1
|
Leonardi MC, Pepa M, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Luraschi R, Vigorito S, Morra A, Dicuonzo S, Mazzola GC, Gerardi MA, Zerella MA, Cante D, Petrucci E, Borzì G, Marrocco M, Chieregato M, Iadanza L, Lobefalo F, Valenti M, Cavallo A, Russo S, Guernieri M, Malatesta T, Meaglia I, Liotta M, Palumbo I, Marcantonini M, Mezzenga E, Falivene S, Arrichiello C, Barbero MP, Ivaldi GB, Catalano G, Vidali C, Giannitto C, Ciabattoni A, Meattini I, Aristei C, Orecchia R, Cattani F, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Impact of inter-observer variability on first axillary level dosimetry in breast cancer radiotherapy: An AIRO multi-institutional study. Tumori 2023; 109:570-575. [PMID: 37688419 DOI: 10.1177/03008916231196801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/10/2023]
Abstract
This study quantified the incidental dose to the first axillary level (L1) in locoregional treatment plan for breast cancer. Eighteen radiotherapy centres contoured L1-L4 on three different patients (P1,2,3), created the L2-L4 planning target volume (single centre planning target volume, SC-PTV) and elaborated a locoregional treatment plan. The L2-L4 gold standard clinical target volume (CTV) along with the gold standard L1 contour (GS-L1) were created by an expert consensus. The SC-PTV was then replaced by the GS-PTV and the incidental dose to GS-L1 was measured. Dosimetric data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis test. Plans were intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)-based. P3 with 90° arm setup had statistically significant higher L1 dose across the board than P1 and P2, with the mean dose (Dmean) reaching clinical significance. Dmean of P1 and P2 was consistent with the literature (77.4% and 74.7%, respectively). The incidental dose depended mostly on L1 proportion included in the breast fields, underlining the importance of the setup, even in case of IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Domenico Cante
- Radiotherapy Department, ASL TO4 Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Edoardo Petrucci
- Unit of Medical Physics, ASL TO4 Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luciano Iadanza
- Unit of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Pio, Benevento, Italy
| | - Francesca Lobefalo
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Marco Valenti
- Unit of Medical Physics, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, G.M. Lancisi, G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Anna Cavallo
- Unit of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Unit of Medical Physics, AUSL Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Firenze, Italy
| | - Marika Guernieri
- Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Tiziana Malatesta
- Unit of Medical Physics, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Meaglia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Liotta
- Unit of Medical Physics, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Marta Marcantonini
- Medical Physics Unit, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Emilio Mezzenga
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Sara Falivene
- Department of Radiotherapy, ASL Napoli1 Centro - Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy
| | - Cecilia Arrichiello
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Barbero
- Unit of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Catalano
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Caterina Giannitto
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aristei C, Bölükbaşı Y, Kaidar-Person O, Pfeffer R, Arenas M, Boersma LJ, Ciabattoni A, Coles CE, Franco P, Krengli M, Leonardi MC, Marazzi F, Masiello V, Meattini I, Montero A, Offersen B, Trigo ML, Bourgier C, Genovesi D, Kouloulias V, Morganti AG, Meduri B, Pasinetti N, Pedretti S, Perrucci E, Rivera S, Tombolini V, Vidali C, Valentini V, Poortmans P. Ways to improve breast cancer patients' management and clinical outcome: The 2020 Assisi Think Tank Meeting. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 177:103774. [PMID: 35917884 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on the third Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer, a brainstorming project which involved European radiation and clinical oncologists who were dedicated to breast cancer research and treatment. Held on February 2020, the ATTM aimed at identifying key clinical questions in current clinical practice and "grey" areas requiring research to improve management and outcomes. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) managing patients with frailty due to either age and/or multi-morbidity; 2) stereotactic radiation therapy and systemic therapy in the management of oligometastatic disease; 3) contralateral breast tumour prevention in BCRA-mutated patients. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. In the lapse period between the survey and the meeting, the working groups reviewed data, on-going studies and the clinical challenges which were then discussed in-depth and subjected to intense brainstorming during the meeting; research protocols were also proposed. Methodology, outcome of discussions, conclusions and study proposals are summarized in the present paper. In conclusion, this report presents an in-depth analysis of the state of the art, grey areas and controversies in breast cancer radiation therapy and discusses how to confront them in the absence of evidence-based data to guide clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Breast Radiation Unit, Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Oncology Institute, Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv and Ben Gurion University Medical School, Israel
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Universitat Rovira I Virgili, Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Hoan de Reus, IISPV, Spain
| | - Liesbeth J Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Antonella Ciabattoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, San Filippo Neri Hospital, ASL Rome 1, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Depatment of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont and Department of Radiation Oncology, 'Maggiore della Carità' University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Marazzi
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Unità Operativa di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagine, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCSS Roma, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence & Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Birgitte Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Maria Lurdes Trigo
- Service of Brachytherapy, Department of Image and Radioncology, Instituto Português Oncologia Porto Francisco Gentil E.P.E., Portugal
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Clinicizzato Chieti and University "G. d'Annunzio", Chieti, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- 2(nd) Department of Radiology, Radiotherapy Unit, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna; DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University; Bologna, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Service, ASST Valcamonica Esine and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Istituto del Radio "O.Alberti" - Spedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia
| | | | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Vincenzo Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Science, University "La Sapienza", Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- former Senior Assistant Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ciabattoni A, Gregucci F, De Rose F, Falivene S, Fozza A, Daidone A, Morra A, Smaniotto D, Barbara R, Lozza L, Vidali C, Borghesi S, Palumbo I, Huscher A, Perrucci E, Baldissera A, Tolento G, Rovea P, Franco P, De Santis MC, Grazia AD, Marino L, Meduri B, Cucciarelli F, Aristei C, Bertoni F, Guenzi M, Leonardi MC, Livi L, Nardone L, De Felice F, Rosetto ME, Mazzuoli L, Anselmo P, Arcidiacono F, Barbarino R, Martinetti M, Pasinetti N, Desideri I, Marazzi F, Ivaldi G, Bonzano E, Cavallari M, Cerreta V, Fusco V, Sarno L, Bonanni A, Mangiacotti MG, Prisco A, Buonfrate G, Andrulli D, Fontana A, Bagnoli R, Marinelli L, Reverberi C, Scalabrino G, Corazzi F, Doino D, Di Genesio-Pagliuca M, Lazzari M, Mascioni F, Pace MP, Mazza M, Vitucci P, Spera A, Macchia G, Boccardi M, Evangelista G, Sola B, La Porta MR, Fiorentino A, Levra NG, Ippolito E, Silipigni S, Osti MF, Mignogna M, Alessandro M, Ursini LA, Nuzzo M, Meattini I, D’Ermo G. AIRO Breast Cancer Group Best Clinical Practice 2022 Update. Tumori 2022; 108:1-144. [DOI: 10.1177/03008916221088885] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Breast cancer is the most common tumor in women and represents the leading cause of cancer death. Radiation therapy plays a key-role in the treatment of all breast cancer stages. Therefore, the adoption of evidence-based treatments is warranted, to ensure equity of access and standardization of care in clinical practice. Method: This national document on the highest evidence-based available data was developed and endorsed by the Italian Association of Radiation and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Breast Cancer Group. We analyzed literature data regarding breast radiation therapy, using the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) methodology ( www.sign.ac.uk ). Updated findings from the literature were examined, including the highest levels of evidence (meta-analyses, randomized trials, and international guidelines) with a significant impact on clinical practice. The document deals with the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer, local relapse, and metastatic disease, with focus on diagnosis, staging, local and systemic therapies, and follow up. Information is given on indications, techniques, total doses, and fractionations. Results: An extensive literature review from 2013 to 2021 was performed. The work was organized according to a general index of different topics and most chapters included individual questions and, when possible, synoptic and summary tables. Indications for radiation therapy in breast cancer were examined and integrated with other oncological treatments. A total of 50 questions were analyzed and answered. Four large areas of interest were investigated: (1) general strategy (multidisciplinary approach, contraindications, preliminary assessments, staging and management of patients with electronic devices); (2) systemic therapy (primary, adjuvant, in metastatic setting); (3) clinical aspects (invasive, non-invasive and micro-invasive carcinoma; particular situations such as young and elderly patients, breast cancer in males and cancer during pregnancy; follow up with possible acute and late toxicities; loco-regional relapse and metastatic disease); (4) technical aspects (radiation after conservative surgery or mastectomy, indications for boost, lymph node radiotherapy and partial breast irradiation). Appendixes about tumor bed boost and breast and lymph nodes contouring were implemented, including a dedicated web application. The scientific work was reviewed and validated by an expert group of breast cancer key-opinion leaders. Conclusions: Optimal breast cancer management requires a multidisciplinary approach sharing therapeutic strategies with the other involved specialists and the patient, within a coordinated and dedicated clinical path. In recent years, the high-level quality radiation therapy has shown a significant impact on local control and survival of breast cancer patients. Therefore, it is necessary to offer and guarantee accurate treatments according to the best standards of evidence-based medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Generale Regionale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Santa Chiara, Trento, Italy
| | - Sara Falivene
- SC Radioterapia, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Antonio Daidone
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica, Villa S.Teresa, Bagheria (PA), Palermo, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Divisione di Radioterapia Oncologica, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, Milano, Italy
| | - Daniela Smaniotto
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Raffaele Barbara
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica - Dipartimento Oncologico Internistico - ARNAS G.Brotzu - P. O. A Businco, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Laura Lozza
- SC Radioterapia 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- UO Radioterapia Oncologica di Arezzo Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- Sezione di Radioterapia Oncologica, Università degli Studi di Perugia e Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giorgio Tolento
- Radioterapia Oncologica, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Rovea
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Dipartimento Medicina Traslazionale (DIMET), Università del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Alfio Di Grazia
- Radioterapia Humanitas, Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radioterapia Humanitas, Istituto Clinico Catanese, Catania, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Dipartimento Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- UO Radioterapia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Sezione di Radioterapia Oncologica, Università degli Studi di Perugia e Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Filippo Bertoni
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia ed Oncologia Clinica, Roma, Italy
| | - Marina Guenzi
- Radioterapia Oncologica, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino e Università, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Livi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche "M. Serio" - Università di Firenze, Firenze, e Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Italy
| | - Luigia Nardone
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Dipartimento Radioterapia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Paola Anselmo
- SC Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | - Fabio Arcidiacono
- SC Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria, Terni, Italy
| | | | | | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Servizio Radioterapia, ASST Valcamonica Esine e Università degli Studi di Brescia, Esine (BS), Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche "M. Serio" - Università di Firenze, Firenze, e Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Italy
| | - Fabio Marazzi
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- PhD Medicina Sperimentale, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia e Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | - Vincenzo Fusco
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, IRCCS-CROB Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy
| | - Laura Sarno
- SC Radioterapia, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milano, Italy
| | - Alessio Bonanni
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale S. Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli - Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Agnese Prisco
- Dipartimento Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanna Buonfrate
- UOC Radioterapia, Ospedale della Misericordia, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Damiana Andrulli
- UOC Radioterapia, Oncologica Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni – Addolorata, Roma, Italy
| | - Antonella Fontana
- SC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale S. Maria Goretti, Latina, Italy
| | - Rita Bagnoli
- SC Radioterapia, Area Omogenea Radioterapia, Ospedale San Luca, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Luca Marinelli
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Reverberi
- Dipartimento Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Giovanna Scalabrino
- UOC Radioterapia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Sant’Andrea, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Corazzi
- SC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale di Città di Castello, Città di Castello (PG), Italy
| | - Daniela Doino
- UO Radioterapia, Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesca Mascioni
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Generale Provinciale di Macerata, Area Vasta 3, Macerata, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Pace
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Generale Provinciale di Macerata, Area Vasta 3, Macerata, Italy
| | - Mirko Mazza
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Salvatore Muraglia, Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Pasquale Vitucci
- Département de Radiothérapie et Physique Médicale, CLCC “Henry Becquerel”, Rouen, France
| | | | - Gabriella Macchia
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica-Gemelli Molise Hospital- Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Mariangela Boccardi
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica-Gemelli Molise Hospital- Università Cattolica S. Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Sola
- SS Radioterapia, Ospedale San Giovanni Antica Sede (SC Radioterapia U-AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza), Torino, Italy
| | | | - Alba Fiorentino
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale Generale Regionale F. Miulli, Acquaviva delle Fonti (BA), Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Niccolò Giaj Levra
- Dipartimento di Radioterapia Oncologica Avanzata, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria, Negrar (VR), Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
| | - Sonia Silipigni
- Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Roma, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- UOC Radioterapia, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico Sant’Andrea, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Roma, Italy
| | - Marcello Mignogna
- SC Radioterapia, Area Omogenea Radioterapia, Ospedale San Luca, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lucca, Italy
| | - Marina Alessandro
- SC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale di Città di Castello, Città di Castello (PG), Italy
| | - Lucia Anna Ursini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale SS Annunziata, Università G d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Marianna Nuzzo
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Ospedale SS Annunziata, Università G d’Annunzio, Chieti, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e Cliniche "M. Serio" - Università di Firenze, Firenze, e Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Italy
| | - Giuseppe D’Ermo
- Dipartimento di Chirurgia P. Valdoni, Sapienza Università di Roma, Co-Coordinatore Task force per le Malattie del Seno LILT Sede Centrale, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leonardi MC, Pepa M, Gugliandolo SG, Luraschi R, Vigorito S, Rojas DP, La Porta MR, Cante D, Petrucci E, Marino L, Borzì G, Ippolito E, Marrocco M, Huscher A, Chieregato M, Argenone A, Iadanza L, De Rose F, Lobefalo F, Cucciarelli F, Valenti M, De Santis MC, Cavallo A, Rossi F, Russo S, Prisco A, Guernieri M, Guarnaccia R, Malatesta T, Meaglia I, Liotta M, Tabarelli de Fatis P, Palumbo I, Marcantonini M, Colangione SP, Mezzenga E, Falivene S, Mormile M, Ravo V, Arrichiello C, Fozza A, Barbero MP, Ivaldi GB, Catalano G, Vidali C, Aristei C, Giannitto C, Miglietta E, Ciabattoni A, Meattini I, Orecchia R, Cattani F, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Geometric contour variation in clinical target volume of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer radiotherapy: an AIRO multi-institutional study. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20201177. [PMID: 33882239 PMCID: PMC8248216 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20201177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine interobserver variability in axillary nodal contouring in breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) by comparing the clinical target volume of participating single centres (SC-CTV) with a gold-standard CTV (GS-CTV). METHODS The GS-CTV of three patients (P1, P2, P3) with increasing complexity was created in DICOM format from the median contour of axillary CTVs drawn by BC experts, validated using the simultaneous truth and performance-level estimation and peer-reviewed. GS-CTVs were compared with the correspondent SC-CTVs drawn by radiation oncologists, using validated metrics and a total score (TS) integrating all of them. RESULTS Eighteen RT centres participated in the study. Comparative analyses revealed that, on average, the SC-CTVs were smaller than GS-CTV for P1 and P2 (by -29.25% and -27.83%, respectively) and larger for P3 (by +12.53%). The mean Jaccard index was greater for P1 and P2 compared to P3, but the overlap extent value was around 0.50 or less. Regarding nodal levels, L4 showed the highest concordance with the GS. In the intra-patient comparison, L2 and L3 achieved lower TS than L4. Nodal levels showed discrepancy with GS, which was not statistically significant for P1, and negligible for P2, while P3 had the worst agreement. DICE similarity coefficient did not exceed the minimum threshold for agreement of 0.70 in all the measurements. CONCLUSIONS Substantial differences were observed between SC- and GS-CTV, especially for P3 with altered arm setup. L2 and L3 were the most critical levels. The study highlighted these key points to address. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The present study compares, by means of validated geometric indexes, manual segmentations of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer from different observers and different institutions made on radiotherapy planning CT images. Assessing such variability is of paramount importance, as geometric uncertainties might lead to incorrect dosimetry and compromise oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Cante
- Radiotherapy Department, ASL TO4 Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Edoardo Petrucci
- Unit of Medical Physics, ASL TO4 Ivrea Community Hospital, Ivrea, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiotherapy Unit, REM Radioterapia, Viagrande (CT), Italy
| | - Giuseppina Borzì
- Unit of Medical Physics, REM Radioterapia, Viagrande (CT), Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiotherapy, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Angela Argenone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Pio, Benevento, Italy
| | - Luciano Iadanza
- Unit of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Pio, Benevento, italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Lobefalo
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radiotherapy Institute, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, G.M. Lancisi, G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Marco Valenti
- Unit of Medical Physics, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, G.M. Lancisi, G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Anna Cavallo
- Unit of Medical Physics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Rossi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Usl Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Firenze, Italy
| | - Serenella Russo
- Unit of Medical Physics, Usl Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Firenze, Italy
| | - Agnese Prisco
- Department of Radiotherapy, ASUFC - P.O. “ Santa Maria della Misericordia” di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Marika Guernieri
- Unit of Medical Physics, ASUFC - P.O. “ Santa Maria della Misericordia” di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Roberta Guarnaccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy
| | - Tiziana Malatesta
- Unit of Medical Physics, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy
| | - Ilaria Meaglia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Marco Liotta
- Medical Physics Unit, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Isabella Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Sarah Pia Colangione
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Emilio Mezzenga
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola (FC), Italy
| | - Sara Falivene
- Department of Radiotherapy, ASL Napoli 1 Centro - Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy
| | - Maria Mormile
- Unit of Medical Physics, ASL Napoli 1 Centro - Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ravo
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Cecilia Arrichiello
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Maria Paola Barbero
- Unit of Medical Physics, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | | | - Gianpiero Catalano
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto San Giovanni (MI), Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUI-TS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Caterina Giannitto
- Division of Radiology, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Eleonora Miglietta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | | | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lancellotta V, Cellini F, Fionda B, De Sanctis V, Vidali C, Fusco V, Frassine F, Tomasini D, Vavassori A, Gambacorta MA, Franco P, Genovesi D, Corvò R, Tagliaferri L. The role of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in stage I esophageal cancer: an AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2021; 24:7589-7597. [PMID: 32744685 DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202007_22257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aimed at examining efficacy of interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy-IRT) alone or combined with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in stage I esophageal cancer as exclusive treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. We analyzed only clinical study as full-text publication, reporting on patients with stage I esophageal cancer treated with IRT alone or in combination with other treatments (e.g., EBRT). Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter, and review were excluded. Patients who underwent previous surgery were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) was applied for years of the publication. RESULTS Twelve studies have been selected. The number of evaluated patients was 514; the median age was 69 years. In the IRT group, the median: local control (LC) was 77% (range 63%-100%), disease-free survival (DFS) was 68.4% (range 49%-86.3%), the overall survival (OS) was 60% (range 31%-84%), the cancer specific survival (CSS) was 80% (range 55-100%), and grade 3-4 toxicity range was 0%-26%. CONCLUSIONS IRT alone or combined to EBRT is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with stage I esophageal cancer. Definitive radiation therapy could be an alternative to surgery in patients with superficial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vavassori A, Tagliaferri L, Vicenzi L, D'Aviero A, Ciabattoni A, Gribaudo S, Lapadula L, Mattiucci GC, Vinante L, De Sanctis V, Vidali C, Murri R, Antonietta Gambacorta M, Mignogna M, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Donato V. Practical indications for management of patients candidate to Interventional and Intraoperative Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy, IORT) during COVID-19 pandemic - A document endorsed by AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) Interventional Radiotherapy Working Group. Radiother Oncol 2020; 149:73-77. [PMID: 32389752 PMCID: PMC7205646 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Revised: 04/18/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Key Words
- asap, as soon as possible
- ebrt, external beam radiation therapy
- sbrt, stereotactic body radiation therapy
- sib, simultaneous integrated boost
- iort, intraoperative radiotherapy
- irt, interventional radiotherapy
- hdr, high dose rate
- pdr, pulsed dose rate
- ht, hormone therapy
- ct, chemotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
| | - Lisa Vicenzi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I - G.M. Lancisi - G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | | | | | - Sergio Gribaudo
- A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Department of Oncology - P.O. Sant'Anna - S.S. Radioterapia, Torino, Italy
| | - Loredana Lapadula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Regionale, Rionero in Vulture (Potenza), Italy
| | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Vinante
- S.O.C. of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Centro di Riferimento Oncologico IRCCS, Aviano (Pordenone), Italy
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Medicine and Surgery and Translational Medicine, Radiotherapy Oncology, Sapienza University of Rome, S. Andrea Hospital, Roma, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Interventional Radiotherapy AIRO Working Group - IntraOperative RadioTherapy, Trieste, Italy
| | - Rita Murri
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Roma, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Marcello Mignogna
- S.C. of Radiation Oncology, S. Luca Hospital, Lucca, Italy, Healthcare Company Tuscany Nord Ovest, Pisa, Italy
| | - Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Vittorio Donato
- U.O.C. of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tagliaferri L, Vavassori A, Lancellotta V, Sanctis VD, Vidali C, Casà C, Aristei C, Genovesi D, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Morganti AG, Kovács G, Guinot JL, Rembielak A, Greto D, Gambacorta MA, Valentini V, Donato V, Corvò R, Magrini SM, Livi L. INTERACTS (INTErventional Radiotherapy ACtive Teaching School) consensus conference on sarcoma interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) endorsed by AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology). J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:397-404. [PMID: 33293980 PMCID: PMC7690224 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.98120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the results of INTERACTS (INTErventional Radiotherapy ACtive Teaching School) consensus conference on sarcoma interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy). MATERIAL AND METHODS An international board of multidisciplinary experts was invited to a consensus conference on the state-of-the-art of sarcoma interventional oncology during the 9th Rome INTER-MEETING (INTERventional Radiotherapy Multidisciplinary Meeting), proposing 3 statements for each one speech. At the end of each lecture, the entire group of experts was invited to vote with an electronic device. The preliminary results were presented and discussed at the end of the meeting, during a dedicated session. After the meeting, a survey was distributed within the consensus conference board to share and definitively vote the statements. RESULTS All the invited authors of the consensus conference board completed the final survey. All the 38 statements received more than 70% of agreement, 31 statements (82%) obtained an agreement of level higher or equal to 90%, 6 statements (15.8%) received an agreement level between 80% and 90%, and 1 statement (2.6%) had less than 80% of agreement. CONCLUSIONS The consensus conference demonstrated that interventional radiotherapy must be considered by a multidisciplinary management of patients affected by sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
| | - Andrea Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy,
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Address for correspondence: Valentina Lancellotta, MD, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy, e-mail:
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant’Andrea Hospital, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy,
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Former Deputy Chair of Interventional Radiotherapy AIRO working Group – IntraOperative RadioTherapy, Trieste, Italy,
| | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Surgery and Biomedical Science, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy,
| | - Domenico Genovesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Gabriele D’Annunzio University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy,
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy,
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy,
| | - Alessio Giuseppe Morganti
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine – DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy,
| | | | - Jose Luis Guinot
- Foundation Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia (I.V.O.), Valencia, Spain,
| | - Agata Rembielak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester and Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom,
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy,
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy,
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy,
| | - Vittorio Donato
- Radiation Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo-Forlanini, Roma, Italy,
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Department of Health Science, University of Genoa, Italy,
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Radiotherapy Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy,
| | - Consensus Conference Board
- Consensus Conference Board: Rosa Autorino (radiation oncologist, Rome), Carmelo Caldarella (nuclear medicine physician, Rome), Annamaria Cerrotta (radiation oncologist, Milan), Antonino De Paoli (radiation oncologist, Aviano), Vitaliana De Sanctis (radiation oncologist, Rome), Nicola Dinapoli (radiation oncologist, Rome), Vittorio Donato (radiation oncologist, Rome), Martina Ferioli (radiation oncologist, Bologna), Vincenzo Fusco (radiation oncologist, Rionero in Vulture), Maria Antonietta Gambacorta (radiation oncologist, Rome), Domenico Genovesi (radiation oncologist, Chieti), Daniela Greto (radiation oncologist, Florence), Jose Luis Guinot (radiation oncologist, València), Roberto Iezzi (interventional radiologist, Rome), Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa (radiation oncologist, Milan), György Kovács (radiation oncologist, Rome and Lübeck), Valentina Lancellotta (radiation oncologist, Rome), Antonio Leone (radiologist, Rome), Giulio Maccauro (orthopedic surgeon, Rome), Stefano Maria Magrini (radiation oncologist, Brescia), Alessio Giuseppe Morganti (radiation oncologist, Bologna), Michela Quirino (medical oncologist, Rome), Agata Rembielak (clinical and radiation oncologist, Manchester), Umberto Ricardi (radiation oncologist, Turin), Vittoria Rufini (nuclear medicine physician, Rome), Giuseppe Sanguineti (radiation oncologist, Rome), Luca Tagliaferri (radiation oncologist, Rome), Andrea Vavassori (radiation oncologist, Milan), Cristiana Vidali (radiation oncologist, Trieste)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Arenas M, Selek U, Kaidar-Person O, Perrucci E, Montero Luis A, Boersma L, Coles C, Offersen B, Meattini I, Bölükbaşı Y, Leonardi MC, Pfeffer R, Cutuli B, Vidali C, Franco P, Kouloulias V, Masiello V, Rivera S, Bourgier C, Ciabattoni A, Lancellotta V, Trigo L, Valentini V, Poortmans P, Aristei C. The 2018 assisi think tank meeting on breast cancer: International expert panel white paper. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 151:102967. [PMID: 32450277 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
We report on the second Assisi Think Tank Meeting (ATTM) on breast cancer which was held under the auspices of the European Society for RadioTherapy & Oncology (ESTRO). In discussing in-depth current evidence and practice it was designed to identify grey areas in diverse forms of the disease. It aimed at addressing uncertainties and proposing future trials to improve patient care. Before the meeting, three key topics were selected: 1) primary systemic therapy, mastectomy, breast reconstruction and post-mastectomy radiation therapy, 2) therapeutic options in ductal carcinoma in situ, and 3) therapy de-escalation in early stage breast cancer. Clinical practice in these areas was investigated by means of an online questionnaire. The time lapse period between the survey and the meeting was used to review the literature and on-going clinical trials. At the ATTM both were discussed in depth and research protocols were proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ugur Selek
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | - Orit Kaidar-Person
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | | | | | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Coles
- Radiation Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy
| | - Yasemin Bölükbaşı
- Radiation Oncology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istambul, Turkey
| | | | - Raphael Pfeffer
- Radiation Oncology, Assuta Medical Centres, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bruno Cutuli
- Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer Courlancy, Reims, France
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Vassilis Kouloulias
- Radiation Oncology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Céline Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, University Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Lurdes Trigo
- Radiation Oncology, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Francisco Martins Porto E.P.E, Porto, Portugal
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp - University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fastner G, Reitsamer R, Urbański B, Kopp P, Murawa D, Adamczyk B, Karzcewska A, Milecki P, Hager E, Reiland J, Ciabattoni A, Matuschek C, Budach W, Nowell K, Schumacher C, Ricke A, Fusco V, Vidali C, Alessandro M, Ivaldi GB, Ziegler I, Fussl C, Zehentmayr F, Grambozov B, Sir A, Hitzl W, Ricardi U, Sedlmayer F. Toxicity and cosmetic outcome after hypofractionated whole breast irradiation and boost-IOERT in early stage breast cancer (HIOB): First results of a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459). Radiother Oncol 2020; 146:136-142. [PMID: 32151790 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To assess the role of intraoperative radiation with electrons (IOERT) as tumor bed boost followed by hypofractionated whole breast irradiation (HWBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) of patients with low to intermediate risk breast cancer focusing on acute/late toxicity and cosmetic outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS In 2011, a prospective multicenter trial (NCT01343459) was started. Treatment consisted of BCS, IOERT (11.1 Gy) and HWBI (40.5 Gy in 15 fractions). In a single-arm design, 5-year IBR-rates are benchmarked by a sequential ratio test (SQRT) against best published evidences in 3 age groups (35-40 y, 41-50 y, >50 y). Acute/late toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated by validated scorings systems. RESULTS Of 627 eligible patients, 44 were excluded, leaving 583 to analyze. After a median follow-up (FUP) of 45 months (range 0-74), for acute effects CTCAE-score 0/1 was noted in 91% (end of HWBI) and 92% (4 weeks later), respectively. Late toxicity Grading 0/1 (mean values, ranges) by LENT-SOMA criteria were observed in 92.7% (89-97.3) at 4/5 months, rising to 96.5% (91-100) at 6 years post HWBI. Baseline cosmesis after wound healing prior to HWBI was scored as excellent/good in 86% of cases by subjective (patient) and in 74% by objective (doctor) assessment with no impairment thereafter. CONCLUSIONS Acute and late treatment tolerance of a combined Boost-IOERT/HWBI regimen is excellent in short/mid-term assessment. Postoperative cosmetic appearance is not impaired after 3 years FUP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerd Fastner
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Roland Reitsamer
- Department of Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Bartosz Urbański
- Department of Radiotherapy and Gynecological Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | - Peter Kopp
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Dawid Murawa
- Clinic of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University, Zielona Gora, Poland
| | - Beata Adamczyk
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | | | - Piotr Milecki
- Department of Radiotherapy Greater Poland Cancer Center and Chair of Electroradiology Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Eva Hager
- Department of Radiotherapy/Radiooncology, Klagenfurt, Austria
| | - Juliann Reiland
- Avera McKennan Hospitals and University Health System, Avera Medical Group, Comprehensive Breast Care, Sioux Falls, United States
| | | | - Christiane Matuschek
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Wilfried Budach
- Medical Faculty, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kerri Nowell
- Department of General Surgery, UnityPoint Health-St.Lukes Hospital, Cedar Rapids, United States
| | - Claudia Schumacher
- Breast Center/Department of Senology, St.-Elisabeth Hospital Cologne-Hohenlind, Germany
| | - Angelika Ricke
- Radiation Institute-CDT-center for Diagnostic and Therapy GmbH, Cologne, Germany
| | - Vincenzo Fusco
- Radioterapia, IRCCS-CROB Reference Cancer Center Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Italy
| | - Marina Alessandro
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale di Città di Castello, USL UMBRIA 1, Città di Castello, Italy
| | | | - Ingrid Ziegler
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christoph Fussl
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franz Zehentmayr
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Brane Grambozov
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Andreas Sir
- Department of Gynecology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Research Office - Biostatistics, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Austria; Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Felix Sedlmayer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, University Hospital Salzburg, Landeskrankenhaus, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leonardi MC, Tomio L, Radice D, Takanen S, Bonzano E, Alessandro M, Ciabattoni A, Ivaldi GB, Bagnardi V, Alessandro O, Francia CM, Fodor C, Miglietta E, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Orecchia R, Tagliaferri L, Vidali C, Massaccesi M, Guenzi M, Jereczek-Fossa BA. Local Failure After Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation with Intraoperative Radiotherapy with Electrons: An Insight into Management and Outcome from an Italian Multicentric Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 27:752-762. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-08075-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
11
|
Lancellotta V, Cellini F, Fionda B, De Sanctis V, Vidali C, Fusco V, Barbera F, Gambacorta MA, Corvò R, Magrini SM, Tagliaferri L. The role of palliative interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in esophageal cancer: An AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) systematic review focused on dysphagia-free survival. Brachytherapy 2019; 19:104-110. [PMID: 31636025 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 08/16/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this review was to examine efficacy of palliative interventional radiotherapy (IRT) in esophageal cancer compared with other treatment in terms of dysphagia-free survival (DyFS) and safety. METHODS AND MATERIAL A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of IRT as palliation in patients with esophageal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. We analyzed only clinical study as full text of patients with symptomatic esophageal cancer treated with IRT alone or in combination with other treatment. Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter, and review were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) as concerns the years of the publication was considered. The primary outcome was the duration of dysphagia relief (DyFS) after brachytherapy vs. other treatment (external-beam radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, stent, and laser) during followup. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and adverse event rates. RESULTS The literature search resulted in 554 articles. Sixty-six articles were assessed via full text for eligibility. Of these, 59 articles were excluded for various reasons, leaving seven randomized studies. The number of evaluated patients was 905 patients, and median age was 70.5 years. In the IRT group, the median DyFS was 99 days, the most relevant G3-G4 toxicity were fistula development and stenosis reported, respectively, in 8.3% and 12.2%; the overall median survival was 175.5 days. CONCLUSION In conclusion, we provided evidence-based support that IRT is an effective and safe treatment option; therefore, its underuse is no longer justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Lancellotta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy.
| | - Vitaliana De Sanctis
- Faculty of Medicina e Psicologia, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Fusco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico Regionale, Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, Italy
| | - Fernando Barbera
- Brachytherapy Section, Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Istituto di Radiologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Renzo Corvò
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino and Department of Health Science, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Radiation Oncology Department, Ospedali Civili Hospital and Brescia University, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Montero-Luis A, Aristei C, Meattini I, Arenas M, Boersma L, Bourgier C, Coles C, Cutuli B, Falcinelli L, Kaidar-Person O, Leonardi MC, Offersen B, Marazzi F, Rivera S, Tagliaferri L, Tombolini V, Vidali C, Valentini V, Poortmans P. The Assisi Think Tank Meeting Survey of post-mastectomy radiation therapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: Suggestions for routine practice. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 138:207-213. [PMID: 31092377 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk factors for local recurrence after mastectomy in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) emerged as a grey area during the second "Assisi Think Tank Meeting" (ATTM) on Breast Cancer. AIM To review practice patterns of post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) in DCIS, identify risk factors for recurrence and select suitable candidates for PMRT. METHODS A questionnaire concerning DCIS management, focusing on PMRT, was distributed online via SurveyMonkey. RESULTS 142 responses were received from 15 countries. The majority worked in academic institutions, had 5-20 years work-experience and irradiated <5 DCIS patients/year. PMRT was more given if: surgical margins <1 mm, high-grade, multicentricity, young age, tumour size >5 cm, skin- or nipple- sparing mastectomy. Moderate hypofractionation was the most common schedule, except after immediate breast reconstruction (57% conventional fractionation). CONCLUSIONS The present survey highlighted risk factors for PMRT administration, which should be further evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Montero-Luis
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital HM Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain.
| | - C Aristei
- Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - I Meattini
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (AOUC), Florence, Italy
| | - M Arenas
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Sant Joan, Reus, Spain
| | - L Boersma
- Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhøek Huis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - C Bourgier
- Radiation Oncology, ICM-Val d'Aurelle, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - C Coles
- Radiation Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - B Cutuli
- Radiation Oncology, Institut du Cancer Courlancy, Reims, France
| | - L Falcinelli
- Radiation Oncology, Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - O Kaidar-Person
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - M C Leonardi
- Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - B Offersen
- Radiation Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - F Marazzi
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - S Rivera
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - L Tagliaferri
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - V Tombolini
- Radiation Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - C Vidali
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - V Valentini
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - P Poortmans
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology; Paris Sciences & Lettres - PSL University; Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Amichetti M, Caffo O, Richetti A, Zini G, Rigon A, Antonello M, Roncadin M, Coghetto F, Valdagni R, Fasan S, Maluta S, Di Marco A, Neri S, Vidali C, Panizzoni G, Aristei C. Subclinical Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the Breast: Treatment with Conservative Surgery and Radiotherapy. Tumori 2018; 85:488-93. [PMID: 10774571 DOI: 10.1177/030089169908500612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Aims and Background In spite of the fact that ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a frequently encountered clinical problem, there is no consensus about the optimal treatment of clinically occult (i.e., mammographic presentation only) DCIS. Interest in breast conservation therapy has recently increased. Few data are available in Italy on the conservative treatment with surgery and adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy. Methods A retrospective multi-institutional study was performed in 15 Radiation Oncology Departments in northern Italy involving 112 women with subclinical DCIS of the breast treated between 1982 and 1993. Age of the patients ranged between 32 and 72 years (median, 50 years). All of them underwent conservative surgery: quadrantectomy in 89, tumorectomy in 11, and wide excision in 12 cases. The most common histologic subtype was comedocarcinoma (37%). The median pathologic size was 10 mm (range 1 to 55 mm). Axillary dissection was performed in 83 cases: all the patients were node negative. All the patients received adjunctive radiation therapy with 60Co units (77%) or 6 MV linear accelerators (23%) for a median total dose to the entire breast of 50 Gy (mean, 49.48 Gy; range, 45-60 Gy). Seventy-six cases (68%) received a boost to the tumor bed at a dose of 8-20 Gy (median 10 Gy) for a minimum tumor dose of 58 Gy. Results At a median follow-up of 66 months, 8 local recurrences were observed, 4 intraductal and 4 invasive. All recurrent patients had a salvage mastectomy and are alive and free of disease at this writing. The 10-year actuarial overall, cause-specific, and recurrence-free survival was of 98.8%, 100%, and 91%, respectively. Conclusions The retrospective multicentric study, with a local control rate of more than 90% at 10 years with 100% cause-specific survival, showed that conservative surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with occult, non-palpable DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Amichetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aristei C, Amichetti M, Ciocca M, Nardone L, Bertoni F, Vidali C. Radiotherapy in Italy after Conservative Treatment of Early Breast Cancer. A Survey by the Italian Society of Radiation Oncology (AIRO). Tumori 2018; 94:333-41. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160809400308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Aims and Background The aim of surveys on clinical practice is to stimulate discussion and optimize practice. In this paper the current Italian radiotherapy practice after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer is described and adherence to national and international guidelines is assessed. Furthermore, results are compared with an earlier survey in northern Italy and international reports. Study Design A multiple-choice questionnaire sent to all 138 Italian radiation oncology centers. Results 48% of centers responded. Most performed breast-conserving surgery when tumor size was ≤3 cm. All centers routinely performed axillary dissection; 45 carried out sentinel node biopsy followed by axillary dissection when the sentinel node was positive. Most centers re-excised when resection margins were positive. The median interval between surgery and radiotherapy, when chemotherapy was not administered, was 60 days. Adjuvant chemotherapy was preferably administered before radiotherapy. Regional lymph nodes were never irradiated in 10 centers; in all others irradiation depended on the number of positive lymph nodes and/or involvement of axillary fat and/or tumor location in medial quadrants. All centers used standard fractionation; hypofractionated schemes were available in 6. Most centers used 4–6 MV photons. In 59 centers the boost dose of 10 Gy could be increased if margins were not negative. All centers ensured patient setup reproducibility. Treatment planning was computerized in 59 centers. The irradiation dose was prescribed at the ICRU point in 56 centers and portal films were made in 54 centers. Intraoperative radiotherapy was used in 4 centers: for partial breast irradiation in 1 and for boost administration in 3 centers. Conclusions Although the quality of radiotherapy delivery has improved in Italy in recent years, approaches that do not conform to international standards persist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Aristei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Perugia, Perugia
| | | | - Mario Ciocca
- Medical Physics Unit, European Institute of Oncology, Milan
| | - Luigia Nardone
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vidali C, Severgnini M, Urbani M, Toscano L, Perulli A, Bortul M. FMECA Application to Intraoperative Electron Beam Radiotherapy Procedure As a Quality Method to Prevent and Reduce Patient's Risk in Conservative Surgery for Breast Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2017; 4:138. [PMID: 28894737 PMCID: PMC5581388 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2017] [Accepted: 08/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Failure Mode Effects and Criticalities Analysis (FMECA) represents a prospective method for risk assessment in complex medical practices. Our objective was to describe the application of FMECA approach to intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT), delivered using a mobile linear accelerator, for the treatment of early breast cancer as an anticipated boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Working Group, including several different professional profiles, was created before the beginning of clinical practice in 2012, with the purpose of writing the Flow Chart and applying the FMECA methodology to IOERT procedure. Several criticalities were identified a priori in the different steps of the procedure and a list of all potential failure modes (FMs) was drafted and ranked using the risk priority number (RPN) scoring system, based on the product of three parameters: severity, occurrence, and detectability (score between 1 and 5). The actions aimed at reducing the risk were then defined by the Working Group and the risk analysis was repeated in 2014 and in 2016, in order to assess the improvement achieved. RESULTS Fifty-one FMs were identified, which represented the issues prospectively investigated according to the FMECA methodology. Considering a set threshold of 30, the evaluated RPNs show that 33 out of 51 FMs are critical; 6 are included in the moderate risk class (RPN: 31-40); 16 in the intermediate risk class (RPN: 41-50), and 11 in the high risk class (RPN: >50). DISCUSSION The most critical steps concerned the surgical procedure and IOERT set-up. The introduction of the corrective actions into the clinical practice achieved the reduction of the RPNs in the re-analysis of the FMECA worksheet after 2 and 4 years, respectively. CONCLUSION FMECA proved to be a useful tool for prospective evaluation of potential failures in IOERT and contributed to optimize patient safety and to improve risk management culture among all the professionals of the Working Group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Vidali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Mara Severgnini
- Department of Medical Physics, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Monica Urbani
- Department of Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Licia Toscano
- Department of Physics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Alfredo Perulli
- Department of Medical Direction, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (ASUITS), Trieste, Italy
| | - Marina Bortul
- Department of Surgery, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Meattini I, Guenzi M, Fozza A, Vidali C, Rovea P, Meacci F, Livi L. Overview on cardiac, pulmonary and cutaneous toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 2016; 24:52-62. [DOI: 10.1007/s12282-016-0694-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2016] [Accepted: 03/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
17
|
Vidali C, Perulli A, Severgnini M, Bortul M, Monteverdi D, Beorchia A. EP-1326: FMECA application to IORT procedure as a quality method to prevent and reduce patient's risk. Radiother Oncol 2015. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)41318-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Severgnini M, de Denaro M, Bortul M, Vidali C, Beorchia A. In vivo dosimetry and shielding disk alignment verification by EBT3 GAFCHROMIC film in breast IOERT treatment. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 16:5065. [PMID: 25679150 PMCID: PMC5689990 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i1.5065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2014] [Revised: 09/10/2014] [Accepted: 09/03/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) cannot usually benefit, as conventional external radiotherapy, from software systems of treatment planning based on computed tomography and from common dose verify procedures. For this reason, in vivo film dosimetry (IVFD) proves to be an effective methodology to evaluate the actual radiation dose delivered to the target. A practical method for IVFD during breast IOERT was carried out to improve information on the dose actually delivered to the tumor target and on the alignment of the shielding disk with respect to the electron beam. Two EBT3 GAFCHROMIC films have been positioned on the two sides of the shielding disk in order to obtain the dose maps at the target and beyond the disk. Moreover the postprocessing analysis of the dose distribution measured on the films provides a quantitative estimate of the misalignment between the collimator and the disk. EBT3 radiochromic films have been demonstrated to be suitable dosimeters for IVD due to their linear dose-optical density response in a narrow range around the prescribed dose, as well as their capability to be fixed to the shielding disk without giving any distortion in the dose distribution. Off-line analysis of the radiochromic film allowed absolute dose measurements and this is indeed a very important verification of the correct exposure to the target organ, as well as an estimate of the dose to the healthy tissue underlying the shielding. These dose maps allow surgeons and radiation oncologists to take advantage of qualitative and quantitative feedback for setting more accurate treatment strategies and further optimized procedures. The proper alignment using elastic bands has improved the absolute dose accuracy and the collimator disk alignment by more than 50%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mara Severgnini
- Department of Medical Physics, A.O.U. "Ospedali Riuniti" di Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vidali C, Breast Cancer Study Group A, Giudici F. EP-1238: Hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy in Italy: A survey by the Breast Cancer Study Group of AIRO. Radiother Oncol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)31356-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
20
|
Severgnini M, de Denaro M, Vidali C, Bortul M, Beorchia A. PO-0992: In vivo dosimetry and shielding disk alignment verification in breast IORT treatment. Radiother Oncol 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(15)33298-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
21
|
Vidali C, Caffo O, Aristei C, Bertoni F, Bonetta A, Guenzi M, Iotti C, Leonardi MC, Mussari S, Neri S, Pietta N. Conservative treatment of breast ductal carcinoma in situ: results of an Italian multi-institutional retrospective study. Radiat Oncol 2012; 7:177. [PMID: 23098066 PMCID: PMC3573934 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-7-177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2012] [Accepted: 10/21/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased markedly in recent decades. In the past, mastectomy was the primary treatment for patients with DCIS, but as with invasive cancer, breast-conserving surgery followed by radiation therapy (RT) has become the standard approach. We present the final results of a multi-institutional retrospective study of an Italian Radiation Oncology Group for the study of conservative treatment of DCIS, characterized by a very long period of accrual, from February 1985 to March 2000, and a median follow-up longer than 11 years. Methods A collaborative multi-institutional study was conducted in Italy in 10 Radiation Oncology Departments. A consecutive series of 586 women with DCIS histologically confirmed, treated between February 1985 and March 2000, was retrospectively evaluated. Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range: 29–84); 32 patients were 40 years old or younger. All women underwent conservative surgery followed by whole breast RT. Irradiation was delivered to the entire breast, for a median total dose of 50 Gy; the tumour bed was boosted in 295 cases (50%) at a median dose of 10 Gy. Results After a median follow-up of 136 months (range: 16–292 months), 59/586 patients (10%) experienced a local recurrence: invasive in 37 cases, intraductal in 20 and not specified in two. Salvage mastectomy was the treatment of choice in 46 recurrent patients; conservative surgery in 10 and it was unknown in three patients. The incidence of local recurrence was significantly higher in women younger than 40 years (31.3%) (p= 0.0009). Five patients developed distant metastases. Furthermore 40 patients developed a contralateral breast cancer and 31 a second primary tumour in a different site. The 10-year actuarial overall survival (OS) was 95.5% and the 10-year actuarial disease-specific survival (DSS) was 99%. Conclusions Our results are consistent with those reported in the literature. In particular it has been defined the importance of young age (40 years or less) as a relevant risk factor for local recurrence. This retrospective multi-institutional Italian study confirms the long term efficacy of breast conserving surgery with RT in women with DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Vidali
- S.C. Radioterapia Oncologica, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti, Via Pietà 19, 34139, Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Vidali C, Caffo O, Aristei C, Bertoni F, Bonetta A, Guenzi M, Iotti C, Leonardi C, Mussari S, Neri S, Pietta N. 749 poster CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF DCIS OF THE BREAST: THE FINAL RESULTS OF A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL ITALIAN RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Radiother Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(11)70871-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
23
|
Capirci C, Valentini V, Cionini L, De Paoli A, Rodel C, Glynne-Jones R, Coco C, Romano M, Mantello G, Palazzi S, Mattia FO, Friso ML, Genovesi D, Vidali C, Gambacorta MA, Buffoli A, Lupattelli M, Favretto MS, La Torre G. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term analysis of 566 ypCR patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 72:99-107. [PMID: 18407433 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 334] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2007] [Revised: 12/10/2007] [Accepted: 12/10/2007] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the literature, a favorable prognosis was observed for complete pathologic response after preoperative therapy (ypCR) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The aim of this study is to verify whether ypCR predicts a favorable outcome in a large series of patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS The Gastro-Intestinal Working Group of the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology collected clinical data for 566 patients with ypCR (ypT0N0) after neoadjuvant therapy. Eligibility criteria included locally advanced rectal cancer with no evidence of metastases at the time of diagnosis, evidence of ypCR after preoperative radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS Median radiation dose was 50 Gy. A total of 527 patients (93%) received one of 12 different neoadjuvant CT schedules. Sphincter preservation, anteroposterior resection, and endoscopic surgery were performed in 73%, 22%, and 5% of patients, respectively. Adjuvant CT was administered to 22% of patients. Median follow-up was 46.4 months. Locoregional recurrence occurred in 7 patients (1.6%). Distant metastases occurred in 49 patients (8.9%). Overall, 5-year rates of disease-free survival, overall survival, and cancer-specific survival were 85%, 90%, and 94%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only age and clinical stage statistically correlated with survival outcome. Adjuvant CT was still of borderline significance (worse for adjuvant CT). No relation was found between survival and neoadjuvant CT schedules. CONCLUSION A ypCR after neoadjuvant therapy identified a favorable group of patients, even in this large series of 566 patients collected in 61 centers. Locoregional recurrence occurred only in 1.6% patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Capirci
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mussari S, Arister C, Bonetta A, Leonardi C, Neri S, Pietta N, Vidali C, Zini P, Caffo O. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiotherapy (XRT): a multi-institutional Italian retrospective study with long-term follow-up. EJC Suppl 2006. [DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(06)80160-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
25
|
Finizio L, Vidali C, Calacione R, Beorchia A, Trevisan G. What is the current role of radiation therapy in the treatment of skin carcinomas? Tumori 2002; 88:48-52. [PMID: 12004850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND BACKGROUND In recent years several radiation therapy units have recorded a decline in the number of referrals for the treatment of skin carcinomas. This study aims to ascertain whether this decline has also affected the radiation therapy unit of Trieste and, if so, to consider the possible reasons. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all cases of non-melanoma skin cancer treated in our unit from January 1986 to December 1999. A database was created that would allow rapid and controlled data entry and a sufficiently simple query system. RESULTS The total number of irradiated skin cancers was 2,219:1,863 basal cell carcinomas, 276 squamous cell carcinomas, and 80 basosquamous carcinomas. The distribution curves for the number of cases treated every year were similar: each of the three types showed a slow and gradual reduction in the number of patients referred for radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS For most authors surgery remains the treatment of choice for skin carcinomas. However, radiation therapy can also yield excellent results in terms of local control, cosmesis and functionality. In our view the indications for radiation therapy are poor general health, elderly age, the presence of diseases that are a contraindication for surgery, location of the tumor in the head region, and tumor size between 1 and 5 cm.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery
- Carcinoma, Basosquamous/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Basosquamous/surgery
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
- Prognosis
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Retrospective Studies
- Skin Neoplasms/radiotherapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Finizio
- Istituto di Clinical Dermatologica, Università degli Studi di Trieste, Ospedale di Cattinara, Italy
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Andolina M, Maximova N, Rabusin M, Vujic D, Bunjevacki G, Vidali C, Beorchia A. Haploidentical bone marrow transplantation in leukemia and genetic diseases. Haematologica 2000; 85:37-40. [PMID: 11268322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
From 1986 to June 2000, sixty children suffering from acute and chronic leukemia (n = 42, 33 of which in resistant relapse), genetic diseases (n = 11), aplastic anemia (n = 2, one of which with platelet refractoriness and bleeding), myelodysplasia (n = 5) received an haploidentical bone marrow, mismatched for 2-3 HLA loci. The donor's marrow was treated in vitro with vincristine and methylprednisolone to obtain a functional T depletion (MLC and CTL inhibition, functional blockade of Th1 and Th2). The prevalence of infectious complications and GVHD was similar to that recorded in matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplants. In situations of high risk of rejection (chronic leukemia, genetic diseases) we infused immediately one half of the harvest and then frozen aliquots from the second week. Of the 25 ALL and 8 AML in resistant relapse, 3 survived, disease-free at 14, 8 and 1 years respectively. Of the 3 ALL, transplanted during remission, 1 is surviving at 18 months. Of the 6 CML, 1 had fractionated bone marrow and is surviving at 3 years, and 5 had standard single dose infusion and died of progression of their disease after rejection of the graft (4) or blast crisis after complete engraftment (1). The 2 patients with aplastic anemia, those with myelodysplasia, and 6 of the 10 with genetic disorders died of transplant-related complications or disease progression. 4 patients with osteopetrosis (n = 2), MLD (n = 1), Wiskott Aldrich dis. (n = 1) survive at 8, 2, 5 and 1.5 years respectively. In patients transplanted with fractionated marrow GVHD > 2nd grade occurred in 15%. Only one patient rejected the graft. Compared with MUD transplantation, mismatched BMT whenever performed in patients in good conditions provides similar outcome and widens the donor availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Andolina
- Transplant Department, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, 34100 Trieste, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zini G, Amichetti M, Valli M, Antonello M, Lora O, Vidali C, Venturini A, Api P, Iannone T. Infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) treated with breast conservation: a retrospective study of the BCNIRTOG-Italy. Eur J Cancer 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)81234-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
28
|
Coghetto F, Amichetti M, Lozza L, Roncadin M, Lora O, Vidali C, Bonetta A, Falchi A, Bordin A. Post-irradiation sarcoma (PIS) in patients treated for breast cancer: a retrospective study of the BCNIRTOG-Italy. Eur J Cancer 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)81729-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
29
|
Cionini L, Cartei F, Valentini V, Lupattelli M, Pizzi G, Osti M, Friso M, Santoni R, Vidali C, De Paoli A. Preop chemoradiation (CTRT) ± postop chemo (CT) in locally advanced rectal cancer. Preliminary results. Eur J Cancer 1999. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)80634-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
30
|
Sandri P, Vidali C, Milan V, Trivillin V, Mustacchi G. Male breast cancer: A retrospective analysis of patients treated in Trieste, Italy. Eur J Cancer 1998. [DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)80202-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
31
|
Torretta A, Vidali C, Milan V, Andolina M, Maximova N. 80 O - Bone marrow transplantation in children: low risk in different total body irradiation regimens. Eur J Cancer 1996. [DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(96)84834-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
32
|
Gozzi G, Vidali C, Polonio G, Cressa C, Sabella M. [Mammographic diagnosis based on oblique projection. Personal experience]. Radiol Med 1988; 75:365-9. [PMID: 3375480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
It is widely known that an early detection of breast cancer, when still asymptomatic, can improve the prognosis. Screening is thus suggested, and mammography should be the methodology of choice. Therefore, we tried to evaluate the best mammographic approach to the screening of breast cancer. Since January 1st, 1986, we have changed our mammographic procedures: the results obtained have been compared with those previously acquired. Through the evaluation of the different parameters we observed that: 1) the best results in patients screened for the first time can be obtained by using the cranio-caudal and the oblique mammographic views; 2) in the follow-up the oblique view can be used alone--which must then be compared with the oblique view of the first exam. This new mammographic approach makes it possible for us to reduce the exposure-dose to the patient and to the population, as well as the time and the cost of the screening. Moreover, the number of examinations can be increased by 20%. These results are extremely interesting, since mammography is now as sensitive as ever.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gozzi
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università degli Studi, Trieste
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Gozzi G, Vidali C, de Guarrini F, Benini L. [Instrumental and clinical comparison of films for mammography. Analysis of the characteristic curve and modulation transfer function]. Radiol Med 1988; 75:215-8. [PMID: 3357991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- G Gozzi
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università, Trieste
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gozzi G, Cressa C, Bazzocchi M, Stanta G, Vidali C. [Causes of attenuation of the sound waves in neoplasms of the breast. Histologic and echographic correlation study]. Radiol Med 1986; 72:195-8. [PMID: 3012661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to compare the ultrasound findings in malignant breast masses (which underwent biopsy) with their histological appearance. In our activity of breast sonography, we observed that the same histological type of breast cancer often shows a different ultrasonic image. The main difference concerns the sonic attenuation or increase through the neoplastic mass. The histological examination took into account the amount of stroma and cells and the architectural pattern of the lesion. Comparing these features with the ultrasonic image, it has been shown that sonic transmission is related more to the architectural pattern than to the fibrous content of the neoplastic tissue.
Collapse
|
35
|
Dalla Palma L, Stacul F, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Predonzan F, Vidali C, Magnaldi S, Abbona M. Impact of technology and technique on the performance of the intravenous D.S.A. of the carotid arteries. Eur J Radiol 1986; 6:73-7. [PMID: 3516701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous Digital Subtraction Angiography (i.v. D.S.A.) was performed at the carotid bifurcation level in 259 patients with clinical or physical findings of a Cerebrovascular Insufficiency (C.V.I.). The angiographic examinations have been performed during two different periods, basically differing for the technology of the digital equipment and for the technique used. The personal experience showed how these two factors are important in determining the quality of the image and therefore the accuracy of the i.v. studies. Images of good quality of the common and internal carotid arteries have been obtained in 73% and 54% of the cases of the first period and in 93% and 82% of the cases of the second period. The role of the i.v. D.S.A. in the management of the C.V.I. depends not only upon the quality of the images, but also upon the surgical policy and from the availability of ultrasounds.
Collapse
|