Effects of intrapleural analgesia on pulmonary function and postoperative pain in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery

OBJECTIVE

Pain after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery remains a significant problem and may cause serious complications because of restricted breathing and limited early mobilization. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intrapleural analgesia on the relief of postoperative pain in patients undergoing CABG surgery.

DESIGN

Postoperative pain, pulmonary function tests, and outcomes were compared with a placebo group after CABG surgery in a double-blind randomized clinical trial.

SETTINGS

Cardiovascular surgery clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred twenty-five patients with decreased lung function were studied.

INTERVENTIONS

Group A (62 patients) received 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine bilaterally in the intrapleural spaces every 6 hours for 4 days, and group B (63 placebo patients) received sterile saline solution.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Group A had a significantly shorter extubation time than the placebo group (8 +/- 1 h v 10 +/- 4 hours, p < 0.001). Blood gas analysis showed higher PaO2 and lower PaCO2 levels in group A. The patients receiving bupivicaine had significantly higher FEV1, FCV, VC, MVV, PEF, and FEF 25-75% values postoperatively when compared with the placebo group. Postoperative analgesic requirements and visual analog pain scales were significantly lower in group A. The intensive care unit stay in group A was shorter (1.2 +/- 0.7 v 1.4 +/- 0.6 days, p = 0.04); however, the hospital stay did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in lung function parameters correlating with decreased postoperative pain with intrapleural bupivacaine was observed. Intrapleural analgesia provided a good level of analgesia, improved respiratory performance, and allowed rapid mobilization, which led to a reduction of postoperative respiratory complications.

Being an elderly woman: is it a risk factor for morbidity after coronary artery bypass surgery?

OBJECTIVE

Despite the refinements in surgical techniques and postoperative care, elderly women still have a higher prevalence of postoperative morbidity.

METHODS

The outcomes of 112 elderly women (>80 years) who underwent an elective CABG procedure were compared with those of males operated during the same time interval (n, 164).

RESULTS

Median age of female and male patients were 82 and 83 years, respectively. Mean number of grafts did not differ significantly (3.7+/-0.8 vs 3.9+/-0.3, p=0.4) between groups. Overall early operative mortality rate was 8.6% (24 of 276 patients); 8.9% (10 of 112 patients) for female and 8.5% (14 of 164 patients) for male patients (p=0.1). Postoperative complications including prolonged ventilation time (13.4% in females vs 8.5% in male, p<0.01), atrial fibrillation (40% in females vs 33% in males, p=0.01), sternal reclosure (8% in females vs 4.2% in males, p=0.01), pneumonia (5.3% in females vs 3% in males, p=0.03), leg wound infection (11.7% in females vs 2.4% in males, p<0.001), renal dysfunction (10.7% in females vs 7.3% in young patients, p=0.02) have been found to be significantly higher in elderly women. Mean intensive care unit (3.2+/-1.1 days in females vs 1.6+/-0.4 in males, p=0.03), and hospital stays (13.6+/-2.1 days in females vs 9.1+/-1.2 in males, p=0.02) were also longer in female patients. Five-year survivals including all deaths for female and male patients were 57% and 62%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In elderly women, revascularization procedures can be done with acceptable mortality rates; but these patients are still associated with a higher prevalence of postoperative morbidity when compared with the male counterparts. Therefore, these patients have to be very carefully evaluated preoperatively and their postoperative care should be more comprehensive to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

A practical and effective approach for the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury after acute myocardial infarction: pressure-regulated tepid blood reperfusion

BACKGROUND

The prevention of perioperative ischemia-reperfusion injury is of critical importance, and this issue becomes more important in patients undergoing an early emergent revascularization procedure after an acute myocardial infarction. In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that our simplified pressure-controlled initial reperfusion technique would be protective against ischemia-reperfusion injury in this subgroup of patients.

METHODS

The data of 20 patients (group I) who underwent an emergent coronary artery bypass grafting procedure were analyzed and compared with the results of 37 patients (group II) underwent an innovative reperfusion technique. In group I patients, the operation was carried out using standard techniques. In group II, after the completion of all anastomoses, reperfusion was initiated before rewarming with a pressure of 20 to 25 mmHg and continued for a 2-minute period. Systemic blood pressure was then gradually increased to 40 mmHg and the aortic root was perfused at this pressure for another 2-minute period. Following the completion of the second low-pressure reperfusion period, cardiopulmonary bypass flow was regulated to preoperatively calculated values until systemic temperature reached 37 degrees C.

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant differences in terms of cardiac output, arrhythmia rates, and biochemical parameters. Spontaneous sinus rhythm recurred more frequently in group II (P < .01, 86% versus 45%). Atrial fibrillation attacks were observed in 5 and 3 patients in groups I and II, respectively. All patients were medically converted to sinus rhythm with amiadarone and/or beta-blockers. Persistent electrocardiographic changes indicating postoperative myocardial infarction occurred in 5 patients in group I and in 1 patient in group II (P = .003). Postoperative enzyme levels were found to be lower in group II patients and the differences became statistically significant at the end of 24 hours.

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that our controlled initial reperfusion technique is effective in the prevention of ischemia-reperfusion injury. We advocate the use of this innovative technique as an alternative to complex controlled aortic root reperfusion with the guidance of the early promising results of this study.