Improving quality of life in the elderly: hearing loss treatment with cochlear implants

BACKGROUND

Hearing loss impacts health-related quality of life and general well-being and was identified in a Lancet report as one of the largest potentially modifiable factors for the prevention of age-related dementia. There is a lack of robust data on how cochlear implant treatment in the elderly impacts quality of life. The primary objective was to measure the change in health utility following cochlear implantation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years.

METHODS

This study uniquely prospectively recruited a large multinational sample of 100 older adults (mean age 71.7 (SD7.6) range 60-91 years) with severe to profound hearing loss. In a repeated-measures design, pre and post implant outcome measures were analysed using mixed-effect models. Health utility was assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3). Subjects were divided into groups of 60-64, 65-74 and 75 + years.

RESULTS

At 18 months post implant, the mean HUI3 score improved by 0.13 (95%CI: 0.07-0.18 p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the HUI3 between age groups (F[2,9228] = 0.53, p = 0.59). The De Jong Loneliness scale reduced by an average of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.25-0.97 p < 0.014) and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale improved on average (1.25, 95%CI: 0.85-1.65 p < 0.001). Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening reduced by an average of 8.7 (95%CI: 6.7-10.8, p < 0.001) from a significant to mild-moderate hearing handicap. Age was not a statistically significant factor for any of the other measures (p > 0.20). At baseline 90% of participants had no or mild depression and there was no change in mean depression scores after implant. Categories of Auditory perception scale showed that all subjects achieved a level of speech sound discrimination without lip reading post implantation (level 4) and at least 50% could use the telephone with a known speaker.

CONCLUSIONS

Better hearing improved individuals' quality of life, ability to communicate verbally and their ability to function independently. They felt less lonely and less handicapped by their hearing loss. Benefits were independent of age group. Cochlear implants should be considered as a routine treatment option for those over 60 years with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ( http://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/ ), 7 March 2017, NCT03072862.

Healthy aging in elderly cochlear implant recipients: a multinational observational study

Background

Given an increase in the aging population and its impact on healthcare systems, policy makers for provision of health and social services are aiming to keep older adults in good health for longer, in other words towards ‘healthy aging’. Our study objective is to show that rehabilitation with cochlear implant treatment in the elderly with hearing impairment improves the overall health-related quality of life and general well-being that translate into healthy aging.

Methods

The multicentre, prospective, repeated measures, single-subject, clinical observational study will accrue 100 elderly, first-time, unilateral CI recipients (≥ 60 years) and analyze changes on specific measurement tools over ca. 20 months from preimplant to postimplant. Evaluations will consist of details collected through case history and interview questionnaires by clinicians, data logging, self-report questionnaires completed by the recipients and a series of commonly used audiometric measures and geriatric assessment tools. The primary indicator of changes in overall quality of life will be the HUI-3.

Discussion

The protocol is designed to make use of measurement tools that have already been applied to the hearing-impaired population in order to compare effects of CI rehabilitation in adults immediately before their implantation, (pre-implant) and after gaining 1–1.5 years of experience (post-implant). The broad approach will lead to a greater understanding of how useful hearing impacts the quality of life in elderly individuals, and thus improves potentials for healthy aging. Outcomes will be described and analyzed in detail.

Trial registration

This research has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), 7 March 2017 under the n° NCT03072862.

Validation of the Chronic Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire (CTAQ-I): the Italian version

Tinnitus is a widespread symptom that is chronically experienced by approximately 10% of the adult population. While the vast majority of individuals do not feel impaired by their ear noise, about 0.5-3% of the adult population develops severe distress and feels impaired in everyday life. The severity of the distress experienced can only partially be explained by the characteristics of the ear noise itself (e.g. objective tinnitus loudness or duration). Psychological variables such as tinnitus acceptance are being increasingly investigated by tinnitus research. The aim of this study was to analyse the psychometric quality of the Italian version of the “Chronic Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire” (CTAQ-I). The CTAQ-I is an adaption of the Italian “Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ)” and altered for the study of tinnitus acceptance. This cross-sectional multicentre questionnaire study included 141 outpatients with chronic tinnitus. Sociodemographic and clinical data were assessed with the Tinnitus Sample Case History (TSCH), tinnitus acceptance with the Italian “Chronic Tinnitus Acceptance Questionnaire” (CTAQ-I), tinnitus distress with the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and the Tinnitus Questionnaire Short Form (TQ 12-I). Furthermore, we assessed the patient’s general psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory - BSI) and Health Related Quality of Life (SF-36). Psychometric and factorial evaluation of the CTAQ-I were carried out. To investigate the influence of sociodemographic and numerous clinical variables on tinnitus acceptance we calculated correlation coefficients, analysis of variance and independent sample-t-tests. The factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution (“activity engagement” and “tinnitus willingness”), accounting for 41.1% of the variance. Good internal consistency for the total score (α = 0.84) and both factors (α = 0.80-0.88) was found. Moderate negative correlations with tinnitus distress indicated good validity. Tinnitus acceptance was further correlated with lower psychological distress and subjective tinnitus loudness, as well as increased emotional well-being. Tinnitus acceptance is considered to be an important source of therapeutic change in behavioural-based treatments as well as in professional counselling for tinnitus. Our study shows that the CTAQ-I is a reliable and valid instrument to measure the acceptance of patients suffering from chronic tinnitus.

Benefit of hearing aid use in the elderly: the impact of age, cognition and hearing impairment

This study describes the benefits of hearing aid (HA) use in a sample of elderly experienced HA users (n = 102, mean age 81.1 years), investigating the role of the age, hearing impairment and cognitive function. The benefit was assessed in aided condition by measuring audiometric outcomes (aided thresholds and speech reception in quiet and in noise) and self-assessed outcomes addressing the disability and the handicap domains of auditory dysfunction. Several cognitive abilities were assessed, including short-term memory, working memory and executive functions. To discover potential latent factors and assess which factors significantly influenced the benefit of HA use, age, hearing impairment, cognitive function, audiometric and self-assessed outcomes were examined with multivariate analysis, followed by correlation and regression analysis. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in aided audiometric outcomes and a decrease in the perceived disability and handicap in the sample population. Multivariate, correlation and regression analyses showed that better aided audiometric outcomes were significantly associated with hearing impairment of lower degree and higher cognitive abilities. Moreover, self-assessed outcomes were significantly associated with audiometric outcomes and hearing impairment: subjects with better audiometric outcomes and lower hearing impairment tend to perceive more benefit in using their HAs. Cognition was only indirectly associated with self-assessed outcomes through its direct correlation with aided audiometric outcomes, meaning that the perceived subjective benefit with HA was not directly associated with better cognitive abilities.

Cochlear implantation in delayed sudden hearing loss after conservative vestibular schwannoma surgery

This is a case of successful cochlear implantation in a 50-year-old man who experienced sudden hearing loss and developed ipsilateral severe tinnitus at three years following conservative stage 1 vestibular schwannoma retrosigmoid surgery. After cochlear implantation, tinnitus improved from THI grade 4 to 2. Localisation skills improved. Hearing in noise (S/N + 7 dB) with target signal from the operated side improved from 38 to 100% of correct answers. A significant improvement of spatial and speech items of the "speech, spatial and qualities of sounds" questionnaire was also measured. In conclusion, cochlear implantation is a feasible and effective solution after conservative vestibular schwannoma surgery should delayed hearing loss occur.

A registry for the collection of data in cochlear implant patients

The need to optimize the use of all the information that modern technological tools have made available to the physician ENT/audiologist has increasingly emerged within the Italian scientific community. Towards this purpose, it is necessary to create a registry of the patients using cochlear implants (CIs). This registry will include a homogeneous summary of the information deriving from multiple sources related to daily clinical practice, in order to assess auditory benefits, safety and reliability in patients with cochlear implants, and organization over the national territory. The primary objectives relative to the above-mentioned analysis are to assess the impact of the use of cochlear implants on patient health, to ensure traceability of the devices currently used, monitoring their safety and reliability over time, to guarantee access of the technique in clinical and organizational conditions that can allow the best possible benefits. The aspects concerning implementation of the registry were discussed extensively during the first meetings of the Working Group (WG). In particular, owing to the complexity and high costs related mainly to the development of the technological aspects and the need to involve technological partners external to the WG, and to respect current privacy laws, the WG members decided that the project should be limited to proposal of a paper registry to be implemented at a later stage, possibly within the framework of successive research projects. During meetings, the WG members discussed various aspects of implementation of the registry, and in particular the scientific features connected to objectives, inclusion criteria, and structure of the forms needed for data collection and organizational aspects. A registry is proposed herein.

Systematic review of the literature on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant procedure in adult patients

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the results of scientific publications on the clinical effectiveness of the cochlear implant (CI) procedure in adults. The members of the Working Group first examined existing research evidence from the national and international literature and main international guidelines. They considered as universally accepted the usefulness/effectiveness of unilateral cochlear implantation in severely-profoundly adult patients. Accordingly, they focused their attention on the systematic reviews addressing clinical effectiveness and cost/efficacy of CI procedures, with particular regard to the most controversial issues for which international consensus is still lacking. The following aspects were evaluated: monolateral CI in advanced-age adult patients; bilateral (simultaneous/sequential) CI vs. unilateral CI and vs. bimodal stimulation; benefits derived from the monolateral CI procedure in adult patients with prelingual deafness. With regard to CI in elderly patients, the selected studies document an improvement of the quality of life and perceptive abilities after CI, even if the benefits were found to be inferior in patients over 70 years at the time of surgery. Thus, from the results of the studies included in the review, advanced age is not a contraindication for the CI procedure. With respect to unilateral CI, bilateral CI offers advantages in hearing in noise, in sound localization and less during hearing in a silent environment. However, high interindividual variability is reported in terms of benefits from the second implant. With regard to CI in prelingually deaf adults, the selected studies document benefits deriving from the CI procedure in terms of improvement of perceptive abilities and in the quality of life after CI, as well as subjectively perceived benefits. However, there is high interindividual variability and the study sample is limited.

Cochlear implantation with Pulsar Med El: a novel small incision technique

Although still widely implanted, Pulsar Med-El is rarely considered for small incision approach. Overall, 30 teen-age and adult patients were operated upon with a novel small incision (4-5 cm). Full insertion of the electrode array was achieved in all cases. No major intra-operative complications occurred. At follow-up, no flap-related complications and no migration of the receiver-stimulator were observed in the "device suture" (14 patients) or "no device suture" groups (16 patients). All patients are full-time users of the device. In conclusion, a small incision for the Pulsar Med-El cochlear implant is feasible, safe and reproducible. Ligature fixation of the device is not critical with this operation. Also with this device, in adult and teen-age patients, it is, therefore, possible to retain several typical advantages of small incision approaches.

[Nasal packing and antibiotic prophylaxis in septoplasty: a controlled study]

Systematic use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and nasal packing (NP) in septoplasty-both directly and indirectly affecting the cost of surgery (length of hospitalization)-appear based on controversial scientific data and, at times, even on unjustified clinical "habits". A controlled study was thus performed on 100 adults undergoing exclusive nasal septoplasty to determine whether these techniques are actually useful. The subjects were randomly divided into four groups: TN-PAP-(29 subjects), TN-PAP+ (25 subjects), TN+ PAP- (21 subjects) and TN+ PAP+ (25 subjects). Surgery was always performed by the same surgeon and was concluded with continuous suture of the mucoperichondrial layers. Only one patient (TN-PAP-) presented complications of infection (vestibulitis). Three patients in the TN- group required nasal packing a few hours after surgery because of moderate bleeding. As of three months after surgery no other complications had arisen. Postoperative pain, evaluated on an analogicalvisual scale, was higher during the 12 hours after surgery. Analysis of variance showed that the only pain-related factor was nasal packing while PAP and the interaction between TN and PAP did not prove significant. The above results suggest that PAP and TN should not be systematically used, thus reducing the hospitalization period for septoplasty to the day of surgery (Day surgery).

[Elaboration of a hearing disability scale]

On the basis of a previous pilot study a multiple-choice questionnaire about hearing disabilities was developed. The questionnaire (SDU) allowed 20 items. The answers were tailored to the single question and scaled in increasingly order of disability (form A) or in random order (form B). Modalities of administration (self-report or interview) and form (A or B) were randomized in a group of 123 adult subjects with different degree of hearing impairment. Only one factor, attributable to hearing disability, was extracted by a factor analysis. This factor explains a major variance ratio of items related to speech perception in difficult listening context. A good correlation (r = .74) was found between SDU total score and hearing threshold in the better ear. No difference in mean score, variance and time of reduction of the SDU was found between form A and B. The Authors so propose the use of form A because of a more easy compute of the total score. Self-report was more time-consuming respect to interview (11.7' vs. 8.4'). Furthermore, self-report was non possible in 13.8% of subjects for severe virus impairment and illiteracy and in 6.1% some form of support was necessary. No difference of mean score and variance between self-report and interview was found. SDU represents a tool for hearing disability evaluation useful in aural rehabilitation protocols. The principal advantage is high applicability thanks to short time required, simplicity of task and flexibility in the modality of administration.

[Elaboration of the hearing disability scale]

On the basis of a previous pilot study, a multiple-choice questionnaire regarding hearing disabilities was developed. The questionnaire (SDU) was made up of 20 items. The answers were tailored to the single question and scaled according to the increasing degree of disability (form A) or in random order (form B). Administration modality (self-report or interview) and form (A or B) were randomized in a group of 123 adult subjects with different degrees of hearing impairment. Only one factor, attributable to hearing disability, was extracted by factor analysis. This factor explains a major variance ratio of items related to speech perception in difficult listening context. A good correlation (r = .74) was found between SDU total score and hearing threshold in the better ear. No difference in mean score, variance and necessary scoring time of the SDU was found between form A and B. The Authors thus propose the use of form A because of a more easy computation of the total score. Self-report was more time consuming with respect to interview (11.7' vs. 8.4'). Furthermore, self-report was non possible in 13.8% of subjects for severe sign impairment and illiteracy and in 6.1% some form of support was necessary. No difference in mean score and variance between self-report and interview was found. SDU represent a tool for hearing disability evaluation useful in aural rehabilitation protocols. The principal advantage is high applicability thanks to the short time required, simplicity of task and flexibility of administration modality.

[The variability of functional gain and insertion gain in hearing aid fitting]

Functional gain (FG) and insertion gain (IG) are currently used as real ear gain measurement of hearing aids. The gain differences observed with hearing aid modifications made in order to achieve the desired prescriptive target must be greater than the variability associated with repetition of measurement in order to be really useful. Limited research is available on FG and IG intratester variability. In order to evaluate single variability factors, some studies use experimental designs not common in clinical work-up while others use equipment mot available commercially. The present study evaluates intratester variability of FG and IG (Madsen IGO 1500 equipment) in a typical clinical configuration in 42 users of behind-ear hearing aids. Mean standard deviation of FG test-retest differences was 5.19 dB. Range of variability was expressed in term of centiles. 5-- and 95-- centiles were -9.8 and 8.7 dB respectively. Mean s.d. of IG test-retest differences was 3.18 dB; 5-- and 95-- centiles were -5.2 and 6.05 dB respectively. Major variability was found at higher frequencies. High variability at lower frequencies was also found probably due to sealing problems of ear molds in the ear canal. Accord between FG and IG was also examined. A good mean correspondence in mid frequency range was found (FG-IG mean difference less than 5 dB) with large inter-subject differences between the two measurements (s.d. 11 dB).

[Diurnal hypersomnolence and chronic snoring: an epidemiological study]

Excessive daytime somnolence (EDS) is highly correlated to the presence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). It appears that interest in such disorders may also be extended to extraneurological fields. The Authors report the results of a study on EDS in 1,146 adult subjects seen consecutively by different physicians. Excessive Somnolence during normal activity was reported in 4.5% of the subjects studied. In a subgroup of habitual snorers, EDS was observed in 8.3% of the subjects and in 2.0% in a group of non-snorers. The subjects with EDS has a mean age and body mass index (BMI) greater than those of the control group and a higher frequency of certain performance disturbances. No sex differences were found. EDS and habitual snoring had a similar age-related trend.

[The prevalence and evolution of hypoacusis in Cooley's disease]

With the improved life expectation of patients with beta-thalassemia-major (BTM) or Cooley's Disease, new clinical problems, such as hearing damage, have emerged. The authors describe audiometric data of 50 patients with BTM. High-frequency thresholds were higher in BTM than those of a control group. Prevalence of hearing loss in BTM was 14-26%, depending on the frequency range considered, while in the control group it was between 4.3-19.1%. The prevalence of hearing loss in BTM with respect to that of the general population was 7-10% higher. Hearing loss ranged from mild to moderate. A good correlation was found between hearing loss and the cumulative dose of desferoxamine administered. These data were indicative of an ototoxic effect of this drug. Many patients (28.6%) showed significant hearing threshold deterioration after 3 years. On the light of these results, the authors suggest regular audiologic follow-up of patients with BTM.

[Snoring: an epidemiological study on 1146 adult subjects]

An epidemiological survey of the prevalence of snoring was performed on 1146 adults consecutively observed in the offices of several practitioners. A reliable, previously assessed snoring questionnaire was given to all patients. Snoring was found as a common sign as 31% of the subjects referred to this symptom. However, the prevalence of every-night snoring was 13.5-17.7%. Snoring was an age-related phenomena: its prevalence raised with age. Males more frequently proved to be heavy snorers although no great difference was found between sexes in the later decades of life.

[Test-retest reliability of anamnestic data on chronic obstructive apnea]

A questionnaire concerning problems inherent to ronchopathy was evaluated in order to assess its test-retest reliability and the interobserver variability of the items. The results indicate the existence of three orders of variables. The first (class A) was characterized by good intra- and inter- observer reliability. It included all interval variables (i.e. weight, height, arterial pressure) and most ordinal variables (i.e. grading of snoring, excessive daytime somnolence, morning headache, smoking, etc.). The second (class B) was characterized by good intra-observer and poor inter-observer reliability. It included snoring onset time and morning somnolence. The third class (class C) was characterized by both poor intra- and inter-observer reliability. It included sleep apnea. For large epidemiological survey purposes the authors suggest that only class A variables be used.

[Quantification of communication difficulty in subjects with hearing loss: a pilot study]

A brief questionnaire concerning auditory disability in every day listening was developed. The aim was to generate a simple, practical test for rehabilitational purposes. The questionnaire was administered to 255 hearing-impaired subjects coming under observation consecutively. The only requirement for participation was an expression of communicational difficulties due to adult onset of hearing loss. Some items were not applicable for all subjects. The higher scores were observed for hearing problems related to speech-in-noise. Good linear correlations were found between better-ear auditory and questionnaire score-based indexes in the 'family' and 'social' sections.

[Allergologic evaluation in chronic rhinitis: study of 411 cases]

The present work reports the results of an allergological evaluation performed on 411 patients suffering from chronic rhinitis alone or associated with bronchial asthma. Allergic diagnosis was based on the results of skin prick tests, serum RAST, nasal provocation, allergy avoidance diets and food provocation. 207 patients were sensitized to one or more allergens (50.4%); mean age for onset of rhinitis was 14.9. The first ten years of age proved most relevant for onset of symptoms, while late onset was significant in females. The most common reactions were to house dust mites, most likely due to the local environmental-climatic conditions which favor the growth of Dermatophagoides. Olive-sensitization was frequently found in pollen-positive subjects. Careful allergological evaluation of chronic rhinitis is very important so as to establish the best treatment and environment prophylaxis for the disease.

[Psychoacoustic tuning in normal and pathological ears]

Since simplified methods have been generated to measure psychoacoustic tuning curves (PTC), they have proved to be useful in clinical workup. Nevertheless, further research is necessary for high level tuning. In the present study PTCs have been generated utilizing a discrete simultaneous masking tone-on-tone paradigm. Thresholds were determined using an adaptive up-down transformed procedure, thus obtaining normative data. The experimental groups allowed frequency-independent, mild to moderate hearing loss, in order to minimize such variable. Results indicate that PTCs were normal in 8 subjects suffering from conductive hearing loss and abnormal in 8 subjects with cochlear loss. Normative high level data and a new quantifying index confirms these results.