Segment Coordination Variability Differs by Years of Running Experience

Running is a popular activity that results in high rates of overuse injury, with less-experienced runners becoming injured at higher rates than their more-experienced peers. Although measures of joint kinematics and kinetics and ground reaction forces have been associated with overuse running injuries, similar differences across levels of running experience have not been found. Because running is a motor skill that may develop with experience, an analysis of segment coordination and its variability could provide additional insight into why injury incidence decreases with increasing experience.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if less-experienced runners have different segment coordination and lower segment coordination variability compared with their more-experienced peers.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included 20 more-experienced (≥10 yr running) and 21 less-experienced (≤2 yr running) runners. Sagittal thigh versus shank and shank versus foot segment coordination and coordination variability were calculated using a modified vector coding approach as individuals ran on a treadmill at preferred pace. Coordination and its variability were compared between groups during terminal swing and early, mid, and late stance for both segment couples.

RESULTS

Segment coordination was similar between less- and more-experienced runners. Less-experienced runners had lower segment coordination variability compared with more-experienced runners for both the thigh versus shank and shank versus foot couples. This lower variability occurred during early and mid stance.

CONCLUSIONS

Runners appeared to attain stable segment coordination patterns within 2 yr of consistent running, but had lower coordination variability compared with individuals who had been running for 10 or more years. These results suggest that assessment of movement patterns and their flexibility may help inform injury prevention or treatment strategies for less-experienced runners.

Years of running experience influences stride-to-stride fluctuations and adaptive response during step frequency perturbations in healthy distance runners

RESEARCH QUESTION

The current study investigated stride-to-stride fluctuations of step rate and contact time in response to enforced step frequency perturbations as well as adaptation and de-adaptation behavior.

METHODS

Forty distance runners ran at a self-selected speed and were asked to match five different enforced step frequencies (150, 160, 170, 180, and 190 beats per min). The influence of experience was explored, because running is a skill that presumably gets better with practice, and increased years of running experience is protective against injury. Detrended fluctuation analysis was used to determine the strength of long-range correlations in gait fluctuations at baseline, during the perturbation, and post-perturbation. Adaptive response was measured by the ability to match, rate of matching, and aftereffect of step frequency perturbations.

RESULTS

The structure of stride-to-stride fluctuations for step rate and contact time did not change during the perturbation or post-perturbation compared to baseline. However, fluctuations in step rate were affected by the level of perturbation. Runners with the most experience had a less persistent structural gait pattern for both step rate and contact time at baseline. Highly experienced runners also demonstrated the best adaptive response. They better matched the enforced step frequency, reached the enforced step frequency sooner, and returned to preferred step frequency more quickly following removal of the perturbation.

SIGNIFICANCE

These findings indicate baseline locomotor flexibility may be beneficial to achieve task demands and return to a stable state once the task is complete. Increased locomotor flexibility may also be a contributing factor for reduced injury risk in experienced runners.

Risk Factors for Baseball-Related Arm Injuries: A Systematic Review

Background:

Contributing factors for arm injuries among baseball players have been described. However, no review has systematically identified risk factors with findings from prospective cohort studies.

Purpose:

To systematically review prospective cohort studies that investigated risk factors for arm injury among baseball players.

Study Design:

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

Electronic databases were searched for relevant English-language studies. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 blinded reviewers to identify only prospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. Two independent investigators screened each article for appropriate criteria.

Results:

Fourteen prospective articles were selected for this review. Youth, high school, and professional baseball players (N = 2426) were pooled, and 43 risk factors were assessed in relation to general arm, shoulder, and elbow injuries. All studies evaluated players for at least 1 season. Deficits in preseason shoulder range of motion and strength were significant risk factors for general arm or shoulder injury among high school and professional players. Elbow and shoulder varus torque at peak external shoulder rotation during pitching, high pitch velocity, and shoulder rotational and flexion deficits were risk factors for elbow injuries among professional pitchers. Pitching >100 innings in 1 year, being aged 9 to 11 years, being a pitcher or catcher, training >16 hours per week, and having a history of elbow pain were significant risk factors for elbow injury among youth players.

Conclusion:

History of elbow pain and age had a high risk of associated elbow injury among youth players. Training or pitching load also increased elbow injury risk for youth athletes. Loss of shoulder range of motion appears to increase risk for elbow injury among professional athletes. Single time-point data collections per season, studies with the same sample population, and studies with self-reported injury and risk factor data may limit the interpretation of these findings. Health care professionals should use caution when assessing injury risk during evaluation and making decisions about the training workload and playing time of baseball players.

Experience does not influence injury-related joint kinematics and kinetics in distance runners

PURPOSE

Increased running experience and more time spent running appears to be advantageous in reducing injury risk, although the reason behind this is unclear. It is plausible that more experience results in better running mechanics leading to less injuries. Running mechanics are often screened during clinical assessments and targeted for correction in gait retraining, particularly those thought to be global indicators of injury or those associated with elevated knee joint loading. Examining the biomechanics of runners who are less-injury prone can improve our understanding of the significance of faulty running mechanics in relation to injury. Our goal was to examine if running experience was correlated to differences in kinematics and kinetics associated with increased knee joint loading and running-related injury risk.

METHODS

One hundred runners with varying experience ran on a pressure-sensing treadmill at a self-selected speed. Trunk and lower extremity kinematics, spatiotemporal measures, and ground reaction forces were collected. Multiple linear regression was used to assess the association between experience and three-dimensional hip kinematics, sagittal plane lower-extremity mechanics, and ground reaction forces while controlling for age and speed.

RESULTS

Increased running experience was not significantly associated with running mechanics. Increased age was significantly associated with reduced peak knee flexion and increased contact time. Running speed influenced several spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables.

CONCLUSION

Increased years of running experience does not appear to significantly influence running mechanics. However, age and running speed do influence biomechanical variables associated with injury in distance runners. Thus, there may be factors, other than running mechanics, that contribute to less risk in more experienced runners.