Local Control after Re-Irradiation of Spinal Metastases with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Determine local control (LC) rate and risk of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) and radiation myelitis (RM) for patients receiving re-irradiation of spinal metastases (SMs) using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from large single-institutional experience with long follow-up.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Retrospectively identified patients receiving re-irradiation SBRT (rSBRT, 1, 3, or 5 fractions) to SMs previously treated with radiation therapy (RT) and having follow up imaging to assess local control. 1 fraction patients typically received 20-24 Gy and 16-18 Gy to the high- and low-risk planning target volumes (PTVs), respectively, and 27-39 Gy and 21-24 Gy for the 3 fraction patients, with a single level of 50 Gy for 5 fractions. Patient and treatment characteristics for previous RT (pRT) and rSBRT were collected, including histology and dose-volume histogram statistics (DVH). Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence (competing with death) of local failure with death as a competing risk was computed for the whole cohort and stratified by radioresistance of histology, and risk of VCF for RM (for treatments at L1 and above) and 95% confidence intervals. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) for PTV and spinal cord (SC) DVH statistics was computed for each individual course and cumulatively, using a/b = 10 Gy for tumor and 2 Gy for SC.

RESULTS

Identified 107 lesions in 91 patients. 48 (45%) had radioresistant histologies. For all patients, at 1 and 2 years, respectively OS was 64% (55-74%) and 43% (34-55%), LC was 88% (81-94%) and 85% (78-91%) with median follow-up of 52 months (Table 1). OS and LC were not significantly different between radiosensitivity groups (p>0.05). Risk of VCF at 1 and 2 years was 7% (3-13%) and 9% (4-16%). RM was identified in 1 patient, who received 30 Gy in 5 fractions to T1, and had 1-fraction rSBRT 21 months later. SC Dmax was 31.5 Gy for pRT and 10.4 Gy, for rSBRT, resulting in total SC EQD2 of 73 Gy. RM was confirmed on MRI 8 months after rSBRT. Cumulative RM risk at 8 months after rSBRT was estimated at 1% (0-4%). Median EQD2 for the minimum dose to the high and low risk PTVs were 17.7 Gy (interquartile range, IQR, 13.0-27.6 Gy) and 13.7 Gy (IQR, 10.8-19.3 Gy) for rSBRT, and maximum EQD to SC for previous RT, rSBRT, and cumulatively was 38 Gy (IQR, 30-41 Gy), 27 Gy (IQR, 22-36 Gy), and 65 Gy (IQR, 54-73 Gy).Re-irradiation of spinal metastasis with SBRT can be delivered safely and provide high rates of local control, including for radioresistant tumors, as demonstrated with the longest reported follow-up in this setting.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation of SM with SBRT provides high rates of LC even for radioresistant tumors, and low risk of VCF and RM, based on the longest reported follow-up in this setting.

The impact of temporal inaccuracies on 4DCT image quality

Accurate delineation of target volumes is one of the critical components contributing to the success of image-guided radiotherapy treatments and several imaging modalities are employed to increase the accuracy in target identification. Four-dimensional (4D) techniques are incorporated into existing radiation imaging techniques like computed tomography (CT) to account for the mobility of the target volumes. However, these methods in some cases introduce further inaccuracies in the target delineation when further quality assurance measures are not implemented. A source of commonly observed inaccuracy is the misidentification of the respiration cycles and resulting respiration phase assignments used in the construction of the 4D patient model. The aim of this work is to emphasize the importance of optimal respiration phase assignment during the 4DCT image acquisition process and to perform a quantitative assessment of the effect of inaccurate phase assignments on the overall image quality. The accuracy of the phase assignment was assessed by comparison with an independent calculation of the respiration phases. Misplaced phase assignments manifest themselves as deformations and artifacts in reconstructed images. These effects are quantified as volumetric discrepancies in the localization of target objects represented by spherical phantoms. Measurements are performed using a fully programmable motion phantom designed and built at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). Implementation of a case based independent check and correction procedure is also demonstrated with emphasis on the use of this procedure in the clinical environment. Review of clinical 4D scans performed in this institution showed discrepancies in the phase assignments in about 40% of the cases when compared to our independent calculations. It is concluded that for improved image reconstruction, an independent check of the sorting procedure should be performed for each clinical 4DCT case.

Automated seed localization from CT datasets of the prostate

With the increasing utilization of permanent brachytherapy implants for treating carcinoma of the prostate, the importance of accurate post-treatment dose calculation also increases for assessing patient outcome and planning future treatments. An automatic method for seed localization of permanent brachytherapy implants, using CT datasets of the prostate, has been developed and tested on a phantom using an actual patient planned seed distribution. This method was also compared to results with the three-film technique for three patient datasets. The automatic method is as accurate or more accurate than the three film technique for 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm contiguous CT slices, and eliminates the inter- and intra-observer variability of the manual methods. The automated method improves the localization of brachytherapy seeds while reducing the time required for the user to input information, and is demonstrated to be less operator dependent, less time consuming, and potentially more accurate than the three-film technique.