Safety of cardiac catheterization in patients with end-stage liver disease awaiting liver transplantation

Patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) are predisposed to bleeding complications due to thrombocytopenia, reduced synthesis of coagulation factors, and increased fibrinolytic activity. The exact incidence of vascular access site and bleeding complications related to cardiac catheterization in this group remains unknown. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with ESLD who underwent left-sided cardiac catheterization from August 2004 to February 2007 were identified. Eighty-one patients without known liver disease matched for age, gender, and body mass index who underwent left-sided cardiac catheterization during the same period were chosen as the control group. Vascular complications were defined as hematoma >5 cm, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, or retroperitoneal bleeding. Patients with ESLD had lower baseline mean hematocrit (32.3 +/- 6.0% vs 39.2 +/- 6.2%, p <0.001) and mean platelet count (90.1 +/- 66.3 vs 236.1 +/- 77.1 x 10(9)/L, p <0.001) compared with controls. They also had higher mean serum creatinine (1.9 +/- 1.7 vs 1.2 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, p = 0.002) and mean international normalized ratio (1.6 +/- 0.7 vs 1.1 +/- 0.2, p <0.001). There were more complicated pseudoaneurysms in the patients with liver failure (5.7% [5 of 88]), compared with 0% in controls (p = 0.029). Patients with ESLD had lower starting hemoglobin levels and greater reductions in hemoglobin after cardiac catheterization, resulting in greater need for packed red blood cell transfusion (16% vs 4%, p = 0.008), fresh frozen plasma (51.7% vs 1.2%, p <0.001), and platelet transfusions (48.3% vs 1.2%, p <0.001). Major bleeding was higher in the ESLD group (14.8% vs 3.7%, p = 0.014), driven mainly by the need for blood transfusion. In conclusion, despite severe coagulopathy, left-sided cardiac catheterization may be performed safely in this patient population, with correction of coagulopathy and meticulous attention to procedural technique.

Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Kidney

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are common and implantation carries risk of AKI. LVADs are used as a bridge to heart transplantation or as destination therapy. Patients with refractory heart failure that develop chronic cardiorenal syndrome and CKD often improve after LVAD placement. Nevertheless, reversibility of CKD is hard to predict. After LVAD placement, significant GFR increases may be followed by a late return to near baseline GFR levels, and in some patients, a decline in GFR. In this review, we discuss changes in GFR after LVAD placement, the incidence of AKI and associated mortality after LVAD placement, the management of AKI requiring RRT, and lastly, we review salient features about cardiorenal syndrome learned from the LVAD experience. In light of the growing number of patients using LVADs as a destination therapy, it is important to understand the effect of these devices on the kidney. Additional research and long-term data are required to better understand the relationship between the LVAD and the kidney.

COVID-19 in recent heart transplant recipients: Clinicopathologic features and early outcomes

BACKGROUND

The impact of COVID-19 on heart transplant (HTx) recipients remains unclear, particularly in the early post-transplant period.

METHODS

We share novel insights from our experience in five HTx patients with COVID-19 (three within 2 months post-transplant) from our institution at the epicenter of the pandemic.

RESULTS

All five exhibited moderate (requiring hospitalization, n = 3) or severe (requiring ICU and/or mechanical ventilation, n = 2) illness. Both cases with severe illness were transplanted approximately 6 weeks before presentation and acquired COVID-19 through community spread. All five patients were on immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and tacrolimus, and three that were transplanted within the prior 2 months were additionally on prednisone. The two cases with severe illness had profound lymphopenia with markedly elevated C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and ferritin. All had bilateral ground-glass opacities on chest imaging. MMF was discontinued in all five, and both severe cases received convalescent plasma. All three recent transplants underwent routine endomyocardial biopsies, revealing mild (n = 1) or no acute cellular rejection (n = 2), and no visible viral particles on electron microscopy. Within 30 days of admission, the two cases with severe illness remain hospitalized but have clinically improved, while the other three have been discharged.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 appears to negatively impact outcomes early after heart transplantation.

An early experience on the effect of solid organ transplant status on hospitalized COVID-19 patients

We compared the outcome of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed solid organ transplant (SOT) patients to a transplant naïve population. In total, 10 356 adult hospital admissions for COVID-19 from March 1, 2020 to April 27, 2020 were analyzed. Data were collected on demographics, baseline clinical conditions, medications, immunosuppression, and COVID-19 course. Primary outcome was combined death or mechanical ventilation. We assessed the association between primary outcome and prognostic variables using bivariate and multivariate regression models. We also compared the primary endpoint in SOT patients to an age, gender, and comorbidity-matched control group. Bivariate analysis found transplant status, age, gender, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, COPD, and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 to be significant predictors of combined death or mechanical ventilation. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, SOT status had a trend toward significance (odds ratio [OR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.99-1.69, p = .06). Compared to an age, gender, and comorbidity-matched control group, SOT patients had a higher combined risk of death or mechanical ventilation (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03-1.74, p = .027).

Meta-analysis of randomized trials of effect of milrinone on mortality in cardiac surgery: an update

OBJECTIVE

The long-term use of milrinone is associated with increased mortality in chronic heart failure. A recent meta-analysis suggested that it might increase mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The authors conducted an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials in patients undergoing cardiac surgery to determine if milrinone impacted survival.

DESIGN

A meta-analysis.

SETTING

Hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand thirty-seven patients from 20 randomized trials.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Biomed, Central, PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane central register of clinical trials, and conference proceedings were searched for randomized trials that compared milrinone versus placebo or any other control in adult and pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Authors of trials that did not include mortality data were contacted. Only trials for which mortality data were available were included. Overall analysis showed no difference in mortality between patients receiving milrinone versus control (12/554 [2.2%] in the milrinone group v 10/483 [2.1%] in the control arm; relative risk [RR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-2.43; p = 0.7) or in analysis restricted to adults (11/364 [3%] in the milrinone group v 9/371 [2.4%] in the control arm; RR = 1.17; 95% CI, 0.54-2.53; p = 0.7). Sensitivity analyses in trials with a low risk of bias showed a trend toward an increase in mortality with milrinone (8/153 [5.2%] in the milrinone arm v 2/152 [1.3%] in the control arm; RR = 2.71; 95% CI, 0.82-9; p for effect = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite theoretic concerns for increased mortality with intravenous milrinone in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the authors were unable to confirm an adverse effect on survival. However, sensitivity analysis of high-quality trials showed a trend toward increased mortality with milrinone.

Update on the Management of Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

OPINION STATEMENT: Treatment goals of acute decompensated heart failure are to decrease congestion, afterload, and neurohormonal activation in order to improve hemodynamics and symptoms and, perhaps, reduce in-hospital events, re-hospitalizations, and mortality while avoiding toxicities of therapy such as hypotension, arrhythmias, and renal dysfunction. Relief of congestion through intravenous loop diuretics is a mainstay of therapy. In cases where diuretics are not effective, ultrafiltration may be used to achieve euvolemia. Beta-blockers should be continued or reduced in dose at admission but should not typically be held. In patients with normotensive or hypertensive heart failure, afterload reduction with vasodilators should be instituted at presentation. Choice of a particular agent such as nitroglycerin, nitroprusside, or nesiritide depends on patient characteristics such as presence of ischemia, degree of congestion, and renal function. Nitroprusside may be preferable in patients with congestion and low cardiac output, but with caution in patients with significant hypotension. Intravenous inotropes/inodilators, such as dobutamine and milrinone, should be limited to hypotensive patients with evidence of poor tissue perfusion. Milrinone may be preferable in patients who have significant pulmonary venous hypertension. In patients who do not respond to initial medical therapy and who are candidates for either cardiac transplantation or destination left ventricular assist device, mechanical circulatory support should be considered early, prior to the development of end-organ damage.

Sex-Based Differences in COVID-19 Outcomes

Background: Smaller studies suggest lower morbidity and mortality associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in women. Our aim is to assess the impact of female sex on outcomes in a large cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study of 10,630 adult patients hospitalized with a confirmed COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction between March 1, 2020 and April 27, 2020, with follow-up conducted through June 4, 2020. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between sex and the primary outcomes, including length of stay, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), need for mechanical ventilation, pressor requirement, and all-cause mortality as well as major adverse events and in-hospital COVID-19 treatments. Results: In the multivariable analysis, women had 27% lower odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.81; p < 0.001), 24% lower odds of ICU admission (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.84; p < 0.001), 26% lower odds of mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.82; p < 0.001), and 25% lower odds of vasopressor requirement (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84; p < 0.001). Women had 34% less odds of having acute cardiac injury (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.59-0.74; p < 0.001; n = 7,289), 16% less odds of acute kidney injury (OR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.76-0.92; p < 0.001; n = 9,840), and 27% less odds of venous thromboembolism (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96; p < 0.02; c-statistic 0.85, n = 9,407). Conclusions: Female sex is associated with lower odds of in-hospital outcomes, major adverse events, and all-cause mortality. There may be protective mechanisms inherent to female sex, which explain differences in COVID-19 outcomes.

Right Ventricular Pressure-Volume Analysis During Left Ventricular Assist Device Speed Optimization Studies: Insights Into Interventricular Interactions and Right Ventricular Failure

BACKGROUND

Interventricular interaction, which refers to the impact of left ventricular (LV) function on right ventricular (RV) function and vice versa, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of RV failure in LV assist device (LVAD) recipients. We sought to understand more about interventricular interaction by quantifying changes in the RV systolic and diastolic function with varying LVAD speeds.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Four patients (ages 22-69 years, 75% male, and 25% with ischemic cardiomyopathy) underwent a protocolized hemodynamic ramp test within 12 months of LVAD implantation where RV pressure-volume loops were recorded with a conductance catheter. The end-systolic PV relationship and end-diastolic PV relationship were compared using the V₂₀ and V₁₀ indices (volumes at which end-systolic PV relationship and end-diastolic PV relationship reach a pressure of 20 and 10 mm Hg, respectively). The ∆V₂₀ and ∆V₁₀ refer to the change in V₂₀ and V₁₀ from the minimum to maximum LVAD speeds. RV PV loops demonstrated variable changes in systolic and diastolic function with increasing LVAD speed. The end-systolic PV relationship changed in 1 patient (patient 2, ∆V₂₀ = 23.5 mL), reflecting a decrease in systolic function with increased speed, and was unchanged in 3 patients (average ∆V₂₀ = 7.4 mL). The end-diastolic PV relationship changed with increasing speed in 3 of 4 patients (average ∆V₁₀ = 12.5 mL), indicating an increase in ventricular compliance, and remained unchanged in one participant (patient 1; ∆V₁₀ = 4.0 mL).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventricular interaction can improve RV compliance and impair systolic function, but the overall effect on RV performance in this pilot investigation is heterogeneous. Further research is required to understand which patient characteristics and hemodynamic parameters influence the net impact of interventricular interaction.

Letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk heart transplant recipients

Letermovir is a novel agent for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease that, unlike traditional CMV DNA polymerase inhibitors, does not carry the risk of myelosuppression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and clinical application of letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in heart transplant (HT) recipients. Between November 1, 2019, and October 1, 2021, at a single, tertiary care hospital, 17 HT recipients were initiated on letermovir due to leukopenia while on valganciclovir. Fifteen (88%) had high-risk mismatch (CMV D+/R-). Median time on letermovir was 5 months (interquartile range, 2-8 months.) At the end of the study period, nine of 17 patients (52.9%) were still on letermovir and four of the 17 (23.5%) had successfully completed the prophylaxis window on letermovir and been switched to the pre-emptive strategy. One patient developed clinically significant CMV viremia in the setting of being unable to obtain medication due to insurance barriers but was later successfully restarted on letermovir. One patient was unable to tolerate letermovir due to symptoms of headache and myalgias. Two patients developed low-level non-clinically significant CMV viremia and were switched back to valacyclovir. All patients had tacrolimus dosages reduced at time of letermovir initiation to minimize the risk of supratherapeutic tacrolimus concentration. One patient required hospitalization due to symptomatic tacrolimus toxicity. For HT recipients who cannot tolerate valganciclovir, letermovir presents an alternative for CMV prophylaxis. Close monitoring for breakthrough CMV and calcineurin inhibitor levels is necessary. Larger studies are required to further delineate its use and help provide further evidence of its safety and efficacy.

Outcomes following Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices: A Single-Center Experience

The Prevalence of ventricular assist devices (VADs) is increasing as advanced cardiac therapies progress. These patients commonly require non-cardiac surgical procedures (NCS), although data are scant regarding the safety, timing, and operations that may safely be performed. We aim to describe our experience with VAD patients undergoing NCS. We retrospectively reviewed records on patients who underwent NCS after VAD implantation between 2013 and 2015 at a single Joint Commission–accredited VAD institution. Data collection included demographics, ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, operative details, and perioperative anticoagulation management and outcomes. Seventy-two NCS were performed by general surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, urologists, vascular surgeons, ENTs, and other services. Procedures were similarly varied, including video-assisted thoracoscopy with decortications or lung biopsy, tracheostomies, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies, exploratory laparotomies, and wound debridements and/or closures. The ten deaths in the study group were judged not to be directly related to NCS. Eleven cases had postoperative bleeding and two cases had postoperative thrombosis, including one pump thrombosis. Based on our results, VAD is not an absolute contraindication to NCS, and a variety of NCS procedures can safely be performed. Further study should focus on quantifying and mitigating the risk that VADs bring to NCS.

Use of a Pulmonary Artery Pressure Sensor to Manage Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Background: Hemodynamic-guided management with a pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) sensor (CardioMEMS^TM) is effective in reducing heart failure hospitalization (HFH) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF). This study aims to determine the feasibility and clinical utility of the CardioMEMS HF system to manage patients supported with LVADs. Methods: In this multi-center prospective study, we followed patients with HeartMate II^TM (n=52) or HeartMate 3^TM (n=49) LVADs and with CardioMEMS PA Sensors, and measured PAP, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L scores), and HFH rates through 6 months. Patients were stratified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR) to reductions in PA diastolic pressure (PAD). Results: There were significant reductions in PAD from baseline to 6 months in R (21.5 to 16.5 mmHg, p<0.001), compared to an increase in NR (18.0 to 20.3, p=0.002). and there was a significant increase in 6MWD among R (266 vs 322 meters, p=0.025) compared to no change in NR. Patients who maintained PAD < 20 compared with PAD ≥ 20 mmHg for more than half the time throughout the study (averaging 15.6 vs 23.3 mmHg) had a statistically significant lower rate of HFH (12.0% vs 38.9%, p=0.005). Conclusions: LVAD patients managed with CardioMEMS with a significant reduction in PAD at 6 months showed improvements in 6MWD. Maintaining PAD < 20 mmHg was associated with fewer HF hospitalizations. Hemodynamic-guided management of LVAD patients with CardioMEMS is feasible and may result in functional and clinical benefits. Prospective evaluation of ambulatory hemodynamic management in LVAD patients is warranted. Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03247829.

Assessment of cardiac recovery in patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Aims

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA‐ECMO) is increasingly being used to support patients in cardiogenic shock (CS). Early determination of disposition is paramount, as longer durations of support have been associated with worse outcomes. We describe a stepwise, bedside weaning protocol to assess cardiopulmonary recovery during VA‐ECMO.

Methods and results

Over 1 year, we considered all patients on VA‐ECMO for CS for the Weaning Protocol (WP) at our centre. During the WP, patients had invasive haemodynamic monitoring, echocardiography, and blood gas analysis while flow was reduced in 1 LPM decrements. Ultimately, the circuit was clamped for 30 min, and final measures were taken. Patients were described as having durable recovery (DR) if they were free of pharmacological and mechanical support at 30 days post‐decannulation. Over 12 months, 34 patients had VA‐ECMO for CS. Fourteen patients were eligible for the WP at 4–12 days. Ten patients tolerated full flow reduction and were successfully decannulated. Twenty‐four per cent of the entire cohort demonstrated DR with no adverse events during the WP. Patients with DR had significantly higher ejection fraction, cardiac index, and smaller left ventricular size at lowest flow during the WP.

Conclusions

We describe a safe, stepwise, bedside weaning protocol to assess cardiac recovery during VA‐ECMO. Early identification of patients more likely to recover may improve outcomes during ECMO support.

Early use of PCSK9 inhibitor therapy after heart transplantation from a hepatitis C virus positive donor

Although statin therapy is a primary treatment to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), its use may be delayed due to pharmacologic interactions in the early post-transplant period among heart transplant (HT) recipients with hepatitis C virus positive (HCV+) donors. Further examination of the possible benefits of early, nonstatin lipid-lowering therapies (LLT), such as PCSK9 inhibitors (PCSK9i), among this specific subset of transplant recipients is therefore becoming increasingly important. We report a 60-year-old man who received a HT from a HCV+ donor for end-stage ischemic cardiomyopathy. In the early post-transplant period, there was concern for drug-drug interactions between statin, immunosuppressant, and direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. In addition, prior to transplant, he reported statin-associated muscle symptoms in response to multiple statins, which persisted despite attempts to re-challenge and use an every-other-day dosing strategy. Therefore, the patient was started on PCSK9i therapy after transplantation and while receiving curative DAA therapy for HCV. As the number of HT recipients of HCV+ donors continue to rise, investigation into the safety and benefits of early use of PCSK9i for the reduction of CAV and improved cardiovascular and mortality outcomes should be pursued.

Structural and functional cardiac changes in endomyocardial fibrosis treated with endomyocardial resection: Disease progression captured by multimodality imaging

Eosinophilic myocarditis, a rare and under-recognized disease process, occurs due to cytotoxic inflammation of the endomyocardium that over time may lead to a restrictive cardiomyopathy. We report clinical, multimodality imaging, and pathologic findings in a 45-year-old woman over a 17-month period as she progressed from suspected acute eosinophilic myocarditis to phenotypic endomyocardial fibrosis resulting in recurrent ascites. Interval echocardiograms demonstrate definitive pathologic structural changes that reflect the hemodynamic consequences of the underlying cardiomyopathy. Despite a negative myocardial biopsy, characteristic findings on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging clarified the diagnosis which led to successful treatment with endomyocardial resection and valve replacements.

Elevated Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Levels Are Associated With Reduced Myocardial Blood Flow but Not Angiographic Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: The EVIDENT Study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) leads to impaired myocardial blood flow (MBF), increasing the risk of cardiovascular death or retransplant among heart transplantation (HT) recipients. Data on elevation in donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) and CAV in the absence of rejection are mixed. We sought to test the hypothesis that CAV with reduced MBF (RMBF) is associated with elevated dd-cfDNA.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on HT recipients at a high-volume center who underwent dd-cfDNA testing between September 2019 and November 2022. Inclusion criteria included undergoing CAV screening with cardiac positron emission tomography scans and coronary angiograms. Patients were grouped by the presence of angiographic CAV diagnosis and MBF reserve evaluated through cardiac positron emission tomography. The latter was subdivided into normal MBF or RMBF, with RMBF defined as an MBF reserve ≤2. Elevated dd-cfDNA was defined as ≥0.12%.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-six HT recipients were included (median age, 55 years; 27.6% female; median, 8 years [interquartile range (IQR), 5-14] post-HT). Ischemic etiology of heart failure was more prevalent in the RMBF group (36%) compared with the normal MBF group (20%; P=0.02). The prevalence and magnitude of a positive dd-cfDNA test with angiographic CAV (29%; median, 0.26% [IQR, 0.15%-0.62%]) were not significantly different from those without CAV (30%; P=0.94; median, 0.31% [IQR, 0.17%-0.71%]; P=0.38). However, RMBF patients exhibited significantly higher dd-cfDNA prevalence and levels (51%; median, 0.81% [IQR, 0.48%-1.11%]) compared with normal MBF patients (27%; P<0.001; median, 0.25% [IQR, 0.15%-0.52%]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

HT recipients with angiographic CAV had similar dd-cfDNA levels and rates as those without. Notably, dd-cfDNA levels and rates were significantly elevated in patients with RMBF assessed by positron emission tomography compared with those with normal MBF.

Impact of Age of Heart Transplant Program on Patient Survival and Post-Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The relationship between age of a heart transplant (HT) program and outcomes has not been explored.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database of all adult HTs between 2009 and 2019. For each patient, we created a variable that corresponded to program age: new (<5), developing (≥5 but <10) and established (≥10) years.

RESULTS

Of 20 997 HTs, 822 were at new, 908 at developing, and 19 267 at established programs. Patients at new programs were significantly more likely to have history of cigarette smoking, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and prior sternotomy. These programs were less likely to accept organs from older donors and those with a history of hypertension or cigarette use. As compared to patients at new programs, transplant patients at established programs had less frequent rates of treated rejection during the index hospitalization (HR 0.43 [95% CI, 0.36-0.53] p < 0.001) and at 1 year (HR 0.58 [95% CI, 0.49-0.70], p < 0.001), less frequently required pacemaker implantations (HR 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.69], p < 0.001), and less frequently required dialysis (HR 0.66 [95% CI, 0.53-0.82], p < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in short- or long-term survival between the groups (log-rank p = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Patient and donor selection differed between new, developing, and established HT programs but had equivalent survival. New programs had increased likelihood of treated rejection, pacemaker implantation, and need for dialysis. Standardized post-transplant practices may help to minimize this variation and ensure optimal outcomes for all patients.

Outcomes Following Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Ventricular Assist Devices: A Single-Center Experience

the prevalence of ventricular assist devices (VADs) is increasing as advanced cardiac therapies progress. These patients commonly require non-cardiac surgical procedures (NCS), although data are scant regarding the safety, timing, and operations that may safely be performed. We aim to describe our experience with VAD patients undergoing NCS. We retrospectively reviewed records on patients who underwent NCS after VAD implantation between 2013 and 2015 at a single Joint Commission-accredited VAD institution. Data collection included demographics, ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy, operative details, and perioperative anticoagulation management and outcomes. Seventy-two NCS were performed by general surgeons, thoracic surgeons, plastic surgeons, urologists, vascular surgeons, ENTs, and other services. Procedures were similarly varied, including video-assisted thoracoscopy with decortications or lung biopsy, tracheostomies, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies , exploratory laparotomies, and wound debridements and/or closures. The ten deaths in the study group were judged not to be directly related to NCS. Eleven cases had postoperative bleeding and two cases had postoperative thrombosis, including one pump thrombosis. Based on our results, VAD is not an absolute contraindication to NCS, and a variety of NCS procedures can safely be performed. Further study should focus on quantifying and mitigating the risk that VADs bring to NCS.