Effect of Lanadelumab Compared With Placebo on Prevention of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Current treatments for long-term prophylaxis in hereditary angioedema have limitations.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of lanadelumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits active plasma kallikrein, in preventing hereditary angioedema attacks.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 41 sites in Canada, Europe, Jordan, and the United States. Patients were randomized between March 3, 2016, and September 9, 2016; last day of follow-up was April 13, 2017. Randomization was 2:1 lanadelumab to placebo; patients assigned to lanadelumab were further randomized 1:1:1 to 1 of the 3 dose regimens. Patients 12 years or older with hereditary angioedema type I or II underwent a 4-week run-in period and those with 1 or more hereditary angioedema attacks during run-in were randomized.

INTERVENTIONS

Twenty-six-week treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (n = 28), 300 mg every 4 weeks (n = 29), 300 mg every 2 weeks (n = 27), or placebo (n = 41). All patients received injections every 2 weeks, with those in the every-4-week group receiving placebo in between active treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES

Primary efficacy end point was the number of investigator-confirmed attacks of hereditary angioedema over the treatment period.

RESULTS

Among 125 patients randomized (mean age, 40.7 years [SD, 14.7 years]; 88 females [70.4%]; 113 white [90.4%]), 113 (90.4%) completed the study. During the run-in period, the mean number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month in the placebo group was 4.0; for the lanadelumab groups, 3.2 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 3.7 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 3.5 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. During the treatment period, the mean number of attacks per month for the placebo group was 1.97; for the lanadelumab groups, 0.48 for the every-4-week 150-mg group; 0.53 for the every-4-week 300-mg group; and 0.26 for the every-2-week 300-mg group. Compared with placebo, the mean differences in the attack rate per month were -1.49 (95% CI, -1.90 to -1.08; P < .001); -1.44 (95% CI, -1.84 to -1.04; P < .001); and -1.71 (95% CI, -2.09 to -1.33; P < .001). The most commonly occurring adverse events with greater frequency in the lanadelumab treatment groups were injection site reactions (34.1% placebo, 52.4% lanadelumab) and dizziness (0% placebo, 6.0% lanadelumab).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients with hereditary angioedema type I or II, treatment with subcutaneous lanadelumab for 26 weeks significantly reduced the attack rate compared with placebo. These findings support the use of lanadelumab as a prophylactic therapy for hereditary angioedema. Further research is needed to determine long-term safety and efficacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Identifier: 2015-003943-20; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02586805.

NAVIGATE I: Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial of the Exhalation Delivery System With Fluticasone for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common, high-morbidity chronic inflammatory disease, and patients often experience suboptimal outcomes with current medical treatment. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) may improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with nasal polyps (NP). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion and polyp grade. Key secondary end points were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised (MOS Sleep-R). Other prespecified end points included all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and key indicators for surgical intervention.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, EDS-placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

METHODS

Three hundred twenty-three subjects with NP and moderate-severe congestion/obstruction, most with history of corticosteroid use (94.4%) and/or prior surgery (60.4%), were randomized to EDS-FLU 93 µg, 186 µg, or 372 µg or EDS-placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (16 double-blind + 8 single-arm extension with EDS-FLU 372 µg BID).

RESULTS

All EDS-FLU doses produced significant improvement in both coprimary end points ( P < .05) and in SNOT-22 total score ( P ≤ .005). EDS-FLU significantly improved all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP ( P < .05), including congestion/obstruction, facial pain/pressure, rhinorrhea/post-nasal drip, and hyposmia/anosmia. Approximately 80% of subjects reported improvement with EDS-FLU, with 65% reporting "much" or "very much" improvement by week 16. Adverse events were generally local in nature and similar to other intranasal steroids studied for similar durations in similar populations, with the most common being epistaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) who were symptomatic despite high rates of prior intranasal steroid use and/or surgery, EDS-FLU produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes (symptoms, SNOT-22, RSDI, SF-36, PGIC, and NP grade), including all 4 cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP.

Impact of lanadelumab on health-related quality of life in patients with hereditary angioedema in the HELP study

Background

An objective of the phase 3 HELP Study was to investigate the effect of lanadelumab on health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE).

Methods

Patients with HAE‐1/2 received either lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4wks; n = 28), 300 mg q4wks (n = 29), 300 mg every 2 weeks (q2wks; n = 27), or placebo (n = 41) for 26 weeks (days 0–182). The Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE‐QoL) was administered monthly, consisting of four domain (functioning, fatigue/mood, fears/shame, nutrition) and total scores. The generic EQ‐5D‐5L questionnaire was administered on days 0, 98, and 182. Comparisons were made between placebo and (a) all lanadelumab‐treated patients and (b) individual lanadelumab groups for changes in scores (day 0–182) and proportions achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID, −6) in AE‐QoL total score.

Results

Compared with the placebo group, the lanadelumab total group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in AE‐QoL total and domain scores (mean change, −13.0 to −29.3; p < 0.05 for all); the largest improvement was in functioning. A significantly greater proportion of the lanadelumab total group achieved the MCID (70% vs 37%; p = 0.001). The lanadelumab 300 mg q2wks group had the highest proportion (81%; p = 0.001) and was 7.2 times more likely to achieve the MCID than the placebo group. Mean EQ‐5D‐5L scores at day 0 were high in all groups, indicating low impairment, with no significant changes at day 182.

Conclusion

Patients with HAE‐1/2 experienced significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL measured by AE‐QoL following lanadelumab treatment in the HELP Study.

Do shrimp-allergic individuals tolerate shrimp-derived glucosamine?

BACKGROUND

There is concern that shrimp-allergic individuals may react to glucosamine-containing products as shrimp shells are a major source of glucosamine used for human consumption.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether shrimp-allergic individuals can tolerate therapeutic doses of glucosamine.

METHODS

Subjects with a history of shrimp allergy were recruited and tested for both shrimp reactivity via a prick skin test and shrimp-specific IgE by an ImmunoCAP assay. Fifteen subjects with positive skin tests to shrimp and an ImmunoCAP class level of two or greater were selected for a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) using glucosamine-chondroitin tablets containing 1,500 mg of synthetically produced (control) or shrimp-derived glucosamine. Immediate reactions, including changes in peak flow and blood pressure, and delayed reactions (up to 24 h post-challenge) via questionnaire were noted and assessed.

RESULTS

All subjects tolerated 1,500 mg of both shrimp-derived or synthetic glucosamine without incident of an immediate hypersensitivity response. Peak flows and blood pressures remained constant, and no subject had symptoms of a delayed reaction 24 h later.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that glucosamine supplements from specific manufacturers do not contain clinically relevant levels of shrimp allergen and therefore appear to pose no threat to shrimp-allergic individuals.

Safety and efficacy of C1 esterase inhibitor for acute attacks in children with hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Human plasma-derived nanofiltered C1 esterase inhibitor (C1 INH-nf) is used to treat acute angioedema attacks in patients with hereditary angioedema (HAE), but data regarding use in children are sparse.

METHODS

Patients 2 to <12 years of age, body weight ≥10 kg, with a diagnosis of HAE type I or II, were recruited for a multicenter open-label trial. Patients were recruited into 2 weight categories (10-25 kg, >25 kg). Each weight category included 2 dosing levels: C1 INH-nf (500 units [U], 1000 U) and C1 INH-nf (1000 U, 1500 U), respectively. Patients experiencing an angioedema attack were given a single intravenous dose. Primary efficacy end-point was the onset of unequivocal relief of the defining symptom within 4 h following initiation of C1 INH-nf treatment.

RESULTS

Nine children were treated: 3 (10-25 kg) received 500 U; 3 (>25 kg) received 1000 U; and 3 (>25 kg) received 1500 U. The lower weight/higher dose category (10-25 kg, 1000 U) was not successfully enrolled. All patients completed the study. Most angioedema attacks (n = 5) were abdominal. All patients met the primary end-point; median time to unequivocal symptom relief was 0.5 (range: 0.25-2.5) h. Doses of C1 INH-nf ranged from 20.8 to 51.9 U/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of a single angioedema attack with C1 INH-nf doses of 500 U (in patients 10-25 kg), 1000 U, and 1500 U (in patients >25 kg) were well tolerated. Doses of C1 INH-nf <1000 U may be appropriate in some pediatric patients.

Lanadelumab demonstrates rapid and sustained prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks

Background

Lanadelumab demonstrated efficacy in preventing hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in the phase 3 HELP Study.

Objective

To assess time to onset of effect and long‐term efficacy of lanadelumab, based on exploratory findings from the HELP Study.

Methods

Eligible patients with HAE type I/II received lanadelumab 150 mg every 4 weeks (q4wks), 300 mg q4wks, 300 mg q2wks, or placebo. Ad hoc analyses evaluated day 0‐69 findings using a Poisson regression model accounting for overdispersion. Least‐squares mean monthly HAE attack rate for lanadelumab was compared with placebo. Intrapatient comparisons for days 0‐69 versus steady state (days 70‐182) used a paired t test for continuous endpoints or Kappa statistics for categorical endpoints.

Results

One hundred twenty‐five patients were randomized and treated. During days 0‐69, mean monthly attack rate was significantly lower with lanadelumab (0.41‐0.76) vs placebo (2.04), including attacks requiring acute treatment (0.33‐0.61 vs 1.66) and moderate/severe attacks (0.31‐0.48 vs 1.33, all P ≤ .001). More patients receiving lanadelumab vs placebo were attack free (37.9%‐48.1% vs 7.3%) and responders (85.7%‐100% vs 26.8%). During steady state, the efficacy of lanadelumab vs placebo was similar or improved vs days 0‐69. Intrapatient differences were significant with lanadelumab 300 mg q4wks for select outcomes. Lanadelumab efficacy was durable—HAE attack rate was consistently lower vs placebo, from the first 2 weeks of treatment through study end. Treatment emergent adverse events were comparable during days 0‐69 and 70‐182.

Conclusion

Protection with lanadelumab started from the first dose and continued throughout the entire study period.

Efficacy and safety of ecallantide in treatment of recurrent attacks of hereditary angioedema: open-label continuation study

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare disorder characterized by recurrent attacks of potentially life-threatening edema. The plasma kallikrein inhibitor ecallantide is approved for treatment of acute HAE attacks. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of ecallantide for treatment of multiple HAE episodes in the DX-88/19 (continuation) study. Patients received 30 mg of subcutaneous ecallantide for acute HAE attack symptoms, with no limit on number of episodes treated. Primary end point was change in patient-reported mean symptom complex severity (MSCS) score at 4 hours. Additional end points included change in MSCS score at 24 hours, treatment outcome score (TOS) at 4 and 24 hours, and time to response. Safety parameters included adverse events. Statistical analyses were conducted on qualifying treatment episodes (those with ≥12 patients). One hundred forty-seven patients received treatment for 625 episodes; analyses were conducted through 13 treatment episodes. Across 13 episodes at 4 hours, mean change in MSCS score ranged from -1.04 to -1.36, and mean TOSs ranged from 56.2 to 79.8. Median time to onset of sustained improvement ranged from 59 to 113 minutes. There was no indication of reduced efficacy with repeated ecallantide use. No new safety signals were detected. Eight patients (5.4%) reported potential hypersensitivity reactions, six of whom met the definition of anaphylaxis based on National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases criteria. Ecallantide is effective for acute recurrent HAE attacks and maintains its efficacy and safety during multiple treatment episodes in patients with HAE. Potential hypersensitivity reactions were consistent with prior reports.

A randomized trial of human C1 inhibitor prophylaxis in children with hereditary angioedema

BACKGROUND

Patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency or dysfunction have burdensome recurrent angioedema attacks. The safety, efficacy, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes of C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) prophylaxis (intravenously administered) in patients aged 6-11 years were investigated.

METHODS

Eligible patients were enrolled in a randomized, single-blind, crossover, phase 3 trial. After a 12-week baseline observation period (BOP), patients received 500 or 1000 U C1-INH, twice weekly, for 12 weeks before crossing over to the alternate dose for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end-point was the monthly normalized number of angioedema attacks (NNA). HRQoL was assessed using the EuroQoL 5-dimensional descriptive system youth version and visual analog scale (EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

Twelve randomized patients had a median (range) age of 10.0 (7-11) years. Mean (SD) percentage reduction in monthly NNA from BOP was 71.1% (27.1%) with 500 U and 84.5% (20.0%) with 1000 U C1-INH. Mean (SD) within-patient difference (-0.4 [0.58]) for monthly NNA with both doses was significant (P = 0.035 [90% CI, -0.706 to -0.102]). Cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and number of acute attacks treated were reduced. No serious adverse events or discontinuations occurred. Mean EQ-VAS change from BOP to week 9 of treatment (500 U C1-INH, 10.4; 1000 U C1-INH, 21.6) was greater than the minimal important difference, indicating a meaningful HRQoL change.

CONCLUSIONS

C1-INH prophylaxis was effective, safe, and well tolerated in children aged 6-11 years experiencing recurrent angioedema attacks. A post hoc analysis indicated a meaningful improvement in HRQoL with C1-INH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02052141.

Long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency

OBJECTIVE

To review the criteria for long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with hereditary angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE), describe how these criteria have evolved over time, and anticipate how criteria may change in the future with the availability of new C1-INH-HAE treatment options.

DATA SOURCES

Treatment guidelines, consensus statements, and expert reviews.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Manuscripts that described long-term prophylaxis therapy in patients with C1-INH-HAE were selected.

RESULTS

Historically, patients with C1-INH-HAE were considered to be candidates for long-term prophylaxis therapy if they had at least 1 attack per month, had at least 5 days of disability per month because of C1-INH-HAE, or did not sufficiently respond to on-demand treatment. More recently, guidelines and reviews state that thresholds of number of attacks or days of disability are arbitrary and that treatment plans should be individualized to the patient's needs. Furthermore, all patients should have a comprehensive management plan that is reviewed periodically and should have at least 2 doses of on-demand treatment available. Prophylaxis therapy should be discussed as a potential treatment option for each patient; however, the decision for its use will depend on the patient's individual needs and the course of their symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The criteria for long-term prophylaxis therapy in C1-INH-HAE have changed with the recognition that treatments should be individualized to the patient's needs and with the availability of new medications that have more favorable benefit-risk profiles, are easier to use, and improve patients' quality of life.

Preventing Hereditary Angioedema Attacks in Children Using Cinryze®: Interim Efficacy and Safety Phase 3 Findings

BACKGROUND

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disease causing unpredictable and potentially life-threatening subcutaneous and submucosal edematous attacks. Cinryze® (Shire ViroPharma Inc., Lexington, MA, USA), a nanofiltered C1 inhibitor (C1-INH), is approved in Europe for the treatment, preprocedure prevention, and routine prophylaxis of HAE attacks, and for the routine prophylaxis of attacks in the USA. This phase 3 study assessed the safety and efficacy of 2 C1-INH doses in preventing attacks in children aged 6-11 years.

METHODS

A randomized single-blind crossover study was initiated in March 2014. Results for the first 6 patients completing the study are reported here. After a 12-week qualifying observation period, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 C1-INH doses, 500 or 1,000 U, every 3-4 days for 12 weeks and crossed over to the alternative dose for a second 12-week period. The primary efficacy endpoint was the number of angioedema attacks per month.

RESULTS

Six females with HAE type I and a median age of 10.5 years received 2 doses of C1-INH (500 and 1,000 U). The mean (SD) difference in the number of monthly angioedema attacks between the baseline observation period and the treatment period was -1.89 (1.31) with 500 U and -1.89 (1.11) with 1,000 U. During the treatment periods, cumulative attack severity, cumulative daily severity, and the number of attacks needing acute treatment were lower. No serious adverse events or study drug discontinuations occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Interim findings from this study indicate that routine prevention with intravenous administration of C1-INH is efficacious, safe, and well tolerated in children ≥6 years of age.

Analysis of hereditary angioedema attacks requiring a second dose of ecallantide

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment of acute attacks is critical in managing hereditary angioedema (HAE). Ecallantide, a plasma kallikrein inhibitor, is approved for the treatment of HAE attacks. Occasionally, a second dose is needed when treating attacks of HAE.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the characteristics of HAE attacks requiring a second dose (dose B) of ecallantide.

METHODS

Data from all ecallantide clinical trials (EDEMA2, EDEMA4, and DX-88/19) that allowed an open-label dose B were included in this analysis. Patient and attack characteristics potentially predictive of dose B after ecallantide were analyzed by logistic regression. A multivariate model was built using a backward selection process, incorporating variables from the univariate model with P < .20 and removing factors with the highest P value until only significant (P < .05) factors remained.

RESULTS

The analysis included 732 ecallantide-treated HAE attacks in 179 patients. Dose B was required in 88 attacks (12.0%), most (80.5%) for incomplete response. By attack location, 31 of 325 abdominal attacks (9.5%), 17 of 158 laryngeal attacks (10.8%), and 40 of 242 peripheral attacks (16.5%) required dose B. On the basis of the univariate analysis, baseline severity (odds ratio = 1.33, P = .15) and peripheral attack (odds ratio = 1.80, P = .01) were identified as potential predictive factors; abdominal attacks had an inverse correlation (odds ratio = 0.64, P = .055). However, the multivariate analysis identified only peripheral attacks as statistically significantly correlated (P < .05) with dose B requirement.

CONCLUSION

A single, 30-mg dose of ecallantide was effective for most HAE attacks (88.0%). Patients with peripheral attacks of HAE were more likely to require a second dose of ecallantide after 4 hours.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: not applicable for EDEMA2 (trial was conducted before registration requirements were implemented), NCT00457015 for EDEMA4, and NCT00456508 for DX-88/19.

Once-Daily Oral Berotralstat for Long-Term Prophylaxis of Hereditary Angioedema: The Open-Label Extension of the APeX-2 Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Berotralstat is a first-line, once-daily oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor approved for prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks in patients 12 years or older.

OBJECTIVE

This analysis examined the safety and effectiveness of long-term prophylaxis with berotralstat.

METHODS

APeX-2 was a phase 3, parallel-group, multicenter trial in patients with HAE caused by C1-inhibitor deficiency (NCT03485911). Part 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of 150 and 110 mg of berotralstat over 24 weeks. In part 2, berotralstat-treated patients continued the same treatment, and placebo-treated patients were re-randomized to 150 or 110 mg of berotralstat for 24 weeks. In part 3, all patients were treated with open-label berotralstat at 150 mg, which could be continued for up to an additional 4 years. In part 3, the primary endpoint was long-term safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included HAE attack rates and quality of life (QoL).

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients entered part 3. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 82.7% of patients, with most being mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs were nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain, arthralgia, coronavirus infection, and diarrhea. Drug-related TEAEs occurred in 14.8% of patients, but none were serious. For patients who completed 96 weeks of berotralstat treatment (n = 70), the mean (standard error) change in attack rate from baseline was -2.21 (0.20) attacks/mo. Clinically meaningful improvements in QoL were also observed, with the largest improvements in the functioning domain.

CONCLUSION

Berotralstat was generally well tolerated, provided rapid and sustained reductions in HAE attacks and improved QoL over 96 weeks.

Oral Sebetralstat for On-Demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks

BACKGROUND

Approved on-demand treatments for hereditary angioedema attacks need to be administered parenterally, a route of administration that is associated with delays in treatment or withholding of therapy.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, three-way crossover trial, we randomly assigned participants at least 12 years of age with type 1 or type 2 hereditary angioedema to take up to two oral doses of sebetralstat (300 mg or 600 mg) or placebo for an angioedema attack. The primary end point, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was the beginning of symptom relief, defined as a rating of "a little better" on the Patient Global Impression of Change scale (ratings range from "much worse" to "much better") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours after the first administration of the trial agent. Key secondary end points, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, were a reduction in attack severity (an improved rating on the Patient Global Impression of Severity [PGI-S] scale, with ratings ranging from "none" to "very severe") at two or more consecutive time points within 12 hours and complete attack resolution (a rating of "none" on the PGI-S scale) within 24 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 136 participants were assigned to one of six trial sequences, with 110 treating 264 attacks. The time to the beginning of symptom relief with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P<0.001 and P = 0.001 for the two comparisons, respectively), with median times of 1.61 hours (interquartile range, 0.78 to 7.04), 1.79 hours (1.02 to 3.79), and 6.72 hours (1.34 to >12), respectively. The time to reduction in the attack severity with the 300-mg dose and the 600-mg dose was faster than with placebo (P = 0.004 and P = 0.003), with median times of 9.27 hours (interquartile range, 1.53 to >12), 7.75 hours (2.19 to >12), and more than 12 hours (6.23 to >12). The time to complete resolution was faster with the 300-mg and 600-mg doses than with placebo (P = 0.002 and P<0.001). The percentage of attacks with complete resolution within 24 hours was 42.5% with the 300-mg dose, 49.5% with the 600-mg dose, and 27.4% with placebo. Sebetralstat and placebo had similar safety profiles; no serious adverse events related to the trial agents were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral sebetralstat provided faster times to the beginning of symptom relief, reduction in attack severity, and complete attack resolution than placebo. (Funded by KalVista Pharmaceuticals; KONFIDENT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05259917; EudraCT number, 2021-001226-21.).

Patient and caregiver perspectives on transitioning to oral prophylaxis in the emerging hereditary angioedema treatment landscape

This report describes the successful transition of two familial patients with HAE from injectable to oral prophylaxis without tapering prior therapy or employing a complex transition protocol.

4th Pediatric Allergy and Asthma Meeting (PAAM)

WORKSHOP 4: Challenging clinical scenarios (CS01–CS06)

CS01 Bullous lesions in two children: solitary mastocytoma

S. Tolga Yavuz, Ozan Koc, Ali Gungor, Faysal Gok

CS02 Multi-System Allergy (MSA) of cystic fibrosis: our institutional experience

Jessica Hawley, Christopher O’Brien, Matthew Thomas, Malcolm Brodlie, Louise Michaelis

CS03 Cold urticaria in pediatric age: an invisible cause for severe reactions

Inês Mota, Ângela Gaspar, Susana Piedade, Graça Sampaio, José Geraldo Dias, Miguel Paiva, Mário Morais-Almeida

CS04 Angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency in a girl: a challenge diagnosis

Cristina Madureira, Tânia Lopes, Susana Lopes, Filipa Almeida, Alexandra Sequeira, Fernanda Carvalho, José Oliveira

CS05 A child with unusual multiple organ allergy disease: what is the primer?

Fabienne Gay-Crosier

CS06 A case of uncontrolled asthma in a 6-year-old patient

Ioana-Valentina Nenciu, Andreia Florina Nita, Alexandru Ulmeanu, Dumitru Oraseanu, Carmen Zapucioiu

ORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 1: Food allergy (OP01–OP06)

OP01 Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: oral food challenge outcomes for tolerance evaluation in a Pediatric Hospital

Adrianna Machinena, Olga Domínguez Sánchez, Montserrat Alvaro Lozano, Rosa Jimenez Feijoo, Jaime Lozano Blasco, Mònica Piquer Gibert, Mª Teresa Giner Muñoz, Marcia Dias da Costa, Ana Maria Plaza Martín

OP02 Characteristics of infants with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome and allergic proctocolitis

Ebru Arik Yilmaz, Özlem Cavkaytar, Betul Buyuktiryaki, Ozge Soyer, Cansin Sackesen

OP03 The clinical and immunological outcomes after consumption of baked egg by 1–5 year old egg allergic children: results of a randomised controlled trial

MerrynNetting, Adaweyah El-Merhibi, Michael Gold, PatrickQuinn, IrmeliPenttila, Maria Makrides

OP04 Oral immunotherapy for treatment of egg allergy using low allergenic, hydrolysed egg

Stavroula Giavi, Antonella Muraro, Roger Lauener, Annick Mercenier, Eugen Bersuch, Isabella M. Montagner, Maria Passioti, Nicolò Celegato, Selina Summermatter, Sophie Nutten, Tristan Bourdeau, Yvonne M. Vissers, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos

OP05 Chemical modification of a peanut extract results in an increased safety profile while maintaining efficacy

Hanneke van der Kleij, Hans Warmenhoven, Ronald van Ree, Raymond Pieters, Dirk Jan Opstelten, Hans van Schijndel, Joost Smit

OP06 Administration of the yellow fever vaccine in egg allergic children

Roisin Fitzsimons, Victoria Timms, George Du Toit

ORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 2: Asthma (OP07–OP12)

OP07 Previous exacerbation is the most important risk factor for future exacerbations in school-age children with asthma

S. Tolga Yavuz, Guven Kaya, Mustafa Gulec, Mehmet Saldir, Osman Sener, Faysal Gok

OP08 Comparative study of degree of severity and laboratory changes between asthmatic children using different acupuncture modalities

Nagwa Hassan, Hala Shaaban, Hazem El-Hariri, Ahmed Kamel Inas E. Mahfouz

OP09 The concentration of exhaled carbon monoxide in asthmatic children with different controlled stadium

Papp Gabor, Biro Gabor, Kovacs Csaba

OP10 Effect of vitamin D3 supplementation during pregnancy on risk of persistent wheeze in the offspring: a randomised clinical trial

Bo Chawes, Klaus Bønnelykke, Jakob Stokholm, Lene Heickendorff, Susanne Brix, Morten Rasmussen, Hans Bisgaard

OP11 Lung function development in childhood

Henrik Wegener Hallas, Bo Chawes, Lambang Arianto, Hans Bisgaard

OP12 Is the effect of maternal and paternal asthma different in female and male children before puberty?

Maike Pincus, Thomas Keil, Andreas Reich, Ulrich Wahn, Susanne Lau, Linus Grabenhenrich

ORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 3: Epidemiology—genetics (OP13–OP18)

OP13 Lifestyle is associated with incidence and category of allergen sensitisation: the ALADDIN birth cohort

Sara Fagerstedt, Helena Marell Hesla, Emelie Johansson, Helen Rosenlund, Axel Mie, Annika Scheynius, Johan Alm

OP15 Maternal filaggrin mutations increase the risk of atopic dermatitis in children: an effect independent of mutation inheritance

Jorge Esparza-Gordillo, Anja Matanovic, Ingo Marenholz, Anja Bauerfeind, Klaus Rohde, Katja Nemat, Min-Ae Lee-Kirsch, Magnus Nordenskjöld, Marten C. G. Winge, Thomas Keil, Renate Krüger, Susanne Lau, Kirsten Beyer, Birgit Kalb, Bodo Niggemann, Norbert Hübner, Heather J. Cordell, Maria Bradley, Young-Ae Lee

OP16 Allergic multimorbidity of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in the first 2 decades of the German MAS birth cohort

Thomas Keil, Hannah Gough, Linus Grabenhenrich, Dirk Schramm, Andreas Reich, John Beschorner, Antje Schuster, Carl-Peter Bauer, Johannes Forster, Fred Zepp, Young-Ae Lee, Renate Bergmann, Karl Bergmann, Ulrich Wahn, Susanne Lau

OP17 Childhood anaphylaxis: a growing concern

Filipe Benito Garcia, Inês Mota, Susana Piedade, Ângela Gaspar, Natacha Santos, Helena Pité, Mário Morais-Almeida

OP18 Indoor exposure to molds and dampness in infancy and its association to persistent atopic dermatitis in school age. Results from the Greek ISAAC II study

Athina Papadopoulou, Despina Mermiri, Elpida Xatziagorou, Ioannis Tsanakas, Stavroula Lampidi, Kostas Priftis

ORAL ABSTRACT SESSION 4: Pediatric rhinitis—immunotherapy (OP19–OP24)

OP19 Associations between residential greenness and childhood allergic rhinitis and aeroallergen sensitisation in seven birth cohorts

Elaine Fuertes, Iana Markevych, Gayan Bowatte, Olena Gruzieva, Ulrike Gehring, Allan Becker, Dietrich Berdel, Michael Brauer, Chris Carlsten, Barbara Hoffmann, Anita Kozyrskyj, Caroline Lodge, Göran Pershagen, Alet Wijga, Heinrich Joachim

OP20 Full symptom control in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma: results of a 2-year sublingual allergen immunotherapy study

Zorica Zivkovic, Ivana Djuric-Filipovic, Jasmina Jocić-Stevanovic, Snežana Zivanovic

OP21 Nasal epithelium of different ages of atopic subjects present increased levels of oxidative stress and increased cell cytotoxicity upon rhinovirus infection

Styliani Taka, Dimitra Kokkinou, Aliki Papakonstantinou, Panagiota Stefanopoulou, Anastasia Georgountzou, Paraskevi Maggina, Sofia Stamataki, Vassiliki Papaevanggelou, Evangelos Andreakos, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos

OP22 Cluster subcutaneous immunotherapy schedule: tolerability profile in children

Monica Piquer Gibert, Montserrat Alvaro Lozano, Jaime Lozano Blasco, Olga Domínguez Sánchez, Rosa Jiménez Feijoo, Marcia Dias da Costa, Mª Teresa Giner Muñoz, Adriana Machinena Spera, Ana Maria Plaza Martín

OP23 Rhinitis as a risk factor for asthma severity in 11-year old children: population-based cohort study

Matea Deliu, Danielle Belgrave, Angela Simpson, Adnan Custovic

OP24 The Global Lung Function Initiative equations in airway obstruction evaluation of asthmatic children

João Gaspar Marques, Pedro Carreiro-Martins, Joana Belo, Sara Serranho, Isabel Peralta, Nuno Neuparth, Paula Leiria-Pinto

POSTER DISCUSSION SESSION 1: Food allergy (PD01–PD05)

PD01 Allergen-specific humoral and cellular responses in children who fail egg oral immunotherapy due to allergic reactions

Marta Vazquez-Ortiz, Mariona Pascal, Ana Maria Plaza, Manel Juan

PD02 FoxP3 epigenetic features in children with cow milk allergy

Lorella Paparo, Rita Nocerino, Rosita Aitoro, Ilaria Langella, Antonio Amoroso, Alessia Amoroso, Carmen Di Scala, Roberto Berni Canani

PD04 Combined milk and egg allergy in early childhood: let them eat cake?

Santanu Maity, Giuseppina Rotiroti, Minal Gandhi

PD05 Introduction of complementary foods in relation to allergy and gut microbiota in farm and non-farm children

Karin Jonsson, Annika Ljung, Bill Hesselmar, Ingegerd Adlerbert, Hilde Brekke, Susanne Johansen, Agnes Wold, Ann-Sofie Sandberg

POSTER DISCUSSION SESSION 2: Asthma and wheeze (PD06–PD16)

PD06 The association between asthma and exhaled nitric oxide is influenced by genetics and sensitisation

Björn Nordlund, Cecilia Lundholm, Villhelmina Ullemar, Marianne van Hage, Anne Örtqvist, Catarina Almqvist

PD09 Prevalence patterns of infant wheeze across Europe

Anna Selby, Kate Grimshaw, Thomas Keil, Linus Grabenhenrich, Michael Clausen, Ruta Dubakiene, Alessandro Fiocchi, Marek Kowalski, Nikos Papadopoulos, Marta Reche, Sigurveig Sigurdardottir, Aline Sprikkleman, Paraskevi Xepapadaki, Clare Mills, Kirsten Beyer, Graham Roberts

PD10 Epidemiologic changes in recurrent wheezing infants

Herberto Jose Chong Neto, Gustavo Falbo Wandalsen, Ana Carolina Dela Bianca, Carolina Aranda, Nelson Augusto Rosário, Dirceu Solé, Javier Mallol, Luis García Marcos

PD13 A single nucleotide polymorphism in the GLCCI1 gene is associated with response to asthma treatment in children

IvanaBanic, Matija Rijavec, Davor Plavec, Peter Korosec, Mirjana Turkalj

PD14 Pollen induced asthma: Could small molecules in pollen exacerbate the protein-mediated allergic response?

Alen Bozicevic, Maria De Mieri, Matthias Hamburger

PD15 A qualitative study to understand how we can empower teenagers to better self-manage their asthma

Simone Holley, Ruth Morris, Frances Mitchell, Rebecca Knibb, Susan Latter, Christina Liossi, Graham Roberts

PD16 Polymorphism of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene among Egyptian children with bronchial asthma

Mostafa M. M. Hassan

POSTER DISCUSSION SESSION 3: Mechanisms—Epidemiology (PD17–PD21)

PD17 Pregnancy outcomes in relation to development of allergy in a Swedish birth cohort

Malin Barman, Anna Sandin, Agnes Wold, Ann-Sofie Sandberg

PD18 Evolution of the IgE response to house dust mite molecules in childhood

Daniela Posa, Serena Perna, Carl-Peter Bauer, Ute Hoffmann, Johannes Forster, Fred Zepp, Antje Schuster, Ulrich Wahn, Thomas Keil, Susanne Lau, Kuan-Wei Chen, Yvonne Resch, Susanne Vrtala, Rudolf Valenta, Paolo Maria Matricardi

PD19 Antibody recognition of nsLTP-molecules as antigens but not as allergens in the German-MAS birth cohort

Olympia Tsilochristou, Alexander Rohrbach, Antonio Cappella, Stephanie Hofmaier, Laura Hatzler, Carl-Peter Bauer, Ute Hoffmann, Johannes Forster, Fred Zepp, Antje Schuster, RaffaeleD’Amelio, Ulrich Wahn, Thomas Keil, Susanne Lau, Paolo Maria Matricardi

PD20 Early life colonization with Lactobacilli and Staphylococcus aureus oppositely associates with the maturation and activation of FOXP3+ CD4 T-cells

Sophia Björkander, Maria A. Johansson, Gintare Lasaviciute, Eva Sverremark-Ekström

PD21 Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies 7 susceptibility loci involved in the atopic march

Ingo Marenholz, Jorge Esparza-Gordillo, Franz Rüschendorf, Anja Bauerfeind, David P. Strachan, Ben D. Spycher, Hansjörg Baurecht, Patricia Margaritte-Jeannin, Annika Sääf, Marjan Kerkhof, Markus Ege, Svetlana Baltic, Melanie C Matheson, Jin Li, Sven Michel, Wei Q. Ang, Wendy McArdle, Andreas Arnold, Georg Homuth, Florence Demenais, Emmanuelle Bouzigon, Cilla Söderhäll, Göran Pershagen, Johan C. de Jongste, Dirkje S Postma, Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer, Elisabeth Horak, Ludmila M. Ogorodova, Valery P. Puzyrev, Elena Yu Bragina, Thomas J Hudson, Charles Morin, David L Duffy, Guy B Marks, Colin F Robertson, Grant W Montgomery, Bill Musk, Philip J Thompson, Nicholas G. Martin, Alan James, Patrick Sleiman, Elina Toskala, Elke Rodriguez, Regina Fölster-Holst, Andre Franke, Wolfgang Lieb, Christian Gieger, Andrea Heinzmann, Ernst Rietschel, Thomas Keil, Sven Cichon, Markus M Nöthen, Craig E Pennell, Peter D Sly, Carsten O Schmidt, Anja Matanovic, Valentin Schneider, Matthias Heinig, Norbert Hübner, Patrick G. Holt, Susanne Lau, Michael Kabesch, Stefan Weidinger, Hakon Hakonarson, Manuel AR Ferreira, Catherine Laprise, Maxim B. Freidin, Jon Genuneit, Gerard H Koppelman, Erik Melén, Marie-Hélène Dizier, A. John Henderson, Young Ae Lee

POSTER DISCUSSION SESSION 4: Food allergy—Anaphylaxis (PD22–PD26)

PD22 Atopy patch test in food protein induced enterocolitis caused by solid food

Purificacion González-Delgado, Esther Caparrós, Fernando Clemente, Begoña Cueva, Victoria M. Moreno, Jose Luis Carretero, Javier Fernández

PD23 Watermelon allergy: a novel presentation

Kate Swan, George Du Toit

PD24 A pilot study evaluating the usefulness of a guideline template for managing milk allergy in primary care

Mudiyur Gopi, Tim Smith, Edara Ramesh, Arun Sadasivam

PD26 Efficacy and safety of cow’s milk oral immunotherapy protocol

Inês Mota, Filipe Benito Garcia, Susana Piedade, Angela Gaspar, Graça Sampaio, Cristina Arêde, Luís Miguel Borrego, Graça Pires, Cristina Santa-Marta, Mário Morais-Almeida

POSTER DISCUSSION SESSION 5: Prevention and treatment—Allergy (PD27–PD36)

PD27 Allergy-protection by the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis G121: mode-of-action as revealed in a murine model of experimental allergy

Stephanie Brand, Karina Stein, Holger Heine, Marion Kauth

PD29 The relationship between quality of life and morning salivary cortisol after acute bronchiolitis in infancy

Leif Bjarte Rolfsjord, Egil Bakkeheim, Johan Alm, Håvard Ove Skjerven, Kai-Håkon Carlsen, Jon Olav Hunderi, Teresa Løvold Berents, Petter Mowinckel, Karin C. Lødrup Carlsen

PD30 Randomised trial of the efficacy of MP29-02* compared with fluticasone propionate nasal spray in children aged ≥6 years to <12 years with allergic rhinitis

Ulrich Wahn, Ullrich Munzel, William Berger

PD31 10 mg of oral bilastine in 2 to 11 years old children has similar exposure to the adult therapeutic dose (20 mg)

Ulrich Wahn, Román Valiente, Valvanera Vozmediano, John C. Lukas, Mónica Rodríguez

PD33 Daily symptoms, nocturnal symptoms, activity limitations and reliever therapies during the three steps of IOEASMA programme: a comparison

Sebastiano Guarnaccia, Luigi Vitale, Ada Pluda, Emanuele D’Agata, Denise Colombo, Stefano Felici, Valeria Gretter, Susanna Facchetti, Gaia Pecorelli, Cristina Quecchia

PD34 Sensitisation to an inert aeroallergen in weaning rats and longstanding disease, in a sensitisation-tolerant and easily tolerisable rodent strain

George Guibas, Evangelia Spandou, Spyridon Megremis, Peter West, Nikolaos Papadopoulos

PD35 Bacterial and fungi exposure in school and allergic sensitisation in children

João Cavaleiro Rufo, Joana Madureira, Inês Paciência, Lívia Aguiar, Patrícia Padrão, Mariana Pinto, Luís Delgado, Pedro Moreira, João Paulo Teixeira, Eduardo Oliveira Fernandes, André Moreira

PD36 Comparative study of allergy rhinitis between two populations: children vs. adults

Adriana Izquierdo Dominguez, Antonio Valero, Joaquim Mullol, Alfonso Del Cuvillo, Javier Montoro, Ignacio Jauregui, Joan Bartra, Ignacio Davila, Marta Ferrer, Joaquin Sastre

POSTER VIEWING SESSION 1: Inflammation—Genetics—Immunology—Dermatology (PP01–PP09)

PP01 Immune profile in late pregnancy: immunological markers in atopic asthmaticwomen as risk factors for atopy in the progeny

Catarina Martins, Jorge Lima, Maria José Leandro, Glória Nunes, Jorge Cunha Branco, Hélder Trindade, Luis Miguel Borrego

PP02 The impact of neonatal sepsis on development of allergic diseases

Secil Conkar, Mehtap Kilic, Canan Aygun, Recep Sancak

PP03 Clinical overview of selective IgE deficiency in childhood

Athina Papadopoulou, Eleni Tagalaki, Lambros Banos, Anna Vlachou, Fotini Giannoula, Despina Mermiri

PP04 Inverse relationship between serum 25(ΟΗ) vitamin D3 and total IgE in children and adolescence

Athina Papadopoulou, Stavroula Lampidi, Marina Pavlakou, Maria Kryoni, Kostas Makris

PP05

PP06

PP07 Asthma control questionnaire and specific IgE in children

Snezhina Lazova, Guergana Petrova, Dimitrinka Miteva, Penka Perenovska

PP08 Features of chronic urticaria of adolescents

Aliya Klyucharova, Olesya Skorohodkina

PP09 Cutaneous mastocytosis in children: a clinical analysis of 8 cases in Greece

Dimitra Koumaki, Alkisti Manousaki, Maria Agrapidi, Lida Iatridou, Omima Eruk, Konstantinos Myridakis, Emmanouil Manousakis, Vasiliki Koumaki

POSTER VIEWING SESSION 2: Food allergy—Anaphylaxis (PP10–PP47)

PP10 Prognostic factors in egg allergy

Maria Dimou, Maria Ingemansson, Gunilla Hedlin

PP11 Evaluation of the efficacy of an amino acid-based formula in infants who are intolerant to extensively hydrolysed protein formula

Nitida Pastor, Delphine de Boissieu, Jon Vanderhoof, Nancy Moore, Kaitlin Maditz

PP12 Anaphylaxis and epinephrine auto-injector use: a survey of pediatric trainees

Adeli Mehdi, Shaza Elhassan, Carolin Beck, Ahmed Al-Hammadi

PP13 Anaphylaxis in children: acute management in the Emergency Department

Ioana Maris, Ronan O’Sullivan, Jonathan Hourihane,

PP14 Understanding Cumbrian schools preparedness in managing children at risk of anaphylaxis in order to provide training and support which will create healthy and safe environments for children with allergies

George Raptis, Louise Michaelis

PP15 A new valid and reliable parent and child questionnaire to measure the impact of food protein enterocolitis syndrome on children: the FPIES Quality of Life Questionnaire (FPIESQL), Parent and Child Short Form

Audrey DunnGalvin, Matthew Greenhawt, Carina Venter, Jonathan Hourihane

PP16 An in-depth case study investigation of the experiences of teenagers and young adults in growing up and living with food allergy with emphasis on coping, management and risk, support, and social and self-identity

Evelyn O’Regan, Duncan Cronin, Jonathan Hourihane, Anna O’Reilly, Audrey DunnGalvin

PP17 Cow’s milk protein allergy in Constantine. A retrospective study of 62 cases between 1996 and 2013

Foued Abdelaziz, Dounia Khelifi-Touhami, Nihad Selim, Tahar Khelifi-Touhami

PP18

PP19 Cow’s milk and egg oral immunotherapy in children older than 5 years

Pablo Merida, Ana Mª Plaza, Juan Heber Castellanos, Adrianna Machinena, Montserrat Alvaro Lozano, Jaime Lozano, Olga Dominguez, Monica Piquer, Rosa Jimenez, Mª Teresa Giner

PP20 Professionals’ awareness of management of Cow’s Milk Protein Allergy (CMPA) in North Wales Hospitals

Konstantinos Kakleas, Manohar Joishy, Wendmu Maskele, Huw R. Jenkins

PP21

PP22 Anaphylaxis: the great unknown for teachers. Presentation of a protocol for schools

Mercedes Escarrer, Agustín Madroñero, Maria Teresa Guerra, Juan Carlos Julia, Juan Carlos Cerda, Javier Contreras, Eulalia Tauler, Maria Jesus Vidorreta, Ana Rojo, Silvia Del Valle

PP23 Challenges facing children with food allergies and their parents in out of school activity sectors

Niamh Flynn

PP24 A review of food challenges at a Regional Irish Centre

Gary Foley, Carol Harmon, John Fitzsimons

PP25 The use of epinephrine in infants with anaphylaxis

Krasimira Baynova, Ávila Maria Del Robledo, Labella Marina

PP26

PP27

PP28 Mother’s psychological state predicts the expression of symptoms in food allergic children

Aaron Cortes, Alicia Sciaraffia, Angela Castillo

PP29 The correlation between sIgE towards tree nuts and birch pollen in a Danish Pediatric Allergy Clinic

Nanna Juel-Berg, Kirsten Skamstrup Hansen, Lars Kærgaard Poulsen

PP30 Food allergy in children: evaluation of parents’ use of online social media

Andreia Florina Nita, Ioana Valentina Nenciu, Adina Lazar, Dumitru Oraseanu

PP31 The impact of food allergy on quality of life: FAQLQ questionnaire

Rita Aguiar, Anabela Lopes, Maria J. Paes, Amélia S. Santos, M. A. Pereira-Barbosa

PP32 An unexpected cause of anaphylaxis: potato

Hatice Eke Gungor, Salih Uytun, Umit Murat Sahiner, Yasemin Altuner Torun

PP33 Is it clinical phenotype of allergic diseases determined by sensitisation to food?

Mirjana Zivanovic, Marina Atanasković-Marković

PP34

PP35 Prescribing adrenaline auto-injectors in children in 2014: the data from regional pediatricians

Tina Vesel, Mihaela Nahtigal, Andreja Obermayer-Temlin, Eva Šoster Križnik, Mirjana Maslar, Ruben Bizjak, Marjeta Tomšič-Matic, Sonja Posega-Devetak, Maja Skerbinjek-Kavalar, Mateja Predalič, Tadej Avčin

PP36 Who should have an adrenaline autoinjector? Adherence to the European and French guidelines among 121 allergists from the Allergy Vigilance Network

Guillaume Pouessel, Etienne Beaudouin, Anne M. Moneret-Vautrin, Antoine Deschildre, Allergy Vigilance Network

PP37 Anaphylaxis by Anacardium Occidentale

Marta Viñas, Bartolomé Borja, Nora Hernández, Mª José Castillo, Adriana Izquierdo, Marcel Ibero

PP38 Anaphylaxis with honey in a child

S. Tolga Yavuz, Ali Gungor, Betul Buyuktiryaki, Ozan Koc, Can Naci Kocabas, Faysal Gok

PP39 Evaluation of courses adopted to children on prevention, recognition and management of anaphylaxis

Tina Vesel, Mihaela Nahtigal

PP40 Symptomatic dust mites and shrimp allergy: three pediatric case reports

Filipa Almeida, Susana Lopes, Cristina Madureira, Tânia Lopes, Fernanda Carvalho

PP41 Poor identification rates of nuts by high risk individuals: a call for improved education and support for families

Camille Heming, Emily Garrett, Adam Blackstock, Santanu Maity, Rahul Chodhari

PP42 DAFALL: database of food allergies in the Czech Republic

Simona Belohlavkova, Eliska Kopelentova, Petr Visek, Ivana Setinova, Ivana Svarcova

PP43 Serological cross-reactivity between grass and wheat is not only caused by profilins and CCDs

Sigrid Sjölander, Nora Nilsson, Malin Berthold, Helena Ekoff, Gunilla Hedlin, Magnus Borres, Caroline Nilsson

PP44 Oil body associated proteins in children with nuts allergy. Allergens to consider in IgE-mediated nuts allergy

Loreto González Domínguez, Cristina Muñoz Archidona, Ana Moreira Jorge, Sergio Quevedo Teruel, Teresa Bracamonte Bermejo, Miriam Castillo Fernández, Fernando Pineda de la Losa, Luis Ángel Echeverría Zudaire

PP45

PP46 Protective effect of helicobacter pylori infection against food allergy in children

Olga Vrani, Antigone Mavroudi, Maria Fotoulaki, Maria Emporiadou, Kleomenis Spiroglou, Ioannis Xinias

PP47 Anaphylaxis pathway: A road tryp-tase to success?

Helyeh A. Sadreddini, Mia Warnes, Donna Traves

POSTER VIEWING SESSION 3: Miscellaneous (PP48–PP58)

PP48 Surveillance study on safety of SLIT in pediatric population

Ivana Djuric-Filipovic, Zorica Zivkovic, Snežana Zivanovic, Gordana Kostić, Đorđe Filipovic

PP49 Efficacy and safety of mixed mite subcutaneous immunotherapy among allergic rhinitis patients in the Northeastern Thailand

Sawapon Sittisomwong, Siripong Sittisomwong

PP50 Effect of inhaled beclomethasone or placebo on brain stem activity in a patient chronically treated with steroids: preliminary report

Zygmunt Podolec, Marcin Hartel, Daria Panek, Magdalena Podolec-Rubiś, Tomasz Banasik

PP51 Sensitisation to aeroallergens in patients with allergic rhinitis, asthma and atopic dermatitis in Shiraz, Southwestern Iran

Elham Abbasi, Mozhgan Moghtaderi

PP52 Referring a child for allergy test: how appropriate are we?

Phani Sanneerappa, Alina Deliu, Moosa Kutty, Nagabathula Ramesh

PP53 EBV lymphoproliferative disease and cardiac lymphoma in a STK4 deficient patient

Roya Sherkat, Mohammad Reza Sabri, Bahar Dehghan, Hamid Bigdelian, Nahid Raeesi, Mino Afshar, Hamid Rahimi, Christoph Klein

PP54 A case study: the effect of massive honeybees attack on various body parameters atopic girl including allergy

Mohemid Al-Jebouri

PP55 The role of TLR9, NLRP3 and proIL-1β in activation of antiviral innate immunity

Oxana A. Svitich, Daria O. Zubacheva, Dmitrii A. Potemkin, Ludmila V. Gankovskaya, Vitalii V. Zverev

PP56 Overnight pulse oximetry, as a screening tool to diagnose obstructive sleep apnoea. How effective is it?

Phani Sanneerappa, Elaine OB Doyle, Paul Gallagher, Nagabathula Ramesh

PP57 The presentation and management of acute urticaria and allergic reactions in children in a multi-ethnic, inner city Emergency Department (ED)

Sherine Dewlett, Kin Man, Minal Gandhi, James Pocock, Anna Gerrardhughes

PP58 Food allergens responsible for delayed-type sensitisation in atopy patch test in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder

Jolanta Wasilewska, Maciej Kaczmarski, Dariusz Lebensztejn

POSTER VIEWING SESSION 4: Asthma—Rhinitis (PP59–PP87)

PP59 Systematic review of incense as a trigger factor for asthma

Chandramani Thuraisingham, Davendralingam Sinniah

PP60 Increased risks of mood and anxiety disorders in children with asthma

Yue Chen, Xiaomei Mei

PP61

PP62 Asthma Control Test (ACT) and Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) association in children

Sebnem Ozdogan, Pinar Karadeniz, Durdugul Ayyildiz-Emecen, Ummuhan Oncul

PP63 Seasonal and gender variations in vitamin D levels in children with asthma and its association with pulmonary function tests

Sebnem Ozdogan, Gizem Sari, Sabanur Cavdar

PP64 Defining treatment response in childhood asthma: rationale and design of the Pharmacogenomics in the Childhood Asthma (PiCA) consortium

Niloufar Farzan, Susanne J. Vijverberg, Colin J. Palmer, Kelan G. Tantisira, Anke-Hilseon Maitland-van der Zee behalf of the PiCA consortium

PP65 Prevalence of asthma and allergic disease in patients with inflammatory disease compared to celiac disease

Fatma Yavuzyilmaz, Sebnem Ozdogan, Nafiye Urganci, Merve Usta

PP66 A severe case with cystic fibrosis (CF) asthma

Mehmet Hoxha, Maksim Basho

PP67 Severe asthma exacerbation complicated with pneumothorax in a child with uncontrolled asthma due to poor treatment compliance

Ioana Valentina Nenciu, Andreia Florina Nita, Adina Lazar, Alexandru Ulmeanu, Carmen Zapucioiu, Dumitru Oraseanu

PP68 Evaluation of the Pediatric Quality of Life inventory (PedsQL) asthma module among low income asthmatic children and adolescents in Sao Paolo, Brazil

Gustavo F. Wandalsen, Fernanda Monteiro, Dirceu Solé

PP69 Early initiation of specific immunotherapy in asthma patients leads to higher benefits

Blerta Lame, Eris Mesonjesi, Arjeta Sherri

PP70 Treatment resistant asthma and rhinosinusitis with recurrent pulmonary infections. Is it primary ciliary dyskinesia?

Alkerta Ibranji, Laert Gjati, Gjustina Loloci, Ardii Bardhi

PP71 The comparison of sensitisation to animal allergens in children- and adult- onset patients with asthma

Behnam Moghtaderi, Shirin Farjadian, Dorna Eghtedari

PP72 Characterisation of children less than five years with wheezing episodes in Cali, Colombia

Manuela Olaya, Laura Del Mar Vasquez, Luis Fernando Ramirez, Carlos Daniel Serrano

PP73 Evaluation of the patients with recurrent croup

Belgin Usta Guc, Suna Asilsoy, Fulya Ozer

PP74 Obesity in adolescence compromising the asthma control

Guergana Petrova, Sylvia Shopova, Vera Papochieva, Snezhina Lazova, Dimitrinka Miteva, Penka Perenovska

PP75 Sleep behavior in children with persistent allergic rhinitis

Gustavo F. Wandalsen, Jessica Loekmanwidjaja, Márcia Mallozi, Dirceu Solé

PP76 Randomised trial of the safety of MP29-02* compared with fluticasone propionate nasal spray in children aged ≥4 years to <12 years with allergic rhinitis

William Berger, Ulrich Wahn, Paul Ratner, Daniel Soteres

PP77 Safety and tolerability evaluation of bilastine 10 mg in children from 2 to 11 years of age with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis or urticaria

Zoltán Novák, Anahí Yáñez, Kiss Ildikó, Piotr Kuna, Miguel Tortajada, Román Valiente, the Bilastine Pediatric Safety Study Group

PP78 Sensitisation to Alternaria alternata: Is it a risk factor for severe rhinitis?

Susana Lopes, Filipa Almeida, Tânia Lopes, Cristina Madureira, José Oliveira, Fernanda Carvalho

PP79 Validation of the Patient Benefit Index (PBI) for the assessment of patient-related outcomes in allergic rhinitis in children

Julia Feuerhahn, Christine Blome, Meike Hadler, Efstrathios Karagiannis, Anna Langenbruch, Matthias Augustin

PP80 Efficacy of sublingual tablet of house dust mite allergen extracts in adolescents with house dust mite-associated allergic rhinitis

Michel Roux, Shinji Kakudo, Efstrathios Karagiannis, Robert K. Zeldin

PP81 Lung function improvement in a child treated with omalizumab for bronchial asthma

Anna Sokolova, Tiago Milheiro Silva

PP82 How to treat a child suffering from asthma, allergic rhinitis, allergy to peanuts and diabetes at the same time?

Snezana S. Zivanovic, Vesna Cvetkovic, Ivana Nikolic, Sonja J. Zivanovic

PP83 Nitric oxide in exhaled air in the relationship of the degree of sensitisation to aeroallergens

Snezana S. Zivanovic, Ljiljana Saranac, Ivana Nikolic, Sonja J. Zivanovic, Zorica Zivkovic

PP84 Clinical basis of diagnostic errors in pediatric asthma

Zoia Nesterenko

PP85

PP86 Childhood asthma control in Serbia and organised Asthma Educational Intervention (AEI)

Snezana Radic, Branislava Milenkovic, Spomenka Smiljanic, Milka Micic-Stanijevic, Olivera Calovic

PP87 Experience from a group of adolescents with severe allergic asthma treated with Omalizumab

Anne Marie Bro Hofbauer, Lone Agertoft

THEMATIC POSTER SESSION 1: Prevention and Treatment—Epidemiology (TP01–TP18)

TP01 A cost effective primary school asthma education program: pilot study from inner London schools

Lucy Everson, Jessica Kearney, Jonny Coppel, Simon Braithwaite, Rahul Chodhari

TP02 The prevalence of allergic diseases among 14–15 years old adolescents in two Danish birth cohorts 14 years apart

Elisabeth S. Christiansen, Henrik Fomsgaard Kjaer, Esben Eller, Charlotte G. Mørtz, Susanne Halken

TP03 Does pattern of sensitisation to phleum pratense change with age? Is it different in children with allergic rhinitis or asthma?

Cristina Román India, Ana Moreira Jorge, Loreto González Domínguez, Cristina Muñoz Archidona, Sergio Quevedo Teruel, Teresa Bracamonte Bermejo, Juana Jiménez Jiménez, Luis Echeverría Zudaire

TP04 Practicalities of prevention of peanut allergy: modelling a national response to LEAP

Cathal O’Connor, Jonathan Hourihane

TP05 Comparison of the influence of sunflower seed oil and skin care lotion on the skin barrier function of newborns: a randomised controlled trial

Varvara Kanti, Lena Lünnemann, Günther Malise, Laine Ludriksone, Andrea Stroux, Wolfgang Henrich, Michael Abu-Dakn, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi, Natalie Garcia Bartels

TP06 The effect of daily skin care on skin barrier properties in infants with dry skin and risk for atopic dermatitis

Varvara Kanti, Lena Lünnemann, Laine Ludriksone, Marianne Schario, Andrea Stroux, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi, Natalie Garcia Bartels

TP07 Change in sum total aeroallergen skin prick test wheal diameters at 6 months predicts which children will respond to subcutaneous immunotherapy by three years

Thorsten Stanley, Nicolien Brandenbarg

TP08 Are mobile apps regarding adrenaline auto-injectors accessed by adolescents for support and education in the community?

Alia Boardman, Gary McGreevy, Emily Rodger, Katherine Knight, Victoria Timms, Trisha Taylor, Gemma Scanlan, Roisin Fitzsimons

TP09

TP10 Prevention of early atopic dermatitis among low-atopy-risk infants by immunoactive prebiotics is not sustained after the first year of life

Grüber Christoph, Ulrich Wahn, Margriet van Stuivenberg, Fabio Mosca, Guido Moro, Gaetano Chirico, Christian P. Braegger, Joseph Riedler, Yalcin Yavuz, Günther Boehm

TP11

TP12

TP13 Treatment with Omalizumab in a 16-year-old Caucasian girl with refractory solar urticaria

Stefania Arasi, Giuseppe Crisafulli, Lucia Caminiti, Federica Porcaro, Giovanni Battista Pajno

TP14 Ultra-pure soft water ameliorates skin conditions of adult and child patients with atopic dermatitis

Akane Tanaka, Yaei Togawa, Kumiko Oida, Naotomo Kambe, Peter Arkwright, Yosuke Amagai, Naoki Shimojo, Yasunori Sato, Hiroyuki Mochizuki, Hyosun Jang, Saori Ishizaka, Hiroshi Matsuda

TP15 Potential adjuvant effect of immunomodulator to improve specific immunotherapy in asthmatic child

Wisnu Barlianto, Ery Olivianto, H. M. S. Chandra Kusuma

TP16 How can Component Resolved Diagnosis (CRD) influence in Specific Immunotherapy (SIT) prescription, in a Spanish children population

Ana Moreira Jorge, Cristina Román India, Loreto González Domínguez, Cristina Muñoz Archidona, Juana Jiménez Jiménez, Teresa Bracamonte Bermejo, Sergio Quevedo Teruel, Luis Echeverría Zudaire

TP17 Mitochondrial dysfunction in food allergy: effects of L. rhamnosus GG in a mice model of peanut allergy

Rosita Aitoro, Mariapia Mollica, Roberto Berni Canani, Giovanna Trinchese, Elena Alfano, Antonio Amoroso, Lorella Paparo, Francesco Amato, Claudio Pirozzi, Antonio Calignano, Rosaria Meli

TP18 Prediction of atopic diseases in childhood: elevated blood eosinophils in infancy in a high risk birth cohort

Siri Rossberg, Kerstin Gerhold, Kurt Zimmermann, Mohammad Zaino, Thomas Geske, Eckard Hamelmann, Susanne Lau

THEMATIC POSTER SESSION 2: Food allergy—Anaphylaxis (TP19–TP38)

TP19

TP20

TP21 Double-blind provocation tests in non-IgE mediated cow’s milk allergy and the occurrence of placebo reactions

Sarah Bogovic, Jochem van den Berg, Chantal Janssen

TP22 Gradual introduction of baked egg (BE) in egg allergic patients under 2 years old

Angela Claver

TP23 Randomised controlled trial of SOTI with raw hen’s egg in children with persistent egg allergy I: safety and efficacy of daily vs. weekly protocols of induction

Mª Flor Martin-Muñoz, C. Martorell, M. T. Belver, E. Alonso Lebrero, L. Zapatero, V. Fuentes, M. Piqué, A. Plaza, C. Muñoz, A. Martorell, Cristina Blasco, B. Villa, C. Gómez, S. Nevot, J. M. García, L. Echeverria

TP24 Randomised controlled trial of SOTI with raw hen’s egg in children with persistent egg allergy II: a randomised controlled trial to study a safer, more effective and easy to perform maintenance (daily vs. every two days) pattern of egg SOTI

Mª Flor Martin-Muñoz, C. Martorell, M. T. Belver, E. Alonso Lebrero, L. Zapatero, V. Fuentes, M. Piqué, A. Plaza, C. Muñoz, A. Martorell, Cristina Blasco, B. Villa, C. Gómez, S. Nevot, J. M. García, L. Echeverria

TP25 Determining the safety of baked egg home reintroduction for children with mild egg allergy

Brenda DeWitt, Judith Holloway, Donald Hodge

TP26 Demographics, investigations and patterns of sensitisation in children with oral allergy syndrome in a London Teaching Hospital

Sian Ludman, Merhdad Jafari-Mamaghani, Rosemary Ebling, Adam T. Fox, Gideon Lack, George Du Toit

TP27 Airborne peanut challenge in children: allergic reactions are rare

Sofia Lovén Björkman, Caroline Nilsson, Natalia Ballardini

TP28 The nutty question on Pediatric Wards: to be or “nut” to be?

Supriyo Basu, Jenny Hallet, Jyothi Srinivas

TP29

TP30

TP31 Allergy education in nursery schools

Hazel Stringer, Nicola Jay

TP32 Food allergy in the first year of life

Tânia Lopes, Cristina Madureira, Filipa Almeida, Susana Lopes, Paula Fonseca, Clara Vieira, Fernanda Carvalho

TP33 Prevalence and geographic distribution of oral allergy syndrome in Italian children: a multicenter study

Carla Mastrorilli, Carlo Caffarelli, Riccardo Asero, Salvatore Tripodi, Arianna Dondi, Gianpaolo Ricci, Carlotta Povesi Dascola, Elisabetta Calamelli, Francesca Cipriani, Andrea Di Rienzo Businco, Annamaria Bianchi, Paolo Candelotti, Tullio Frediani, Carmen Verga, Paolo Maria Matricardi

TP34 Are common standardised allergen extracts used in skin test enough in the diagnosis of nuts allergy?

Cristina Muñoz Archidona, Loreto González Domínguez, Ana Moreira Jorge, Sergio Quevedo Teruel, Teresa Bracamonte Bermejo, Miriam Castillo Fernández, Fernando Pineda de la Losa, Luis Ángel Echeverría Zudaire

TP35 Evaluation of IgE sensitisation in children with allergic proctocolitis and its relationship to atopic dermatitis

Despina Mermiri, Paraskevi Korovessi, Skevi Tiliakou, Evaggelia Tavoulari, Kalliopi-Maria Moraiti, Fotini Giannoula, Athina Papadopoulou

TP36 Food allergy in children: are we managing them appropriately in the Emergency Department?

Wan Jean Tee, Samir Deiratany, Raymond Seedhoo, Roisin McNamara, Ike Okafor

TP37 Importance of oil body associated allergenic proteins in nuts suspected allergy children

Loreto González Domínguez, Ana Moreira Jorge, Cristina Muñoz Archidona, Teresa Bracamonte Bermejo, Sergio Quevedo Teruel, Fernando Pineda de la Losa, Miriam Castillo Fernández, Luis Ángel Echeverría Zudaire

TP38 Practical application of basophil activation test in children with food allergy

Ekaterina Khaleva, Gennady Novic, Natalia Bychkova

THEMATIC POSTER SESSION 3: Asthma (TP39–TP57)

TP39 Effect of corticosteroid therapy upon serum magnesium level in chronic asthmatic children

Amany Abd Al-Aziz, Amany Fatouh, Ayat Motawie, Eman El Bostany, Amr Ibrahim

TP40 ADAM33 in Bulgarian children with asthma

Guergana Petrova, Dimitrinka Miteva, Snezhina Lazova, Penka Perenovska, Sylvia Andonova, Alexey Savov

TP41

TP42 The impact of vitamin D serum levels in asthma and allergic rhinitis

Maria Zoto, Marialena Kyriakakou, Paraskevi Xepapadaki, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos

TP43 Life-threatening, first reported, paradoxical bronchospasm after nebulised Salbutamol in a 10 year old child

Paraskevi Korovessi, Mariza Vassilopoulou, Athina Balaska, Lambros Banos, Stavroula Kostaridou, Despina Mermiri

TP44

TP45 Asthma symptoms in children with treatment for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis

Jorien Wartna, Arthur M. Bohnen, Gijs Elshout, David H. J. Pols, Patrick J. E. Bindels

Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

TP46 Atopy increased the risk of developing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in young athletes

Sven F. Seys; Ellen Dilissen, Sarah Van der Eycken, An-Sofie Schelpe, Gudrun Marijsse, Thierry Troosters, Vincent Vanbelle, Sven Aertgeerts, Jan L. Ceuppens, Lieven J. Dupont, Koen Peers, Dominique M. Bullens

TP47 The effect of higher BMI on risk for asthma and treatment outcome in overweight and obese children

Ivana Banic, Sandra Bulat Lokas, Jelena Zivkovic, Boro Nogalo, Iva Mrkic Kobal, Davor Plavec, Mirjana Turkalj

TP48

TP49

TP50

TP51

TP52 The impact of a multidisciplinary project intended to change the culture of nebulisers towards pressurised metered dose inhalers

Georgeta Oliveira, Katharine Pike, Alda Melo, Tomás Amélia, José Carlos Cidrais Rodrigues, Cristina Serrano, José Manuel Lopes dos Santos, Carla Lopes

TP53

TP54

TP55

TP56 Increased asthma control in patients with severe persistent allergic asthma after 12 month of nightly temperature controlled laminar airflow (TLA)

Eckard Hamelmann, Uwe Schauer, Karl-Christian Bergmann

TP57

THEMATIC POSTER SESSION 4: Drug allergy—Dermatology (TP58–TP77)

TP58 Should we proceed directly to provocation challenges to diagnose drug allergy? Our experience says yes

Luis Moral, Teresa Toral, Nuria Marco, Beléns García Avilés, Mª Jesús Fuentes, Jesús Garde, Cristina Montahud, Javier Perona, Mª José Forniés

TP59 Anaphylaxis to 13-valent pneumococcal vaccine

Esozia Arroabarren, Marta Anda, Maria Luisa Sanz, Maria Teresa Lizaso, Candida Arregui

TP60 Intrapartum antibiotic exposure for treatment of group B streptococcus was not associated with the development of penicillin allergy in children

Sara May, Martha Hartz, Avni Joshi, Miguel A. Park

TP61 Evaluation of suspected drug hypersensitivity reactions in 169 children referred to the General Hospital

Sonja Posega Devetak, Tina Vesel, Anja Koren Jeverica, Tadej Avčin

TP62 Drug provocation testing: experience of a tertiary hospital

Leonor Castro, Carolina Gouveia, Ana Carvalho Marques, Antonio Jorge Cabral

TP63 Perioperative anaphylaxis: a growing concern in pediatric population

Luis Amaral, Fabrícia Carolino, Eunice Castro, Madalena Passos, Josefina R. Cernadas

TP64 Raising awareness of hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the pediatric age

Fabrícia Carolino, Luís Amaral, Eunice Dias de Castro, Josefina R. Cernadas

TP65 Perioperative anaphylaxis in young children: how to confirm the suspicion

Josefina R. Cernadas, Fabrícia Carolino, Luís Amaral, Fernando Pineda, Armanda Gomes

TP66 A case study of a child suspected to be penicillin allergic-digging deeper

Katherine Knight, Roisin Fitzsimons, Helen Brough

TP67 Prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of hypersensitivity reactions to antibiotics in patients with cystic fibrosis

Jobst Röhmel, Carsten Schwarz, Anne Mehl, Philippe Stock, Doris Staab

TP68 Antibiotic drug hypersensitivity in cystic fibrosis: A pilot study using cellular allergy tests for diagnostics

Jobst Röhmel, Carsten Schwarz, Christine Seib, Doris Staab, Philippe Stock

TP69 Oral antibiotics challenges in children

Anita Critchlow, Alyson Barber, Nicola Jay

TP70 Hypersensitivity reaction to vancomycin: a new successful desensitization protocol

Belen Delavalle, Teresa Garriga, Blanca Vilá, Cristina Blasco

TP71

TP72 Clinical phenotypes according to FLG gene loss of function mutations in children with atopic dermatitis

Francesca Cipriani, Annalisa Astolfi, Costanza Di Chiara, Elisabetta Calamelli, Iria Neri, Annalisa Patrizi, Gianpaolo Ricci

TP73

TP74 Urticaria in children: clinical and epidemiological features

Katerina Neskorodova, Asya Kudryavtseva

TP75

TP76 Acute urticaria at the Pediatrics Emergency Department: is it allergy?

Esozia Arroabarren, Jorge Alvarez, Marta Anda, Miriam Palacios, Marta Martinez-Merino, Ibone Vaquero

TP77

Real-world outcomes in patients with hereditary angioedema prescribed lanadelumab versus other prophylaxis

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by painful, debilitating, and potentially fatal swelling attacks. Lanadelumab is approved as long-term prophylaxis (LTP) in patients with HAE. However, real-world data on LTP use in patients with HAE are limited. Objective: To describe clinical characteristics, attack history, and quality of life (QoL) of patients with HAE type I/II who were receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs. Methods: Data were drawn from the Adelphi HAE Disease Specific Program, a cross-sectional survey of HAE physicians conducted in the United States from July to November 2021. Physician-reported disease characteristics, HAE attack frequency, and QoL were compared among patients receiving lanadelumab or other LTPs for at least 12 months. Results: Physicians reported data for 144 patients, of whom 29 had received lanadelumab and 115 had received another prophylaxis for at least 12 months. The mean ± standard deviation number of attacks in the previous 12 months was lower among patients receiving lanadelumab than other LTPs (2.3 ± 3.1 versus 3.4 ± 2.8, respectively; p = 0.075). Although both groups had similar current disease activity and severity, more patients receiving lanadelumab versus other LTPs had high disease activity (51.7% versus 12.5%, respectively; p < 0.0001) and disease severity rated as severe (51.7% versus 16.1%, respectively; p = 0.0001) at diagnosis. Physicians reported that more patients who received lanadelumab had good or very good QoL (72.4%) than those receiving other LTPs (36.5%) (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Analysis of these findings suggests lower attack frequency, lower symptomatic impact, and better QoL in patients treated with lanadelumab than another prophylaxis in a real-world setting.

Interplay between on-demand treatment trials for hereditary angioedema and treatment guidelines

Over the past 2 decades, guidelines for the on-demand treatment of hereditary angioedema attacks have undergone significant evolution. Early treatment guidelines, such as the Canadian 2003 International Consensus Algorithm, often gated on-demand treatment by attack location and/or severity. Pivotal trials for on-demand injectable treatments (plasma-derived C1 esterase inhibitor, icatibant, ecallantide [United States only], and recombinant human C1 esterase inhibitor), which were approved in the United States and the European Union between 2008 and 2014, were designed accordingly. Subsequent post hoc analyses of clinical trial data alongside real-world evidence led to a paradigm shift. In 2013, the US Hereditary Angioedema Association guidelines recommended that all attacks, irrespective of location or severity, be considered for treatment as early as possible after onset to minimize morbidity and mortality. This approach remains the cornerstone of current treatment guidelines and has shaped the design of recent clinical trials, such as those for the investigational agents, oral plasma kallikrein inhibitor sebetralstat and oral bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist deucrictibant. This narrative review discusses the evolution of on-demand treatment guidelines, the clinical trial and real-world data that prompted significant revisions, and the subsequent changes to trial designs introduced to facilitate guideline compliance.

The utility of shared decision making in the management of hereditary angioedema

Background: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a complex disorder with a wide array of treatment options. Shared decision-making (SDM) should be used to ensure that patients are choosing their best treatment option. The goal was to develop and psychometrically test a brief instrument for assessing the patient's perspective of the SDM process during his or her clinical encounters with an HAE specialist/allergist. Method: We hypothesized that SDM could be used effectively to help patients in their choice of therapy for HAE. Ten HAE treating physicians from the United States with a total of 50 patients with HAE used SDM to help patients choose the best prophylactic therapies (oral kallikrein inhibitor, androgens, subcutaneous C1 inhibitor replacement therapy, intravenous C1 inhibitor replacement therapy, monoclonal antibody kallikrein inhibitor) for their HAE and then completed surveys to analyze the effectiveness of the implementation of SDM as a quality indicator in health services assessment. Results: The congruence of answers between the physicians and the patients was then analyzed; 90% of the patient-physician pairs agreed that the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment options were precisely explained; 92% of the patient-physician pairs agreed that the physician helped them understand all the information and that the physician asked them which treatment option they preferred; 88% of the pairs agreed that the different treatment options were thoroughly weighed and 92% of the pairs felt that they selected a treatment option together. Conclusion: In summary, SDM is being implemented by treating physicians to determine the best management options for their patients with HAE.