Integrating Tumor-Intrinsic and Immunologic Factors to Identify Immunogenic Breast Cancers from a Low-Risk Cohort: Results from the Randomized SweBCG91RT Trial

PURPOSE

The local immune infiltrate's influence on tumor progression may be closely linked to tumor-intrinsic factors. The study aimed to investigate whether integrating immunologic and tumor-intrinsic factors can identify patients from a low-risk cohort who may be candidates for radiotherapy (RT) de-escalation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The SweBCG91RT trial included 1,178 patients with stage I to IIA breast cancer, randomized to breast-conserving surgery with or without adjuvant RT, and followed for a median of 15.2 years. We trained two models designed to capture immunologic activity and immunomodulatory tumor-intrinsic qualities, respectively. We then analyzed if combining these two variables could further stratify tumors, allowing for identifying a subgroup where RT de-escalation is feasible, despite clinical indicators of a high risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR).

RESULTS

The prognostic effect of the immunologic model could be predicted by the tumor-intrinsic model (Pinteraction = 0.01). By integrating measurements of the immunologic- and tumor-intrinsic models, patients who benefited from an active immune infiltrate could be identified. These patients benefited from standard RT (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.85; P = 0.025) and had a 5.4% 10-year incidence of IBTR after irradiation despite high-risk genomic indicators and a low frequency of systemic therapy. In contrast, high-risk tumors without an immune infiltrate had a high 10-year incidence of IBTR despite RT treatment (19.5%; 95% CI, 12.2-30.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating tumor-intrinsic and immunologic factors may identify immunogenic tumors in early-stage breast cancer populations dominated by ER-positive tumors. Patients who benefit from an activated immune infiltrate may be candidates for RT de-escalation.

Abstract 2401: Molecular mechanisms of intrinsic radioresistance in breast cancer

Background: Clinical management of BC includes radiation therapy (RT), with most women receiving RT as part of their treatment. Although effective, many women develop locoregional recurrence, including a disproportionate number of women with triple-negative or inflammatory BC. Unfortunately, the molecular mechanisms that underly RT response and intrinsic radioresistance are poorly understood. We hypothesized that transcriptomic and proteomic changes that occur after ionizing radiation in intrinsically radiosensitive and resistant BC models would offer mechanistic insight into mediators of this differential response.

Methods: Intrinsic radiosensitivity across all 10 cell lines was measured with clonogenic survival assays as the surviving fraction (SF) after 2 Gy RT. Gene expression changes were assessed by RNA-Seq 24 hours after 4 Gy RT. For long-course RT, cell lines were treated with fractionated RT (2 Gy x 5 fractions). For in vivo mouse xenograft experiments mice received fractionated RT (2 Gy x 6 fractions). Differential gene expression analysis with DeSeq2 was performed on all samples, followed by pathway analysis with Advaita Bioinformatics’ iPathwayGuide. Protein was collected 1, 12, and 24 hours after RT for RPPA analysis evaluating expression changes in 100 proteins and phospho-proteins with SuperCurve.

Results: Clonogenic survival identified a wide range of radiation sensitivity in human BC cell lines (SF 83% - 19%) with no significant correlation (r %lt 0.3) to intrinsic BC subtype. The most highly affected pathways in both resistant and sensitive cell lines 24 hours after RT include cell cycle, cellular senescence, and estrogen signaling pathways. For the long-course RT samples, several pathways were significantly altered in fractionated samples only, including MAPK and Hippo signaling and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance. From the in vivo experiments, pathways uniquely affected in the in vivo samples include IL-17 signaling and transcriptional misregulation in cancer. From the proteomic data, we found that proteins including p53, Bcl-2 family proteins, and cell cycle proteins exhibit expression changes after 1 hour. A significant number of pathways (N=69, p %lt 0.01, FDR 0.05) were affected in radioresistant BC models compared to radiosensitive cell lines and these pathways may underlie intrinsic radioresistance.

Conclusions: Ionizing radiation induces transcriptomic and proteomic expression changes that differ between intrinsically sensitive and resistant BC models in both single fraction and fractionated studies. Pathways identified in these analyses offer potential insight into the mechanisms underlying intrinsic radioresistance and suggest biologic vulnerabilities that may be targeted to more effectively treat women at a high risk of local BC recurrence. Genome wide CRIPSR-Cas9 screens are currently underway in these breast cancer models to confirm these vulnerability targets.

Citation Format: Breanna N. McBean, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Kari Wilder-Romans, Benjamin C. Chandler, Lynn M. Lerner, Connor Ward, Meilan Liu, Alan P. Boyle, Corey W. Speers. Molecular mechanisms of intrinsic radioresistance in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 2401.

Evaluation of the Sensitivity to Endocrine Therapy Index and 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score in the SWOG S8814 Trial

PURPOSE

Chemotherapy has not demonstrated benefit over adjuvant endocrine therapy alone for postmenopausal patients with node-positive breast cancer with a 21-gene breast recurrence score (RS) of 25 or below (RS ≤ 25). We tested whether combined results from RS and the sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3) index of endocrine-related transcription (SETER/PR) adjusted for baseline prognostic index (BPI) improve prognostic assessment, and whether SET2,3 predicted benefit from anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

A blinded retrospective clinical validation of SET2,3 in two randomized treatment arms from the SWOG S8814 trial comparing adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by tamoxifen endocrine therapy for 5 years, versus tamoxifen alone. SET2,3 assay was calibrated and measured using whole-transcriptome RNA sequence of tumor samples already tested for RS. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

There were 106 events in 283 patients over a median follow-up of 8.99 years. Proportional hazards assumptions were met during the first 5 years only. SET2,3 index and RS were not correlated (r = -0.04) and were independently prognostic (SET2,3: hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 per unit; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.68; P < .001; RS: HR, 1.28 per 10 units; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.44; P < .001). SET2,3 index did not predict chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = .77). SET2,3 was high in 93/175 (53%) patients with RS ≤ 25 (concordant low-risk), with 5-year DFS 97%. SET2,3 was low in 55/108 (51%) patients with RS > 25 (concordant high-risk), with 5-year DFS 53%. Both components of SET2,3 index were prognostic after adjustment for RS: SETER/PR (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.92) and BPI (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.64).

CONCLUSION

SET2,3 index was not correlated with RS, demonstrated additive prognostic performance, and was not chemopredictive in this subset of patients from S8814. The SETER/PR and BPI components of SET2,3 each added prognostic information to RS.

Development and Validation of a Genomic Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiation in Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) is used for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery. However, some women with low risk of recurrence may safely be spared RT. This study aimed to identify these women using a molecular-based approach.

METHODS

We analyzed two randomized trials of women with node-negative invasive breast cancer to ± RT following breast-conserving surgery: SweBCG91-RT (stage I-II, no adjuvant systemic therapy) and Princess Margaret (age 50 years or older, T1-T2, adjuvant tamoxifen). Transcriptome-wide profiling was performed (Affymetrix Human Exon 1.0 ST microarray). Patients with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative tumors and with gene expression data were included. The SweBCG91-RT cohort was divided into training (N = 243) and validation (N = 354) cohorts. A 16-gene signature named Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiation (POLAR) was trained to predict locoregional recurrence (LRR) using elastic net regression. POLAR was then validated in the SweBCG91-RT validation cohort and the Princess Margaret cohort (N = 132).

RESULTS

Patients categorized as POLAR low-risk without RT had a 10-year LRR of 6% (95% CI, 2 to 16) and 7% (0 to 27) in SweBCG91-RT and Princess Margaret cohorts, respectively. There was no significant benefit from RT in POLAR low-risk patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.1 [0.39 to 3.4], P = .81, and HR, 1.5 [0.14 to 16], P = .74, respectively). Patients categorized as POLAR high-risk had a significant decreased risk of LRR with RT (HR, 0.43 [0.24 to 0.78], P = .0055, and HR, 0.25 [0.07 to 0.92], P = .038, respectively). An exploratory analysis testing for interaction between RT and POLAR in the combined validation cohort was performed (P = .066).

CONCLUSION

The novel POLAR genomic signature on the basis of LRR biology may identify patients with a low risk of LRR despite not receiving RT, and thus may be candidates for RT omission.

Abstract P1-09-05: Effect of Wire vs Magnetic Seed Localization on Lumpectomy Cavity Size

Purpose/Objectives To assess whether an association exists between surgical localization technique and size of lumpectomy cavity on radiation (RT) planning CT scan. Adjuvant RT with boost to lumpectomy cavity has been shown to improve local control compared to adjuvant whole breast radiation alone, but larger cavity sizes can lead to worse cosmetic outcomes following boost administration, which could lead providers to omit boost. Therefore, decreasing cavity size could increase guideline-concordant boost administration and minimize adverse cosmetic outcomes. Materials/Methods A retrospective review was conducted of all patients undergoing breast conserving surgery with either wire- or magnetic seed -guided lumpectomy followed by adjuvant RT at a single institution from 2018 to 2021. Data were collected from pre-surgical work-up, surgical pathology, and radiation planning. Women undergoing bracketed wire localization and patients treated by a surgeon who only performed wire localized procedures were excluded. The primary outcome was lumpectomy cavity size as measured on planning CT. We first conducted an overlapping weights propensity score analysis to account for imbalance between groups in age, BMI, breast size as measured on planning CT scan, pre-operative imaging tumor volume, neoadjuvant therapies, lumpectomy histology (DCIS alone vs DCIS + invasive vs invasive alone vs invasive with lobular features vs no residual), and multifocality. Multivariable analysis (MVA) of CT cavity volume included the above weighted variables as well as surgeon and radiation oncologist. Secondary analyses included MVA of total pathologic volume, bivariable analysis of boost delivery, bivariable analysis of electron vs photon boost, stratification by surgeon, and fixed effect model for year of surgery. Results Of 617 women who received lumpectomy during the study period, 387 were included in final analysis. Patients who underwent seed localization were less likely to have multifocal disease, less likely to have calcifications on mammogram, more likely to have ultrasound measurements for pre-op imaging, and had smaller tumor size on pre-op imaging. Four surgeons performed all cases, with rates of seed use per surgeon ranging from 27.7% to 70.7% but generally increasing throughout the study period. There was no difference between wire and seed localization in the need for additional margins based on intra-operative margin analysis (58.4 vs 62.7%, p = 0.5). There was no difference in positive margins (6.4 vs 5.4%, p = 0.81) or second surgeries (9.4 vs 8.1%, p = 0.79). Rates of close margins were the same for DCIS (23.4 vs 17.3%, p = 0.35) and invasive carcinoma (7.6 vs 6.8%, p = 0.97) between techniques. Initial uncorrected bivariable analysis shows wire localization has a non-significant trend toward increased CT cavity volume (4.56cc, p = 0.15) and a significant association with total pathology volume (21.7cc, p = 0.004). For the primary outcome, breast size, time from surgery to simulation, and surgeon were all significantly associated with CT cavity volume but there was no significant difference by localization technique (p=0.38). For pathology volume, there was a non-significant trend toward increased specimen volume with wire localization (p = 0.07), and significant associations with BMI, histology, and pre-op imaging volume. When stratified by surgeon, there was no surgeon for whom one localization technique led to significantly different CT or pathology volume over the other. There were no significant changes of the treatment effect over time (p = 0.79). There was no significant difference between wire and seed localization in indicated boost delivery (85% vs 79%, p = 0.14) or electron boost (42% vs 56%, p = 0.13). Conclusion There was no significant difference in CT cavity size between wire localization and magnetic seed localization, suggesting that the choice between these surgical techniques does not impede RT boost delivery.

Citation Format: Michael Dykstra, Jessica Thompson, Jessica Aldous, Shannon Jiang, Tasha Hughes, James Hayman, Aleksandar Dragovic, Jennifer Shah, Alfred Chang, Corey W. Speers, Michael Sabel, Lesly Dossett, Matthew Schipper, Reshma Jagsi. Effect of Wire vs Magnetic Seed Localization on Lumpectomy Cavity Size [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-05.

Abstract GS4-03: Validation of Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) in a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials of breast conserving surgery +/- radiotherapy

Background: There are currently no commercially available tests to identify early stage breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) and systemic therapy at low risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) for whom postoperative radiotherapy (RT) may be safely omitted. Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) is a 16-gene molecular signature developed to identify invasive breast cancer patients who may be candidates for RT omission after BCS. In this work, we seek to validate POLAR in a meta-analysis of three RCTs of BCS +/- RT: SweBCG91RT, Scottish Conservation Trial (SCT) and Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH).

Methods: A patient-level meta-analysis was performed in 623 node-negative breast cancer patients with ER+/HER2-negative tumors who were enrolled in the three RCTs and for whom primary tumor material was available for analysis. Contributions from each cohort were as follows: SweBCG91RT N=354 (57%), SCT N=137 (22%), and PMH N=132 (21%). Numbers of LRR events in each cohort were as follows: SweBCG91RT N=72 (20%), SCT N=28 (20%), and PMH N=16 (12%). There was a mix of systemic therapy used (no systemic therapy for SweBCG91RT, chemotherapy or adjuvant endocrine therapy, but not both, in SCT, and tamoxifen but no chemotherapy for PMH). Median follow-up time for the patients who did not have LRR was 13.3 years for SweBCG91RT, 21.1 years for SCT, and 8.6 years for PMH. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model on time to LRR, including the continuous standardized POLAR score, RT, and interaction, stratified by cohort, was used to test the interaction between the continuous POLAR score and RT. Additional Cox models tested the association between treatment arms separately for patients with a low and high POLAR score using a pre-specified cut point. Cumulative incidences were computed, with distant metastasis and death without recurrence considered as competing events.

Results: The test for interaction between RT treatment and POLAR was statistically significant (p = 0.022). Patients with a high POLAR score (N=429 [69%]) had a large benefit from RT (10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 20% [15%-26%] for those not treated with RT vs 7% [4%-11%] for those treated with RT; hazard ratio for RT vs no RT: 0.37 [0.23-0.60], p &lt; 0.001), whereas there was no evidence of benefit from RT for patients with a low POLAR score (N=194 [31%], 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR: 5% [2%-11%] for those not treated with RT vs 7% [3%-14%] for those treated with RT; hazard ratio for RT vs no RT: 0.92 [0.42-2.02], p = 0.832).

Conclusions: To our knowledge, POLAR is the first genomic classifier that is not only prognostic for LRR but also predictive, showing a significant interaction between RT and the classifier. Patients with a high POLAR score should be recommended radiotherapy while patients with a low score may be candidates for omission of radiotherapy after breast conserving surgery.

Citation Format: Per Karlsson, Anthony Fyles, S. Laura Chang, Bradley Arrick, Frederick Baehner, Per Malmström, Mårten Fernö, Erik Holmberg, Martin Sjöström, Fei-Fei Liu, David A. Cameron, Linda J. Williams, John MS Bartlett, Joanna Dunlop, Jacqueline Caldwell, Joseph F. Loane, Elizabeth Mallon, Tammy Piper, Wilma J. Jack, Ian Kunkler, Felix Y. Feng, Corey W. Speers, Lori Pierce, John Bennett, Karen J. Taylor. Validation of Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) in a meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials of breast conserving surgery +/- radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-03.

Abstract P4-02-12: Validation of Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) in early-stage invasive breast cancer patients of the Scottish Conservation Trial

Background: Adjuvant whole breast radiotherapy (RT) is provided to almost all women with early-stage invasive breast cancer after breast conserving surgery and appropriate systemic therapy. While there is increasing interest to personalize the use of RT based on molecular profiling, to date, there is no molecular signature available to reliably assess the benefit of radiotherapy after surgical resection. Here we assess the ability of a 16-gene signature named Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) to identify who may be suitable candidates for radiotherapy omission in patients of the Scottish Conservation Trial. Methods: The POLAR signature was applied to archival tissue from the Scottish Conservation Trial, which randomized 585 patients with stage I-II breast cancer, tumor size &lt; 4 cm, and age ≤70 years old to receive RT or not. The archival tissue was measured for ER (ER+ &gt;10%), PgR (PgR+ ≥20%), Ki67 (Ki67 high ≥14%), and HER2 (HER2+ defined as HER2 over-expressed or amplified). 26% received adjuvant chemotherapy, the remainder received tamoxifen 20 mg/daily for 5 years. Cox models for the locoregional recurrence (LRR) endpoint tested the association between treatment arms separately for patients with a low and high POLAR score using a pre-specified cut point. Cumulative incidences were computed, with distant metastasis and death without recurrence considered competing events. Results: 224 patients had tissue available and complete clinical data for analysis, 40 (18%) were node-positive. The distribution of clinicopathologic variables between the RT and no RT arms remained balanced. 43% were ER+/PgR+/Ki67 low/HER2-, 31% were ER+/HER2-/Ki67 high or PgR-, 5% were HER2+, and 13% were triple negative. The continuous standardized POLAR score was prognostic for LRR in the no RT arm after adjusting for relevant covariates (HR=1.78 [1.20-2.64], p=0.003). For patients with a POLAR-high score, the 10-year LRR rate was 31% [21%-42%] for patients not receiving RT and 8% [3%-15%] for patients receiving RT (HR 0.36 [0.19-0.69], p=0.0022). For patients with a POLAR low score, the 10-year LRR rates were 20% [10%-33%] for patients not receiving RT and 6% [1%-18%] for patients receiving RT; HR=0.28 [0.08-0.98], p=0.046). In the subgroup of node-negative patients with ER+/HER2-negative tumors (N=137), there was a statistically significant RT benefit for patients with a POLAR high score (HR=0.31 [0.11-0.88], p=0.028) but not for patients with a POLAR low score (HR=0.5 [0.1-2.4], p=0.39). Conclusions: For patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery without RT, POLAR is prognostic for LRR and may refine the selection of “low risk” for omission of RT.

Citation Format: Karen J. Taylor, John MS Bartlett, John Bennett, S. Laura Chang, Bradley Arrick, Frederick Baehner, Joseph F. Loane, Tammy Piper, Elizabeth Mallon, Joanna Dunlop, Wilma J. Jack, Jacqueline Caldwell, Ian Kunkler, Linda J. Williams, Corey W. Speers, Felix Y. Feng, Lori Pierce, David A. Cameron. Validation of Profile for the Omission of Local Adjuvant Radiotherapy (POLAR) in early-stage invasive breast cancer patients of the Scottish Conservation Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-12.

Updates in combined approaches of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent non-skin cancer diagnosed in females and developing novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes is crucial. The immune system plays an integral role in the body’s response to breast cancer and modulating this immune response through immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic option. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors were recently approved for the treatment of breast cancer patients, not all patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors as a monotherapy, highlighting the need to better understand the biology underlying patient response. Additionally, as radiotherapy is a critical component of breast cancer treatment, understanding the interplay of radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be vital as recent studies suggest that combined therapies may induce synergistic effects in preclinical models of breast cancer. This review will discuss the mechanisms supporting combined approaches with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer. Moreover, this review will analyze the current clinical trials examining combined approaches of radiotherapy, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Finally, this review will evaluate data regarding treatment tolerance and potential biomarkers for these emerging therapies aimed at improving breast cancer outcomes.

Androgen and oestrogen receptor co-expression determines the efficacy of hormone receptor-mediated radiosensitisation in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) and hormone receptor (HR) inhibition are used for the treatment of HR-positive breast cancers; however, little is known about the interaction of the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) in response to RT in AR-positive, ER-positive (AR+/ER+) breast cancers. Here we assessed radiosensitisation of AR+/ER+ cell lines using pharmacologic or genetic inhibition/degradation of AR and/or ER.

METHODS

Radiosensitisation was assessed with AR antagonists (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, seviteronel, ARD-61), ER antagonists (tamoxifen, fulvestrant) or using knockout of AR.

RESULTS

Treatment with AR antagonists or ER antagonists in combination with RT did not result in radiosensitisation changes (radiation enhancement ratios [rER]: 0.76-1.21). Fulvestrant treatment provided significant radiosensitisation of CAMA-1 and BT-474 cells (rER: 1.06-2.0) but not ZR-75-1 cells (rER: 0.9-1.11). Combining tamoxifen with enzalutamide did not alter radiosensitivity using a 1 h or 1-week pretreatment (rER: 0.95-1.14). Radiosensitivity was unchanged in AR knockout compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 1.07 ± 0.11), and no additional radiosensitisation was achieved with tamoxifen or fulvestrant compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 0.84-1.19).

CONCLUSION

While radiosensitising in AR + TNBC, AR inhibition does not modulate radiation sensitivity in AR+/ER+ breast cancer. The efficacy of ER antagonists in combination with RT may also be dependent on AR expression.

Bcl-xL inhibition radiosensitizes PIK3CA/PTEN wild-type triple negative breast cancers with low Mcl-1 expression

Patients with radioresistant breast cancers, including a large percentage of women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), demonstrate limited response to radiation (RT) and increased locoregional recurrence; thus, strategies to increase the efficacy of RT in TNBC are critically needed. We demonstrate that pan Bcl-2 family inhibition (ABT-263, rER: 1.52-1.56) or Bcl-xL specific inhibition (WEHI-539, A-1331852; rER: 1.31-2.00) radiosensitized wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN TNBC (MDA-MB-231, CAL-120) but failed to radiosensitize mutant PIK3CA/PTEN TNBC (rER: 0.90 - 1.07; MDA-MB-468, CAL-51, SUM-159). Specific inhibition of Bcl-2 or Mcl-1 did not induce radiosensitization, regardless of PIK3CA/PTEN status (rER: 0.95 - 1.07). In wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN TNBC, pan Bcl-2 family inhibition or Bcl-xL specific inhibition with RT led to increased levels of apoptosis (p < 0.001) and an increase in cleaved PARP and cleaved caspase 3. CRISPR-mediated PTEN knockout in wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN MDA-MB-231 and CAL-120 cells induced expression of pAKT/Akt and Mcl-1 and abolished Bcl-xL inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization (rER: 0.94 - 1.07). Similarly, Mcl-1 overexpression abolished radiosensitization in MDA-MB-231 and CAL-120 cells (rER: 1.02 - 1.04) but transient MCL1 knockdown in CAL-51 cells promoted Bcl-xL-inhibitor mediated radiosensitization (rER 2.35 ± 0.05). In vivo, ABT-263 or A-1331852 in combination with RT decreased tumor growth and increased tumor tripling time (p < 0.0001) in PIK3CA/PTEN wild-type TNBC cell line and patient-derived xenografts. Collectively, this study provides the preclinical rationale for early phase clinical trials testing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of Bcl-xL inhibition and RT in women with wild-type PIK3CA/PTEN wild-type TNBC at high risk for recurrence.

Abstract 2697: Inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling as a strategy for radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers

Purpose: The estrogen receptor (ER) is expressed in over 80% of breast tumors and has been shown to be a significant driver of breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis and therefore a target of effective first-line therapies. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and endocrine therapies (ET) are used for the treatment of ER+ BC, the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear, with concerns it may be radioprotective based on G1 cell arrest with ET treatment. Here we assessed the efficacy and mechanism of ER-mediated radiosensitization using various pharmacologic approaches in ER+ BC.

Methods: Radiosensitization with ER inhibitors (tamoxifen [TAM], fulvestrant [FULV], AZD9496) was assessed using clonogenic survival assays. DNA damage was assessed by the neutral comet assay. Efficiency of homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) as well as changes in cell cycle, apoptosis, and senescence were assessed. The efficacy of TAM with RT in vivo was assessed with an MCF-7 xenograft model.

Results: The selective estrogen receptor modulator TAM radiosensitized ER+ MCF-7 (enhancement ratio [enhR]: 1.14-1.50) and T47D (enhR: 1.33-1.60) cells but not ER-negative SUM-159 cells (enhR: 0.99-1.02). The selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) FULV had similar radiosensitization effects in MCF-7 (enhR: 1.33-1.76) and T47D cells (enhR: 0.97-2.81) with no radiosensitization observed in SUM-159 cells (enhR: 1.01-1.03). The novel oral SERD AZD9496 radiosensitized MCF-7 cells (enhR: 1.36-1.56). MCF-7 cells treated with TAM and RT had an increase in dsDNA breaks compared to RT alone as measured by the comet assay (p&lt;0.05) and a decrease in NHEJ-mediated repair with TAM (p&lt;0.05). No changes were observed in HR-mediated repair by Rad51 foci or a reporter (p=NS). RT alone and in combination with TAM or FULV induced similar levels of cell cycle arrest, suggesting that radiosensitization with the combination therapy is cell-cycle independent. There were no significant changes in apoptosis with TAM, FULV, RT, or the combination (p=NS). Although TAM or FULV did induce senescence, ET with RT increased senescence induction (p&lt;0.05). In vivo, combination RT and TAM led to a significant delay in days to tumor doubling (control: 17, TAM: 40, RT: 32, TAM+RT: undefined; p&lt;0.0001), and a significant difference in tumor growth between mice treated with TAM or RT alone compared combination treatment, with no increased toxicities or skin lesions from the combination treatment. Conclusion: Our data suggest that TAM, FULV, or AZD9496 can radiosensitize ER+ breast tumors, and these agents with RT may be more effective for radiosensitization. This work also supports further clinical investigation of the timing of RT for patients receiving ET, including using ET during RT, especially as initiating ET prior to RT has been increasingly utilized as a bridging therapy followed by concurrent ET+RT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citation Format: Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Lynn M. Lerner, Andrea M. Pesch, Connor Ward, Rachel Schwartz, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Charles Nino, Kassidy Jungles, Ruth Azaria, Alexa Jelley, Nicole Zambrana Garcia, Alexis Harold, Amanda Zhang, Bryan Wharram, Daniel F. Hayes, James M. Rae, Lori J. Pierce, Corey W. Speers. Inhibition of estrogen receptor signaling as a strategy for radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2697.

Abstract 3307: Multiomics analysis to uncover the mechanism of radiosensitization of AR-positive triple negative breast cancers with AR inhibition

Purpose: Expression of the androgen receptor (AR) has been identified as a driver of tumor growth in triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), and previous work has nominated AR inhibition as a strategy for radiosensitization in AR+ TNBC. Despite its role in radioresistance in AR+ TNBC, the mechanistic role of AR and specifically its role in mediating DNA damage repair in response to radiation therapy (RT) remains unknown.

Methods: Nuclear fractionation experiments were performed to assess cellular localization of AR protein in AR+ TNBC cell lines (ACC-422, MDA-MB-453). Cells were cultured in media containing hormones (FBS) with treatment of enzalutamide (ENZA), apalutamide (APA), or darolutamide (DARO). Cells were alternatively cultured in media containing charcoal stripped serum (CSS) without hormones with R1881 stimulation. RNA-sequencing was performed to compare AR+ TNBC cells treated with CSS or R1881 stimulation alone or in combination with ionizing radiation. Reverse phase protein arrays were performed in cells treated with ENZA, RT, or combination treatment.

Results: While stimulation with R1881 was sufficient to induce nuclear translocation of AR in MDA-MB-453 cells, AR inhibition with ENZA, APA, or DARO blocked AR nuclear translocation under CSS or FBS growth conditions. When cells were treated with R1881+RT, AR nuclear translocation was induced at similar or greater levels compared to R1881 alone in MDA-MB-453 and ACC-422 cells. Combination treatment of RT with ENZA in the presence of hormones reduced AR nuclear localization (39% reduction in MDA-MB-453 cells and 32% reduction in ACC-422 cells) compared to RT alone. These results suggest that decreased promoter region binding, and gene expression upregulation may be a mechanism of radiosensitization with AR inhibition. In addition, transcriptomic analyses demonstrated at least 979 genes differentially expressed in multiple models. Pathway analyses in these models showed common affected pathways included ECM-receptor interaction, PPAR-gamma activation, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Proteomic analysis in the same cell lines identified apoptosis, DNA damage, and cell cycle pathway changes after RT when AR-signaling was blocked. Common affected pathways in combined analyses identified PI3K-Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathway changes that may be responsible for this radiosensitizing phenotype.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that AR inhibition in AR+ TNBC is sufficient to inhibit AR nuclear translocation suggesting that AR may play a nuclear role in response to RT to promote DNA repair and radioresistance. We identify potential pathways, including ECM-receptor interaction, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and the MAPK/ERK signaling pathway that may be regulated by AR in response to RT and therefore may be responsible for radioresistance.

Citation Format: Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Andrea M. Pesch, Benjamin C. Chandler, Lynn M. Lerner, Connor Ward, Leah Moubadder, Stephanie The, Breanna McBean, Caleb Cheng, Lori J. Pierce, Corey W. Speers. Multiomics analysis to uncover the mechanism of radiosensitization of AR-positive triple negative breast cancers with AR inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 3307.

Abstract 216: Expression of DNA damage response proteins modifies the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization in breast cancer models

Purpose: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC). CDK4/6 inhibition + radiation therapy (RT) is synergistic in both ER+ and triple negative breast cancers (TNBC), but the underlying mechanism is not entirely understood. In this study, we evaluated how pre-existing or genetically engineered deficits in DNA damage response genes (BRCA1/2, RAD51, RB1, XRCC6, TP53) influence radiosensitization. We hypothesized that inhibition of homologous recombination (HR) would prevent CDK4/6i-mediated radiosensitization and blocking non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) would be synergistic.

Methods: Cellular proliferation assays determined the half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) of the 3 approved CDK4/6i palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Clonogenic survival assays determined the radiation enhancement ratios (rERs) and evaluated the efficacy of CDK4/6i + RT. Immunofluorescence assays measured RAD51 foci formation and quantified micronuclei formation following RT and/or CDK4/6 inhibition. Immunoprecipitation with myc-RAD51 and GFP-RB assessed potential protein-protein interactions.

Results: While ER+ and TNBC cell lines with wild type BRCA1 expression are radiosensitized by CDK4/6i, BRCA1-deficient SUM-149 cells are not radiosensitized by CDK4/6i at concentrations up to 1µM (rER: 0.92-1.01). In an MCF-7 isogenic model of BRCA2 knockout, CDK4/6i-mediated radiosensitization was abolished compared to Cas9 control or parental cell lines. In ER+ BC cell lines (MCF-7-p53 wt, T47D-p53 mutant), transient or genetic knockdown of RAD51 prevented CDK4/6i-induced radiosensitization. The total quantity of RT-induced RAD51 foci increased in vitro following overexpression of RB-a tumor suppressor and downstream target of CDK4/6. RB overexpression also rescued CDK4/6i-mediated radiosensitization in RB-deficient cell lines through changes in HR efficiency but not via NHEJ or altered micronuclei formation. Moreover, immunoprecipitation of RAD51 in ER+ (MCF-7) and TNBC (MDA-MB-231) cells exhibited an interaction with RB. Conversely, loss of the NHEJ-associated protein Ku70 (XRCC6) was synergistic with palbociclib + RT in MCF7 (rER: 1.76-2.44) and T47D (rER: 1.61-3.88) cells. Finally, CRISPR Cas9-mediated loss of the tumor suppressor p53 (TP53) did not affect radiosensitization induced by CDK4/6i in isogenic p53 wt ER+ (MCF-7, rER: 1.19-1.33) and p53 wt TNBC (CAL-51, rER: 1.23-1.52) cell lines with TP53 loss.

Conclusions: Taken together, our results in multiple non-overlapping isogenic models of ER+ and TNBC suggest that CDK4/6i-mediated radiosensitization of BC cell lines occurs through impaired HR activity and RB signaling, and not through the actions of p53 or NHEJ-mediated DNA repair.

Citation Format: Kassidy M. Jungles, Andrea M. Pesch, Nicole Hirsh, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Kari Wilder-Romans, Benjamin C. Chandler, Meilan Liu, Lynn Lerner, Lori J. Pierce, James M. Rae, Corey W. Speers. Expression of DNA damage response proteins modifies the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization in breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 216.

Abstract PD9-06: Evaluation of the predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3 index) and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay in node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: Results from an analysis in the SWOG S8814 trial

Background. SWOG trial S8814 randomized postmenopausal patients with pathologic lymph node-positive (N+) breast cancer that was hormone receptor-positive to receive adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil) followed by tamoxifen endocrine therapy for 5 years (CAF-T), versus tamoxifen alone (TAM). The 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay was prognostic in S8814 and predicted chemotherapy benefit in patients with higher Recurrence Score® (RS) (Albain et al, Lancet Oncol 2009). Other prognostic signatures have yet to be evaluated in this cohort. The sensitivity to endocrine therapy index (SET2,3) measures non-proliferative hormone receptor-related transcription (SETER/PR) adjusted for a baseline prognosis index derived from tumor size, nodes involved and a 4-gene molecular subtype (RNA4) (Du et al, Ann Oncol 2021). SET2,3 has been shown to provide prognostic information independent from neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. We sought to evaluate the predictive and prognostic value of SET2,3 in SWOG 8814. Methods. Independently, the SET2,3 index and cut point were calibrated from their diagnostic platform to the whole transcriptome RNA sequencing (RNAseq) platform in 85 sample pairs. Expression of the 31 transcripts used for SET2,3 were provided from RNAseq data of 283 tumors in S8814 (all previously tested for RS). Blinded calculated results of SET2,3 were then merged with outcome data. The planned analysis tested whether SET2,3 (continuous index, dichotomized high/low) provided additional prognostic information to RS (overall and in pts. with RS≤25) by treatment arm, and whether low SET2,3 was associated with chemo benefit. Cox proportional hazards models of disease-free survival (DFS) included SET2,3; RS; treatment arm; and (where relevant) interaction term and reported hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results. There were 106 events over median follow-up of 9.1 years in 283 patients. 175 patients had RS ≤25, 108 had RS &gt;25. Distribution of the SET2,3 low was similar in both RS high (51%) and low groups (47%), reflecting minimal correlation between the two. As proportional hazards assumptions were met during the first 5 years only the analysis was restricted to 5 years. Adjusting for treatment arm, high SET2,3 category was highly prognostic in this randomized trial (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.15-0.49, p&lt;0.0001). High SET2,3 was not predictive of chemotherapy response (interaction p=0.83). In multivariable Cox models (Table), continuous RS and SET2,3 were independently prognostic in the overall population for each treatment arm (p≤0.01), whereas only SET2,3 was prognostic for patients with RS≤25 (N=175, p&lt;0.001). In patients with RS≤25, continuous SET2,3 was prognostic within the CAF-T arm (HR 0.34, p=0.006) with similar results in the TAM alone arm (HR 0.38, p=0.062). Conclusions. SET2,3 added independent prognostic information to RS results in the S8814 trial for patients with N+ disease treated with tamoxifen, though it was not predictive of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. When RS result ≤25, SET2,3 remained independently prognostic. Hence, SET2,3 provided independent information complementary to RS, possibly because it incorporates tumor size and number of positive nodes. SET2,3 warrants further evaluation in patients with N+ breast cancer.

Table: Multivariable Cox models in the overall population and subset with RS≤25 by treatment arm.CohortTreatment ArmContinuous Recurrence ScoreContinuous SET2,3HR (95%CI) per 10 unitsp-valueHR (95%CI)per 1 unitp-valueAll RS(N=283)CAF-TAM(N=166)1.21 (1.04-1.40)0.0120.48 (0.31-0.76)0.002TAM(N=117)1.44 (1.18-1.76)&lt; 0.0010.48 (0.27-0.88)0.017RS≤25 (N=175)CAF-TAM(N=99)1.43 (0.58-3.49)0.440.34 (0.15-0.73)0.006TAM(N=76)1.66 (0.46-5.93)0.440.38 (0.14-1.05)0.062

Citation Format: Corey W. Speers, W. Fraser Symmans, William E. Barlow, Alex Trevarton, Stephanie The, Lili Du, James M. Rae, Steven Shak, Frederick L. Baehner, Priyanka Sharma, Lajos Pusztai, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi, Daneil F Hayes, Kathy S. Albain, Andrew Godwin, Alastair Thompson. Evaluation of the predicted sensitivity to endocrine therapy (SET2,3 index) and the 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® assay in node-positive postmenopausal breast cancer: Results from an analysis in the SWOG S8814 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD9-06.

Abstract P4-02-04: Endocrine therapy treatment radiosensitizes estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers

Purpose: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is present in over 80% of breast tumors and has been shown to be a significant driver of breast cancer (BC) pathogenesis and therefore a target of first-line therapies for ER-positive (ER+) BC patients. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and endocrine therapies (ET) are used for the treatment of ER+ BC, the sequencing of therapy and the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remain unclear. Recently, this question has become much more clinically relevant when many physicians started offering ET as a bridging strategy to surgery and RT during the COVID-19 pandemic. Here we assessed the efficacy and mechanism of ER inhibition in ER+ BC in combination with RT in preclinical models. Methods: Clonogenic survival assays were used to assess radiosensitization. Inhibition of ER signaling was accomplished by treating ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells with the selective ER modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, or the selective ER degrader (SERD), fulvestrant. The ER-negative SUM-159 cells were used as a negative control. DNA damage was assessed by the neutral comet assay. Efficiency of homologous recombination (HR) was measured by Rad51 foci or a GFP reporter system. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) efficiency was assessed with a pEYFP reporter. Cell cycle effects were measured using flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Apoptosis was assessed by annexin V/PI via flow cytometry. Senescence was measured using β-galactosidase staining. Western blotting was used to quantify expression of proteins and phospho-proteins involved in cell cycle and apoptosis. An MCF-7 xenograft model was used to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen with RT in vivo. Synergy was determined using the fractional tumor volume (FTV) method. Results: ER inhibition with tamoxifen radiosensitized ER+ MCF-7 (10-250 nM, enhR: 1.14-1.50) and T47D (500 nM-2.0 µM, enhR: 1.33-1.60) cells but not ER-negative SUM-159 cells (500 nM-2.0 µM, enhR: 0.99-1.02). ER degradation with fulvestrant had similar radiosensitization effects in MCF-7 (1-25 nM, enhR: 1.33-1.76) and T47D cells (0.5-5 nM, enhR: 0.97-2.81) with no radiosensitization observed in SUM-159 cells (1-25 nM, enhR: 1.01-1.03). MCF-7 cells treated with 500 nM tamoxifen and 4 Gy RT had an increase in dsDNA breaks compared to RT alone as measured by the comet assay (p&lt;0.05), and there was a decrease in NHEJ-mediated repair with tamoxifen treatment (p&lt;0.05). No changes were observed in HR-mediated repair by Rad51 foci or an HR reporter (p=NS). RT alone and in combination with tamoxifen and fulvestrant induced similar levels of cell cycle arrest, suggesting that radiosensitization with the combination therapy is a cell-cycle independent effect. In addition, there were no significant changes in apoptosis in MCF-7 or T47D cells with endocrine therapy, RT, or the combination (p=NS). Although treatment with ET did induce senescence in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells, the combination treatment of ET with RT induced senescence to a much greater level suggesting this mechanism may contribute to radiosensitization (p&lt;0.05). In vivo, combination RT and tamoxifen led to a significant delay in time to tumor doubling (17 days in control, 40 days with tamoxifen alone, 32 days with RT alone, and undefined with combination; p&lt;0.0001) and a significant difference in tumor growth between mice treated with tamoxifen or RT alone compared to mice treated with tamoxifen and RT with synergy noted with combination treatment (FTV 1.297). Conclusion: Our data suggest that ET can radiosensitize ER+ breast tumors, and ET with RT may be more effective for radiosensitization. Ongoing studies will address concurrent versus sequential ET with RT. This work also supports further clinical investigation of the timing of RT for patients receiving ET, especially as ET prior to RT is increasingly used as a bridging therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Citation Format: Anna R Michmerhuizen, Lynn Lerner, Andrea M Pesch, Connor Ward, Rachel Schwartz, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Bryan Wharram, Alexis Harold, Ruth Azaria, Nicole Zambrana Garcia, Daniel F Hayes, James M Rae, Lori J Pierce, Corey W Speers. Endocrine therapy treatment radiosensitizes estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-02-04.

RB expression confers sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization across breast cancer subtypes

Standard radiation therapy (RT) does not reliably provide locoregional control for women with multinode-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) would increase the radiosensitivity not only of estrogen receptor–positive (ER⁺) cells, but also of TNBC that expresses retinoblastoma (RB) protein. We found that CDK4/6i radiosensitized RB WT TNBC (n = 4, radiation enhancement ratio [rER]: 1.49–2.22) but failed to radiosensitize RB-null TNBC (n = 3, rER: 0.84–1.00). RB expression predicted response to CDK4/6i + RT (R² = 0.84), and radiosensitization was lost in ER⁺/TNBC cells (rER: 0.88–1.13) after RB1 knockdown in isogenic and nonisogenic models. CDK4/6i suppressed homologous recombination (HR) in RB WT cells but not in RB-null cells or isogenic models of RB1 loss; HR competency was rescued with RB reexpression. Radiosensitization was independent of nonhomologous end joining and the known effects of CDK4/6i on cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, RB and RAD51 interact in vitro to promote HR repair. CDK4/6i produced RB-dependent radiosensitization in TNBC xenografts but not in isogenic RB1-null xenografts. Our data provide the preclinical rationale for a clinical trial expanding the use of CDK4/6i + RT to difficult-to-control RB-intact breast cancers (including TNBC) and nominate RB status as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.

Abstract 1386: The role of MDM2 inhibition in the radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers

Background​: Radiation therapy (RT) is standard in the treatment of many women with breast cancer (BC). Despite this, women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC respond heterogeneously to RT. Radiosensitization methods for aggressive ER+ disease are needed. We performed a radiosensitizer screen paired with transcriptomic and proteomic data from ER+ models treated +/-RT to identify potential mediators of RT resistance.

Methods​: Clonogenic survival assays were used to determine RT sensitivity of 21 BCC lines as well as radiosensitization with drug treatment. IC50 values were determined for 130 clinical compounds and correlation coefficients were calculated using IC50 values and SF-2Gy. Microarray and RPPA data was used for differential gene/protein expression and pathway analysis. AlamarBlue was used to determine IC-50 values of the MDM2 inhibitor AMG-232. Western blot analysis of Cleaved PARP and Annexin V staining for FLOW was used to measure apoptosis and Cyclins A, E, B and p-Histone H3 and flow cytometry to measure cell cycle progression. yH2AX immunofluorescence was used to measure dsDNA breaks.

Results​: A MDM2 inhibitor (JNJ-26854165) was nominated as an effective drug in treatment for RT-resistant BC cell lines (R2​ = 0.43, p-value &lt;0.01) in our novel radiosensitizer screen. Differential gene expression and pathway analysis in multiple non-overlapping ER+ BC cell lines treated +/-RT identified apoptosis, cell cycle, and p53 signaling as the top pathways induced in ER+ cell lines by RT. Within these MDM2 was significantly overexpressed after RT+ compared to RT- in ER+ p53 wild-type (WT) cells. In p53 mutant (MT) cell lines, however, MDM2 was not differentially expressed. This suggests MDM2 may mediate radioresistance in a p53 dependent manner. Cell growth in the p53​ ​WT cell lines MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 was inhibited by AMG-232, an MDM2 inhibitor (IC-50 values of 554nM and 264nM). p53 MT ER+ cell lines were not sensitive to MDM2 inhibition with this drug (IC-50&gt; 10uM). Clonogenic survival assays demonstrated that at sub-IC50 doses MDM2 inhibition leads to radiosensitization in p53 WT ER+ cell lines (MCF-7 rER: 1.17-2.13; ZR751 rER: 1.30-1.65), however, p53 MT ER+ cells were not radiosensitized (T47D rER: 0.94-1.11; CAMA-1 rER: 0.88-0.95). AMG-232 and RT combined led to an increase in apoptosis compared to RT alone in ER+ p53 WT cells but not p53 MT cells. Combination treatment led to differential cyclin and p-Histone H3 expression in p53 WT cells but not p53 MT cells. ​G1 cell cycle arrest was a secondary effect of MDM2 inhibition and radiation. Experiments investigating the role of dsDNA breaks in radiosensitization are ongoing.

Conclusions​: Our novel radiosensitizer screen identifies MDM2 as a potential mediator of radioresistance in ER+ BC in a p53-dependent manner and suggests that MDM2 targeting concurrent with RT may represent a tractable clinical strategy in women with locally advanced ER+, p53 WT BC.

Citation Format: Cassandra Lynne Ritter, Benjamin C. Chandler, Andrea M. Pesch, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Nicole Hirsh, Tanner Ward, Amanda Zhang, Mattia Cremona, Lori J. Pierce, Bryan Hennessy, Corey W. Speers. The role of MDM2 inhibition in the radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1386.

Abstract 737: Estrogen receptor inhibition with tamoxifen mediates radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancer models

Purpose: Estrogen receptor (ER) expression is present in over 80% of breast tumors and has been shown to be a significant driver of tumor initiation and progression. Therefore, patients with ER-positive (ER+) breast cancers are given first-line therapies which target the ER and downstream ER signaling. Ionizing radiation (RT) has been shown to significantly improve locoregional control and increase overall survival in patients with ER+ breast cancer. Similarly, endocrine therapy (ET) has also been shown to improve metastasis-free and overall survival in women with ER+ breast cancer. While both radiation and ET are used in women with ER+ breast cancer, the effect of endocrine therapies on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear. Here we assessed the efficacy and mechanism of ER inhibition in ER+ breast cancers in combination with radiation therapy.

Methods: Clonogenic survival assays were performed to assess radiosensitization and calculate radiation enhancement ratios (enhR) with the selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM), tamoxifen, in ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells or ER-negative (ER-) SUM-159 cells. DNA damage was assessed by yH2AX foci. Efficiency of homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) was measured by RAD51 foci or using a pYFP reporter, respectively. Cell cycle effects were measured using flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI) staining. Apoptosis was assessed by annexin V/PI via flow cytometry. Western blotting was used to quantify expression of proteins and phospho-proteins involved in DNA repair, cell cycle, and apoptosis. An MCF-7 xenograft model was used to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen with RT in vivo.

Results: ER inhibition with tamoxifen radiosensitized ER+ MCF-7 (enhR: 1.14-1.50) and T47D (enhR: 1.33-1.60) cells but not ER- SUM-159 cells (enhR: 0.99-1.02). MCF-7 and T47D cells treated with tamoxifen did not have changes in the kinetics of dsDNA break repair as measured by yH2AX foci (p&gt;0.05) but demonstrated a decrease in NHEJ-mediated repair (p&lt;0.05). No changes were observed in HR-mediated repair by Rad51 foci (p&gt;0.05). While cell cycle arrest was induced at 24 hours after RT, no changes were observed with tamoxifen treatment in combination with RT. In addition, there were no significant changes in apoptosis in MCF-7 or T47D cells with treatment of tamoxifen, radiation, or the combination (p&gt;0.05). In vivo xenograft studies demonstrate a significant delay in time to tumor doubling and a significant difference in tumor growth between mice treated with tamoxifen or RT alone compared to mice treated with tamoxifen and RT.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that tamoxifen may be effectively used to radiosensitize ER+ breast tumors. This work also supports further clinical investigation of the timing of radiation for patients receiving endocrine therapy as concurrent use may be more effective than sequential.

Citation Format: Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Andrea M. Pesch, Rachel Schwartz, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Ruth Azaria, Alexa Jelley, Lori J. Pierce, Corey W. Speers. Estrogen receptor inhibition with tamoxifen mediates radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancer models [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 737.

Abstract 1943: Radiosensitization of PIK3CA wild type triple negative breast cancers with Bcl-family inhibition

Purpose: Compared to other breast cancer subtypes, triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) derive the least benefit from adjuvant radiation (RT) which contributes to higher rates of locoregional recurrence. Thus, there is a critical need to identify clinical strategies to increase the effectiveness of RT therapy in TNBC.

Methods: Alamar blue proliferation assays were used to calculate half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for each Bcl-2 family inhibitor 72 hours after drug treatment. Clonogenic survival assays were used to evaluate radiosensitivity and to calculate the radiation enhancement ratio (rER) after combination treatment. Apoptosis was assessed through formation of cleaved PARP and annexin V/PI-based flow cytometry. Xenograft models with MDA-MB-231 cells and TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PDX4664) were used to assess radiosensitization in vivo.

Results: A novel radiosensitizer screen identified Bcl-2 family inhibition as a potentially effective treatment strategy in radioresistant breast cancer models. Single-agent response to pan Bcl-2 family inhibition (ABT-263) or Bcl-xL inhibition (WEHI-539, A-1331852) was more effective in PIK3CA wild type (wt) TNBC (IC50 &lt; 1µM) compared to PIK3CA mutant TNBC. Inhibition of apoptosis with ABT-263 led to radiosensitization of PIK3CA/PTEN wild-type TNBC cell lines (rER: 1.09-1.74), but had no effect on PIK3CA/PTEN mutant TNBC (rER: 0.87-1.18). Radiosensitization was observed to be Bcl-xL-dependent, with Bcl-xL inhibitor-specific radiosensitization (rER: 1.12-2.38) but a lack of Bcl-2 inhibitor (ABT-199, rER: 0.94 - 1.21) or MCL-1 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization (S63845, rER: 0.91 - 1.06). In PIK3CA wt TNBC, combination treatment of Bcl-2 family inhibition and RT significantly increased the percent of apoptotic cells (p &lt; 0.001) and led to increased formation of cleaved PARP 48 hours after RT. Sensitivity to RT was dependent on expression of MCL-1, an anti-apoptotic protein that is overexpressed in PIK3CA/PTEN mutant TNBC. Overexpression of MCL-1 in PIK3CA/PTEN wild type TNBC rescued radioresistance (rER: 0.99-1.09), whereas co-inhibition of MCL-1 and Bcl-xL in PIK3CA/PTEN mutant TNBC was sufficient to overcome radioresistance (rER: 2.32 - 2.35). In vivo, nonspecific Bcl-2 family inhibition or specific Bcl-xL inhibition in combination with RT decreased tumor growth and increased time to tumor tripling (p &lt; 0.0001) in PIK3CA wt models of TNBC.

Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrated that inhibition of Bcl-2 family proteins in combination with RT led to increased levels of apoptosis and cell death in PIK3CA/PTEN wt - but not PIK3CA/PTEN mutant - TNBC and we identified MCL-1 as a critical mediator of this radiosensitIvity. Together, these results indicate that Bcl-xL inhibition may be a feasible clinical strategy for the radiosensitization of PIK3CA/PTEN wild-type TNBC.

Citation Format: Andrea M. Pesch, Benjamin C. Chandler, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Nicole Hirsh, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Tanner Ward, Dana Messinger, Charles Nino, Cassandra Ritter, James M. Rae, Corey W. Speers. Radiosensitization of PIK3CA wild type triple negative breast cancers with Bcl-family inhibition [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1943.

Abstract 1952: CDK4/6 inhibition radiosensitizes RB1 wild type triple negative breast cancers through impaired homologous recombination

Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4&6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of metastatic, estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancers, but there is growing interesting in CDK4/6 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in other breast cancer subtypes, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Previous studies have shown that CDK4/6 inhibition radiosensitizes ER+ breast cancers, but the interaction between CDK4/6 inhibition and radiation (RT) in TNBC is incompletely understood.

Methods: Cellular viability was quantified 72 hours after drug treatment (in the absence of RT) to calculate a half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value of proliferation. Radiation enhancement ratios (rER) and surviving fractions of cells after RT were calculated using clonogenic survival assays in RB1 wild type and mutant TNBC cell lines. Homologous recombination (HR) was assessed using RAD51 foci formation and a stable HR reporter system. G1 cell cycle arrest was quantified using propidium iodide-based flow cytometry. CRISPR-induced knockout of RB1 and transient siRNA-mediated knockdown of RB1 in TNBC cell lines was used in both clonogenic survival assays and immunofluorescence experiments. In vivo efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibition + RT was assessed using TNBC patient-derived xenograft models (PDX4664).

Results: Although most TNBC cell lines are resistant to CDK4/6 inhibitor monotherapy (IC50 &gt; 250nM) compared to ER+ cells, treatment with 250nM-1μM palbociclib radiosensitized RB1 wild type TNBC (MDA-MB-231, CAL-51, SUM-159, CAL-120; rER 1.08 – 2.22) but failed to radiosensitize RB1 mutant TNBC (CAL-851, MDA-MB-468; rER: 0.84 – 1.00). Radiosensitization of TNBC cell lines also occurred with short term ribociclib or abemaciclib pretreatment. At 6 and 16 hours following RT, significant suppression of RT-induced homologous recombination (HR) activity (RAD51 foci) was observed in RB1 wild type (p &lt; 0.001) but not RB1 mutant (p &gt; 0.05) TNBC cell lines. Cell cycle arrest after short term CDK4/6 inhibition was dependent on the presence of RB1. In addition, genetic knockdown of RB1 in RB1 wild type TNBC lead to a loss of CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated HR suppression (p &gt; 0.05) and diminished radiosensitization.

Conclusions: In TNBC, CDK4/6 inhibition and RT leads to suppression of HR activity in an RB1-dependent manner. While ongoing studies seek to elucidate the role of RB1 in HR suppression in the context of CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization of TNBC, our data suggests that CDK4/6 inhibition + RT could be a valuable clinical strategy to radiosensitize a wide range of breast cancer subtypes, including RB1 wild type TNBC.

Citation Format: Andrea M. Pesch, Nicole Hirsh, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Benjamin C. Chandler, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Lori J. Pierce, James M. Rae, Corey W. Speers. CDK4/6 inhibition radiosensitizes RB1 wild type triple negative breast cancers through impaired homologous recombination [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1952.

Xenograft-based, platform-independent gene signatures to predict response to alkylating chemotherapy, radiation, and combination therapy for glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Predictive molecular biomarkers to select optimal treatment for patients with glioblastoma and other cancers are lacking. New strategies are needed when large randomized trials with correlative molecular data are not feasible.

METHODS

Gene signatures (GS) were developed from 31 orthotopic glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs), treated with standard therapies, to predict benefit from radiotherapy (RT-GS), temozolomide (Chemo-GS), or the combination (ChemoRT-GS). Independent validation was performed in a heterogeneously treated clinical cohort of 502 glioblastoma patients with overall survival as the primary endpoint. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to adjust for confounding variables and evaluate interactions between signatures and treatment.

RESULTS

PDX models recapitulated the clinical heterogeneity of glioblastoma patients. RT-GS, Chemo-GS, and ChemoRT-GS were correlated with benefit from treatment in the PDX models. In independent clinical validation, higher RT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving RT (P = 0.0031, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.78 [0.66-0.92]), higher Chemo-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving chemotherapy (P < 0.0001, HR = 0.66 [0.55-0.8]), and higher ChemoRT-GS scores were associated with increased survival only in patients receiving ChemoRT (P = 0.0001, HR = 0.54 [0.4-0.74]). RT-GS and ChemoRT-GS had significant interactions with treatment on multivariate analysis (P = 0.0009 and 0.02, respectively), indicating that they are bona fide predictive biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a novel PDX-driven methodology, we developed and validated 3 platform-independent molecular signatures that predict benefit from standard of care therapies for glioblastoma. These signatures may be useful to personalize glioblastoma treatment in the clinic and this approach may be a generalizable method to identify predictive biomarkers without resource-intensive randomized trials.

ARe we there yet? Understanding androgen receptor signaling in breast cancer

The role of androgen receptor (AR) activation and expression is well understood in prostate cancer. In breast cancer, expression and activation of AR is increasingly recognized for its role in cancer development and its importance in promoting cell growth in the presence or absence of estrogen. As both prostate and breast cancers often share a reliance on nuclear hormone signaling, there is increasing appreciation of the overlap between activated cellular pathways in these cancers in response to androgen signaling. Targeting of the androgen receptor as a monotherapy or in combination with other conventional therapies has proven to be an effective clinical strategy for the treatment of patients with prostate cancer, and these therapeutic strategies are increasingly being investigated in breast cancer. This overlap suggests that targeting androgens and AR signaling in other cancer types may also be effective. This manuscript will review the role of AR in various cellular processes that promote tumorigenesis and metastasis, first in prostate cancer and then in breast cancer, as well as discuss ongoing efforts to target AR for the more effective treatment and prevention of cancer, especially breast cancer.

Short-term CDK4/6 Inhibition Radiosensitizes Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have improved progression-free survival for metastatic, estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancers, but their role in the nonmetastatic setting remains unclear. We sought to understand the effects of CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) and radiotherapy in multiple preclinical breast cancer models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses were used to identify significantly altered pathways after CDK4/6i. Clonogenic assays were used to quantify the radiotherapy enhancement ratio (rER). DNA damage was quantified using γH2AX staining and the neutral comet assay. DNA repair was assessed using RAD51 foci formation and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) reporter assays. Orthotopic xenografts were used to assess the efficacy of combination therapy.

RESULTS

Palbociclib significantly radiosensitized multiple ER⁺ cell lines at low nanomolar, sub IC₅₀ concentrations (rER: 1.21-1.52) and led to a decrease in the surviving fraction of cells at 2 Gy (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed in ribociclib-treated (rER: 1.08-1.68) and abemaciclib-treated (rER: 1.19-2.05) cells. Combination treatment decreased RAD51 foci formation (P < 0.001), leading to a suppression of homologous recombination activity, but did not affect NHEJ efficiency (P > 0.05). Immortalized breast epithelial cells and cells with acquired resistance to CDK4/6i did not demonstrate radiosensitization (rER: 0.94-1.11) or changes in RAD51 foci. In xenograft models, concurrent palbociclib and radiotherapy led to a significant decrease in tumor growth.

CONCLUSIONS

These studies provide preclinical rationale to test CDK4/6i and radiotherapy in women with locally advanced ER⁺ breast cancer at high risk for locoregional recurrence.

Abstract 6280: CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediatated radiosensitization of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

Purpose: Although cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors like palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib have improved progression free survival in patients with metastatic, estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, acquired resistance to these drugs limits their efficacy. Despite promising new studies defining the utility of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the upfront, non-metastatic setting, there is limited data available on the effects of concurrent CDK4/6 inhibition and radiation (RT).

Methods: Transcriptomic and proteomic expression data was used to quantify changes in RNA and protein expression in ER+ breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, T47D) after short term (16 hour) CDK4/6 inhibition. Proliferation assays were used to determine the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Clonogenic survival assays were performed to calculate the radiation enhancement ratio (rER) and the surviving fraction at 2 Gy for each treatment. Homologous recombination (HR) proficiency was assessed using RAD51 and γH2AX foci formation and a pYFP reporter was used to assess non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) efficiency. Western blots were used to quantify protein expression. MCF-7 xenografts were used to study the efficacy of combination (palbociclib + RT) therapy in vivo. MCF-7 and T47D cell lines with acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition (IC50 &gt;1uM) were used for comparison in all assays.

Results: Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses identified changes in expression of DNA damage response mediators and cell cycle machinery with short term CDK4/6 inhibition. Palbociclib significantly radiosensitized ER+ cell lines at concentrations at or below the IC50 value in clonogenic survival assays (MCF-7 rER: 1.22-1.52, T47D rER: 1.23-1.50) and led to a decrease in the surviving fraction of cells at 2 Gy (p &lt; 0.001). Similar results were observed in ribociclib- (rER: 1.08 - 1.68) and abemaciclib-treated (rER: 1.19 - 2.05) cells. MCF-7 and T47D cells treated with CDK4/6 inhibition and RT showed a decrease in RAD51 foci formation, suggesting a decrease in HR efficiency (p &lt; 0.001). However, CDK4/6 inhibition did not affect NHEJ efficiency (p &gt; 0.05). CDK4/6 inhibition + RT led to a decrease in expression of protein expression of HR meditators like p-CHK1 but did not affect phosphorylation of NHEJ proteins like pKu80/pKu70. Cells with acquired resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition did not demonstrate radiosensitization (MCF-7 rER: 0.93 - 1.03, T47D rER: 0.96 - 1.11) or changes in RAD51 foci formation with combination treatment.

Conclusions: Our data suggests that CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization may be effective in ER+ breast cancers prior to the development of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance. These studies provide preclinical rationale to test CDK4/6 inhibition + RT in women with locally-advanced ER+ breast cancer at high risk for locoregional recurrence.

Citation Format: Andrea M. Pesch, Nicole Hirsh, Benjamin C. Chandler, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Cassandra L. Ritter, Marlie Androsiglio, Kari Wilder-Romans, Meilan Liu, Christina L. Gersch, Jose M. Larios, James M. Rae, Corey W. Speers. CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediatated radiosensitization of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6280.

Abstract 6270: A radiosensitizer screen identifies a novel role for MDM2 inhibition in the radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers in a p53 dependent manner

Background: Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay of treatment for most women with breast cancer (BC). Despite this treatment, response remains heterogenous for women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) BC. Thus, approaches that result in radiosensitization of aggressive ER+ disease are critically needed. We performed a radiosensitizer screen paired with transcriptomic and proteomic data from ER+ models treated +/-RT to identify potential mediators of RT resistance.

Methods: Clonogenic survival assays were used to determine RT sensitivity of 21 BCC lines as well as radiosensitization with drug treatment. IC50 values were determined for 130 clinical compounds and correlation coefficients were calculated using IC50 values and SF-2Gy. Microarray and RPPA data was used for differential gene/protein expression and pathway analysis. AlamarBlue was used to determine IC50 values of the MDM2 inhibitor AMG-232. Western blot analysis of Cleaved PARP was used to measure apoptosis and Cyclins A and E to measure cell cycle progression.

Results: Our radiosensitizer screen nominated the MDM2 inhibitor (JNJ-26854165) as one of the most effective drugs in treating RT-resistant BC cell lines (R2= 0.43, p-value &lt;0.01). In addition, differential gene expression and pathway analysis in multiple non-overlapping ER+ BC cell lines treated +/-RT identified apoptosis, cell cycle, and p53 signaling as the top pathways induced by RT in ER+ cell lines. Within these pathways MDM2 was significantly overexpressed after RT compared to RT- in ER+ p53 wild-type (WT) cells. However, in p53 mutant (MT) cell lines MDM2 was not differentially expressed suggesting MDM2 may mediate radioresistance in a p53 dependent manner. The MDM2 inhibitor AMG-232 inhibited cell growth in the p53 WT cell lines MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 (IC-50 values of 554nM and 264nM, respectively). In contrast, p53 MT ER+ cell lines were not sensitive to MDM2 inhibition (IC-50&gt; 10uM). Clonogenic survival assays demonstrated that MDM2 inhibition at sub-IC50 doses leads to radiosensitization in p53 WT ER+ cell lines (MCF-7 rER: 1.37-1.66;ZR751 rER: 1.30-1.65). In contrast, p53 MT ER+ cells did not demonstrate significant radiosensitization (T47D rER: 0.94-1.11). Combination of AMG-232 and RT led to an increase in apoptosis compared to RT alone in ER+ p53 WT cells but not p53 MT cells. Additionally, combination treatment led to differential cylin expression in p53 WT cells but not p53 MT cells. In vivo studies testing MDM2 inhibition with RT in p53 WT and MT orthotopic and PDX models are ongoing.

Conclusions: Our novel radiosensitizer screen identifies MDM2 as a potential mediator of radioresistance in ER+ BC. Additionally, MDM2 inhibition confers radiosensitization in a p53 dependent manner in ER+ BC and may represent a tractable clinical strategy in women with p53 WT BC.

Citation Format: Cassandra L. Ritter, Benjamin C. Chandler, Andrea M. Pesch, Anna R. Michmerhuizen, Nicole Hirsh, Amanda Zhang, Tanner Ward, Mattia Cremona, Bryan Hennessy, Lori J. Pierce, Corey W. Speers. A radiosensitizer screen identifies a novel role for MDM2 inhibition in the radiosensitization of ER+ breast cancers in a p53 dependent manner [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 6270.

Clinicogenomic Radiotherapy Classifier Predicting the Need for Intensified Locoregional Treatment After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Most patients with early-stage breast cancer are treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to prevent locoregional recurrence (LRR). However, no genomic tools are used currently to select the optimal RT strategy.

METHODS

We profiled the transcriptome of primary tumors on a clinical grade assay from the SweBCG91-RT trial, in which patients with node-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to either whole-breast RT after BCS or no RT. We derived a new classifier, Adjuvant Radiotherapy Intensification Classifier (ARTIC), comprising 27 genes and patient age, in three publicly available cohorts, then independently validated ARTIC for LRR in 748 patients in SweBCG91-RT. We also compared previously published genomic signatures for ability to predict benefit from RT in SweBCG91-RT.

RESULTS

ARTIC was highly prognostic for LRR in patients treated with RT (hazard ratio [HR], 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0 to 5.9; P < .001) and predictive of RT benefit (P_interaction = .005). Patients with low ARTIC scores had a large benefit from RT (HR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.21 to 0.52], P < .001; 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR, 6% v 21%), whereas those with high ARTIC scores benefited less from RT (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.44 to 1.2], P = .23; 10-year cumulative incidence of LRR, 25% v 32%). In contrast, none of the eight previously published signatures were predictive of benefit from RT in SweBCG91-RT.

CONCLUSION

ARTIC identified women with a substantial benefit from RT as well as women with a particularly elevated LRR risk in whom whole-breast RT was not sufficiently effective and, thus, in whom intensified treatment strategies such as tumor-bed boost, and possibly regional nodal RT, should be considered. To our knowledge, ARTIC is the first classifier validated as predictive of benefit from RT in a phase III clinical trial with patients randomly assigned to receive or not receive RT.

Abstract 4766: Transcriptomic profiling reveals a potential role for JAK/STAT inhibition in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant, ER+ breast cancers

Purpose: Specific cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors are standard of care for patients with metastatic, estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibitors have improved rates of progression free survival among metastatic, ER+ patients, but resistance limits their clinical efficacy. Various mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors have been reported, but a comprehensive understanding of this resistance remains elusive.

Methods: We generated in vitro models of acquired (AR) and intrinsic (IR) resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors using ER+ breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, T47D) cultured with either continuous high dose (500nM) or dose-escalated (50nM to 500nM) CDK4/6 inhibition over three months. RNA expression and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to nominate potential pathways associated with AR and IR palbociclib resistance. Reverse phase protein array (RPPA) and western blots were used to measure protein and phosphoprotein levels in CDK4/6 inhibitor resistant cell lines to validate nominated pathways. Cellular proliferation assays were performed to calculate the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) with inhibitors for CDK4/6 and JAK/STAT.

Results: Proliferation assays confirmed that MCF-7 AR and IR cells are resistant to palbociclib (IC50 both &gt;1uM) compared to parental cells (60nM); similar results were observed in the T47D cell lines. Cells resistant to either palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib demonstrated cross resistance to all three inhibitors. GSEA of transcriptomic data identified 579 genes (from AR cells) and 936 genes (from IR cells) that were differentially expressed between palbociclib-resistant MCF-7s and parental controls. RPPA analyses identified several key pathways that regulate CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in these models. From GSEA analysis, the interferon (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway was the most differentially expressed pathway identified between palbociclib-resistant and sensitive cells. Western blot analyses showed that baseline expression of phospho-STAT1 is significantly elevated in palbociclib-resistant cells. In cellular proliferation assays, palbociclib-resistant MCF-7s and T47Ds retained sensitivity to JAK/STAT inhibitors like the JAK2-selective compound AZ960.

Conclusions: Our data suggests that overactivation of JAK/STAT signaling may be directly involved in the development of CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance in ER-dependent tumors. CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cells retain sensitivity to single-agent JAK/STAT inhibition, suggesting that this may be a viable therapeutic option for patients with CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant ER+ breast cancer. This work was supported in part by 5T32GM007767-40 (Pesch), the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (N003173 to JMR), the UM Rogel Cancer Center and the Taubman Emerging Scholar funds.

Citation Format: Andrea M. Pesch, Thomas L. Gonzalez, Benjamin C. Chandler, Siqi Sun, Christina L. Gersch, José M. Larios, Wadie S. David, Corey W. Speers, James M. Rae. Transcriptomic profiling reveals a potential role for JAK/STAT inhibition in CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant, ER+ breast cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4766.

Abstract P5-12-01: A novel gene expression signature prognostic for both locoregional and distant failure and predictive for adjuvant radiotherapy

Background: Most patients with early stage breast cancer (BC) are treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) following breast conserving surgery (BCS) to prevent locoregional recurrences (LRR). No predictive tools are currently available to select patients for RT, resulting in considerable over- and under treatment. We aimed to create and validate a gene expression-based classifier to prognosticate for LRR and to stratify patients for treatment with RT.

Patients and methods: A 27-gene expression signature was developed using three publicly available early stage BC gene expression datasets where patients were treated with RT and had detailed local recurrence information. The largest of the datasets was used to train the signature, and the other two datasets were used for signature refinement. As age was the strongest clinical factor for the endpoint in the training dataset, it was included in the model, resulting in a final clinical-genomic classifier of 27 genes and age. The classifier was locked before external validation in the SweBCG91-RT trial. This phase III clinical trial included primary tumors from 765 patients and for which gene expression data was available. The trial randomized node-negative BC patients to +/- RT following BCS, with sparse use of adjuvant systemic treatment (9%) and a median follow-up of 14.0 years for LRR in patients free from event. The classifier was validated using Cox regression with LRR as the primary endpoint, and hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using the raw continuous classifier score (range: 0.5 to 2.5).

Results: The novel classifier was highly prognostic for LRR in SweBCG91-RT patients treated with RT (HR=7.5[3.3-16.9], p&lt;0.001), and remained prognostic in multivariate analysis (MVA) that included systemic treatment, subtype and grade (HR=7.2[3.1-16.4], p&lt;0.001). To a lesser extent, the classifier was also prognostic for LRR in patients not treated with RT (HR=1.9[1.0-3.5], p=0.03; MVA HR=1.9[1.0-3.3], p=0.05). Patients at high risk of LRR had a smaller effect of RT, and the treatment predictive potential was confirmed by testing for interaction (pinteraction=0.008). In patients treated with RT, age and the genomic component of the model were both prognostic for LRR (p&lt;0.01) as well as predictive for RT response (pinteraction&lt;0.05) and provided independent information (p&lt;0.01). The combined classifier has increased performance over its individual components (10-year AUC=0.72, 0.67, 0.65 for the classifier, age, and genomic component, respectively). While the novel signature was prognostic for metastasis (HR=4.3[2.3-7.8], p&lt;0.0001), calculated scores from previously published signatures to the metastasis endpoint, including the Oncotype-like score, were not prognostic for LRR.

Conclusions: This novel gene expression signature is highly prognostic for LRR, can identify patients at risk of LRR despite RT, and appears to be treatment predictive for adjuvant RT. Furthermore, the current signature is highly prognostic for metastasis. In contrast, calculated scores of previously published signatures modeled for the metastasis endpoint had inferior performance for LRR. These results underscore both the importance of signatures prognostic for LRR and the similarities in the biology of LRR and distant failure.

Citation Format: Sjöström M, Chang SL, Fishbane N, Davicioni E, Zhao SG, Hartman L, Holmberg E, Feng FY, Speers CW, Pierce LJ, Malmström P, Fernö M, Karlsson P. A novel gene expression signature prognostic for both locoregional and distant failure and predictive for adjuvant radiotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-12-01.

Abstract P1-09-05: Radiosensitization of androgen receptor (AR)-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells using seviteronel (INO-464), a selective CYP17 lyase and AR inhibitor

Background: Increased rates of locoregional recurrence (LR) have been observed in TNBC despite chemotherapy and radiation (RT). A novel radiosensitizer screen nominated the AR as a promising target for treatment of radioresistant breast cancer, including TNBC. We assessed the activity of seviteronel (Sevi), a selective CYP17 lyase and AR inhibitor in Phase 2 clinical development for advanced breast and prostate cancer, as a potential radiosensitizer in AR+ TNBC model.

Methods: Clonogenic survival assays were used to determine the intrinsic RT sensitivity of 21 breast cancer cell (BCC) lines. IC50 values were determined for 130 clinically available compounds and correlation coefficients were calculated using IC50 values and SF-2Gy. Gene expression was measured using RNA Seq or qRT-PCR and protein expression was measured using RPPA arrays. AR function was assessed using functional inhibition with Sevi in MDA-MB-453, ACC-422, ACC-460, SUM-185 (all four AR+ TNBC), MDA-MB-231 (AR- TNBC), and T47D (AR- ER+) BCC lines. Double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) break repair was assessed with γH2AX foci counting. In vivo tumor growth was measured with varying control and treatment groups (16-20 tumors/group). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate local control. A Cox proportional hazards model and multi-variate analysis (MVA) were used to determine variables associated with LRF survival.

Results: Our novel radiosensitizer screen identified the activity of anti-androgen therapy as a potentially effective strategy for radiosensitization in RT-resistant BCC lines (R2 =0.46, p-value &lt; 0.01) (Speers et al, J Clin Oncol 35, 2017 (suppl; abstr e12102). Heterogeneity in AR expression was identified in human BCC lines and TNBC samples from patients (N=2098). There was a strong correlation between AR RNA expression and protein expression across all BC intrinsic subtypes. AR inhibition using Sevi induced radiation sensitivity in vitro with an enhancement ratio (ER) of 1.24-1.69 in four different AR+ TNBC lines. No such radiosensitization was seen in AR(-) TNBC or ER+, AR(-) BCC lines. Radiosensitization was at least partially dependent on impaired dsDNA break repair with significant delays in dsDNA break repair at 16 and 24 hours in all AR+ TNBC lines examined (p-value &lt; 0.01). AR inhibition with Sevi significantly radiosensitized AR+ TNBC xenografts in mouse models and markedly delayed tumor-volume tripling time (TTT) and tumor growth (MDA-MB-453: median TTT 16.1 days for RT alone vs. not reached after 45 days for Sevi+RT, p-value &lt;0.001). Similar delays were seen in tumor growth, weight, and tumor doubling. Clinically, TNBC patients whose tumors had higher than median expression of AR had higher rates of LR after RT (HR for LR ˜3, p-value &lt;0.01, 2 independent datasets). In MVA, high AR expression was the variable most significantly associated with worse LR survival after RT in TNBC patients, outperforming all other variables (HR of 3.42; p-value &lt; 0.01).

Conclusions: Our results implicate the AR as a mediator of radioresistance in breast cancer and support the rationale for developing Sevi as a novel radiosensitizing agent in AR+ TNBC.

Citation Format: Speers CW, Chandler B, Olsen E, Wilder-Romans K, Moubadder L, Nyati S, Rae J, Hayes DF, Spratt DE, Wahl DR, Eisner J, Feng FY, Pierce LJ. Radiosensitization of androgen receptor (AR)-positive triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells using seviteronel (INO-464), a selective CYP17 lyase and AR inhibitor [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-09-05.

Abstract 5839: Androgen receptor (AR): A novel target for radiosensitization in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC)

Purpose: Increased rates of local recurrence (LR) have been observed in TNBC despite chemotherapy and radiation (RT). Thus, approaches that result in radiosensitization in TNBC are critically needed. We characterized the RT response of 21 breast cancer cell (BCC) lines using clonogenic survival assays and paired this with high-throughput drug screen data, identifying AR as a top target for radiosensitization. We demonstrate that AR inhibition confers radiosensitization in vitro and in vivo, identified a biomarker of response, and characterize the mechanism of AR-mediated radiosensitization in TNBC.

Materials/Methods: Clonogenic survival assays determined the intrinsic RT sensitivity of 21 BCC lines. IC50 values were determined for 130 clinical compounds and correlation coefficients were calculated using IC50 values and SF-2Gy. Gene and protein expression was measured using RNA Seq and RPPA arrays, respectively, in tumor samples (n=2,061) and BCC lines (n=51). AR function was assessed using gene knockdown (KD) or functional inhibition with anti-androgen drugs. We measured in vivo tumor growth with varying control and treatment groups (16-20 tumors/group). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to estimate local control. A Cox proportional hazards model and MVA were used to determine variables associated with LRF survival.

Results: Our unbiased drug radiosensitizer screen nominated bicalutamide as an effective drug in treating RT-resistant BCC lines (R2= 0.46, p-value &lt;0.01). We interrogated the expression of AR in &gt;2000 human breast tumor samples and 51 BCC lines and found heterogeneity in AR expression with strongly correlated expression of protein and RNA levels in TNBC (R2=0.89, p-value &lt;0.001). Inhibition of AR, using both KD and drug (MDV3100) induced RT sensitivity with an enhancement ratio (ER) of 1.35-1.42 in AR+ TNBC lines with no effect on controls. Radiosensitization was at least partially dependent on impaired dsDNA break repair mediated by DNAPKcs. AR inhibition with MDV3100 significantly radiosensitized TNBC xenografts in mouse models and markedly delayed tumor tripling time (TTT) and tumor growth (median TTT 17.4 days for RT alone vs. not reached after 50 days for MDV3100+RT, p-value &lt;0.001). Activated DNAPK was identified as a biomarker of response. Clinically, TNBC patients whose tumors had higher than median expression of AR had higher rates of LR after RT (HR for LR ~3, p-value &lt;0.01, 2 independent datasets). In MVA, high AR expression was the variable most significantly associated with worse LRF survival after RT in TNBC patients, outperforming all other variables (HR of 3.58; p-value &lt; 0.01).

Conclusion: Our results implicate AR as a mediator of radioresistance in breast cancer and support the rationale for developing clinical strategies, including clinical trials, to inhibit AR as a novel radiosensitizing target in TNBC.

Citation Format: Benjamin C. Chandler, Corey W. Speers, Shuang G. Zhao, Meilan Liu, Kari Wilder-Romans, Eric Olsen, Shyam Nyati, Daniel Spratt, Daniel Wahl, Daniel Hayes, Felix Y. Feng, Lori J. Pierce. Androgen receptor (AR): A novel target for radiosensitization in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5839. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5839

Abstract P6-12-05: Targeting estrogen receptor mutations for treatment of endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer

This abstract was withdrawn by the authors.

Inhibition of the p38 kinase suppresses the proliferation of human ER-negative breast cancer cells

p38 kinases are members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase family that transduce signals from various environmental stresses, growth factors, and steroid hormones. p38 is highly expressed in aggressive and invasive breast cancers. Increased levels of activated p38 are markers of poor prognosis. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that blockade of p38 signaling would inhibit breast cancer cell proliferation. We studied breast cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation upon p38 blockade by using three independent approaches: dominant-negative (DN) constructs, small interfering RNA (siRNA), and small molecule inhibitors. p38alpha and p38delta are the most abundant isoforms expressed by all examined human breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines. Expression of a DN p38 inhibited both anchorage-dependent and -independent proliferation of MDA-MB-468 cells. Silencing of p38alpha, but not p38delta, using siRNA suppressed MDA-MB-468 cell proliferation. Pharmacologic inhibitors of p38 significantly inhibited the proliferation of p53 mutant and ER-negative breast cancer cells. Whereas p38 has previously been considered as a mediator of stress-induced apoptosis, we propose that p38 may have dual activities regulating survival and proliferation depending on the expression of p53. Our data suggest that p38 mediates the proliferation signal in breast cancer cells expressing mutant but not wild-type p53. Because most ER-negative breast tumors express mutant p53, our results provide the foundation for future development of p38 inhibitors to target p38 for the treatment of p53 mutant and ER-negative breast cancers.