenosis, with or without tricuspid regurgitation.

Impact of Preoperative Measurement of Right Heart Chambers in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension Following Aortic Valve Replacement

BACKGROUND

Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with aortic stenosis is related to poor prognosis following aortic valve replacement (AVR). Current European PH guidelines recommend adding two different echocardiographic signs to tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) in PH estimation, classifying its probability as low (TRV ≤ 2.8 m/s), intermediate (TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s), and high (TRV > 3.4 m/s). The right ventricle is an important determinant of prognosis in PH. The goal of this study was to analyze the value of right atrial area > 18 cm² and right ventricular/left ventricular ratio > 1 in the long-term prognosis following AVR, mainly in the intermediate probability group.

METHODS

This study included 429 consecutive patients (mean age, 73 ± 8 years; 55% male) with a median follow-up of 4.25 years (completed in 98%). Patients were divided into low (n = 247), intermediate (n = 117), and high probability groups (n = 65). The intermediate probability group was divided into two subgroups: subgroup 2a (n = 27; TRV nonmeasurable or ≤ 2.8 m/s and two signs present) and subgroup 2b (n = 90; TRV 2.9-3.4 m/s, and none or only one sign present).

RESULTS

Overall mortality rates during follow-up of the low, intermediate, and high probability groups were 24%, 32%, and 42%, respectively. High PH probability was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.82; 95% CI, 1.11-3.00), but the intermediate probability group did not reach significance following multivariate analysis (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.91-2.16). When the intermediate probability group was divided into subgroups, the subgroup 2a mortality rate (56%) was higher than that of both subgroup 2b (24%; P = .002) and the low probability group (24%; P < .001). Following multivariate analysis, subgroup 2a showed a significantly higher mortality (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.11-4.10) in contrast to subgroup 2b (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.75-2.05), both compared with the low probability group.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating measurement of the right cavities into the PH probability model in the assessment of long-term prognosis following AVR allowed better risk discrimination, especially in the intermediate probability group.