Clinical Outcomes of the HIV Protease Inhibitor Nelfinavir With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Stage IIIA/IIIB Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 1/2 Trial

Importance

Local failure after chemoradiotherapy (CT-RT) significantly contributes to mortality in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). One approach to improve local control is through targeted radiosensitization of the tumor.

Objective

To evaluate the dose-limiting toxic effects, maximally tolerated dose, and recommended phase 2 dose of the protease inhibitor nelfinavir mesylate, administered concurrently with CT-RT in patients with LA-NSCLC, and, in the phase 2 portion of the study, to estimate the objective response rate, local and distant failure rates, and overall survival.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, open-label, single-group, single-institution phase 1/2 trial tested the oral protease inhibitor nelfinavir in combination with concurrent CT-RT in 35 patients aged 18 to 89 years with biopsy-confirmed unresectable stage IIIA/IIIB LA-NSCLC and a minimum Karnofsky performance status from June 29, 2007, to February 22, 2012, with an analysis date of May 9, 2017. Median follow-up for all patients was 6.8 years, with a minimum 5 years of follow-up for all survivors.

Interventions

Oral nelfinavir mesylate, 625 mg, twice daily or 1250 mg, twice daily was administered for 7 to 14 days before and during concurrent CT-RT.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Graded toxic effects, overall survival, local failure, distant failure, objective response rate, and progression-free survival as measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

Results

Thirty-five patients (16 women and 19 men; median age, 60 years [range, 39-79 years]) enrolled and met protocol-specified criteria for adherence, with 5 at a dose of 625 mg twice daily and 30 at a dose of 1250 mg twice daily. No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed. No grade 4 or higher nonhematologic toxic effects were observed. Thirty-three of the 35 patients had evaluable posttreatment computed tomographic scans, with an objective response rate of 94% (31 of 33; 95% CI, 86%-100%). The cumulative incidence of local failure was 39% (95% CI, 30.5%-47.5%). Median progression-free survival was 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.2-17.1 months). Median overall survival for all patients was 41.1 months (95% CI, 19.0-63.1 months); the 5-year mean (SE) overall survival rate was 37.1% (8.2%).

Conclusions and Relevance

This study suggests that nelfinavir administered with concurrent CT-RT is associated with acceptable toxic effects and a promising objective response rate, local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival in unresectable LA-NSCLC. These data suggest that nelfinavir may enhance the efficacy of standard CT-RT in this disease. Additional testing in the randomized phase 3 setting should be conducted to establish the improvement associated with nelfinavir with concurrent CT-RT.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00589056.

Abstract A52: Radiation and dual PD-L1 and CTLA4 checkpoint blockade non-redundantly improves tumor resistance, response, and immunity

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors such as CTLA4 and PD-1 result in impressive clinical responses, but optimal results will require combination therapy. This raises fundamental questions about non-redundancy and mechanisms of resistance. Emerging data indicate that combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with radiation (RT) may hold promise. We therefore evaluated this combination for metastatic melanoma using parallel studies in mice and humans.

Methods: In a phase I clinical trial with 19 patients with multiple melanoma metastases, a single index lesion was irradiated with hypofractionated RT, delivered over two or three fractions, followed by four cycles of the anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab. We reproduced this therapy in mice using the melanoma cell line B16-F10. For this, each flank of C57BL/6 mice was implanted with tumors to model multiple metastases. Mice received anti-CTLA4 (on days 5, 8, and 11), irradiation of one tumor using an image-guided micro-irradiator (20 Gy x 1 on day 8), or both treatments. Mechanistic studies were performed on material obtained from patients and mice at baseline and thereafter.

Results: Overall, treatment in the phase I study was well tolerated and toxicity was similar to that reported for anti-CTLA4. Major tumor regressions were observed in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-CTLA4 + RT. In mice, although combined treatment enhanced the CD8 T cell to Treg ratios and improved responses in irradiated and unirradiated tumors, resistance was common. Genome-wide and unbiased analyses revealed that resistant tumors have increased PD-L1, interferon-stimulated genes, and exhausted T cells that depress the CD8/Treg ratio. Patients and mice with high PD-L1 tumors that were treated with RT + anti-CTLA4 poorly reinvigorated exhausted T cells, did not respond, and rapidly progressed. In mice, adding anti-PD-L1/PD-1 to RT + anti-CTLA4 reinvigorated exhausted T cells, leading to complete responses and immunity across multiple cancer types. The extent of T cell exhaustion/reinvigoration predicts response and can be assessed through peripheral blood.

Conclusions: Resistance to RT + anti-CTLA4 results from depression in the CD8/Treg ratio due to elevated tumor PD-L1 and persistent T cell exhaustion. Both clinical and pre-clinical data suggest that the combination of RT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PDL1 is a rational and non-redundant approach to improving resistance, response, and immunity to melanoma and other cancer types.

Citation Format: Andrew J. Rech, Christina Twyman, Amit Maity, Ramesh Rengan, Kristen E. Pauken, Erietta Stelekati, Bihui Xu, Hannah Dada, Pamela M. Odorizzi, Ramin D. Herati, Kathleen D. Mansfield, Dana Patsch, Ravi Amaravadi, Lynn Schuchter, Hemant Ishwaran, Rosemarie Mick, Daniel Pryma, George Xu, Michael Feldman, Tara C. Gangadhar, Stephen Hahn, E. John Wherry, Andy J. Minn, Robert H. Vonderheide. Radiation and dual PD-L1 and CTLA4 checkpoint blockade non-redundantly improves tumor resistance, response, and immunity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy: A New Chapter; December 1-4, 2014; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2015;3(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A52.

Abstract 2858: Radiation and dual immune checkpoint blockade overcome tumor resistance and distinctly improve immunity

Optimal results with immune checkpoint inhibitors such as CTLA4 and PD-1 will likely require combination therapy. This raises important questions about tumor resistance and non-redundant mechanisms of action. Pre-clinical and clinical data indicate that radiation (RT) may augment responses to immune checkpoint inhibition. We therefore evaluated this combination for metastatic melanoma using parallel studies in mice and humans. In a phase I clinical trial with 19 patients with multiple melanoma metastases, a single index lesion was irradiated with hypofractionated RT, delivered over two or three fractions, followed by four cycles of the anti-CTLA4 antibody ipilimumab. We reproduced this therapy in mice using the melanoma cell line B16-F10. For this, each flank of C57BL/6 mice was implanted with tumors to model multiple metastases. Mice received anti-CTLA4 (on days 5, 8, and 11), irradiation of one tumor using an image-guided micro-irradiator (20 Gy x 1 on day 8), or both treatments. Mechanistic studies were performed on material obtained from patients and mice at baseline and thereafter. Overall, treatment in the phase I study was well tolerated and toxicity was similar to that reported for anti-CTLA4. Major tumor regressions were observed in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti-CTLA4 + RT. In mice, although combined treatment enhanced the CD8 T cell to Treg ratios and improved responses in irradiated and unirradiated tumors, resistance was common. Genome-wide and unbiased analyses revealed that resistant tumors have increased PD-L1, interferon-stimulated genes, and exhausted T cells that depress the CD8/Treg ratio. Patients and mice with high PD-L1 tumors that were treated with RT + anti-CTLA4 poorly reinvigorated exhausted T cells, did not respond, and rapidly progressed. In mice, adding anti-PD-L1/PD-1 to RT + anti-CTLA4 reinvigorated exhausted T cells, leading to complete responses and immunity across multiple cancer types. The extent of T cell exhaustion/reinvigoration predicts response and can be assessed through peripheral blood. Resistance to RT + anti-CTLA4 results from depression in the CD8/Treg ratio due to elevated tumor PD-L1 and persistent T cell exhaustion. Both clinical and pre-clinical data suggest that the combination of RT with CTLA4 and PD-1 checkpoint blockade is a rational, non-redundant approach to overcoming tumor resistance and improving immunity in multiple cancer types.

Citation Format: Andrew J. Rech, Christina Twyman-Saint Victor, Amit Maity, Ramesh Rengan, Kristen E. Pauken, Erietta Stelekati, Joseph Benci, Bihui Xu, Hannah Dada, Pamela M. Odorizzi, Ramin S. Herati, Kathleen D. Mansfield, Dana Patsch, Ravi K. Amaravadi, Lynn M. Schuchter, Hemant Ishwaran, Rosemarie Mick, Daniel Pryma, Xiaowei Xu, Michael D. Feldman, Tara C. Gangadhar, Stephen M. Hahn, E. John Wherry, Andy J. Minn, Robert H. Vonderheide. Radiation and dual immune checkpoint blockade overcome tumor resistance and distinctly improve immunity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2858. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2858

Radiation and dual checkpoint blockade activate non-redundant immune mechanisms in cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors¹ result in impressive clinical responses^2–5 but optimal results will require combination with each other⁶ and other therapies. This raises fundamental questions about mechanisms of non-redundancy and resistance. Here, we report major tumor regressions in a subset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with an anti-CTLA4 antibody (anti-CTLA4) and radiation (RT) and reproduced this effect in mouse models. Although combined treatment improved responses in irradiated and unirradiated tumors, resistance was common. Unbiased analyses of mice revealed that resistance was due to upregulation of PD-L1 on melanoma cells and associated with T cell exhaustion. Accordingly, optimal response in melanoma and other cancer types requires RT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD-L1/PD-1. Anti-CTLA4 predominantly inhibits T regulatory cells (Tregs) to increase the CD8 T cell to Treg (CD8/Treg) ratio. RT enhances the diversity of the T cell receptor (TCR) repertoire of intratumoral T cells. Together, anti-CTLA4 promotes expansion of T cells, while RT shapes the TCR repertoire of the expanded peripheral clones. Addition of PD-L1 blockade reverses T cell exhaustion to mitigate depression in the CD8/Treg ratio and further encourages oligo-clonal T cell expansion. Similar to results from mice, patients on our clinical trial with melanoma showing high PD-L1 did not respond to RT + anti-CTLA4, demonstrated persistent T cell exhaustion, and rapidly progressed. Thus, PD-L1 on melanoma cells allows tumors to escape anti-CTLA4-based therapy, and the combination of RT, anti-CTLA4, and anti-PD-L1 promotes response and immunity through distinct mechanisms.