Fertility and gonadal function in female survivors after treatment of early unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD14 trial

BACKGROUND

In the HD14 trial, 2×BEACOPPescalated+2×ABVD (2+2) has improved the primary outcome. Compared with 4×ABVD, this benefit might be compromised by more infertility in women. Therefore, we analyzed gonadal function and fertility.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women≤45 years in ongoing remission at least 1 year after therapy were included. Hormone parameters, menopausal symptoms, measures to preserve fertility, menstrual cycle, pregnancies, and offspring were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three hundred and thirty one of 579 women addressed participated (57.2%) and 263 per-protocol treated patients qualified (A=ABVD: 137, B=2+2: 126, mean time after therapy 42 and 43 months, respectively). Regular menstrual cycle after treatment (A: 87%, B: 83%) and time to recovery (≤12 months) were not different. Follicle-stimulating hormone and anti-Muellerian hormone were significantly better in arm A. However, pregnancies after therapy favored arm B (A: 15%, B: 26%, P=0.043) and motherhood rates were equivalent to the German normal population. Multivariate analysis revealed prophylactic use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues as highly significant prognostic factor for preservation of fertility (odds ratio=12.87, P=0.001). Severe menopausal symptoms were frequent in women≥30 years (A: 21%, B: 25%).

CONCLUSIONS

Hormonal levels after 2+2 indicate a reduced ovarian reserve. However, 2+2 in combination with GnRH analogues does not compromise fertility within the evaluated observation time.

Sexual quality of life in Hodgkin Lymphoma: a longitudinal analysis by the German Hodgkin Study Group

Background:

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) comprises different domains of physical, mental, and social well-being. In this analysis, we focus on sexual quality of life in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients.

Methods:

Four-thousand one-hundred and sixty patients enroled in the HD10–HD12 trials underwent HRQoL assessment. Instruments included the Quality of Life Questionnaire for survivors (QLQ-S), combining the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30, Multidimensional fatigue (FA) inventory (MFI-20) and an additional sexual functioning (SX) scale. We describe SX up to 27 months after therapy and analyse relationship to stage, age, gender, FA, social functioning, and therapy. Statistical methods range from descriptive statistics to a classification of SX courses, and a longitudinal structural equations model with full information maximum likelihood estimation of missing data. In the analysis, a score below 50 was used to describe severe sexual dysfunction.

Results:

Three-thousand two-hundred and eight patients provided data on SX. Patients in advanced stages reported lower SX than patients in early stages both, before and after the treatment. During follow-up, an improvement of SX compared with baseline was detected, except for those ⩾50 years. Patients in early stages reached normal SX, whereas advanced-stage patients remained below the reference value for healthy controls. Sexual functioning during follow-up was significantly and strongly related to previous SX, other HRQoL measures, age, and stage, and to lesser degree with gender and chemotherapy.

Conclusion:

Overall, HL patients have a decreased sexual quality of life at baseline, which improves after therapy and normalises in early-stage patients. Importantly, long-term SX is more closely related to patient characteristics and SX at baseline than to the intensity of treatment.

[Proposal for participation in intensive care and emergency medicine studies for patients unable to give informed consent (Cologne Model)]

When conducting clinical trials in intensive care and emergency medicine, physicians, ethics committees, and legal experts have differing views regarding the inclusion of patients who are incapable of giving consent. These different views on the participation of patients who are not capable of giving consent also complicate how clinical trials are prepared and conducted. Based on the results of a literature search, a consensus model (Cologne Model) was developed by physicians performing clinical research, ethics committees, and lawyers in order to provide patients, those scientifically responsible for the study, ethics committees, and probate (guardianship) judges with a maximum of patient safety and legal certainty, while simultaneously enabling scientific research.

Correlation between progression-free and overall survival in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma: a comprehensive analysis of individual patient data from randomized German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) trials

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after first-line treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and to assess the potential of PFS as a surrogate parameter for OS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed individual patient data collected during and after treatment with polychemotherapy in nine randomized phase III trials [German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD7-HD15] between January 1993 and August 2018. The effects of 16 experimental treatments on PFS and OS at the trial level were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards (PH) regression and linear weighted least squares regression. At the patient level, marginal Cox PH models for multiple endpoints were applied using the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld method.

RESULTS

At least one PFS and OS event was recorded in 1682 and 1064 of 10 605 patients, respectively. At the trial level, there was a strong correlation between treatment effects on PFS and OS (weighted Pearson r = 0.72, R2 = 0.54, P < 0.001). At the patient level, a moderate to strong correlation between treatment effects on PFS and OS was observed, with Pearson r values ranging between 0.61 and 0.85 (each P < 0.001) and an overall r = 0.74. A regression model that accounted for different types of experimental treatments and historical progress across trial generations achieved a very strong correlation (R2 = 0.93). When applied to data from the contemporary first-line ECHELON-1 trial, this model successfully predicted OS from PFS {prognosticated ln[HR(OS)] = -0.68 as compared with observed ln[HR(0.59)] = -0.53}.

CONCLUSION

In first-line trials of HL, PFS and OS, as well as treatment effects and prognostic effects on these endpoints, are strongly correlated. PFS serves as a strong predictor of treatment effects on OS, providing valuable insights many years before OS can be reliably assessed.