In The Line of Treatment: A Systematic Review of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia

Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) is a common tachyarrhythmia, and an electrocardiogram is the best tool for making a diagnosis. If Valsalva maneuvers and carotid sinus massage do not give positive results, then the next choice is either adenosine or calcium channel blockers. At this time, adenosine is the drug of choice of treatment. Verapamil and diltiazem are the most commonly used calcium channel blockers (CCBs). This review aimed to compare the efficacy of both drugs in the treatment of PSVT.

We utilized the databases PubMed Central and Medline by using keywords: "calcium channel blockers OR adenosine AND supraventricular tachycardia." In the end, we finalized 32 studies, including observational studies, literature reviews, systematic reviews/metanalysis, and randomized control trials. We included articles only in the English language and related to humans. Two authors completed the quality assessment and evaluation of bias according to specific guidelines. Only high-quality studies were included in this systematic review based on the cut-off score of seven or above. Calcium channel blockers have a longer half-life than adenosine and were previously used as the drug of choice in the treatment of PSVT. Calcium channel blockers are safe if given slowly; however, adenosine is safer and useful when an electrocardiogram is uncertain. We compared both drugs in certain aspects and found equal efficacy. Though safer, adenosine was found to have a higher cost and a higher probability of re-initiation arrhythmia compared to calcium channel blockers. 

The Role of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Therapy in the Treatment of Hematological Malignancies: Advantages, Trials, and Tribulations, and the Road Ahead

Immunotherapy is the upcoming trend in cancer treatment. Traditional cancer treatment methods include surgical resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, small molecule targeted drugs, monoclonal antibodies, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Surgical resection is useful for early-stage patients but not for metastatic cancer cells; radiotherapy and chemotherapy are more common but produce substantial damage to normal tissues and have poor selectivity. Targeted drugs, including monoclonal antibodies, have better comprehensive efficacy but can also encourage gene mutation of tumor cells and drug tolerance. HSCT is effective, but choosing a donor is often difficult, and the graft is also prone to rejection. Thus, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, a form of cellular/adoptive immunotherapy, is at the forefront of cancer therapy treatments due to its sustained remission, fewer side effects, and a better quality of life. CAR-T cell therapy involves genetically modifying the T cells and multiplying their numbers to kill cancer cells. This review article gives an insight into how the CAR-T cells have evolved from simple T cells with modest immune function to genetically engineered robust counterparts that brought great hope in the treatment of hematological malignancies. Much research has been undertaken during the past decade to design and deliver CAR-T cells. This has led to successful outcomes in leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma, paving the way for expanding CAR therapy. Despite tremendous progress, CAR-T cell therapies are faced with many challenges. Areas for improvement include limited T cell persistence, tumor escape, immunosuppressive components in the tumor microenvironment, cancer relapse rate, manufacturing time, and production cost. In this manuscript, we summarize the innovations in the design and delivery of CAR technologies, their applications in hematological malignancies, limitations to its widespread application, latest developments, and the future scope of research to counter the challenges and improve its effectiveness and persistence.

Cardiovascular Manifestations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Pathogenesis and Management of Pericarditis

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic condition of the bowel that can be further categorized into ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Rarely, this condition can be associated with pericarditis, which can be an extraintestinal manifestation of the disease or drug-induced. This review aims to determine the pathogenesis and management of pericarditis in IBD. In this review, the goal is to elucidate the pathogenesis of pericarditis in IBD and determine if pericarditis is an extraintestinal manifestation of IBD or a complication of current drug therapy used to manage IBD. Additionally, this review intends to explain the first-line management of pericarditis in IBD and explore the role of biologicals in attenuating pericarditis. An electronic search was conducted to identify relevant reports of pericarditis in IBD, and a quality assessment was conducted to identify high-quality articles according to the inclusion criteria. Full-text articles from inception to November 2020 were included, while non-English articles, gray literature, and animal studies were excluded. The majority of studies suggest that pericarditis arises as a complication of drug therapy by 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives such as sulfasalazine, mesalamine, and balsalazide, and it occurs due to IgE-mediated allergic reactions, direct cardiac toxicity, cell-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, and humoral antibody response to therapy. Drug cessation or the initiation of a corticosteroid regimen seems to be the most effective means of managing pericarditis in IBD due to drug therapy or an extraintestinal manifestation.