Family-centered communication in pediatric sickle cell disease

BACKGROUND

Individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience systemic barriers in accessing high-quality care. Research suggests that patient/family-provider relationships are an important indicator of healthcare quality and can influence disease self-management and outcomes. The Patient Centered Communication (PCC) framework holds that patient/family-centered communication (e.g., eliciting, understanding, and validating patients' perspectives within their unique psychosocial contexts) contributes to improved family-provider relationships, as well as self-efficacy for disease management, adherence, and health outcomes. While the PCC framework has been useful in guiding the evaluation of patient/family-provider communication in other pediatric populations, it has not yet been applied in the context of pediatric SCD. This study aimed to use this framework to examine patient and family perceptions of communication with pediatric SCD healthcare providers.

PROCEDURE

Total 17 caregivers (82% mothers, 94% Black/African American) and eight patients (62% female, aged 13-19 years, M = 16.50) completed semi-structured interviews. The PCC framework informed the development of a preliminary codebook. Thematic content analysis summarized family perspectives regarding communication with providers.

RESULTS

For youth with SCD and their caregivers, specific themes related to family-centered communication included: reducing patient/family distress, supporting disease self-management efforts, facilitating information exchange and decision-making, and fostering positive and trusting relationships with providers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study helps to address gaps in the literature related to patient/family-provider communication within pediatric SCD. Results underscore the importance of patient- and family-centered communication across pediatric SCD care. These findings can inform future research and clinical care initiatives to improve patient/family-provider interactions and health outcomes for this underserved population.

Impact of preoperative thyroid ultrasonography on the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism

BACKGROUND

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) with coexisting thyroid disease has been considered a contraindication to minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP). This study assessed the impact of thyroid ultrasonography and guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy with cytological review of the aspiration in distinguishing patients eligible for MIP from those requiring open parathyroidectomy with thyroid surgery.

METHODS

The records of 194 consecutive patients who had minimally invasive or open parathyroidectomy for sporadic PHPT were reviewed retrospectively. Thyroid ultrasonographic findings and FNA results were compared with surgical and pathology records.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients (84.0 per cent) were eligible for MIP based on ultrasonographic findings with or without FNA results. Ultrasonography detected concurrent thyroid disease in 163 patients (84.0 per cent). Thirty-nine (23.9 per cent) underwent FNA, of whom 16 had benign findings and were eligible for MIP; the remaining 23 had suspicious FNA results and had open parathyroidectomy combined with thyroid surgery. Postoperative thyroid histopathology confirmed malignancy in nine patients, eight of whom had disease detected ultrasonographically. Micronodular thyroid disease (less than 1 cm) accounted for four of nine malignancies.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with PHPT are eligible for MIP. Experienced ultrasonographers can diagnose coexisting micronodular and macronodular thyroid disease, and identify patients eligible for MIP.