Predictive Value of Flow Cytometry Quantification of BAL Lymphocytes and Neutrophils in ILD

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are pathologies affecting the pulmonary interstitium and, less frequently, the alveolar and vascular epithelia. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is commonly used in ILD evaluation since it allows the sampling of the lower respiratory tract. The prognostic value of BAL cell counts in ILD is unknown. Flow cytometry quantification of lymphocytes and neutrophils in BAL of 1074 real-life consecutive patients were retrospectively correlated with clinical, radiological, anatomopathological, functional/spirometry, and evolutionary data. Cut-offs with predictive value were established at 7% and 5% for lymphocytes and neutrophils, respectively. Three risk stratification groups (Risk-LN) were established: FAVORABLE (lymphocytes > 7% and neutrophils < 5%), INTERMEDIATE (rest of patients), and UNFAVORABLE (lymphocytes < 7% and neutrophils > 5%), showing 75th percentile overall survival (OS) of 10.0 ± 1.4, 5.8 ± 0.6, and 3.0 ± 0.3 years (p < 0.001), respectively. A scoring model combining Risk-LN and the age of the patients with great predictive capacity for OS on fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILDs is proposed. This score is an independent predictive factor (HR = 1.859, p = 0.002) complementary to the fibrosis status (HR = 2.081, p < 0.001) and the type of treatment. Flow cytometry of BAL provides rapid and accurate quantification of lymphocytes and neutrophils, allowing the establishment of a risk score model that is useful in the clinical management of fibrotic and non-fibrotic ILDs from the time of diagnosis.

Diagnostic Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Flow Cytometric Leukocyte Profiling in Interstitial Lung Disease and Infection

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) represent a diverse group of disorders that primarily affect the pulmonary interstitium and, less commonly, involve the alveolar and vascular epithelium. Overlapping clinical, radiological and histopathological features make proper classification difficult, requiring multiple complementary methodologies, including flow cytometry of bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL). This retrospective study analyzed BAL flow cytometry data from 1074 real-life patients, quantifying alveolar macrophages, CD4/CD8 lymphocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, and CD1a+ Langerhans cells, with the aim of evaluating its diagnostic utility in ILD and pulmonary infection. Clustering and logistic regression analyses identified seven distinct leukocyte profiles: lymphocytic (associated with hypersensitivity pneumonitis, cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, and lymphocytic interstitial pneumonia), sarcoidosis, macrophagic (including nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, desquamative interstitial pneumonitis, pneumoconiosis, and unclassifiable ILD), neutrophilic (including usual interstitial pneumonia, respiratory bronchiolitis ILD, and acute interstitial pneumonia), infectious diseases, eosinophilic ILD, and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. The estimated leukocyte profiles were associated with different overall survival (OS) outcomes. Neutrophilic profiles, both infectious and non-infectious, correlated with poorer OS, particularly in patients without pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive therapies did not show significant OS differences across leukocyte profiles. Although the gold standard in BAL cytology continues to be cytopathology, these results support BAL flow cytometry as a rapid and reliable complementary tool to aid in the classification of interstitial lung diseases based on immune cell profiles, providing valuable predictive information and contributing to personalized therapeutic approaches.

Neutrophils and Lymphocytes: Yin and Yang of Lung Fibrosis and Patient Outcome in Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases

Objective: Antifibrotics can improve the outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and other fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), but predictive biomarkers at diagnosis are needed to guide the use of immunomodulating and antifibrotic therapies. Methods: Flow cytometry quantification of lymphocytes and neutrophils in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of 145 IPFs, 561 non-IPF-ILDs (125 F-ILDs), and 112 BAL controls were retrospectively correlated with the incidence of fibrosis and third-quartile overall survival (Q3-OS). Results: The incidence of IPF was directly proportional (9.6%, 22.2%, and 42.6%, p < 0.001) to BAL neutrophil counts (<5%, 5-15%, and >15%), but inversely proportional (34.1%, 18.6%, and 8.8%, p < 0.001) to BAL lymphocyte counts (<7%, 7-20%, and >20%). Elevated neutrophils (>5%) with low lymphocytes (<7%) were associated with an increasingly higher incidence of IPF (10.0-56.3%, p < 0.001) in patients aged 40 to 80, compared to the rest of patients (13.0-17.1%). Lymphocytes >20% compared to lymphocytes <7% strongly protected patients with neutrophils >15% (59.7% vs. 20.7%, p < 0.001) from IPF. In contrast, the incidence of F-ILD was not clearly related to BAL lymphocyte/neutrophil counts. Although, IPF and F-ILD showed a shorter Q3-OS (1.8 ± 0.3 and 4.6 ± 0.8 years; p < 0.001) than non-fibrotic-ILDs (11.1 ± 1.3 years), lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were associated with a longer and shorter Q3-OS of non-fibrotic-ILDs (p < 0.03) and F-ILDs (p < 0.04), respectively, but not with a Q3-OS of IPF patients (p < 0.708). Corticosteroids in patients with fibrosis showed a shorter Q3-OS than other immunomodulators (2.4 ± 0.3 vs. 4.0 ± 1.8 years, p = 0.011). Conclusions: Accurate counting of BAL lymphocytes and neutrophils by flow cytometry in ILD patients at diagnosis could help guide immunomodulatory and antifibrotic therapies.