Preoperative Dose-Escalated Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) in Patients with Retroperitoneal Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: Final Results of a Clinical Phase I/II Trial

BACKGROUND

To report the final results of a prospective, one-armed, single-center phase I/II trial (NCT01566123).

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 37 patients with primary or recurrent (N = 6) retroperitoneal sarcomas were enrolled. Treatment included preoperative IMRT of 45-50 Gy with a simultaneous integrated boost of 50-56 Gy, surgery and IORT. The primary endpoint was local control (LC) at 5 years. The most common histology was dedifferentiated liposarcoma (51%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (24%) and well-differentiated liposarcoma (14%). The majority of lesions were high-grade (FNCLCC G1: 30%, G2: 38%, G3: 27%, two missing). Five patients were excluded from LC analysis per protocol.

RESULTS

The minimum follow-up of the survivors was 62 months (median: 109; maximum 162). IORT was performed for 27 patients. Thirty-five patients underwent gross total resection; the pathological resection margin was mostly R+ (80%) and, less often, R0 (20%). We observed 10 local recurrences. The 5-year LC of the whole cohort was 59.6%. Eleven patients received a dose > 50 Gy plus IORT boost; LC was 64.8%; the difference, however, was not significant (p = 0.588). Of 37 patients, 15 were alive and 22 deceased at the time of final analysis. The 5-year OS was 59.5% (68.8% per protocol).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary endpoint of a 5-year LC of 70% was not met. This might be explained by the inclusion of recurrent disease and the high rate of G3 lesions and leiomyosarcoma, which have been shown to profit less from radiotherapy. Stratification by grading and histology should be considered for future studies.

Oral Sequelae after Head and Neck Radiotherapy: RCT Comparing 3D-Printed Tissue Retraction Devices with Conventional Dental Splints

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate oral sequelae after head and neck radiotherapy (RT) when using two different types of intraoral appliances. Thermoplastic dental splints (active control) protect against backscattered radiation from dental structures. Semi-individualized, 3D-printed tissue retraction devices (TRDs, study group) additionally spare healthy tissue from irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 29 patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in a randomized controlled pilot trial and allocated to receive TRDs (n = 15) or conventional splints (n = 14). Saliva quality and quantity (Saliva-Check, GC), taste perception (Taste strips, Burghart-Messtechnik), and oral disability (JFLS-8, OHIP-14, maximum mouth opening) were recorded before and 3 months after RT start. Radiotherapy target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance were case-dependent. To evaluate intra-group developments between baseline and follow-up, nonparametric Wilcoxon tests were performed. Mann-Whitney-U tests were applied for inter-group comparisons.

RESULTS

At follow-up, taste perception was unimpaired (median difference in the total score; TRDs: 0, control: 0). No significant changes were found regarding oral disability. Saliva quantity (stimulated flow) was significantly reduced with conventional splints (median -4 mL, p = 0.016), while it decreased insignificantly with TRDs (median -2 mL, p = 0.07). Follow-up was attended by 9/15 study group participants (control 13/14). Inter-group comparisons showed no significant differences but a tendency towards a better outcome for disability and saliva quality in the intervention group.

CONCLUSION

Due to the small cohort size and the heterogeneity of the sample, the results must be interpreted with reservation. Further research must confirm the positive trends of TRD application. Negative side-effects of TRD application seem improbable.

Neoadjuvant irradiation of extremity soft tissue sarcoma with ions (Extrem-ion): study protocol for a randomized phase II pilot trial

BACKGROUND

The standard of care treatment for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities is a wide resection in combination with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy with high local control rates, sparing patients the necessity of amputation without compromising on overall survival rates. The currently preferred timing of radiotherapy is under debate. Albeit having higher rates of acute wound complications, late side effects like fibrosis, joint stiffness or edema are less frequent in preoperative compared to postoperative radiotherapy. This can be explained in smaller treatment volumes and a lower dose in the preoperative setting. Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in less radiosensitive tumors. Hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment duration.

METHODS

Extrem-ion is a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the proportion of therapies without wound healing disorder the first 120 days after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. The secondary endpoints of the study consist of local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life.

DISCUSSION

The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The potential for reduced toxicity by the utilization of particle therapy is the rational of this trial. A subsequent randomized phase III trial will compare the hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation in regards to local control.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04946357 ; Retrospectively registered June 30, 2021.

[Differences in injury patterns in motorcycle accidents involving children and adolescents]

Hintergrund

Verkehrsunfälle und ihre Verletzungsfolgen stellen eine häufige traumatische Ursache für das Versterben und für das Auftreten von irreversiblen Schäden bei Kindern und Jugendlichen dar. Bei Motorradunfällen unterscheiden sich dabei Verletzungsmuster abhängig vom Patientenalter.

Ziel der Arbeit

Ziel dieser Studie ist es, die typischen Verletzungsmuster nach Motorradunfällen im Kindes- und Jugendalter vergleichend zu beschreiben, da diese einen ausschlaggebenden Einfluss auf die Prävention sowie die adäquate Behandlung der jeweiligen Patientengruppen bieten können.

Material und Methoden

In die Studie wurden innerhalb der Jahre 2002–2018 22.923 Patienten aus dem TraumaRegister der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU®) eingeschlossen. Die Auswertung erfolgte in 4 Altersgruppen: Gruppe 1 (4 bis 15 Jahre), Gruppe 2 (16 bis 17 Jahre), Gruppe 3 (18 bis 20 Jahre) sowie Gruppe 4 (21 bis 50 Jahre) als Kontrolle.

Ergebnisse

In Gruppe 2 stellten Extremitätenverletzungen das häufigste Verletzungsmuster dar und traten überwiegend im Bereich der unteren Extremität auf. Zudem ergab die Analyse, dass Gruppe 1 häufiger ein schweres Schädel-Hirn-Trauma erleidet, trotz initial schlechtem Zustand aber ein besseres Outcome aufweist. Thorakale, abdominelle sowie Wirbelsäulen- und Beckenverletzungen kommen bei den jüngeren Altersgruppen seltener vor. Insbesondere stellen Rippenfrakturen eine Rarität bei Kindern dar. In der Diagnostik werden Kinder im Vergleich zu Erwachsenen seltener einer Ganzkörper-CT-Diagnostik zugeführt.

Diskussion

Die Studie deckt altersabhängige Unterschiede in den Verletzungsmustern von Patienten auf, die als Beifahrer oder Fahrer eines Motorrades in einen Unfall involviert waren. Zudem konnten ebenso Unterschiede in der prä- und innerklinischen Versorgung herausgearbeitet werden.

Vorbereitung auf eine differenzierte Hämotherapie nach Trauma – Ergebnisse einer Befragung deutscher Kliniken

Hintergrund

Die unkontrollierte Blutung ist weiterhin eine führende potenziell vermeidbare Todesursache im Rahmen schwerer Verletzungen.

Ziel der Arbeit

Die vorliegende Arbeit hat zum Ziel, die Vorbereitung für eine differenzierte Hämotherapie im Rahmen der Schwerstverletztenbehandlung in Kliniken verschiedener Versorgungsstufen innerhalb der Struktur des TraumaNetzwerks der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU)® zu evaluieren.

Material und Methoden

Anhand einer Online-Umfrage wurden gezielt Diagnose- und Therapiestrategien sowie vorhandene Ressourcen innerhalb der Kliniken erfragt. Im Rahmen einer Subgruppenanalyse sollte festgestellt werden, ob es Unterschiede in Bezug auf infrastrukturelle Voraussetzungen und diagnostisches bzw. therapeutisches Vorgehen innerhalb der Versorgungsstufen des TraumaNetzwerks DGU® gibt.

Ergebnisse

Massivtransfusionsprotokolle (MTP) bestehen in 75 % der Kliniken. Die Aktivierung erfolgt i. d. R. durch den Trauma-Leader (62 %). In 63 % erfolgt die Aktivierung aufgrund einer Anforderung aus der Präklinik. Als Transfusionstrigger werden ein positives FAST (80 %) und ein Pulsdruck < 45 mm Hg (60 %) angegeben. In 50 % der Kliniken existiert kein starres Transfusionsverhältnis der einzelnen Blutkomponenten. Überregionale Traumazentren (ÜTZ) bekommen im Vergleich zu regionalen Traumazentren (RTZ) und lokalen Traumazentren (LTZ) angeforderte Blutprodukte frühzeitiger (p 0,025).

Diskussion

Der massive Blutverlust ist ein seltenes Ereignis, welches mit einer hohen Letalität vergesellschaftet sein kann. MTP bilden die Grundlage für eine frühe Therapie der traumainduzierten Koagulopathie und tragen zur Verbesserung der Überlebenschancen der Patienten bei. Es existiert ein deutlicher Unterschied in den diagnostischen und therapeutischen Möglichkeiten in den einzelnen Versorgungsebenen. ÜTZ verfügen mehrheitlich über die umfangreichsten Optionen, gefolgt von RTZ und LTZ.

3D-printed individualized tooth-borne tissue retraction devices compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck cancer radiotherapy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Despite modern treatment techniques, radiotherapy (RT) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) may be associated with high rates of acute and late treatment-related toxicity. The most effective approach to reduce sequelae after RT is to avoid as best as possible healthy tissues and organs at risk from the radiation target volume. Even small geometric changes can lead to a significant dose reduction in normal tissue and better treatment tolerability. The major objective of the current study is to investigate 3D printed, tooth-borne tissue retraction devices (TRDs) compared to conventional dental splints for head and neck RT.

METHODS

In the current two-arm randomized controlled phase II trial, a maximum of 34 patients with HNC will be enrolled. Patients will receive either TRDs or conventional dental splints (randomization ratio 1:1) for the RT. The definition of the target volume, modality, total dose, fractionation, and imaging guidance is not study-specific. The primary endpoint of the study is the rate of acute radiation-induced oral mucositis after RT. The quality of life, local control and overall survival 12 months after RT are the secondary endpoints. Also, patient-reported outcomes and dental status, as well as RT plan comparisons and robustness analyzes, will be assessed as exploratory endpoints. Finally, mesenchymal stem cells, derived from the patients' gingiva, will be tested in vitro for regenerative and radioprotective properties.

DISCUSSION

The preliminary clinical application of TRD showed a high potential for reducing acute and late toxicity of RT in patients with HNC. The current randomized study is the first to prospectively investigate the clinical tolerability and efficacy of TRDs for radiation treatment of head and neck tumors.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT04454697; July 1st 2020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04454697 .

Neoadjuvant irradiation of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma with ions (Retro-Ion): study protocol for a randomized phase II pilot trial

Background

Following surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy.

Methods and design

We present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5–6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3–5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study.

Discussion

The aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202. Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020

Prostate bed irradiation with alternative radio-oncological approaches (PAROS) - a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial

Background

For patients with treatment-naïve carcinoma of the prostate, hypofractionated irradiation becomes more and more popular. Due to the low α/β value of prostate cancer, increased single dose leading to a shortened treatment period seems to be safe and feasible. However, reliable data is lacking for post-prostatectomy patients so far. Further, the role of proton therapy is still under debate. Two prospective phase II trials with both, hypofractionated photon and proton therapy, provided promising results.

Methods/ design

The PAROS trial is a prospective, multicenter and randomized phase III trial for men with localized prostate carcinoma after surgery. Post-prostatectomy patients will be randomized to either normofractionated radiotherapy (nRT) with photons (70.0/ 2.0 Gy), or hypofractionated radiotherapy (hRT) with photons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy) or hRT with protons (57.0/ 3.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]). Block randomization is stratified by Gleason Score (≤ 7 vs. > 7) and treatment indication (adjuvant vs. salvage). The trial is planned to enroll 897 patients. The primary objective is to show an improvement in the bowel-score according to EORTC QLQ-PR25 after proton therapy compared to photon irradiation (week 12 vs. baseline). Secondary aims are non-inferiority of hRT compared to nRT with regard to biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life and toxicity.

Discussion

The present study aims to evaluate the role of hypofractionated radiotherapy to the prostate bed with photons and protons leading to significant impact on future management of operated men with prostate cancer.

Trial registration

Deutsches Register klinischer Studien: DRKS00015231; registered 27 September 2018.

[Antiviral therapy adjustment in corneal recipients using antibody testing in the aqueous humor]

INTRODUCTION

In corneal recipients with herpes infection, acyclovir given for 1 year postoperatively prevents viral reactivation and improves graft outcome. The indication for prophylactic antiviral therapy relies on the preoperative diagnosis of herpes. However, many patients present with corneal scars featuring sequelae of herpes without a proven history of herpes. Here we report the results of a prospective study of anti-herpes simplex virus (anti-HSV) and varicella zoster virus (VZV) antibody testing in the aqueous humor at the time of corneal transplantation to refine the indication of the antiviral treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study involved 33 keratitis corneal graft recipients, 21 of whom had documented herpes keratitis. A control group was made with 11 cataract patients. An anterior chamber puncture was performed just before surgery. The micro-ELISA test was done on both aqueous humor and serum, and local anti-HSV or VZV antibody synthesis was acknowledged if the ratio of antibody concentrations was above 4.

RESULTS

Local antibody synthesis to HSV was detected in 22 cases, to VZV in 9 cases, to both HSV and VZV in 6 cases, and no synthesis in 8 cases. The sensitivity of the test was 65% in patients with a documented history of herpes (14 cases out of 21). Among non-herpetic patients, the test was positive in 9 patients, who thus benefited from postoperative antiviral therapy. No viral reactivation was encountered after a minimum follow-up of 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibody testing in the aqueous humor at the time of keratoplasty is a convenient, inexpensive diagnostic tool in corneal recipients. It provides useful information before prescribing a long and expensive postoperative antiviral therapy.