[Implantable cardioverter defibrillator]

This article aims to give an overview over important articles in the field of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy in 2012. Important publications concern analyses on therapy efficacy and safety of the subcutaneous ICD, gender-specific differences in the complication rate and prognosis after ICD implantation, the necessity of intraoperative testing of the defibrillation threshold and the impact of preventive measures to reduce ICD therapies on prognosis after device implantation. The relevance of the study findings for daily clinical practice is briefly discussed.

[Recommendations of the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the German Society of Cardiology on the approach to patients with Riata® and Riata ST® leads (St. Jude Medical). Nucleus of the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the German Society of Cardiology]

Riata® and Riata ST® implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) leads (St. Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) show an increased incidence of insulation defects, particularly "inside-out" lead fracture where inner, separately insulated cables penetrate through the surrounding silicone of the lead body. The exact incidence of Riata® lead problems is not clear and seems to range between 2-4% per year in the first 5 years after implantation according to new registry data. We recommend beyond a detailed information the following care of patients with Riata® and Riata ST® leads: 1) Activation of automatic ICD alerts, 2) remote monitoring with automatic daily alerts whenever possible, 3) monthly ICD controls in patients at high risk (pacemaker dependency, history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias) and high or moderate lead-related risk (8F, 7F single coil), 3-monthly controls in moderate patient and lead-related risk, 3 to 6-monthly controls in low patient and lead-related risk (no bradycardia, no history of ventricular tachyarrhythmia). Every ICD control should include meticulous analysis of oversensing artifacts in stored electrograms (EGMs) of sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias and registration of EGMs during provocation testing (pectoral muscle activity, arm movements). If electrical abnormalities are observed, reoperation with addition of a new ICD lead is recommended; lead extraction only if indicated according to current guidelines. Fluoroscopy should only be performed if electrical abnormalities are found by an experienced electrophysiologist and a high frame rate and resolution. Management of fluoroscopic abnormalities in the absence of electrical abnormalities is not clear. Therefore, routine fluoroscopy of patients with Riata® leads without electrical abnormalities is not recommended.

Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy systems in the CARE-HF trial: procedural success rate and safety

AIMS

To assess procedural characteristics and adjudicated procedure-related (<or=30 days) major adverse events among patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in the CARE-HF study. The CARE-HF study shows that CRT improves symptoms and reduces morbidity and mortality in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, safe and proper implantation of pacing systems remains key to effective CRT delivery.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Generalized linear modeling was used to examine the relationships between first implant success/failure and: NYHA class; beta-adrenergic blocker use; underlying ischemic vs. non-ischemic heart disease; history of coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery; left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume<or=vs. >300 cm(3); and, influence of the participating study-centres. Implantation was attempted in 404/409 patients assigned to CRT, and in 65/404 patients assigned to medical therapy. Among these 469 patients, 450 (95.9%) received a successfully implanted and activated device. Complications occurred within 24 h in 47 patients (10.0%), mainly lead dislodgments (n = 10, 2.1%) and coronary sinus dissection/perforation (n = 10, 2.1%), and between 24 h and 30 days in 26 patients (5.5%), mainly lead dislodgment (n = 13, 2.8%). Mean LV lead stimulation threshold was significantly higher than at the right atrium or right ventricle, though remained stable, delivering effective, and reliable CRT. Implanting experience was the only predictor of procedural outcome.

CONCLUSION

Transvenous CRT system implantation, using a CS lead designed for long-term LV pacing, was safe and reliable. As implanting centres become more experienced, this success rate is expected to increase further.

The RIONI study rationale and design: validation of the first stored electrograms transmitted via home monitoring in patients with implantable defibrillators

Appropriate and inappropriate therapies of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) have a major impact on morbidity and quality of life in ICD recipients. The recently introduced home monitoring of ICD devices is a promising new technique which remotely offers information about the status of the system. Stored intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs), which are essential for correct classification of appropriate and inappropriate ICD discharges, have until now not been available with ICD home monitoring on a day-by-day basis because of limitations of transferable data. We demonstrate the first compressed IEGMs daily transferable via home monitoring (IEGM-online). Validation of these electrograms will be performed in the Reliability of IEGM-Online Interpretation (RIONI) study. A total of 210 episodes of stored IEGMs will be collected by at least 12 European centres. The primary endpoint of this study is to investigate whether the IEGM-online based evaluation of the appropriateness of the ICDs therapeutic decision following episode detection is equivalent to the evaluation based on the complete ICD episode Holter extracted from the IEGM stored. The evaluation is independently done by an expert board of three experienced ICD investigators. The equivalence of the two methods is accepted if the evaluations yield a different conclusion for <10% of all evaluated IEGMs. The conclusion of the study is expected at the beginning of 2007. If RIONI successfully validates IEGMs transmitted via home monitoring, a strong basis for the use of this promising technique will be established.

Transvenous ICD implantation after artificial tricuspid valve replacement

Implantation of a transvenous device in patients with a tricuspid valve replacement or a complex congenital heart disease with no access to the right ventricle represents problems. The lack of access to the right ventricle might preclude transvenous placement of a defibrillation lead at ICD implantation. A young patient (21 years) with a history of severe chest trauma with rupture of the tricuspid valve as well as the right coronary artery and consecutive inferior myocardial infarction was initially treated with tricuspid valve replacement (St Jude Medical artificial prosthesis, 33 mm) and a bypass graft to the right coronary artery. Four years later, the patient was admitted with a hemodynamically not tolerated ventricular tachycardia (VT: CL 250 ms, LBBB, left axis). The VT could be reproduced during electrophysiological testing. An ICD was implanted subpectorally in combination with a transvenous active fixation ICD lead. The transvenous ICD lead was placed via a guiding catheter into a coronary sinus branch (middle cardiac vein). Acceptable pacing and sensing values could be obtained. The defibrillation threshold was 25 J. In conclusion transvenous ICD lead implantation into a side branch of the coronary sinus in combination with a pectorally implanted "active can" ICD device seems to be an alternative approach. This approach may avoid implantation of additional subcutaneous defibrillation leads or even thoracotomy for ICD implantation.

[Cardiac resynchronization therapy and arrhythmias]

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is now considered an established therapy for patients with chronic heart failure in the presence of a wide QRS complex. Though proarrhythmic effects have been described in a few cases, CRT did not increase the frequency of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in prospective studies. In patients on CRT therapy, persistent atrial fibrillation sometimes converts back to sinus rhythm, possibly dependent on the duration of atrial fibrillation.

Rationale and design of a randomised controlled clinical trial on supplemental intake of n-3 fatty acids and incidence of cardiac arrhythmia: SOFA

BACKGROUND

Evidence from earlier studies indicates that intake of very long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA, also named omega-3 fatty acids) as present in fish oil reduces the risk of sudden death. Sudden death forms a major part of mortality from cardiovascular disease and is in most cases a direct consequence of cardiac arrhythmia. n-3 PUFA may exert their protective effect through reducing the susceptibility for cardiac arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of n-3 PUFA on the incidence of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia. This paper presents the rationale, design and methods of the Study on Omega-3 Fatty acids and ventricular Arrhythmia (SOFA) and discusses problems encountered in conducting a multicentre clinical trial on food.

DESIGN

A randomised, parallel, placebo-controlled, double blind intervention study, which obeys the guidelines for Good Clinical Practice.

SETTING

Multiple cardiology centres in Europe.

SUBJECTS

A total of 500 patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). An ICD detects, treats and stores cardiac arrhythmic events in its memory chip.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients receive either 2 g/day of fish oil, containing approximately 450 mg eicosapentaenoic acid and 350 mg docosahexaenoic acid, or placebo for 12 months.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias as recorded by the ICD or all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

SOFA is designed to answer the question whether intake of n-3 PUFA from fish-a regular food ingredient-can reduce the incidence of life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia. If this proves to be true, increasing the intake of n-3 PUFA could be an easy, effective and safe measure to prevent fatal arrhythmia in the general population.

QRS duration: a simple marker for predicting cardiac mortality in ICD patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

Patients resuscitated from ventricular tachyarrhythmias benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) as opposed to medical treatment. Patients with increased QRS duration receiving an ICD in the presence of heart failure are at greatest risk of cardiac death and benefit most from ICD therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an increased QRS duration predicts cardiac mortality in ICD recipients.

DESIGN

Consecutive patients with heart failure in New York Heart Association functional class III were grouped according to QRS duration (< 150 ms, n = 139, group 1; v > or = 150 ms, n = 26, group 2) and followed up for (mean (SD)) 23 (20) months.

PATIENTS

165 patients were studied (80% men, 20% women); 73% had coronary artery disease and 18% had dilated cardiomyopathy. Their mean age was 62 (10) years and mean ejection fraction (EF) was 33 (14)%. They presented either with ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall and cardiac mortality; recurrence rates of VT, fast VT, or VF.

RESULTS

Mean left ventricular EF did not differ between group 1 (33 (13)%) and group 2 (31 (15)%). Forty patients died (34 cardiac deaths). There was no difference in survival between patients with EF > 35% and < or = 35%. Cardiac mortality was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (31.3% at 12 months and 46.6% at 24 months, v 9.5% at 12 months and 18.2% at 24 months, respectively; p = 0.04). The recurrence rate of VT was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Within subgroups at highest risk of cardiac death, QRS duration-a simple non-invasive index-predicts outcome in ICD recipients in the presence of heart failure.

[Evaluating the first German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) in cardiological patients: problems in the correct medical and economic grouping]

About three years ago, the German Government initiated a complete change in the reimbursement system for costs of the in-hospital treatment of patients. A commission of representatives from every component of the German health system decided to adapt the Australian refined Diagnosis Related Groups (AR-DRG system). The AR-DRG system was selected as it would fit best to the German system and because of its high flexibility and preciseness reflecting severity of diseases and treatments. In October 2002, the first German Diagnosis Related Groups (G-DRGs) were calculated from the data of about 116 hospitals. These data now allow first analyses in how far a correct and precise grouping of patients in specific hospital settings is indeed performed and corresponds to the actual costs. Thus, we thoroughly calculated all costs for material and personnel during the in-hospital stay for each patient discharged during the first 4 months of 2002 from our cardiological department. After performing the grouping procedure for each patient, we analyzed in how far inhomogeneous patient distribution in the DRGs occurred and which impact this had on costs and potential reimbursements. Several different problems were identified which should be outlined in this work regarding three G-DRGs: costs of patients who received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (F01Z) were markedly influenced by multimorbidity and additional expensive interventions which were not reflected by this G-DRG. Use of numerous catheters and expensive drugs represented a major factor for costs in patients with coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction (F10Z) but seemed to be not sufficiently included in the cost weight. A specific area of patient management in our department is high frequency ablation of tachyarrhythmias which is included in other percutaneous interventions (F19Z). Complex procedures such as ablation of ventricular tachycardia or new innovative procedures as ablation of atrial fibrillation were associated with high costs leading to inadequate reimbursement. Furthermore, problems in the associated codes for diseases and procedures became apparent. Opportunities for future optimization such as specific new DRGs, splitting of DRGs, or the impact of changes in reimbursement for high-outliers were discussed.

Non-invasive estimation of cardiac output in critical care patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was carried out to compare cardiac output measurements determined by thermodilution and by Portapres, a non-invasive system.

DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING

Eighty-seven non-invasive blood pressure measurements were performed in 46 patients in our critical care unit utilising the new, non-invasive Portapres system. Cardiac output values were obtained from these blood pressure values using an aortic impedance model and compared to cardiac output values estimated by the thermodilution technique.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Statistically significant (p < 0.01) differences (2.3 l/min; limits of agreement +/-5 l/min) were noted between invasive and non-invasive cardiac output measurements. Differences in measured cardiac outputs increased for patients receiving catecholamine therapy, in patients with hemodynamic instability (e.g., sepsis and cardiac insufficiency), in patients with artificial ventilation, in patients with long duration of intensive care, in younger (<60 yr) patients and in women. We found no influence of the body mass index (BMI) on the accuracy of Portapres results. In only one single subgroup, 10 patients with pulmonary diseases, Portapres measurements were not statistically significant different from reference results.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, Portapres measurements cannot replace thermodilution cardiac output estimations. Fluctuations of finger arterial perfusion due to hemodynamic instability, hypothermia and catecholamines may be responsible for problems of Portapres use in critically ill patients.

Prediction of clinical outcome after cardiac surgery: the role of cytokines, endotoxin, and anti-endotoxin core antibodies

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) can lead to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with organ failure and increased morbidity and mortality. The mechanisms of these findings are still under discussion. We investigated whether anti-endotoxin core antibodies, endotoxin, and proinflammatory cytokines influence the clinical course after cardiac surgery. Seventy-eight patients undergoing CABG using CPB were investigated. Anti-endotoxin core antibodies, endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha were measured 24 h preoperatively and up to 72 h postoperatively. Patients with a postoperative mechanical ventilation time below 24 h (n = 65; Group A) were compared to patients with prolonged respirator therapy (>24 h; n = 13; Group B). Preoperative antibody levels were significantly lower in Group B (P < 0.001). In this group, antibody levels remained decreased during the observation period (P < 0.001). Endotoxin significantly increased 30' postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.002). The increase in Group B was 3-fold higher (P< 0.001). IL-8 increased postoperatively in both groups, peaking 3 h after surgery (P < 0.001). In Group B, the IL-8 release was significantly higher than in Group A (P < 0.001). IL-6 significantly increased in both groups, reaching its maximum 24 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). No differences between groups were observed. No significant changes of IL-1beta and TNF-alpha were observed. We conclude that anti-endotoxin core antibodies may be predictive of adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. The imbalance between antibodies and endotoxin results in an exaggerated increase in endotoxin and IL-8 with an impact on clinical outcome.

Morphology discrimination: a beat-to-beat algorithm for the discrimination of ventricular from supraventricular tachycardia by implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Inappropriate therapy of SVTs by ICDs remains a major clinical problem despite enhanced detection criteria like "sudden onset" and "rate stability" in third-generation devices. Electrogram morphology discrimination offers an additional approach to improve discrimination of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from ventricular tachycardia (VT). In a prospective, multicenter study, patients received an ICD with a beat-to-beat algorithm for morphological analysis of the intracardiac electrogram (Morphology Discrimination, MD). A nominal programmingfor standard enhancement criteria and morphology discrimination was required at implant. Electrogram storage of tachycardia episodes irrespective of delivery of therapy was used to assess sensitivity and specificity of the morphology algorithm alone and in combination with established detection criteria. During a 126 6-month follow-up, 886 episodes of device stored electrograms from 82 of 256patients were evaluated. Atnominal settings, the MD algorithm correctly identified 423 of 551 episodes as VT resulting in sensitivity of 77%. The classification of SVT was met in 239 of 335 episodes resulting in specificity of 71%. In combination with sudden onset, sensitivityincreased to 99.5% at the expense of specificity (48%). In conclusion, SVT-VT discrimination based on morphological analysis alone results in limited sensitivity and specificity. Programming the monitor mode allows individual assessment of the performance of this detection enhancement feature during clinical follow-up without compromising device safety. Only in patients with documented efficacy of morphology discrimination should this feature be subsequently activated.

The impact of anti-endotoxin core antibodies on endotoxin and cytokine release and ventilation time after cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that a temporary cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced reduction of endotoxin antibody levels contributes to elevated endotoxin levels and the associated inflammatory consequences, with a significant influence on the postoperative ventilation time period.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac surgery using CPB induces a systemic inflammatory response syndrome with an associated risk of increased postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

A total of 100 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery using CPB were prospectively investigated. Endotoxin core antibodies (immunoglobulin [Ig] M/IgG against lipid A and lipopolysaccharide), endotoxin, interleukin (IL)-1-beta, IL-6, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were measured serially from 24 h preoperatively until 72 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Eighty-five patients had no complications (group 1), whereas 15 patients required prolonged ventilation (group 2). In both groups, there was a decrease of all antibodies 5 min after CPB onset, compared with baseline values (p < 0.001), an increase of endotoxin and IL-8 peaking at 30 min postoperatively (p < 0.001) and an increase of IL-6 peaking 3 h postoperatively (p < 0.001). In group 2, preoperative antibody levels were lower (p < 0.01)--specifically, the decrease in IgM was significantly stronger and of longer duration (p < 0.002)--and levels of endotoxin (p < 0.001) and IL-8 (p < 0.001) were higher at 30 min postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that an CPB-associated temporary reduction of anti-endotoxin core antibody levels contributes to elevated endotoxin and IL-8 release. Furthermore, lower levels of IgM anti-endotoxin core antibodies were associated with a greater rise in endotoxin and IL-8, as well as prolonged respirator dependence.

[Syncope of unknown origin in heart failure: which diagnostic possibilities should be considered today?]

In patients with congestive heart failure, unexplained syncope is often due to ventricular arrhythmias and associated with a poor prognosis. Electrophysiological studies should be considered early in the work-up of syncope. Implantation of a defibrillator might become necessary in many patients with syncope and heart failure.

Implantation of a dual chamber pacing and sensing single pass defibrillation lead

Dual-chamber ICDs are increasingly used to avoid inappropriate shocks due to supraventricular tachycardias. Additionally, many ICD patients will probably benefit from dual chamber pacing. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the intraoperative performance and short-term follow-up of an innovative single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead capable of bipolar sensing and pacing in the right atrium and ventricle. Implantation of this single pass right ventricular defibrillation lead was successful in all 13 patients (age 63 +/- 8 years; LVEF 0.44 +/- 0.16; New York Heart Association [NYHA] 2.4 +/- 0.4, previous open heart surgery in all patients). The operation time was 79 +/- 29 minutes, the fluoroscopy time 4.7 +/- 3.1 minutes. No perioperative complications occurred. The intraoperative atrial sensing was 1.7 +/- 0.5 mV, the atrial pacing threshold product was 0.20 +/- 0.14 V/ms (range 0.03-0.50 V/ms). The defibrillation threshold was 8.8 +/- 2.7 J. At prehospital discharge and at 1-month and 3-month follow-up, atrial sensing was 1.9 +/- 0.9, 2.1 +/- 0.5, and 2.7 +/- 0.6 mV, respectively, (P = NS, P < 0.05, P < 0.05 to implant, respectively), the mean atrial threshold product 0.79, 1.65, and 1.29 V/ms, respectively. In two patients, an intermittent exit block occurred in different body postures. All spontaneous and induced ventricular arrhythmias were detected and terminated appropriately. Thus, in a highly selected patient group, atrial and ventricular sensing and pacing with a single lead is possible under consideration of an atrial pacing dysfunction in 17% of patients.

Nonthoracotomy implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement in children: use of subcutaneous array leads and abdominally placed implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children

INTRODUCTION

The need to access the right ventricle might preclude transvenous placement of a defibrillation lead at implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement, especially in small children or children with complex congenital heart defects. We investigated a subcutaneous array lead in addition to an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device in two children to avoid a thoracotomy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The first child (age 12 years, 138 cm, 41 kg) had transposition of the great arteries with a subsequent surgical intra-atrial correction by the Mustard technique. The second child (age 14 years, 161 cm, 54 kg) had a single atrium and a single ventricle, d-transposition of the aorta, and atresia of the main pulmonary artery with a surgical anastomosis between the aorta and the right pulmonary artery by the Cooley technique. The defibrillation threshold was 18 J and <20 J at initial implantation and at generator replacement in the first patient and 20 J in the second patient. During follow-up of 6 years and 1 month, respectively, no ICD-related complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

In children in whom endocardial, right ventricular placement of a defibrillation lead is precluded, defibrillation is possible and safe between an abdominally placed "active can" ICD device and a subcutaneous array lead. This approach may avoid a thoracotomy in children with no possibility for transvenous ICD placement.

Antitachycardia pacing for rapid VT during ICD charging: a method to prevent ICD shocks

In patients with ICDs, rapid VTs are usually treated with shocks. It is unknown, if antitachycardia pacing (ATP) delivered once for rapid VT during capacitor charging can avoid painful shocks without increasing the risk of syncope. In patients in whom rapid monomorphic VT (cycle length 300-220 ms) could be reproducibly induced during predischarge ICD testing, the success of cardioversion (defibrillation threshold plus 10 J) and a single ATP attempt (burst with 8 or 16 stimuli) was compared using a randomized crossover study design. Consciousness of the patients was checked by the signal from a button constantly pushed by the patient. In 20 patients (ejection fraction 0.50 +/- 0.19) rapid VTs (253 +/- 26 ms) were reproducibly induced. A single burst successfully terminated 11 (55%) of 20 rapid VTs, 6 episodes could not be terminated with a single burst pacing and 3 VTs accelerated. Rapid VTs not terminated by ATP were significantly faster than those that could be terminated (246 vs 258 ms, P = 0.026). Cardioversion (19 +/- 3 J) terminated the VTs in all cases. No patient suffered syncope during rapid VTs. A single ATP may terminate rapid VT with cycle lengths < 300 ms in 55% of patients without increasing the risk of syncope. Therefore, in rapid VTs one attempt of ATP may be suitable as an additional therapy option during ICD capacitor charging to avoid painful shocks without compromise of safety. Thus, future ICDs should implement the option of ATP during charging of capacitors.

Pacing Therapies in Congestive Heart Failure II study

Ventricular resynchronization therapy (VRT) by left or biventricular stimulation is gaining increasing acceptance as a new therapy in addition to drugs in patients with advanced heart failure and intraventricular conduction disturbances. Several studies have demonstrated acute hemodynamic benefit of VRT in these patients, although there are only limited long-term data in small patient cohorts. Many open questions remain: whether to pace both ventricles or the left ventricle alone, the optimal left ventricular pacing site, the criteria used to identify the optimal candidate for VRT (e.g., QRS width), and the importance of an integrated defibrillator function in a VRT device. The Pacing Therapy in Congestive Heart Failure (PATH-CHF) II study is a prospective, randomized, cross-over study currently investigating the potential benefit of VRT in a population with advanced heart failure, with or without an accepted indication for an implantable defibrillator. It focuses on the effects of optimized univentricular pacing in these patients, and both acute hemodynamic and chronic functional effects are assessed. Acute hemodynamic testing mainly investigates the impact of different left ventricular pacing sites, alone or combined with right ventricular sites, on hemodynamic performance. Primary endpoint of the study is an improvement in functional capacity as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing and 6-minute walk distance; secondary endpoints include improvement in quality of life (assessed by Minnesota quality of life score, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and hospitalization frequency), and improvements in prognostic and hemodynamic parameters. The trial aims to enroll 64 patients with full datum sets (separately in 2 groups with a QRS of < or = 150 or > 150 msec, respectively) in 9 European centers. The enrollment began September 1998, and is expected to conclude in summer 2000 to reach the number of necessary datum sets.

[A new ICD morphology criterion for differentiating supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia]

The high incidence of inappropriate therapies due to supraventricular tachycardia remains a major unsolved problem of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator. A new morphology discrimination (MD) algorithm has been introduced to improve specificity of ICD therapy without loss of sensitivity. It was the aim of this study to systematically analyze sensitivity and specificity of the MD criterion in combination with the enhanced detection criteria sudden onset and rate stability in the detection of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia. After ICD implantation in 259 patients, 787 detected episodes in 74 patients with available stored electrograms were documented during a follow-up period of 359 +/- 214 days. With a nominal programming of the MD algorithm at > or = 60%, sensitivity and specificity for all episodes were 82.6%/77.2%. For sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter the specificities were 80.6%, 69.6% and 75%, respectively. In patients with primarily appropriate MD detection, sensitivity and specificity significantly improved to 95.8%/91.7%. Programming the sudden onset criterion with < 100 ms and the stability criterion with < 50 ms, sensitivity and stability of the combined application of the MD algorithm and sudden onset and MD algorithm and stability were 96.2%/52.2% and 94.4%/63.8%, respectively. The MD criterion in combination with other enhanced detection criteria might significantly improve specificity of tachyarrythmia detection of ICD therapy.

Ventricular tachycardias above the initially programmed tachycardia detection interval in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: incidence, prediction and significance

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was performed to provide data on ventricular tachycardias (VT) with a cycle length longer than the initially programmed tachycardia detection interval (TDI) in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

BACKGROUND

It has been clinical practice to program a safety margin of 30 to 60 ms between the slowest spontaneous or inducible VT and the TDI.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of 659 consecutive patients with ICDs were prospectively; follow-up information was retrospectively collected.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 31+/-23 months, 377 patients (57.2%) had at least one recurrent VT or ventricular fibrillation; 47 patients (7.1%) suffered 61 VTs above the TDI. The risk of a VT above the TDI ranged between 2.7% and 3.5% per year during the first four years after ICD implantation. The difference between the cycle length of the slowest VT before ICD implantation, spontaneous or induced, and the first VT above TDI was 108+/-58 ms. Fifty-four VTs (88.5%) above the TDI were associated with significant clinical symptoms (angina or palpitation 63.9%, heart failure 6.6% and syncope 8.2%). Six patients (9.8%) had to be resuscitated. Kaplan-Meyer analysis identified New York Heart Association class II or III (p = 0.021), ejection fraction < 0.40 (p = 0.027), spontaneous (p<0.001) or inducible (p<0.001) monomorphic VTs and the use of class III antiarrhythmic drugs (amiodarone, p<0.001; sotalol, p = 0.004) as risk predictors of VTs above the TDI. The risk of recurrent VTs above TDI was 11.8%, 12.5% and 26.6% during the first, second and third year after first VT above TDI, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of VTs above the TDI is significantly increased in some patients, and many VTs above TDI cause significant clinical symptoms. A larger safety margin between spontaneous or inducible VTs and the TDI seems to be necessary in selected patients. This is in conflict with an increased risk of inadequate episodes and demands highly specific and sensitive detection algorithms in these patients.

Clusters of ventricular tachycardias signify impaired survival in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study was undertaken to provide data on occurrence, significance and therapy of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT) clusters (VTCs) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

BACKGROUND

Data on the clinical significance of VTCs are lacking in patients with DCM and ICDs.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics of 106 consecutive patients with DCM and ICDs were prospectively collected, and chart reviews and episode data retrospectively analyzed. A VTC was defined as > or =3 sustained VTs/24 h.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 33+/-23 months, 73 patients (68.9%) had recurrent VT or ventricular fibrillation (VF), 43 patients (40.6%) suffered only single VTs and 30 patients (28.3%) experienced 52 clusters of VTs. Actuarial survival free of VT or VF was 44.6%, 33.0% and 26.5%, and survival free of VTC was 77.3%, 72.2% and 67.1% after one, two and three years, respectively. Independent predictors of VT clusters were heart failure before ICD implantation (p = 0.033), presenting monomorphic VT (p = 0.044), EF <0.40 (p = 0.014) and inducible mVT, especially with right bundle branch block and superior axis configuration (p<0.001). Survival free of recurrent VTCs was 50.8%, 38.1% and 19.0% after one, two and three years, respectively. Once a VTC had occurred, only 56.7%, 46.4%, 30.9% and 15.5% of patients survived and were not transplanted after one, two, three and four years, respectively. Survival was even more reduced if a VTC was associated with cardiac decompensation: 65.6% and 21.9% after one and two years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite antiarrhythmic intervention, clusters of VTs occur and recur frequently in patients with DCM. They signify impaired survival, especially if they are associated with cardiac decompensation, and may be a harbinger of progressive myocardial deterioration rather than a primarily arrhythmic problem. The benefit of ICD therapy may therefore be low in these patients.

Fractally coated defibrillation electrodes: is an improvement in defibrillation threshold possible?

AIMS

In patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), the goals of lowering the defibrillation threshold (DFT) can be achieved by means of higher defibrillation safety margins, more rapid charging of capacitors, improved battery longevity, implying smaller devices. Whether an increase in the electrically active surface of ICD leads by fractal coating results in decreased DFTs is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this prospective randomized cross-over study the defibrillation efficacy of a novel right ventricular endocardial defibrillation electrode fractally coated with iridium was compared with an uncoated but otherwise identical electrode in 30 patients undergoing ICD implantation. In each patient, DFT testing was performed twice according to a binary search protocol introducing the two different electrodes in a random order. The mean DFT was 8.4 +/- 4.1 J with the fractally coated lead and 9.6 +/- 3.6 J using the uncoated lead. The improvement of 1.2 J was statistically not significant (P = 0.11). No differences were observed between the patients with an improved DFT (n =12) and those with an unchanged or worsened DFT (n = 18) concerning age, underlying cardiac disease, NYHA class, or left ventricular ejection fraction, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the electrical surface of defibrillation leads by fractal coating does not lead to a substantial clinically relevant reduction in defibrillation thresholds. Defibrillation impedance is not influenced by the increased electrical surface of the defibrillation lead.

Arrhythmias in heart failure: current concepts of mechanisms and therapy

About one half of deaths in patients with heart failure are sudden, mostly due to ventricular tachycardia (VT) degenerating to ventricular fibrillation or immediate ventricular fibrillation. In severe heart failure, sudden cardiac death also may occur due to bradyarrhythmias. Other dysrhythmias complicating heart failure include atrial and ventricular extrasystoles, atrial fibrillation (AF), and sustained and nonsustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The exact mechanism of the increased vulnerability to arrhythmias is not known. Depending on the etiology of heart failure, different preconditions, including ischemia or structural alterations such as fibrosis or myocardial scarring, may be prominent. Reentrant mechanisms around scar tissue, afterdepolarizations, and triggered activity due to changes in calcium metabolism significantly contribute to arrhythmogenesis. Furthermore, alterations in potassium currents leading to action potential prolongation and an increase in dispersion of repolarization play a significant role. Treatment of arrhythmias is necessary either because patients are symptomatic or to reduce the risk for sudden cardiac death. The individual history, left ventricular function, electrophysiologic testing, and the signal-averaged ECG give useful information for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has evolved as a promising therapy for life-threatening arrhythmias. A potential role may exist for antiarrhythmic drugs, mainly amiodarone. There is growing evidence that patients with sustained VT or a history of resuscitation have the best outcome with ICD therapy regardless of the degree of heart failure. Many of these patients require additional antiarrhythmic therapy because of AF or nonsustained VTs that may activate the device. Catheter ablation or map-guided endocardial resection are additional options in selected patients but seldom represent the only therapeutic strategy.

Is there a need for routine testing of ICD defibrillation capacity? Results from more than 1000 studies

AIMS

Benefits and complications of postoperative implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests are controversial matters. This study sought to assess the necessity of defibrillation function tests after implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively analysed 1007 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests in 587 systems and 556 patients. Nine hundred and thirty implantable cardioverter-defibrillator tests (89.4%) were routinely performed. Seventy-one tests (7%) were performed after a change in the antiarrhythmic drug regimen and six tests (0.60%) because of a suspected dysfunction of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. During routine tests, four systems (0.4%) failed to defibrillate the patient. However, in all but one test, abnormalities of the system had been observed before the test. After the addition of antiarrhythmic drugs, two of 71 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems (2.8%) failed to defibrillate the patient. One of six systems tested due to a suspected dysfunction failed to defibrillate the patient. During 16 tests (1.6%), complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience demonstrates that postoperative tests of the defibrillation function of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators rarely reveal dysfunctions. As testing is unpleasant for the patient and not free of complications, tests might be restricted to those patients in whom a dysfunction is suspected and to those patients in whom class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs have been added to the antiarrhythmic drug regimen.

Amiodarone and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in congestive heart failure

Sudden death accounts for a significant proportion of all death in patients with heart failure. Of currently available therapy, amiodarone and the implantable defibrillator (ICD) appear to have the greatest potential to reduce sudden death in heart failure. In this paper, the currently available information on the relative role of amiodarone and implantable defibrillators (ICD) in heart failure is reviewed.

Combining nonpharmacologic therapies for advanced heart failure: the Münster experience with the assist device-defibrillator combination

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) and ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. In selected patients, the combined implantation may be required. This study was motivated by a case of a 33-year-old female patient with giant cell myocarditis who died of ventricular tachyarrhythmias after having been placed on a VAD with which she had been treated on an out-of-hospital basis for a prolonged period of time. A subsequent retrospective analysis of our data showed that, of 73 patients who had to be bridged mechanically (54 Novacor, 12 TCI Heartmate, 4 Thoratec, 3 Medos) in our institution between 1993 and 1998, 10 patients had undergone defibrillator implantation either before (n = 8) or after (n = 2) implantation of a VAD. The cases are presented, and the feasibility of the combination therapy discussed.

Antiarrhythmic drugs or implantable cardioverter defibrillators in heart failure: the "poor heart"

Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation account for a substantial proportion of all deaths in patients with heart failure. Of currently available therapies, amiodarone and the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) appear to have the greatest potential to decrease sudden death in heart failure. In this article, the presently available information on the relative role of antiarrhythmic drugs, with a focus on amiodarone and ICDs in heart failure, is reviewed.

Efficacy and safety of the initial use of stability and onset criteria in implantable cardioverter defibrillators

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate therapies are the most frequent adverse event in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). Most ICDs offer a stability criterion to discriminate ventricular tachycardia (VT) from atrial fibrillation and an onset criterion to discriminate VT from sinus tachycardia. The efficacy and safety of these criteria, if used immediately after implantation, is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a case control study, 87 patients in whom stability and onset criteria had been activated immediately after ICD implantation were matched to 87 patients in whom these criteria had not been activated. The groups were matched for known predictors of inappropriate therapies. With stability and onset criteria off, 24 patients (28%) received inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation (n = 14) or sinus tachycardia (n = 11); with stability and onset on, only 11 patients (13%) were treated by the ICD due to atrial fibrillation (n = 5) or sinus tachycardia (n = 7) (log rank: P = 0.029). Five patients suffered inappropriate therapies despite the fact that onset (n = 4) or stability (n = 1) criteria were not fulfilled once tachycardias continued for a prespecified duration. Only one patient experienced a failure to detect VT due to the onset criterion; none because of stability.

CONCLUSION

The immediate use of stability and onset criteria after ICD implantation reduces inappropriate therapies due to atrial fibrillation and sinus tachycardia. Because of the potential for underdetection of VT, this approach should be limited to tachycardia rates hemodynamically tolerated by the patient.

Philosophy of antiarrhythmic approaches to ventricular tachyarrhythmias close to the 21st century

The scientific basis and the reasoning underlying the changes in antiarrhythmic approaches to ventricular arrhythmias during recent decades are discussed. The early enthusiasm in the use of antiarrhythmic drugs in patients after myocardial infarction to prevent sudden cardiac death was severely affected by the results of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) which show an increased mortality of patients on sodium-channel antagonist antiarrhythmic drugs. A transient euphoria for drugs that prolong repolarization received criticism after premature termination of the Survival With Oral D-sotalol-trial (SWORD). Recently, attention has focused on the use of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in both secondary and primary prevention of sudden death. In contrast, catheter ablation, although very useful in supraventricular tachycardia, still plays a limited role in the management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the presence of organic heart disease.

Potential benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in patients with and without heart failure

BACKGROUND

Whether patients with heart failure derive a benefit from therapy with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class had an impact on the potential benefit from ICD therapy as assessed from data stored in the memory of ICDs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1989 and 1996, 603 patients (77% men; 59% with coronary artery disease and 16% with dilated cardiomyopathy; age, 57+/-13 years; ejection fraction, 44+/-18%) were treated with an ICD with extended memory function (storage of electrograms and/or RR intervals from treated episodes) in combination with endocardial lead systems. The stages of heart failure (NYHA functional class I through III) at implantation were correlated with overall mortality and the recurrence of fast ventricular tachyarrhythmias (>240 bpm) during follow-up. The potential benefit of the device was estimated as the difference between overall mortality and the hypothetical death rate had the device not been implanted. The latter was based on the recurrence of fast and, without termination by the devices, presumably fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In the overall group, a significant difference between hypothetical death rate and overall mortality was observed (13.9%, 23.5%, and 26.6% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively) that suggested a benefit from ICD implantation. In patients in NYHA class I, the estimated benefit, which increased over time, was 15.2%, 29.2%, and 35.6% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. In patients in NYHA class II or III, the estimated benefit increased until the third year (21.8% and 21.9%, respectively) and then remained constant until the fifth year (22.9% and 23.8%, respectively). Even those patients in NYHA class III with a history of decompensated heart failure benefited from ICD implantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of stored ECG data suggests that in patients with a history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, ICD therapy may lead to a prolongation of life in NYHA classes I through III. The initial benefit is greatest in patients in NYHA class II and class III, but the estimated benefit might persist longest for patients in NYHA class I.

Antiarrhythmic therapy--future trends and forecast for the 21st century

This article discusses recent changes in antiarrhythmic therapy, with a focus on nonpharmacologic therapy (electrode catheter ablation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators [ICDs]), and puts them into perspective for the coming years. The treatment of supraventricular tachycardias and tachycardia involving accessory pathways is likely to remain the domain of catheter ablation. With promising new techniques under investigation, the spectrum of arrhythmias that can be cured will probably be expanded. Treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias is likely to remain the domain of the ICD in the foreseeable future. With the safety net of the ICD in place, new antiarrhythmic drugs or other forms of antiarrhythmic therapy can be developed and tested.

[Results of testing defibrillator function of implanted cardioverter/defibrillators]

Postoperative tests of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are routinely performed to ensure appropriate defibrillation by the device. However, efficacy and complications of this procedure are unknown. To scrutinize the currently accepted indications to test the defibrillation function of the ICD we retrospectively analyzed 844 ICD-tests in 439 ICD-systems and 409 patients. 755 ICD-tests (89.4%) were routinely performed (57% before discharge and 43% during follow-up); 58 tests (6.9%) were performed after a change of the antiarrhythmic drug regimen, 24 tests (2.9%) after a revision of a part of the ICD-system, and seven tests (0.8%) because of a suspected dysfunction of the ICD. During routine-tests six ICD-systems (0.8%) failed to defibrillate the patient. However, in all but one test abnormalities of the ICD-system had been observed before the test. After addition of antiarrhythmic drugs, three of 58 ICD-systems (5.2%) failed to defibrillate the patient during the test (amiodarone: n = 2, flecainide: n = 1). Four of seven ICD-systems (57%) tested due to a suspected dysfunction failed to defibrillate the patient. After revisions of parts of the ICD-systems, ICD-tests never revealed a failure of defibrillation. During 16 ICD-tests (1.9%) complications occurred. The most frequent complications was inappropriate shocks (n = 10; 1.2%), the most severe one (transient) neurologic symptoms (n = 4; 0.48%). Our experience demonstrates that postoperative tests of the defibrillation function of ICDs rarely reveal ICD-dysfunction. As testing is unpleasant for the patient and not free of complications, tests might be restricted to those patients in whom an ICD-dysfunction is suspected (based on clinical presentation, results of chest-x-ray, testing of sensing signal and stimulation threshold) or class I or class III antiarrhythmic drugs have been added to the antiarrhythmic drug regimen.

Heart rate variability in time domain after acute myocardial infarction

These results suggest that analysis of heart rate variability recorded even very early after acute myocardial infarction (1 to 2 days after onset of pain) is feasible in clinical routine and strongly related to subsequent arrhythmic events and cardiac mortality. Decreased HRV is considered not only a marker of impaired vagal activity of the heart but complete autonomic impairment, strongly associated with the degree of myocardial damage. HRV represents the integrated response of the cardiovascular system to a variety of different influences: the plasma level of catecholamines, the baroreflex activation and the direct sympathetic and vagal activity. The HRV profile is dynamic-HRV reduction caused by myocardial damage changes over time presenting a progressive increase up to normality over a 2-month follow-up. The observed early differences between anterior and inferior myocardial infarction disappear later in the healing phase. However, group analysis results of different HRV indices are stabile over time and highly reproducible, but presenting large individual variations. HRV parameters which are adjusted to heart rate (e. g. CV) seemed to be more stabile. The role of HRV analysis in risk stratification of patients after myocardial infarction is strongly related to the actual model of the genesis of ventricular arrhythmias. Multiple experimental and clinical studies described the development of life threatening ventricular arrhythmias as a multifactorial event which can not be described adequately using just one risk parameter for stratification. The arrhythmogenic substrate representing the underlying inhomogeneity of electrical behaviour of adjacent myocardial areas might be detectable by the analysis of ventricular late potentials or frequency disturbances from the signal averaged ECG. The autonomic modulation of this substrate is represented by an altered heart rate variability. Possible trigger factors to initiate arrhythmias in a modulated arrhythmogenic substrate like ventricular premature beats or transient myocardial ischemia can be detected by conventional arrhythmia and ST segment analysis from Holter tapes. The optimized combination of these non-invasive risk predictors together with well known evident clinical risk parameters, like left ventricular ejection fraction, may lead to a valid set of screening parameters for individual risk estimation after myocardial infarction.