Frequency, Clinical Characteristics and Predictors of Ketoacidosis at Diagnosis of Type One Diabetes Mellitus in Children and Adolescents from Jordan

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at diagnosis of type one diabetes (T1D) in developing countries are scarce. The aim of this study was to describe the frequency of DKA at the onset of T1D in children and adolescents in Jordan and to compare the clinical and biochemical characteristics between the group that presented with DKA and the group that did not.

METHODS

The records of 341 children and adolescents, less than sixteen years of age, who were diagnosed with T1D between 2015 and 2019 were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of all the children diagnosed with T1D, 108 (31.7%) presented with DKA. The majority had mild or moderate DKA (38% and 33.3% respectively). Higher paternal education levels were associated with a lower probability of presenting with DKA (p=0.043). A family history of T1D had a protective effect on the occurrence of DKA (Odds ratio=2.138; 95% confidence interval=1.167-3.917, p=0.014). Patients with celiac disease and higher HbA1c levels were more likely to experience recurrent episodes of DKA, (p=0.004 and 0.011, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In Jordan, the rate of DKA at presentation of T1D remains high. Prevention campaigns are needed to increase diabetes awareness among the public and healthcare providers.

Management of a rare case of isolated U-shaped displaced sacral fracture in a young female high school student

Sacral fractures in young healthy patients are usually linked to high-energy trauma. They are often associated with multiple other injuries. Isolated sacral fractures are rare and can be easily missed in the absence of other surrounding pelvic or spinal injuries. In this article, we present a rare case of isolated U-shaped displaced sacral fracture despite the high-energy mechanism of injury being missed on initial presentation. This is a 17-year-old healthy female who presented to the emergency department after falling from five-meter height. She complained of lower back pain and inability to ambulate. Physical examination revealed significant sacral tenderness, bilateral lower limb weakness and hypoesthesia, anesthesia of the saddle area, weak anal tone and absent anal reflex. Initial radiographs showed no apparent fractures. Further imaging by pelvic computed tomography, however, revealed an isolated U-shaped displaced sacral fracture. The patient was treated by decompression and lumbopelvic fixation by triangular osteosynthesis and iliosacral screw. This fixation method restored stability of the spinopelvic junction and allowed for early mobilization. At her 18-month follow-up visit, she showed minimal disability score (10%) on the Oswestry Disability Index. In conclusion, sacral fractures are considered exceedingly rare to occur in isolation and in young healthy patients.

Factors influencing long-term survival after lung metastasectomy

BACKGROUND

Disease-free interval, histology of primary tumor, and number and size of metastases resected (at first metastasectomy) were studied after resection of pulmonary metastases.

METHODS

Between 1980 and 1993, 276 consecutive patients underwent lung resections for curative removal of metastatic disease. At subsequent relapse, 63 patients had a second-stage metastasectomy, 12 went on to a third phase, and 2 patients had four stages.

RESULTS

The primary tumor was sarcoma in 126 cases (46%), teratoma in 88 (32%), carcinoma in 53 (19%), melanoma in 5, and miscellaneous in 4. Actuarial survival was 69% at 2 years (95% confidence interval 62% to 74%), 48% at 5 years (40% to 55%), and 35% at 10 years (23% to 44%).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival was not related to disease-free interval. Multivariate analysis showed that nearly all predictive information can be obtained through histologic studies (p < 0.0001); inclusion of the number of metastases resected contributed to a lesser degree (p = 0.032). Short disease-free intervals, numerous lung metastases, or even deposits recurring after a first or second metastasectomy should not preclude patients from operation.