heredERA Breast Cancer: a phase III, randomized, open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of giredestrant plus the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with previously untreated HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer

BACKGROUND

HER2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (HER2+, ER+ BC) is a distinct disease subtype associated with inferior response to chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy compared with HER2+, ER-negative BC. Bi-directional crosstalk leads to cooperation of the HER2 and ER pathways that may drive treatment resistance; thus, simultaneous co-targeting may optimize treatment impact and survival outcomes in patients with HER2+, ER+ BC. First-line (1L) treatment for patients with HER2+ metastatic BC (mBC) is pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and taxane chemotherapy. In clinical practice, dual HER2 blockade plus a fixed number of chemotherapy cycles are given as induction therapy to maximize tumor response, with subsequent HER2-targeted maintenance treatment given as a more tolerable regimen for long-term disease control. For patients whose tumors co-express ER, maintenance endocrine therapy (ET) can be added, but uptake varies due to lack of data from randomized clinical trials investigating the superiority of maintenance ET plus dual HER2 blockade versus dual HER2 blockade alone. Giredestrant, a novel oral selective ER antagonist and degrader, shows promising clinical activity and manageable safety across phase I-II trials of patients with ER+, HER2-negative BC, with therapeutic potential in those with HER2 co-expression.

METHODS

This phase III, randomized, open-label, two-arm study aims to recruit 812 patients with HER2+, ER+  locally advanced (LA)/mBC into the induction phase (fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection [PH FDC SC] plus a taxane) to enable 730 patients to be randomized 1:1 to the maintenance phase (giredestrant plus PH FDC SC or PH FDC SC [plus optional ET]), stratified by disease site (visceral versus non-visceral), type of LA/metastatic presentation (de novo versus recurrent), best overall response to induction therapy (partial/complete response versus stable disease), and intent to give ET (yes versus no). The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate, duration of response, safety, and patient-reported outcomes.

DISCUSSION

heredERA BC will address whether giredestrant plus dual HER2 blockade is superior to dual HER2 blockade alone, to inform the use of this combination in clinical practice for maintenance 1L treatment of patients with HER2+, ER+ LA/mBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05296798; registered on March 25, 2022. Protocol version 3.0 (November 18, 2022).

SPONSOR

F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124 4070, Basel, Switzerland.

The impact of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents administration concomitantly with adjuvant anti-HER2 treatments on the outcomes of patients with early breast cancer: a sub-analysis of the ALTTO study

PURPOSE

To assess whether erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) administration impacts the outcomes of patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC).

METHODS

ALTTO (NCT00490139) patients were categorized by ESA use during adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment. Disease-free-survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and time-to-distant recurrence (TTDR) were analyzed by ESA administration, with subgroup analyses according to prognostic factors. Log-rank tests and Cox modeling were performed. Adverse events (AEs) of ESA-interest were compared.

RESULTS

Among 8381 patients recruited in ALTTO, 123 (1.5%) received ESA concomitantly with study treatment. The median age of patients receiving ESA was 54 years, 39.0% premenopausal, most had tumor size > 2 cm (56.9%), node-positive (58.5%), and positive estrogen receptor expression (61.8%). Median follow-up was shorter in the ESA group [6.1 years (IQR 5.3-7.0) vs. 6.9 years (6.0-7.1); p < 0.001]. There was no DFS difference by ESA administration (log-rank p = 0.70), with 3- and 7-year DFS of 89.2% (95% CI 81.8-93.8%) and 81.6% (71.4-88.5%) in ESA group vs. 88.3% (87.6-89.0%) and 80.0% (79.1-80.9%) in No-ESA group. In subgroup analyses, the interaction of ESA administration with menopausal status was statistically significant (unadjusted p = 0.024; stratified p = 0.033), favoring premenopausal women receiving ESA. We observed no significant association of ESA administration with OS (log-rank p = 0.57; 7-year OS in ESA 88.6% vs. 90.0% in non-ESA) or TTDR. ESA-interest AEs were experienced by eight (6.5%) patients receiving ESA and 417 (5.1%) in the No-ESA group (p = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

ESA administration to patients receiving adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive EBC was safe and not associated with a negative impact on survival outcomes.

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin and durvalumab with or without oleclumab for women with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the randomized SYNERGY phase I/II trial

Chemo-immunotherapy is the first-line standard of care for patients with PD-L1 positive metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC). SYNERGY (NCT03616886) is a dose-finding phase I and a randomized phase II, open-label trial evaluating if targeting the immunosuppressive adenosine pathway can enhance the antitumor activity of chemo-immunotherapy. The phase I part included 6 patients with untreated locally-advanced or mTNBC to determine the safety and recommended phase II dose of the anti-CD73 antibody oleclumab in combination with the anti-PD-L1 durvalumab and 12 cycles of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel. In the phase II part, 127 women were randomized 1:1 to receive chemo-immunotherapy, with (arm A) or without (arm B) oleclumab. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate at week 24, defined as stable disease, partial or complete response per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate, duration of response, survival outcomes (progression-free survival and overall survival), and safety. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint, as the 24-week clinical benefit rate was not significantly improved by adding oleclumab (43% vs. 44%, p = 0.61). Exploratory median progression-free survival was 5.9 months in arm A as compared to 7.0 months in arm B (p = 0.90). The safety profile was manageable in both arms.

Abstract OT2-03-01: heredERA Breast Cancer: Phase III study of first-line, fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection ± giredestrant (GDC-9545) for estrogen receptor+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND Giredestrant is a highly potent, nonsteroidal, oral selective estrogen receptor antagonist and degrader (SERD) that was found to be well tolerated and active as a monotherapy and in combination therapy in Phase I/II studies in early BC and pretreated locally advanced/metastatic BC (LA/mBC). Dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab + trastuzumab (PH) + a taxane (induction therapy) followed by maintenance PH is the first-line standard of care for most patients (pts) with HER2+ LA/mBC. Despite HER2–ER blockade synergy, paucity of Phase III data evaluating maintenance PH + endocrine therapy (ET) vs. PH in pts with ER+/HER2+ LA/mBC leads to variable use of ET in this setting. Adding giredestrant to the maintenance phase could improve outcomes. TRIAL DESIGN This is a Phase III, randomized, two-arm, open-label, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy and safety of giredestrant + the fixed-dose combination of PH for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) vs. PH FDC SC after induction therapy with PH FDC SC + a taxane in pts with ER+/HER2+ LA/mBC. In the induction phase, pts will receive 4–6 PH FDC SC cycles (1200 mg P/600 mg H in the first cycle, followed by 600/600 mg every 3 weeks) + a taxane (investigator choice of docetaxel/paclitaxel). Pts deriving clinical benefit may receive two additional cycles per investigator’s discretion. Pts completing ≥4 induction therapy cycles, achieving at least stable disease, and with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% will be randomly assigned 1:1 to maintenance giredestrant 30 mg/day + PH FDC SC every 3 weeks or PH FDC SC only, until disease progression (PD). ET (aromatase inhibitor/tamoxifen) will be allowed in the PH FDC SC-only arm. Study treatment will continue until PD, limiting toxicity, death, or consent withdrawal. ELIGIBILITY Enrolled pts must have ER+/HER2+ LA/mBC, disease-free interval from completion of (neo)adjuvant non-ET ≥6 months, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0/1, LVEF ≥50%, and adequate organ function. Pts with prior SERD treatment or presence of symptomatic central nervous system metastases will be excluded. All men and pre-/perimenopausal women must be eligible for a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. AIMS The primary endpoint is investigator-assessed, maintenance progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), objective response rate, duration of response, clinical benefit rate, pt-reported outcomes, and safety. STATISTICAL METHODS The primary endpoint analysis will use a stratified log-rank test at an overall 0.05 significance level (two-sided). An interim OS analysis is planned, and an independent data monitoring committee will be in place. ACCRUAL The study is open for enrollment. Approximately 812 pts will be enrolled in the induction phase, to allow for approximately 730 pts to be randomized in the maintenance phase. CONTACT INFORMATION For more information or to refer a patient, email global.rochegenentechtrials@roche.com or call 1-888-662-6728 (USA only). Clinicaltrials.gov number: NCT05296798.

Citation Format: Sherko Küemmel, Catherine Harper-Wynne, Yeon H. Park, Fábio Franke, Michelino De Laurentiis, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Daniel Eiger, Sarah Heeson, Mahesh Shivhare, Eleonora Restuccia, Joyce O’Shaughnessy. heredERA Breast Cancer: Phase III study of first-line, fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection ± giredestrant (GDC-9545) for estrogen receptor+, HER2+ advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-03-01.

Cardiac safety of dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer in the APHINITY trial

BACKGROUND

Trastuzumab increases the incidence of cardiac events (CEs) in patients with breast cancer (BC). Dual blockade with pertuzumab (P) and trastuzumab (T) improves BC outcomes and is the standard of care for high-risk human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early BC patients. We analyzed the cardiac safety of P and T in the phase III APHINITY trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 55% was required at study entry. LVEF assessment was carried out every 3 months during treatment, every 6 months up to month 36, and yearly up to 10 years. Primary CE was defined as heart failure class III/IV and a significant decrease in LVEF (defined as ≥10% from baseline and to <50%), or cardiac death. Secondary CE was defined as a confirmed significant decrease in LVEF, or CEs confirmed by the cardiac advisory board.

RESULTS

The safety analysis population consisted of 4769 patients. With 74 months of median follow-up, CEs were observed in 159 patients (3.3%): 83 (3.5%) in P + T and 76 (3.2%) in T arms, respectively. Most CEs occurred during anti-HER2 therapy (123; 77.4%) and were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic decreases in LVEF (133; 83.6%). There were two cardiac deaths in each arm (0.1%). Cardiac risk factors indicated were age > 65 years, body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m², baseline LVEF between 55% and <60%, and use of an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimen. Acute recovery from a CE based on subsequent LVEF values was observed in 127/155 patients (81.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual blockade with P + T does not increase the risk of CEs compared with T alone. The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy increases the risk of a CE; hence, non-anthracycline chemotherapy may be considered, particularly in patients with cardiovascular risk factors.

Outcomes of patients with small and node-negative HER2-positive early breast cancer treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and anti-HER2 therapy-a sub-analysis of the ALTTO study

BACKGROUND

Patients with small node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer are commonly treated with paclitaxel and 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. We performed a sub-analysis of the ALTTO trial to explore the long-term outcomes of patients with small node-negative tumours.

METHODS

The ALTTO trial randomised 8381 patients with early HER2-positive BC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (anthracycline/taxane- or taxane/carboplatin-based), to trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L), their sequence (T → L) or their combination (L + T). Patients with tumours ≤3 cm and node-negative were included in this sub-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2821 patients were analysed (median follow-up of 7 years). The median age was 52 years, and most patients had tumours ≤2 cm (64.3%). The 7-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 88.1% (95% CI: 86.7-89.3%). DFS was similar for arms T, T + L and T⟶L and significantly lower for arm L (stratified log-rank P = 0.031). The 7-year overall survival rate was 95.9% (95% CI: [95.0-96.6%) and the 7-year time-to-distant recurrence was 93.4% (95% CI: 92.3-94.4%).

CONCLUSION

With most patients treated with anthracycline-based regimens, ALTTO shows that patients with small tumours treated with trastuzumab and concomitant chemotherapy have excellent long-term outcomes, similar to those of the APT trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00490139.

Atezolizumab With Neoadjuvant Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Therapy and Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: Primary Results of the Randomized Phase III IMpassion050 Trial

Combining standard of care (pertuzumab-trastuzumab [PH], chemotherapy) with cancer immunotherapy may potentiate antitumor immunity, cytotoxic activity, and patient outcomes in high-risk, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive early breast cancer. We report the phase III IMpassion050 primary analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab, PH, and chemotherapy in these patients.

Clinical characteristics and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of patients with HER2-positive and hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) initiating endocrine therapy (ET) in combination with the first line of treatment: An analysis of electronic health records in the United States

e13028

Background: Dual HER2 blockade with pertuzumab (P) + trastuzumab (H), combined with taxane induction therapy, is the standard of care for the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive MBC. In clinical practice, after achieving clinical benefit with approximately 4–6 cycles of PH + taxane induction, maintenance therapy is continued with PH only until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity. Approximately 50–60% of patients with HER2-positive MBC also have concurrent HR expression and may receive ET in combination with PH. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients initiating ET combined with PH as maintenance therapy after completion of PH + taxane induction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide US electronic health record-derived de-identified database (Flatiron Health). Patients with HER2-positive and HR-positive MBC who initiated an ET between Jan 1, 2012 and Feb 28, 2021 with concomitant PH after receiving at least four cycles of first-line PH + taxane induction were included. The index date was the date of ET initiation. Progression data were abstracted from the medical charts. Mortality data were abstracted and combined with patient-level structured data (obituaries and Social Security Death Index). rwPFS was defined as the time from index date until first progression event > 14 days after the index date, or date of death; otherwise, patients were censored on the date of last clinical note abstraction. Baseline characteristics were described using summary statistics, and rwPFS in the maintenance setting was described using a Kaplan–Meier estimator from the index date. Results: Of 24,690 patients diagnosed with MBC in the database, 252 (1%) met the eligibility criteria. All patients were female. The median age was 56.6 years; 149 patients (59%) were diagnosed with de novo MBC; 248 (98%), with estrogen receptor-positive disease; and 182 (72%), with progesterone receptor-positive disease. One hundred ninety-three patients (77%) received an aromatase inhibitor as ET. The median number of taxane cycles received prior to the index date was six. Median maintenance rwPFS was 21.4 months (95% confidence interval = 16.1, 25.3). Conclusions: Given the therapeutic opportunity presented by HER2/HR co-expression and the favorable maintenance rwPFS shown here with PH + ET following taxane induction, the investigation of more potent ETs combined with PH is justified in order to further improve outcomes in first-line HER2-positive/HR-positive MBC.

BERENICE Final Analysis: Cardiac Safety Study of Neoadjuvant Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, and Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab in HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer

BERENICE (NCT02132949) assessed the cardiac safety of the neoadjuvant−adjuvant pertuzumab−trastuzumab-based therapy for high-risk, HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC). We describe key secondary objectives at final analysis. Eligible patients received dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide q2w × 4 ➝ paclitaxel qw × 12 (Cohort A) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide q3w × 4 ➝ docetaxel q3w × 4 (B) as per physician’s choice. Pertuzumab−trastuzumab (q3w) was initiated from the taxane start and continued post-surgery to complete 1 year. Median follow-up: 64.5 months. There were no new cardiac issues and a low incidence of Class III/IV heart failure (Cohort B only: one patient (0.5%) in the adjuvant and treatment-free follow-up (TFFU) periods). Fourteen patients (7.7%) had LVEF declines of ≥10% points from baseline to <50% in Cohort A, as did 20 (10.5%) in B during the adjuvant period (12 (6.2%) in A and 7 (3.6%) in B during TFFU). The five-year event-free survival rates in Cohorts A and B were 90.8% (95% CI: 86.5, 95.2) and 89.2% (84.8, 93.6), respectively. The five-year overall survival rates were 96.1% (95% CI: 93.3, 98.9) and 93.8% (90.3, 97.2), respectively. The final analysis of BERENICE further supports pertuzumab−trastuzumab-based therapies as standard of care for high-risk, HER2-positive EBC.

Timelines to initiate a phase III trial across the globe: a sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial

Background

Geographic location and national income may influence access to innovation in healthcare. We aimed to study if geographical location and national income influenced the timelines to activate the global phase III APHINITY trial, evaluating adjuvant pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer.

Methods

Time from regulatory authority (RA) submission to approval (RAA), time to Ethics Committee/Institutional Review Board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomised patient and from first to last randomised patient were collected. Analyses were conducted grouping countries by geographical region or economic income classification.

Results

Forty-one countries (of 42) had data available regarding all relevant timelines. No statistical difference was observed between the time to RAA and geographical region (p = 0.47), although there was a trend to longer time to RAA in upper middle-income economies (p = 0.07). Except for time from first to last patient randomised, there was wide variation in timelines overall and within geographical regions and economic income groups.

Conclusions

Geographical location and income classification did not appear to be the major drivers influencing time for clinical trial activation. Wide variability in activation timelines within geographical regions and income groups exists and is worthy of further investigation.

Abstract P1-14-05: The impact of erythropoietin administration concomitantly with adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment on the patients’ outcome: Sub-analysis of the ALTTO study

Background: The erythropoietin (EPO) receptor activation can stimulate tumor proliferation and may be implicated in resistance to anti-HER2 therapies. EPO administration can be used for the management of chemotherapy-induced anemia. We aim to assess if EPO intake during the adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment impacts the outcomes of HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) patients. Methods: For this post hoc analysis of the ALTTO trial (NCT00490139), we categorized two cohorts according to the use of EPO during adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment: i) at least one EPO dose (EPO-cohort) vs ii) no EPO (non-EPO-cohort). We compared their baseline characteristics to identify potential confounders. The primary endpoint disease-free-survival (DFS), and the secondary endpoint overall survival (OS) were compared between these two cohorts, with subgroup analysis according to menopausal status, tumor characteristics, and anti-HER2 treatment. Kaplan Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression model adjusted for confounders were performed for DFS and OS (removal criterion p&lt;0.10). The frequency of cardiovascular and thromboembolic adverse events (AEs) of EPO interest was compared between both cohorts. Results: Out of the 8,381 patients recruited in the ALTTO trial, 123 (1.5%) received EPO concomitantly with adjuvant treatment, 59 in the single HER2 blockade (Lapatinib (L)-alone or Trastuzumab (T)-alone) and 64 in dual blockade (T→L or T+L) arms. The median age of EPO-cohort patients was 54 (range: 27-74) years, and 39% were premenopausal, while most had pathologic tumor size &gt;2 cm (56.9%), positive nodal status (58.5%), positive hormone receptor (HR) status (61.8%), and poorly differentiated or undifferentiated histologic grade (64.2%). Baseline characteristics were similar in both cohorts, except for the timing of chemotherapy, for which 93.5% of patients from the EPO-cohort were enrolled in the concurrent designs (2/2B) vs 44.2% in the non-EPO-cohort (p&lt;0.001). Median FU was 6.9 years, with 6,409 (76.5%) patients still on follow-up. For the entire ALTTO cohort, the estimated 3- and 7-year DFS were 88.3% (95% CI: 87.6% - 89.0%) and 80.1% (95% CI: 79.1% - 81.0%), respectively. No difference in DFS by EPO administration (Yes/No) was observed (log-rank p=0.70). The effect of EPO remained non-significant when controlled for the four stratification factors and all other characteristics (p=0.91). The effect of EPO administration on DFS was significant for the subgroup of premenopausal women (p=0.041), favoring the EPO-cohort, noting that this result is based on small event numbers. The interaction was found significant in Cox analysis (p=0.024), remaining significant after adjustment for important prognostic variables (p=0.032). For the entire ALTTO cohort, 758 (9.0%) deaths occurred, with 3-year OS estimate 95.7% (95% CI: 95.2% - 96.1%) and 7-year OS estimate 89.9% (89.2% - 90.6%). The OS results are consistent with those for DFS regarding the lack of a significant association with EPO and the significance (p&lt;0.10) of menopausal status and EPO interaction. In the EPO-cohort (n=123), eight (6.5%) AEs of EPO interest were recorded, while from the non-EPO-cohort (n=8,147), 417 (5.1%) reported similar AEs. Three fatal and 25 life-threatening AEs of EPO interest were recorded in the non-EPO-cohort, and none in the EPO-cohort. Conclusion: EPO administration to patients receiving adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment for HER2-positive EBC was safe and not associated with a harmful impact on survival outcomes, however the sample size of patients who received EPO is rather small. These findings contrast with data suggesting poorer outcomes with EPO, therefore further investigation of tumour microenvironment is needed to better understand these results, particularly in the premenopausal subgroup.

Citation Format: Diogo Martins-Branco, Marie Kassapian, Véronique Debien, Rafael Caparica, Daniel Eiger, Urania Dafni, Charitini Andriakopoulou, Sarra El-Abed, Miguel Izquierdo, Malou Vicente, Saranya Chumsri, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Ann Søegaard Knop, Janine Lombard, Evandro de Azambuja. The impact of erythropoietin administration concomitantly with adjuvant anti-HER2 treatment on the patients’ outcome: Sub-analysis of the ALTTO study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-05.

Clinical Implications of Body Mass Index in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Abemaciclib and Endocrine Therapy

BACKGROUND

There are limited data regarding the impact of body mass index (BMI) on outcomes in advanced breast cancer, especially in patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) + cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors.

METHODS

A pooled analysis of individual patient-level data from MONARCH 2 and 3 trials was performed. Patients were classified according to baseline BMI into underweight (<18.5 kg/m2), normal (18.5-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m2), and obese (≥30 kg/m2) and divided into 2 treatment groups: abemaciclib + ET vs placebo + ET. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to BMI in each treatment group. Secondary endpoints were response rate, adverse events according to BMI, and loss of weight (≥5% from baseline) during treatment.

RESULTS

This analysis included 1138 patients (757 received abemaciclib + ET and 381 placebo + ET). There was no difference in PFS between BMI categories in either group, although normal-weight patients presented a numerically higher benefit with abemaciclib + ET (Pinteraction = .07). Normal and/or underweight patients presented higher overall response rate in the abemaciclib + ET group compared with overweight and/or obese patients (49.4% vs 41.6%, odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval = 0.54 to 0.99) as well as higher neutropenia frequency (51.0% vs 40.4%, P = .004). Weight loss was more frequent in the abemaciclib + ET group (odds ratio = 3.23, 95% confidence interval = 2.09 to 5.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding abemaciclib to ET prolongs PFS regardless of BMI, showing that overweight or obese patients also benefit from this regimen. Our results elicit the possibility of a better effect of abemaciclib in normal and/or underweight patients compared with overweight and/or obese patients. More studies analyzing body composition parameters in patients under treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors may further clarify this hypothesis.

Neo-CheckRay: radiation therapy and adenosine pathway blockade to increase benefit of immuno-chemotherapy in early stage luminal B breast cancer, a randomized phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Residual breast cancer after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) predicts disease outcome and is a surrogate for survival in aggressive breast cancer (BC) subtypes. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate, however, is lower for luminal B BC in comparison to the triple negative (TNBC) and HER2+ subtypes. The addition of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to NACT has the potential to increase pCR rate but is hampered by the lower immunogenicity of luminal B BC. Novel strategies are needed to stimulate the immune response and increase the response rate to ICB in luminal B BC.

METHODS

The Neo-CheckRay trial is a randomized phase II trial investigating the impact of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to the primary breast tumor in combination with an anti-CD73 (oleclumab) to increase response to anti PD-L1 (durvalumab) and NACT. The trial is designed as a three-arm study: NACT + SBRT +/- durvalumab +/- oleclumab. The result at surgery will be evaluated using the residual cancer burden (RCB) index as the primary endpoint. Six patients will be included in a safety run-in, followed by a randomized phase II trial that will include 136 evaluable patients in 3 arms. Inclusion is limited to luminal B breast cancers that are MammaPrint genomic high risk.

DISCUSSION

combination of ICB with chemotherapy in luminal B BC might benefit from immune priming agents to increase the response rate. As none have been identified so far, this phase II trial will evaluate SBRT and oleclumab as potential immune priming candidates.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

trial registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03875573 ) on March 14th, 2019.

Clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced breast cancer: An 11-year single institutional experience

BACKGROUND/METHODS

Although the prognosis of metastatic breast cancer (BC) has improved, some patients still develop high burden metastases or visceral crisis (VC) and polychemotherapy is commonly used in these cases. Data reporting the real effectiveness of this strategy are scanty. Therefore, the outcomes of patients with metastatic BC treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (P-ChT) at the Jules Bordet Institute during the period of January 2008 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of VC was defined according to ABC 4 criteria.

RESULTS

441 patients were identified: visceral metastases were observed in 430 (97.5%) while 261 (59.2%) presented VC. As for metastatic BC subtype, 255 (57.8%) had ER-positive/HER2-negative, 41 (9.3%) ER-positive/HER2-positive, 34 (7.7%) ER-negative/HER2-positive and 111 (25.1%) triple-negative BC. Median number of prior treatment lines was 3.8 (0-12). Median OS with P-ChT in the entire cohort was 6.13 months. Patients with VC had lower OS than patients without VC (8.6 vs 3.7 months; p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, the variables correlated with worse OS were hyperbilirubinemia (HR 1.90; 95% CI 1.34-2.75), ECOG ≥2 (HR 1.77; 95% CI 1.13-2.78) and ECOG ≥3 (HR 2.52; 95% CI 1.48-4.28), and >3 previous treatment lines (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.53-3.21). Of the 261 patients with VC, 106 (40.5%) presented a resolution of the VC which correlated with better OS (9.3 vs 2.0 months, HR 0.27; 95% CI 0.21-0.36).

CONCLUSION

Patients who overcome VC benefit from P-ChT with OS similar to patients without VC. In this analysis, hyperbilirubinemia, poor ECOG and >3 previous treatment lines were significant prognostic factors in the overall study population.

Cardiac safety of dual anti-HER2 blockade with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (P+T) in the APHINITY trial

510

Background: Trastuzumab (T) increases the incidence of cardiac events (CEs) in patients (pts) with early breast cancer (BC). Dual blockade with P+T improves BC outcomes and is the standard of care for high-risk HER2-positive BC pts following the phase 3 APHINITY trial that evaluated the addition of P or placebo (Pla) to T and chemotherapy (CT). We analyzed the cardiac safety of P+T in APHINITY. Methods: APHINITY eligibility required a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥55% at study entry. LVEF assessment was performed every 3 months (mos) during treatment, every 6 mos up to month 36, and yearly thereafter. Primary CE was defined as heart failure (HF) class III/IV and a significant decrease in LVEF of at least 10 percentage points from baseline and to <50%, or cardiac death. Secondary CE was defined as a confirmed significant decrease in LVEF or CEs confirmed by the cardiac advisory board. Results: The safety analysis population consists of 4,769 pts. With 74 mos median follow-up (FU), CEs were observed in 159 pts (3.3%): 83 (3.5%) in the P+T and 76 (3.2%) in Pla+T arms, respectively. Most CEs occurred during anti-HER2 therapy: 123/159 (77.4%) and were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic LVEF decrease (133/159; 83.6%) (Table 1). There were 2 cardiac deaths in each arm (0.1%). More CEs occurred in pts receiving an anthracycline-based CT compared to those receiving non-anthracycline CT (139 vs. 20 CEs, respectively). Acute recovery from a CE based on subsequent LVEF values was observed in 127/155 pts (81.9%). Conclusions: Dual blockade with P+T does not increase the risk of CE compared to Pla+T alone. The use of anthracycline-based CT increases the risk of a CE; hence non-anthracycline CT may be considered particularly in pts with other cardiovascular risk factors. Clinical trial information: NCT01358877. [Table: see text]

Emerging Therapeutics for Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 10-15% of all breast cancers and it is associated with a poor prognosis. However, recent new effective treatment strategies have improved its outcomes. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the emerging therapeutics for TNBC, describing both previously approved therapies that are currently being repurposed, as well as new target therapies that may improve patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging therapies are forthcoming in TNBC's treatment landscape, including new post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies, PARP inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates. Combination of different therapies such as AKT/PI3K/mTOR-inhibitors, other immunotherapeutic agents, CDK-inhibitors, antiandrogens, antiangiogenics, and histone deacetylase inhibitors is under clinical investigation. The treatment landscape for TNBC is gradually evolving towards a more personalized approach with promising expectations.

Cardiotoxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may cause potentially life-threatening adverse events (AEs), but the risk of cardiotoxicity has not been fully investigated. It is also unknown whether ICI combinations increase cardiotoxicity compared with single ICI. We aimed to assess the cardiotoxicity of ICI in a range of tumour types.

METHODS

This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020183524). A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase databases, and conference proceedings was performed up to 30 June 2020. All randomised clinical trials comparing ICI with other treatments (primary objective) or dual-agent ICI versus single-agent ICI (secondary objective) in any solid tumour were included. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for cardiotoxicity events were calculated using random effect models.

RESULTS

Eighty studies including 35,337 patients were included in the analysis (66 studies with 34,664 patients for the primary endpoint and 14 studies with 673 patients for the secondary endpoint). No significant differences in terms of cardiac AEs were observed between ICI and non-ICI groups (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.88-1.48, p = 0.326) nor between dual ICI and single ICI groups (RR 1.91, 95% CI 0.52-7.01, p = 0.329). Myocarditis incidence did not significantly differ between ICI and non-ICI groups (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.64-1.92, p = 0.701) nor between dual ICI and single ICI groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.31-3.87, p = 0.881). No differences were observed in subgroup analyses according to tumour type, setting of disease, treatment line, and type of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The use of ICI as single or combination regimens is not associated with increased risk of cardiotoxicity.

Impact of HIV infection on baseline characteristics and survival of women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

As women living with HIV (WLWH) become older, their risk of developing breast cancer increases. Nonetheless, literature is conflicting regarding tumor stage, distribution of subtypes and overall survival among WLWH vs. HIV-negative women with breast cancer. We assessed differences in clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival between these two groups.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge, LILACS, SciELO and conference abstracts up to 1 January 2020. Cross-sectional/cohort studies comparing baseline characteristics (stage and/or subtypes) and/or overall survival of WLWH vs. HIV-negative women with breast cancer were included. We performed random-effects meta-analyses to estimate summary statistics and subgroup analyses according to region of the world.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies [4 from North America, 14 from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)] were included, with 3174 WLWH and 2 394 598 HIV-negative women. WLWH from North America and SSA were more likely to present with stage III/IV disease compared with HIV-negative women - pooled odds ratio (pOR) 1.76 [95% confidence interval (CI):1.58-1.95] and pOR 1.23 (95% CI: 1.06-1.42), respectively. WLWH from SSA were also less likely to have estrogen receptor-positive/HER2-negative tumors (pOR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66-0.99). After adjustment, WLWH had worse overall survival compared with HIV-negative women, both in North America [pooled adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 2.45; 95% CI: 1.11-5.41] and SSA (aHR 1.43; 95% CI: 1.06-1.92).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HIV-negative women, WLWH are diagnosed with breast cancer at a more advanced stage and have a worse overall survival. These results should raise awareness regarding the detection and survival gap among WLWH with breast cancer and further studies are needed to decipher the reasons behind these disparities.

Abstract PS7-21: Timelines to initiate an adjuvant phase III trial across the globe: A sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial

Background:Previous analysis of an adjuvant breast cancer trial (NCT00490139) suggested that geographical location and income affected the time required to set up a clinical trial, being significantly longer in South American and upper-middle income economies, potentially affecting access of innovative therapies in these locations. Understanding that this can be a dynamic process, we performed a similar analysis for the recent global phase III APHINITY trial (NCT01358877), which investigated the addition of pertuzumab to chemotherapy and trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with HER2-positive primary breast cancer.

Methods:Time to regulatory authority (RA) submission to approval, time to ethics committee/institutional review board (EC/IRB) approval, time from study approval by EC/IRB to first randomized patient, and time from first to last randomized patient were collected prospectively. Analyses were conducted by grouping countries either by geographical region or economic income classification as per 2019 World Bank criteria. Descriptive statistics of medians and ranges were calculated for the different timelines evaluated. Differences between geographical regions and economic income classification groups were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following data normalization on square roots of the time to local RA. Geographical regions represented by only one participating country were not included in the ANOVA calculations.

Results:APHINITY randomized 4805 patients between November 2011 and August 2013. Of the 42 participating countries, 41 had data available regarding all relevant timelines. Of those, 21 (51.2%) were located in Europe, 9 (21.9%) in the East Asia-Pacific region, 8 (19.5%) in Latin America and Caribbean, 2 (4.8%) in North America, and 1 (2.4%) in Sub-Saharan Africa. Twenty-seven (65.8%) of the participating countries had high, 11 (26.8%) upper-middle, and 3 (7.3%) had lower-middle income economies.

Except for time from first patient to last patient randomized, there was wide variation in timelines within geographical region and across economic income classification. For example, the median time from EC/IRB approval to first recruited patient across all geographical regions was 118 days, but the range was wide (13– 463 days). There was, however, no statistical difference between the time to RA according to geographical region (p=0.47) although there was a trend to longer time to RA in upper-middle income economies compared to the others (p=0.07).

Conclusion

Our results did not demonstrate a significantly longer time for trial activation in Latin American & Caribbean countries and upper-middle income economies compared to other groups in the APHINITY trial. When compared to a previous report, this may reflect collective work from collaborative research groups, pharmaceutical industry sponsors and regulatory authorities across the globe and is to be welcomed. Variability in timelines within geographical regions and income classifications may exist and should be further investigated.

Table 1: Timelines in the activation process of APHINITY across geographical region and economic income classification.Time to RA (days)*Time to EC/IRB (days)Time from EC/IRB approval to first patient (days)Time from first patient to last patient randomized (months)Europe and Central Asia56 (4-135)67 (22-164)109 (13-257)17.6 (13.2-21.7)North America31 (30-32)73 (19-126)126 (86-165)17.6 (13.8-21.5)East Asia and Pacific53 (15-372)67 (31-421)108 (56-147)18 (8.7-19.9)Latin America and Caribbean51 (15-276)43 (19-273)232 (98-463)14.6 (6.5-17.5)Middle East and North Africa-141 (141-141)92 (92-92)13.9 (13.9-13.9)Sub-Saharan Africa103 (103-103)14 (14-14)185 (185-185)18.2 (18.2-18.2)Overall53 (4-372)56 (14-421)118 (13-463)17 (6.5-21.7)High income45 (4-276)60 (19-273)98 (13-257)18.2 (11.9-21.7)Upper middle income92 (15-372)54 (14-421)185 (73-463)14.2 (6.5-18.2)Lower middle income55 (32-111)33 (32-78)201 (147-209)15.1 (13.5-17.4)Overall53 (4-372)56 (14-421)118 (13-463)17 (6.5-21.7)Data are medians (range)*The protocol was not submitted to a country regulatory authority for Israel. The corresponding timelines for Israel cannot be calculated.EC/IRB = ethics committee/institutional review board; RA = regulatory approval

Citation Format: Maria Alice Franzoi, Marion Procter, Orianne Emond, Damien Parlier, Noam Pondé, Daniel Eiger, Sebastien Guillaume, Linda Reaby, Christopher Twelves, Emma Clark, Evandro de Azambuja, Jose Bines. Timelines to initiate an adjuvant phase III trial across the globe: A sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-21.

Long-term cardiac outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated in the adjuvant lapatinib and/or trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiotoxicity is the most significant adverse event associated with trastuzumab (T), the main component of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) treatment. Less is known about the cardiotoxicity of dual HER2 blockade with T plus lapatinib (L), although this regimen is used in the metastatic setting.

METHODS

This is a sub-analysis of the ALTTO trial comparing adjuvant treatment options for patients with early HER2-positive BC. Patients randomised to either T or concomitant T + L were eligible. Cardiac events (CEs) rates were compared according to treatment arm.

RESULTS

With 6.9 years of median follow-up (FU) and 4190 patients, CE were observed in 363 (8.6%): 166 (7.9%) of patient in T + L arm vs. 197 (9.3%) in T arm (OR = 0.85 [95% CI, 0.68-1.05]). During anti-HER2 treatment 270 CE (6.4%) occurred while 93 (2.2%) were during FU (median time to onset = 6.6 months [IQR = 3.4-11.7]). While 265 CEs were asymptomatic (73%), 94 were symptomatic (26%) and four were cardiac deaths (1%). Recovery was observed in 301 cases (83.8%). Identified cardiac risk factors were: baseline LVEF < 55% (vs > 64%, OR 3.1 [95% CI 1.54-6.25]), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.85 [95% CI 1.25-2.75]), BMI > 30 kg/m2 (vs < 25 mg/kg2, OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.40-3.49]), cumulative dose of doxorubicin ≥240 mg/m2 (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.01-1.82]) and of epirubicin≥ 480 mg/m2 (OR 2.33 [95% CI 1.55-3.51]).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual HER2 blockade with T + L is a safe regimen from a cardiac perspective, but cardiac-focused history for proper patient selection is crucial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00490139 (registration date: 22/06/2007); EudraCT Number: 2006-000562-36 (registration date: 04/05/2007); Sponsor Protocol Number: BIG2-06 /EGF106708/N063D.

Computed tomography-based analyses of baseline body composition parameters and changes in breast cancer patients under treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors

PURPOSE

Body composition parameters including muscle and adipose tissue measurements have emerged as prognostic factors in cancer patients. Besides cell cycle regulation, CDK 4 and 6 also control metabolic processes (lipid synthesis, glycolysis, and mitochondrial function). We studied the impact of baseline body composition parameters on response to CDK 4/6 inhibition and changes on body composition during treatment.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 50 patients treated at Institut Jules Bordet between December 2016 and August 2019 with endocrine therapy and CDK 4/6 inhibitor as first or second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (BC). CT-based body composition analysis was performed at 3 time points. Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used for the association with Progression-free survival (PFS). Changes in body composition parameters were described in means and compared using paired sampled T test.

RESULTS

Baseline sarcopenia was present in 40% of patients and associated with a significantly worse PFS compared to patients without sarcopenia (20.8 vs 9.6 months, HR 2.52; 95% CI 1.02-6.19, p = 0.037). Patients with higher visceral fat index and higher visceral fat density had better PFS (20.8 vs 10.4 months, HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.99 p = 0.041-stratified for treatment line). No significant alterations in body composition parameters during treatment were observed.

CONCLUSION

Sarcopenia is a potential early marker of poor prognosis among patients with metastatic BC treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors. CT scan evaluation of sarcopenia and adiposity revealed significant prognostic information. Visceral fat could also play an important role in response to CDK 4/6 inhibitors, deserving further investigation.

Abstract P6-11-03: Characteristics and survival outcomes of HIV-positive breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: The number of people living with HIV is increasing worldwide thanks to the use of effective antiretroviral therapy. As these individuals get older, their risk of being diagnosed with cancer increases, including non-AIDS defining cancers such as breast cancer (BC). Most reports reveal that HIV+ patients (pts) with BC tend to be younger than HIV-uninfected (HIV-) pts. However, epidemiological data is yet conflicting regarding tumor stage at diagnosis, distribution of BC subtypes and overall survival (OS) of HIV+ pts as compared to HIV- pts. This meta-analysis aims to assess differences of baseline clinicopathological characteristics and OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts.

Methods: We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE, Scielo, and conference abstracts up to June 10, 2019, with no language restrictions. Cohort studies and consecutive series comparing baseline characteristics (age, stage at diagnosis or BC subtypes) and/or OS of HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts were included. BC subtypes were defined according to 2 classifications: 1) “classic” immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes (ER+/HER2-; HER2+; triple-negative BC); 2) surrogate intrinsic subtypes as per the St. Gallen Consensus (luminal A-like, luminal B-like, HER2-enriched and basal-like). Summary risk estimates (pooled mean ratios [pMR] and odds ratios [pOR]) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random effects models. OS data were pooled as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI and modeled using a random effects model. The main endpoints were age (as a continuous variable), stage at diagnosis (early [0-II] vs late [III-IV]), distribution of BC subtypes and OS (using both adjusted and unadjusted HR). Subgroup analysis of each endpoint was performed according to region of the world.

Results: A total of 16 studies (4 from North America and 12 from Sub-Saharan Africa [SSA]) published from 2005-2019 were included in this meta-analysis (with 1,764 HIV+ and 1,330,122 HIV- pts). HIV+ pts were younger than HIV- pts (pooled mean age of 41.1 vs 50.5 years, respectively; pMR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.90, p &lt; 0.001) and had a 45% increased risk of presenting with late stage disease (pOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.25-1.68, p &lt; 0.001). There were no differences regarding distribution of BC subtypes, both by the “classic” IHC or by the St. Gallen classification. Overall, HIV+ pts had a 91% increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR for OS: 1.91, 95% CI 1.06-3.45, p = 0.031 and unadjusted HR for OS: HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.10-1.95, p = 0.008). Subgroup analysis of OS according to region of the world showed that, in North America, HIV+ pts had a significantly increased risk of dying as compared to HIV- pts (adjusted HR 2.96, 95% CI 1.06-8.25, p = 0.038). In SSA, the increased mortality risk among HIV+ pts was also significant (adjusted HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.00, p &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analysis showed similar findings.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides for the first time a comprehensive comparison of baseline characteristics and survival outcomes between HIV+ vs HIV- BC pts. Our results consistently demonstrate that HIV+ pts are diagnosed with BC at a younger age and at a more advanced stage. Additionally, even after adjusting for known prognostic factors, HIV+ pts have a worse OS as compared to HIV- pts, not only in developing countries (SSA) but also and particularly in developed countries (North America). There were no apparent differences in terms of distribution of BC subtypes. These results should raise the awareness of clinicians and policy makers regarding the detection and survival gap among HIV+ BC pts. This underserved population should be the focus of more research efforts, in order to better understand the reasons behind these disparities, which can be related to the HIV infection itself, to a more aggressive BC biology, and/or to a lower access to timely diagnosis and effective treatment.

Citation Format: Mariana Brandão, Marco Bruzzone, Maria Alice Franzoi, Claudia De Angelis, Daniel Eiger, Rafael Caparica, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Laurence Buisseret, Marcello Ceppi, Evandro de Azambuja, Matteo Lambertini. Characteristics and survival outcomes of HIV-positive breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-11-03.

Cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab given for 12 months compared to shorter treatment periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of six clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Treatment de-escalation in early-stage, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has been attempted in order to decrease costs and toxicities. One of the strategies pursued is decreasing trastuzumab treatment duration, with mixed results thus far. Trastuzumab-associated cardiotoxicity, however, may be more frequent with 12 months of trastuzumab compared with shorter treatment lengths. Therefore, we have conducted a meta-analysis to address this question.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A meta-analysis of trials testing 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab versus shorter regimens, reporting cardiac outcomes in patients with HER2-positive BC was performed with the random effects model with inverse variance weighting.

RESULTS

Clinical cardiac dysfunction associated with 12 months of trastuzumab versus shorter trastuzumab regimens, including 11 250 patients, showed a pooled OR (pOR) of 1.90 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.64; p value <0.001; I2=65.7%); in the subgroup comparison of 12 versus 6 months, the pOR was 1.57 (95% CI 1.30 to 1.90; p<0.001; I2=5.7%). pOR for low left ventricular ejection fraction was 1.45 (95% CI 1.19 to 1.75; p<0.001; I2=11.9%), 1.55 (95% CI 1.00 to 2.42; p=0.052; I2=0.0%) for congestive heart failure and 3.70 (95% CI 0.27 to 51.60; p=0.33; I2=78.8%) for premature trastuzumab discontinuation due to cardiotoxicity for 12 months versus shorter trastuzumab regimens. Funnel plot analyses indicated a low risk of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to shorter treatment durations, there is sufficient evidence that 12 months of trastuzumab yields higher odds for the occurrence of relevant cardiac events. An individual patient-level data meta-analysis is needed in order to provide adequate data on risk factors for cardiotoxicity.

Biomarkers of response and resistance to PI3K inhibitors in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients and combination therapies involving PI3K inhibitors

In this review, we discuss biomarkers of response and resistance to PI3K inhibitors (PI3Ki) in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer, both in the early and advanced settings. We analyse data regarding PIK3CA mutations, PI3K pathway activation, PTEN expression loss, Akt signalling, insulin levels, 18FFDG-PET/CT imaging, FGFR1/2 amplification, KRAS and TP53 mutations. Most of the discussed data comprise retrospective and exploratory studies, hence many results are not conclusive. Therefore, among all of these biomarkers, only PIK3CA mutations have proved to have a predictive value for treatment with the α-selective PI3Ki alpelisib (SOLAR-1 trial) and the β-sparing PI3Ki taselisib (SANDPIPER trial) in the advanced setting. Since the accuracy of current individual biomarkers is not optimal, a composite biomarker, including DNA, RNA and protein expression data, to more precisely assess the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation status, may arise as a promising approach. Finally, we describe the rational for new combination therapies involving PI3Ki and anti-HER2 agents, chemotherapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors or new endocrine treatments and discuss the ongoing trials in this field.

Pertuzumab in HER2-positive early breast cancer: current use and perspectives

Although the prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer patients has dramatically improved with modern chemotherapy and the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, up to 31% of them will experience a recurrence in the long term. After the unprecedented benefit in overall survival with the addition of the second monoclonal antibody pertuzumab for patients with metastatic disease, the drug was tested with various degrees of success in the preoperative and postoperative settings. In this review, we will focus on the pharmacologic aspects of the drug, including mechanism of action and toxicities, and discuss clinical data regarding its use in advanced and early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, placing in perspective the pros and cons regarding other available drugs and biomarkers.

Complete lymphadenectomy following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous melanoma: a critical review

Cutaneous melanoma is the solid neoplasia with the highest growing incidence among all tumors. It spreads predictably to the lymphatic vessels and sentinel lymph node, and when the latter is affected the prognosis worsens dramatically. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is considered when thickness of the primary tumor exceeds 1mm and/or when there are adverse features in thinner melanomas. When there is nodal metastasis, current evidence in the literature recommends complete lymphadenectomy, although this procedure has its intrinsic risks (i.e., lymphedema and cellulitis), and there are no published clinical trials proving additional overall survival benefits. The current in-depth literature review thus aims to identify patients that will benefit most from the procedure, including those with the highest likelihood of presenting additional affected lymph nodes in the same nodal basin. The authors also discuss techniques for identification of the sentinel lymph node, false-negative rates, and predictive models for lymph node involvement. In conclusion, complete elective lymphadenectomy should always be discussed on a case-by-case basis when metastases are detected in the sentinel lymph node.

Continuous palliative sedation for patients with advanced cancer at a tertiary care cancer center

Background

Palliative sedation (PS) is an intervention to treat refractory symptoms and to relieve suffering at the end of life. Its prevalence and practice patterns vary widely worldwide. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency, clinical indications and outcomes of PS in advanced cancer patients admitted to our tertiary comprehensive cancer center.

Methods

We retrospectively studied the use of PS in advanced cancer patients who died between March 1st, 2012 and December 31st, 2014. PS was defined as the use of continuous infusion of midazolam or neuroleptics for refractory symptoms in the end of life. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of our institution (project number 2481–15).

Results

During the study period, 552 cancer patients died at the institution and 374 met the inclusion criteria for this study. Main reason for exclusion was death in the Intensive Care Unit. Among all included patients, 54.2% (n = 203) received PS. Patients who received PS as compared to those not sedated were younger (67.8 vs. 76.4 years-old, p < 0.001) and more likely to have a diagnosis of lung cancer (23% vs. 14%, p = 0.028). The most common indications for sedation were dyspnea (55%) and delirium (19.7%) and the most common drugs used were midazolam (52.7%) or midazolam and a neuroleptic (39.4%). Median initial midazolam infusion rate was 0.75 mg/h (interquartile range – IQR - 0.6-1.5) and final rate was 1.5 mg/h (IQR 0.9–3.0). Patient survival (length of hospital stay from admission to death) of those who had PS was more than the double of those who did not (33.6 days vs 16 days, p < 0.001). The palliative care team was involved in the care of 12% (n = 25) of sedated patients.

Conclusions

PS is a relatively common practice in the end-of-life of cancer patients at our hospital and it is not associated with shortening of hospital stay. Involvement of a dedicated palliative care team is strongly recommended if this procedure is being considered. Further research is needed to identify factors that may affect the frequency and outcomes associated with PS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12904-017-0264-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Experience with palliative sedation (PS) in an inpatient oncology setting

63

Background: Palliative sedation (PS) is an intervention to treat refractory symptoms and to relieve suffering at the end of life. Its prevalence and practice patterns vary widely. Methods: This is a retrospective study of the use of PS in cancer patients who died at our comprehensive cancer center between March 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014. PS was defined as the use of continuous infusion of midazolam or neuroleptics for refractory symptoms as stated in the progress notes. Patients who died in the ICU were excluded. The aim of our study was to evaluate PS practice patterns, describing its frequency, clinical indications and outcomes. Results: During the study period, 556 cancer patients died at the institution and 203 (36.5%) received PS. Main reasons for exclusion were death in the ICU (168 patients) and no use of midazolam or neuroleptics (77 patients). Patients who received PS as compared to those not sedated were younger (67.8 vs. 71.5 years-old, p = 0.007) and more likely to have a primary diagnosis of lung cancer (23% vs. 15% p < 0.001). Patients receiving PS were more likely to be seen by oncology/hematology rather than other specialties (70% vs 45% p < 0.001) and more likely to have a longer hospital stay from admission to death (47.9 days vs 26.2 days p < 0.001). Only 25 patients (12%) were seen by a dedicated palliative care team. The most common indications for sedation were dyspnea (51.5%) and delirium (19.5%) and the most common dugs used were midazolam (52.9%) or midazolam and a neuroleptic (39.2%). Median initial midazolam infusion rate was 0.75 mg/h (interquartile range – IQR - 0.6-1.5) and final rate was 1.5 mg/h (IQR 0.9-3.0). Median time from sedation to death was 27 hours (IQR 12-58). Conclusions: Palliative sedation is a common practice at our hospital and it is not associated with shortening of hospital stay. Further research is needed to identify factors that may affect the frequency and outcomes associated with palliative sedation.