Ten golden rules for optimal antibiotic use in hospital settings: the WARNING call to action

Antibiotics are recognized widely for their benefits when used appropriately. However, they are often used inappropriately despite the importance of responsible use within good clinical practice. Effective antibiotic treatment is an essential component of universal healthcare, and it is a global responsibility to ensure appropriate use. Currently, pharmaceutical companies have little incentive to develop new antibiotics due to scientific, regulatory, and financial barriers, further emphasizing the importance of appropriate antibiotic use. To address this issue, the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery established an international multidisciplinary task force of 295 experts from 115 countries with different backgrounds. The task force developed a position statement called WARNING (Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance National/International Network Group) aimed at raising awareness of antimicrobial resistance and improving antibiotic prescribing practices worldwide. The statement outlined is 10 axioms, or "golden rules," for the appropriate use of antibiotics that all healthcare workers should consistently adhere in clinical practice.

A pandemic recap: lessons we have learned

On January 2020, the WHO Director General declared that the outbreak constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. The world has faced a worldwide spread crisis and is still dealing with it. The present paper represents a white paper concerning the tough lessons we have learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, an international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making. With the present paper, international and heterogenous multidisciplinary panel of very differentiated people would like to share global experiences and lessons with all interested and especially those responsible for future healthcare decision making.

Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis: A Proposal for a Global Evidence-Based Bundle

In the multimodal strategy context, to implement healthcare-associated infection prevention, bundles are one of the most commonly used methods to adapt guidelines in the local context and transfer best practices into routine clinical care. One of the most important measures to prevent surgical site infections is surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). This narrative review aims to present a bundle for the correct SAP administration and evaluate the evidence supporting it. Surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidelines published by the WHO, CDC, NICE, and SHEA/IDSA/APIC/AHA, and the clinical practice guidelines for SAP by ASHP/IDSA/SIS/SHEA, were reviewed. Subsequently, comprehensive searches were also conducted using the PubMed®/MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, in order to identify further supporting evidence-based documentation. The bundle includes five different measures that may affect proper SAP administration. The measures included may be easily implemented in all hospitals worldwide and are based on minimal drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics knowledge, which all surgeons should know. Antibiotics for SAP should be prescribed for surgical procedures at high risk for SSIs, such as clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical procedures or for clean surgical procedures where SSIs, even if unlikely, may have devastating consequences, such as in procedures with prosthetic implants. SAP should generally be administered within 60 min before the surgical incision for most antibiotics (including cefazolin). SAP redosing is indicated for surgical procedures exceeding two antibiotic half-lives or for procedures significantly associated with blood loss. In principle, SAP should be discontinued after the surgical procedure. Hospital-based antimicrobial stewardship programmes can optimise the treatment of infections and reduce adverse events associated with antibiotics. In the context of a collaborative and interdisciplinary approach, it is essential to encourage an institutional safety culture in which surgeons are persuaded, rather than compelled, to respect antibiotic prescribing practices. In that context, the proposed bundle contains a set of evidence-based interventions for SAP administration. It is easy to apply, promotes collaboration, and includes measures that can be adequately followed and evaluated in all hospitals worldwide.

1136 Polysomnography Is Feasible During Inpatient TBI Rehabilitation

Introduction

A recent meta-analytic report highlighted that obstructive sleep apnea was 12 times more prevalent in TBI (mixed severity) than in community-based samples. Recent studies highlight prevalent obstructive sleep apnea during acute inpatient rehabilitation which is a time of critical neural repair. Acute sleep disturbances are associated with therapy cooperation due to effects on daytime sleepiness and are associated with key rehabilitation outcomes. Given the high rates of OSA and risk for negative morbidity, this analysis sought to examine the feasibility of administering polysomnography (PSG) with EEG to diagnose sleep apnea during inpatient rehabilitation in persons with moderate to severe TBI.

Methods

This is a secondary analysis from a prospective diagnostic comparative effectiveness clinical trial (NCT03033901) that took place at six NIDILRR and one VA TBI Model System Centers. Participants were included if they met the TBI Model System case definition and slept at least 2 hours per night prior to PSG. PSG was conducted following AASM procedures in the participant’s hospital bed on the inpatient rehabilitation unit. Studies were scored by RPSGT staff and interpreted by a board certified sleep medicine physician at a centralized sleep scoring center in Tampa, FL.

Results

Of 896 potential TBI participants, 449 met initial eligibility and 345 consented for further screening; a final sample of 263 (76%) completed PSG during hospitalization. Primary reasons for not completing PSG included early discharge or medical instability (n=59) and last-minute withdrawal of consent for PSG (n=23). Of the 263 participants who completed PSG, 3 were excluded from analysis due to technical issues and 12 were excluded as the total sleep time (TST) was less than 120 minutes. Of the 248, 85.5% of the PSGs were rated as interpretable/scoreable by RPSGT and sleep physicians.

Conclusion

For a majority of participants, polysomnography is feasible during inpatient rehabilitation. Participants with shorter lengths of stay, medical instability, prolonged agitation may require polysomnography follow-up after discharge.

Support

Supported by PCORI (CER-1511-33005), VA TBIMS, DVBIC with subcontract from GDIT/GDHS (W91YTZ-13-C-0015, HT0014-19-C-0004), and NIDILRR (90DPTB00070, 90DPTB00130100, 90DPTB0008, 90DPT8000402, 90DPTB0001).

Transcriptomic response and immunological responses to chimpanzee adenovirus- and MVA viral-vectored vaccines for RSV in healthy adults

Cohorts of healthy younger adults (18-50yrs) and healthy older adults (60-75yrs) were immunized intramuscularly or intranasally with an adenovirus-vectored RSV vaccine (PanAd3-RSV) as a prime dose and boosted with PanAd3-RSV or a poxvirus-vectored vaccine (MVA-RSV) encoding the same insert. Whole blood gene expression was measured at baseline, 3- and 7-days post vaccination. Intramuscular prime vaccination with PanAd3-RSV induced differential expression of 643 genes (DEGs, FDR < 0.05). Intranasal prime vaccination with PanAd3-RSV did not induce any differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in blood samples at 3 days post vaccination. Intranasally primed participants showed greater numbers of DEGS on boosting than intramuscularly primed participants. The most highly enriched biological processes related to DEGs after both prime and boost vaccination were type-1 interferon related pathways, lymphocytic and humoral immune responses.